1. Comparing phase sensitive detection and Fourier analysis of modulation excitation spectroscopy data exemplified by Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy.
- Author
-
Küst, Ulrike, Prumbs, Julia, Eads, Calley, Wang, Weijia, Boix, Virginia, Klyushin, Alexander, Scardamaglia, Mattia, Temperton, Robert, Shavorskiy, Andrey, and Knudsen, Jan
- Subjects
- *
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , *FOURIER analysis , *MODULATION spectroscopy , *PHOTOELECTRON spectroscopy , *FOURIER transforms - Abstract
Dynamic processes in catalysis are gaining increased attention and could very well be one of the next frontiers in surface science. One way to study such processes is to induce chemical changes on the surface for example by periodically adjusting the (electro)chemical potential in situ and identify the resulting spectral changes. Often this is referred to as Modulation Excitation Spectroscopy (MES). Using Ambient Pressure Photoelectron Spectroscopy data, we here discuss and compare the analysis of MES data using both Phase Sensitive Detection (PSD) and Fourier analysis. We discuss that PSD determines the component magnitude at a user-defined phase value while Fourier analysis provides the maximum oscillation amplitude and respective phase value of oscillating spectral features. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the different analysis schemes and explore how the full time-evolution can be obtained. [Display omitted] • Phase Sensitive Detection and Fourier analysis are compared for the first time • Pros and cons and limitations of the PSD and Fourier analysis are discussed in detail • Fourier analysis enables on-the-fly detection of oscillating minority species in situ • For the special case of APXPS this enables structure-activity correlation • We hope our work will inspire many future studies of oscillating surface structures [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF