Search

Tracking group-housed individual broilers using video can provide valuable information on their health, welfare, and performance, allowing breeders to identify novel or indicator traits that aid genetic improvement. However, their similar appearances make tracking individual broilers in a group-housed setting challenging. This study aimed to analyze broiler tracking on video (number of ID-switches, tracking time and distance) and examined potential tracking errors (ID-losses – location, proximity, kinematics) in an experimental pen to enable broiler locomotion phenotyping. This comprehensive analysis provided insights into the potential and challenges of tracking group-housed broilers on video with regards to phenotyping broiler locomotion. Thirty-nine broilers, of which 35 noncolor marked, were housed in an experimental pen (1.80 × 2.61 m), and only data at 18 d of age were used. A YOLOv7-tiny model was trained (n = 140), validated (n = 30), and tested (n = 30) on 200 annotated frames to detect the broilers. On the test set, YOLOv7-tiny had a precision, recall, and average precision (@0.5 – Intersection over Union threshold) of 0.99. A multi-object tracker (SORT) was implemented and evaluated on ground-truth trajectories of thirteen white broilers based on 136 min of video data (1-min intervals). The number of ID-switches varied from 5 to 20 (mean: 9.92) per ground-truth trajectory, tracking times ranged from 1 (by definition) to 51 min (mean: 12.36), and tracking distances ranged from 0.01 to 17.07 meters (mean: 1.89) per tracklet. Tracking errors primarily occurred when broilers were occluded by the drinker, and relatively frequently when broilers were in close proximity (within 10 cm), with velocity and acceleration appearing to have a lesser impact on tracking errors. The study establishes a 'baseline' for future research and identified the potential and challenges of tracking group-housed individual broilers. The results highlighted the importance of addressing ID-switches, identified potential tracking algorithm improvements, and emphasized the need for an external animal identification system to enable objective, simultaneous and semi-continuous locomotion phenotyping of group-housed individual broilers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phenotypes on individual animals are required for breeding programs to be able to select for traits. However, phenotyping individual animals can be difficult and time-consuming, especially for traits related to health, welfare, and performance. Individual broiler behavior could serve as a proxy for these traits when recorded automatically and reliably on many animals. Sensors could record individual broiler behavior, yet different sensors can differ in their assessment. In this study a comparison was made between a passive radio frequency identification (RFID) system (grid of antennas underneath the pen) and video tracking for the determination of location and movement of 3 color-marked broilers at d 18. Furthermore, a systems comparison of derived behavioral metrics such as space usage, locomotion activity and apparent feeding and drinking behavior was made. Color-marked broilers simplified the computer vision task for YOLOv5 to detect, track, and identify the animals. Animal locations derived from the RFID-system and based on video were largely in agreement. Most location differences (77.5%) were within the mean radius of the antennas' enclosing circle (≤128 px, 28.15 cm), and 95.3% of the differences were within a one antenna difference (≤256 px, 56.30 cm). Animal movement was not always registered by the RFID-system whereas video was sensitive to detection noise and the animal's behavior (e.g., pecking). The method used to determine location and the systems' sensitivities to movement led to differences in behavioral metrics. Behavioral metrics derived from video are likely more accurate than RFID-system derived behavioral metrics. However, at present, only the RFID-system can provide individual identification for non-color marked broilers. A combination of verifiable and detailed video with the unique identification of RFID could make it possible to identify, describe, and quantify a wide range of individual broiler behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]