Search

This study investigates the impact of housing on financial adequacy of New Zealand retirees using the Survey of Family, Income, and Employment (SoFIE) data for the period 2002–2009. We examine the differential effect of housing liquidation options, rent imputation and asset liquidity on financial adequacy. We report evidence of financial adequacy variation across five housing liquidation options and this is influenced by rent imputation. The results show that non-homeowners are less financially adequate than homeowners. We find that Māori, renters and individuals living in multi-dwelling occupancies have much lower levels of financial adequacy. Individuals of Pākehā or Asian ethnicity, homeowners and those living alone benefit more from imputed rent derived through home ownership. Our study highlights the need for the New Zealand government to address the lack of suitable public housing, rising housing and rental prices and mandate compulsory contributory retirement savings plans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We estimate non-cash income from owner-occupied housing, subsidised rental housing, and free use of the main residence, and evaluate their impact on the household income distribution and selected inequality measures. We use a novel data set that provides inter-subjective information on housing quality, thus eschewing selection problems. We confirm the standard finding in the literature that imputed rents accruing to home owners have an equalising effect on the distribution of income and find similar evidence for non-cash income from subsidised rents. Whereas imputed rents equalise the upper part of the income distribution, subsidised housing has an equalising effect on the lower part of the income distribution. Overall, the effect of non-cash income from owner-occupied housing clearly dominates the distributional effects, which translates into a combined effect of around 13% higher equivalised household income for the bottom half and around 8% for the upper half of the distribution. Our data provide us with two rare opportunities: to distinguish between council and cooperative housing, and to apply all three approaches used to calculate imputed rents for owner-occupiers: the capital-, the self-assessment and the equivalent rent approach. We find that using the equivalent rent approach leads to the strongest reduction in income inequality. This suggests that, while the inequality reducing effects of imputed rents are robust, they might be overestimated in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Do market fundamentals explain house price inflation in Beijing? This paper answers the above by estimating the current value of residential houses in Beijing as the conditional expectations of the discounted stream of housing services accruing to the owner of houses. The value of housing services is represented by the imputed rent that is estimated by three market fundamentals – urban disposable income, the number of population and housing vacancy area. The cross-equation restrictions are tested between the restricted reduced form of the model under the assumption of rational expectation, and the unrestricted model governing the stochastic process of imputed rents. Empirical tests reject the null hypothesis of rational expectation. The cross-equation restrictions are not valid within the two tested models. The unrestricted model explains 60% of the changes in housing prices, and the residuals suggest that the model generally underestimated the extent of housing price changes that actually took place during periods of boom. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Motivated by the increasing importance of housing wealth, the paper reviews the debate about the inclusion of housing in social indicators. The review identifies the availability of two different approaches: the inclusion of imputed rent and the deduction of housing expenses from disposable income. The advantages and disadvantages of different measurement methods are discussed from the point of view of different policy aims (poverty and tax analyses). This study uses 2010 EU-SILC data and provides an assessment of the impact of the housing situation of households on relative poverty and inequality and corresponding transition matrices into and out of poverty, according to the two approaches for measuring the housing situation. The results show that relative income poverty and inequality decrease if imputed rent is taken into account, while they increase if housing expenses are considered. The paper suggests that the deduction of housing expenses provides a better measure of relative poverty, while avoiding most measurement problems. The use of the capital market approach for the estimation of imputed rent would improve the assessment of the redistributive effect of taxes. The analysis and comparison of both approaches provides useful suggestions on the distributional effect of housing in different housing systems. Finally, the paper concludes with some remarks on housing-related variables and measurement issues for the construction of better social indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the antipoverty effect of public rental housing (PRH) in Hong Kong based on a comparison of estimated imputed rents from PRH through regression-based and stratified rental equivalence methods. Empirical analysis shows that stratified equivalence method tended to generate a larger effect of poverty rate reduction and smaller effect of poverty gap reduction than regression-based method. The study identified a trend towards upwardly biased estimate of public imputed rent in the implementation of stratified equivalence method in Hong Kong where limited strata was available for the estimation. The development of antipoverty measures may be misguided if the stratified equivalence method is used in its current form in Hong Kong. The paper suggests that the choice of estimation method has important implications for evaluating the pros and cons of PRH from both poverty reduction and budgetary perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Most empirical distributional studies of well-being in developed countries rely on distributions of disposable income. From a theoretical point of view this practice is contentious since a household’s command over resources is determined not only by its spending power over commodities it can buy in the market but also on resources available to the household members through non-market mechanisms such as the in-kind provisions of the welfare state and the value of private non-cash incomes. In developed market economies the most important private non-cash income component is imputed rent from owner-occupied or subsidized accommodation. Employing a wider definition of imputed rent that also allows the analyst to capture income advantages among tenants living in rent-subsidized accommodations of various sorts (including rent-free or reduced-rent households), the present paper examines the differential effects of including imputed rents in the concept of resources in five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy and the UK). The results suggest that in almost all cases, the inclusion of imputed rents in the concept of resources leads to a decline in measured levels of inequality and poverty. The main beneficiaries are outright homeowners and households living in rent-free (or heavily subsidized) accommodation—most often older persons. The inclusion of imputed rents in the concept of resources does not lead to substantial changes in the ranking of the countries according to their level of inequality, despite widespread differences in the rates of home ownership and subsidization across the countries studied here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]