Search

Algebraic effects & handlers are a modular approach for modeling side-effects in functional programming. Their syntax is defined in terms of a signature of effectful operations, encoded as a functor, that are plugged into the free monad; their denotational semantics is defined by fold-style handlers that only interpret their part of the syntax and forward the rest. However, not all effects are algebraic: some need to access an internal computation. For example, scoped effects distinguish between a computation in scope and out of scope; parallel effects parallelize over a computation, latent effects defer a computation. Separate definitions have been proposed for these higher-order effects and their corresponding handlers, often leading to expedient and complex monad definitions. In this work we propose a generic framework for higher-order effects, generalizing algebraic effects & handlers: a generic free monad with higher-order effect signatures and a corresponding interpreter. Specializing this higher-order syntax leads to various definitions of previously defined (scoped, parallel, latent) and novel (writer, bracketing) effects. Furthermore, we formally show our framework theoretically correct, also putting different effect instances on formal footing; a significant contribution for parallel, latent, writer and bracketing effects. • A generic monad and recursion scheme with higher-order effect signatures. • A modeling of different classes of effects, both from the literature and novel. • Practical programming examples. • A categorical model based on a free-forgetful adjunction proves our monad is free. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Automatic differentiation (AD) has been a topic of interest for researchers in many disciplines, with increased popularity since its application to machine learning and neural networks. Although many researchers appreciate and know how to apply AD, it remains a challenge to truly understand the underlying processes. From an algebraic point of view, however, AD appears surprisingly natural: it originates from the differentiation laws. In this work we use Algebra of Programming techniques to reason about different AD variants, leveraging Haskell to illustrate our observations. Our findings stem from three fundamental algebraic abstractions : (1) the notion of semimodule, (2) Nagata's construction of the 'idealization of a module', and (3) Kronecker's delta function, that together allow us to write a single-line abstract definition of AD. From this single-line definition, and by instantiating our algebraic structures in various ways, we derive different AD variants, that have the same extensional behaviour, but different intensional properties, mainly in terms of (asymptotic) computational complexity. We show the different variants equivalent by means of Kronecker isomorphisms , a further elaboration of our Haskell infrastructure which guarantees correctness by construction. With this framework in place, this paper seeks to make AD variants more comprehensible, taking an algebraic perspective on the matter. • Basic forward mode AD is the fusion of two semiring homomorphisms: symbolic differentiation and evaluation. • Three fundamental algebraic abstractions lay the foundations of a single-line definition of AD algorithms. • Different AD algorithms can be obtained using isomorphisms. • Our approach supports common extensions: more primitives, overloading, let-sharing, higher derivatives, non-commutativity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]