Search

Prediction of histology by endoscopic examination is important in the clinical management of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs), including adenoma and adenocarcinoma. The use of a simple scoring system based on the findings of white-light endoscopy or magnified endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is useful to differentiate between Vienna category 3 (C3) and C4/5 lesions. Less invasive endoscopic resection procedures, such as cold snare polypectomy, are quick to perform and convenient for small (<10 mm) C3 lesions. Neoplasms with higher grade histology, such as C4/5 lesions, should be treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgery. Although EMR often requires piecemeal resection, the complication rate is acceptable. Excellent complete resection rates could be achieved by ESD; however, it remains a challenging method considering the high risk of complications. Shielding or closure of the ulcer after ESD is effective at decreasing the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery is an ideal treatment with a high rate of en bloc resection and a low rate of complications, although it is limited to high-volume centers. Patients with NADETs could benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to stratify the optimal treatment based on endoscopic diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Curative management after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which invades the muscularis mucosa (pMM-ESCC) or shallow submucosal layer (pSM1- ESCC), has been controversial. METHODS: We identified patients with pMM-ESCC and pSM1-ESCC treated by ER. Outcomes were the predictive factors for regional lymph node and distant recurrence, and survival data were based on the depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and additional treatment immediately after ER. RESULTS: A total of 992 patients with pMM-ESCC (n = 749) and pSM1-ESCC (n = 243) were registered. According to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, pSM1-ESCC (hazard ratio 5 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.07, P = 0.012) and LVI (hazard ratio 5 6.92, 95% confidence interval 4.09-11.7, P < 0.0001) were associated with a risk of regional lymph node and distant recurrence. In the median follow-up period of 58.6 months (range 1-233), among patients with risk factors (pMM-ESCC with LVI or pSM1-ESCC), the 5-year overall survival rates, relapse-free survival rates, and cause-specific survival rates of patients with additional treatment were significantly better than those of patients without additional treatment; 85.4% vs 61.5% (P < 0.0001), 80.5%vs 53.3% (P < 0.0001), and 98.5% vs 93.1% (P50.004), respectively. There was no difference in survival rate between the chemoradiotherapy and surgery groups. DISCUSSION: pSM1 and LVI were risk factors for metastasis after ER for ESCC. To improve the survival, additional treatment immediately after ER, such as chemoradiotherapy or surgery, is effective in patients with these risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment method for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. However, it has not been standardized for duodenal lesions because of its high complication rates. Recently, minimally invasive and simple methods such as cold snare polypectomy and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection have been utilized more for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). Although the rate of complications associated with duodenal ESD has been gradually decreasing because of technical advancements, performing ESD for all SNADETs is unnecessary. As such, the appropriate treatment plan for SNADETs should be chosen according to the lesion type, patient condition, and endoscopist’s skill. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: One-piece endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for lesions >15 mm is still unsatisfactory, and attempted 1-piece EMR for lesions >25 mm can increase perforation risk. Therefore, modifications to ensure 1-piece EMR of 15- to 25-mm lesions would be beneficial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Tip-in EMR, which anchors the snare tip within the submucosal layer, increases en bloc resection for 15- to 25-mm colorectal lesions compared with EMR. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients with nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms of 15-25 mm in size were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo Tip-in EMR or standard EMR, stratified by age, sex, tumor size category, and tumor location. The primary endpoint was the odds ratio of en bloc resection adjusted by location and size category. Adverse events and procedure time were also evaluated. RESULTS: We analyzed 41 lesions in the Tip-inEMRgroup and 41 lesions in theEMRgroup. En bloc resection was achieved in 37 (90.2%) patients undergoing Tip-in EMR and 30 (73.1%) who had EMR. The adjusted odds ratio of en bloc resection in Tip-in EMR vs EMR was 3.46 (95% confidence interval: 1.06-13.6, P = 0.040). The Tip-in EMR and EMR groups did not differ significantly in adverse event rates (0%vs 4.8%) or median procedure times (7 vs 5 minutes). DISCUSSION: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, we found that Tip-in EMR significantly improved the en bloc resection rate for nonpolypoid lesions 15-25 mm in size, with no increase in adverse events or procedure time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]