1. Aberrant patterns of PET response during treatment for DLBCL patients with MYC gene rearrangements.
- Author
-
Eertink, J. J., Arens, A. I. J., Huijbregts, J. E., Celik, F., de Keizer, B., Stroobants, S., de Jong, D., Wiegers, S. E., Zwezerijnen, G. J. C., Burggraaff, C. N., Boellaard, R., de Vet, H. C. W., Hoekstra, O. S., Lugtenburg, P. J., Chamuleau, M. E. D., and Zijlstra, J. M.
- Subjects
- *
MYC oncogenes , *GENE rearrangement , *DIFFUSE large B-cell lymphomas , *POSITRON emission tomography , *PROTEINS , *DISEASE progression , *GENETICS , *MOLECULAR diagnosis , *ONCOGENES , *B cell lymphoma , *CANCER patients , *COMPARATIVE studies , *DIAGNOSTIC imaging , *GENES , *RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS , *SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry) , *COMPUTED tomography , *DEOXY sugars - Abstract
Purpose: MYC gene rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients are associated with poor prognosis. Our aim was to compare patterns of 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) response in MYC + and MYC- DLBCL patients. Methods: Interim PET/CT (I-PET) and end of treatment PET/CT (EoT-PET) scans of 81 MYC + and 129 MYC- DLBCL patients from 2 HOVON trials were reviewed using the Deauville 5-point scale (DS). DS1-3 was regarded as negative and DS4-5 as positive. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were quantified at baseline, I-PET, and EoT-PET. Negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated using 2-year overall survival. Results: MYC + DLBCL patients had significantly more positive EoT-PET scans than MYC- patients (32.5 vs 15.7%, p = 0.004). I-PET positivity rates were comparable (28.8 vs 23.8%). In MYC + patients 23.2% of the I-PET negative patients converted to positive at EoT-PET, vs only 2% for the MYC- patients (p = 0.002). Nine (34.6%) MYC + DLBCL showed initially uninvolved localizations at EoT-PET, compared to one (5.3%) MYC- patient. A total of 80.8% of EoT-PET positive MYC + patients showed both increased lesional SUV and MTV compared to I-PET. In MYC- patients, 31.6% showed increased SUV and 42.1% showed increased MTV. NPV of I-PET and EoT-PET was high for both MYC subgroups (81.8–94.1%). PPV was highest at EoT-PET for MYC + patients (61.5%). Conclusion: MYC + DLBCL patients demonstrate aberrant PET response patterns compared to MYC- patients with more frequent progression during treatment after I-PET negative assessment and new lesions at sites that were not initially involved. Trial registration number and date of registration: HOVON-84: EudraCT: 2006–005,174-42, retrospectively registered 01–08-2008. HOVON-130: EudraCT: 2014–002,654-39, registered 26–01-2015 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF