4 results on '"Zickuhr, Lisa"'
Search Results
2. Unnecessary complexity of home medication regimens among seniors.
- Author
-
Lindquist, Lee A., Lindquist, Lucy M., Zickuhr, Lisa, Friesema, Elisha, and Wolf, Michael S.
- Subjects
- *
DRUGS , *ABSORPTION , *MEDICAL care , *PHARMACODYNAMICS , *MEDICINE , *MEDICAL research - Abstract
Abstract: Objective: To determine whether seniors consolidate their home medications or if there is evidence of unnecessary regimen complexity. Methods: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 200 community-dwelling seniors >70 years in their homes. Subjects demonstrated how they took their medications in a typical day and the number of times a day patients would take medications was calculated. A pharmacist and physician blinded to patient characteristics examined medication regimens and determined the fewest number of times a day they could be taken by subjects. Results: Home medication regimens could be simplified for 85 (42.5%) subjects. Of those subjects not optimally consolidating their medications, 53 (26.5%) could have had the number of times a day medications were taken reduced by one time per day; 32 (16.0%) reduced by two times or more. The three most common causes of overcomplexity were (1) misunderstanding medication instructions, (2) concern over drug absorption (i.e. before meals), and (3) perceived drug–drug interactions. Conclusion: Almost half of seniors had medication regimens that were unnecessarily complicated and could be simplified. This lack of consolidation potentially impedes medication adherence. Practice implications: Health care providers should ask patients to explicitly detail when medication consumption occurs in the home. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Health care practitioners' confidence assessing lupus-related rashes in patients of color.
- Author
-
Kannuthurai, Vijay, Murray, Jacob, Chen, Ling, Baker, Elizabeth A, and Zickuhr, Lisa
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL personnel , *IMPLICIT bias , *HUMAN skin color , *MEDICAL care , *CONFIDENCE , *DERMATOLOGISTS - Abstract
Background: Patients with skin of color (P-SOC) are disproportionately burdened by lupus and often have worse disease outcomes than white patients. This is partly because educational materials underrepresent P-SOC, thereby promoting unconscious bias and clinical deficiencies among practitioners. Purpose: We sought to measure providers' confidence in diagnosing the cutaneous manifestations of lupus (i.e., lupus-related rashes) in P-SOC and to assess which factors influenced their confidence. Research Design: We created and distributed a survey that gathered information about participants' personal characteristics, clinical specialty, training, and current practice as well as measuring their confidence assessing lupus-related rashes in various skin tones. Study Sample: Practitioners from the fields of rheumatology, dermatology, and internal medicine in the greater St. Louis area (Missouri, USA) participated in the survey. Analysis: We compared practitioners' mean confidence levels assessing lupus-related rashes in patients with fair skin and P-SOC with a linear mixed effects model and used univariate and multivariate linear regression models to determine if the aforementioned factors correlated with confidence. Results: Participants' mean confidence in diagnosing lupus-related rashes in P-SOC was significantly lower than assessing such findings in patients with fair skin (p =.009). Several factors correlated with confidence level at a univariate level; however, the multivariate model revealed experience as the only factor significantly associated with confidence (p =.001). Conclusions: Providers report significantly less confidence assessing lupus-related rashes in P-SOC than in patients with fair skin. Our analysis demonstrates that experience positively correlates with confidence and suggests that interventions which enhance practitioners' exposure to and experience with these rashes in P-SOC can improve clinical confidence as well as patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Hiring and Screening Practices of Agencies Supplying Paid Caregivers to Older Adults.
- Author
-
Lindquist, Lee A., Cameron, Kenzie A., Messerges-Bernstein, Joanne, Friesema, Elisha, Zickuhr, Lisa, Baker, David W., and Wolf, Michael
- Subjects
- *
ELDER care , *CAREGIVERS , *EMPLOYEE screening , *EMPLOYEE selection , *HOME care services , *INTERVIEWING , *JOB descriptions , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *RESEARCH funding , *SUPERVISION of employees , *WAGES , *NATIONAL competency-based educational tests , *CROSS-sectional method , *DATA analysis software , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *ECONOMICS - Abstract
Objectives To assess what screening practices agencies use in hiring caregivers and how caregiver competency is measured before assigning responsibilities in caring for older adults. Design One-to-one phone interviews in which interviewers posed as prospective clients seeking a caregiver for an older adult relative. Setting Cross-sectional cohort of agencies supplying paid caregivers to older adults in Illinois, California, Florida, Colorado, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Indiana. Participants Four hundred sixty-two home care agencies were contacted, of which 84 were no longer in service, 165 offered only nursing care, and 33 were excluded; 180 agencies completed interviews. Measurements Agencies were surveyed about their hiring methods, screening measures, training practices, skill competencies assessments, and supervision. Two coders qualitatively analyzed open-ended responses. Results To recruit caregivers, agencies primarily used print and Internet (e.g., ) advertising (n = 69, 39.2%) and word-of-mouth referrals (n = 49, 27.8%). In hiring, agencies required prior 'life experiences' (n = 121, 68.8%) few of which (n = 33, 27.2%) were specific to caregiving. Screening measures included federal criminal background checks (n = 96, 55.8%) and drug testing (n = 56, 31.8%). Agencies stated that the paid caregiver could perform skills, such as medication reminding (n = 169, 96.0%). Skill competency was assessed according to caregiver self-report (n = 103, 58.5%), testing (n = 62, 35.2%), and client feedback (n = 62, 35.2%). General caregiver training length ranged from 0 to 7 days. Supervision ranged from none to weekly and included home visits, telephone calls, and caregivers visiting the central office. Conclusion Using an agency to hire paid caregivers may give older adults and their families a false sense of security regarding the background and skill set of the caregiver. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.