Search

The aim of this study was to investigate a conventional battery of tests capable of assessing the presence of the component and extent of the lesions in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Ninety-four patients who had unilateral spatial neglect with a stroke in right hemisphere were assessed on 12 traditional neglect batteries 4 weeks after the onset. Computerized tomography was also performed to investigate the possible anatomical relationships with each neglect battery. Factor analysis showed that the tests loaded significantly on five factors. There are not only visual scanning factors but also factors of imaging, visual judgement, visual cognition and effectiveness from left hemisphere in the unilateral spatial neglect. There are high correlations between each neuropsychological test and neglect batteries. Furthermore, lesions in the paraventricular white matter were associated with clock and person drawing tasks. Lesions in the occipital lobe were associated with reading, explaining and visual counting tasks. Lesions in the temporal lobe and the posterior limb of the internal capsule were associated with line bisection tasks. It is suggested that it is possible that there are some different components in unilateral spatial neglect. Failure in some tasks may predict different lesions in terms which include localization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined 33 patients with left intracerebral haemorrhage to investigate the relations to buccofacial apraxia BFA . BFA was present in 18 cases at 1 month and disappeared in 3 cases and persisted in 15 cases at 6 months from the onset. The existence of BFA seems to be partially dependent the haema toma volume which may cause the organic damage in lenticulate nucleus, insula, posterior limb or internal capsule and anterior portion of paraventricle white matter. All patients with BFA had aphasia Broca 6, Wernicke 1, Total 10, Amnestic 1 . Aphasia of the patients with transient BFA improved as well as the patients without BFA after BFA disappeared. We suspected that improvement or aphasia might be affected by BFA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: ObjectivesPsychological treatments are considered to be useful in the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although the evidence is based on small, often flawed trials. Although cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and relaxation therapy have both been promising, we hypothesized that CBT would be superior to relaxation and standard care alone in IBS patients. The objective of this study was to test this assumption by comparing the effects of cognitive behavior therapy with relaxation therapy and routine clinical care alone in individuals with IBS.: MethodsPatients (n = 105) with Rome I criteria for IBS were recruited from advertisement (n = 51) and outpatient clinics (n = 54); those patients with resistant IBS were not included. A randomized controlled trial with three arms (standard care for all groups plus either CBT or relaxation) for 8 wk was conducted, which applied blinded outcome assessments using validated measures with 1 yr of follow-up. The primary outcome for this study was bowel symptom severity.: ResultsOf 105 patients at the commencement of treatment, the mean bowel symptom frequency score for the whole sample was 21.1 and at the end of treatment had fallen to 18.1; this persisted at the 52-wk follow-up, with a significant linear trend for scores to change over time (F = 39.57 p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences among the three treatment conditions. Significant changes over time were found for physical functioning (F = 4.37, p < 0.001), pain (F = 3.12, p < 0.05), general health (F = 2.71, p < 0.05), vitality (F = 2.94, p < 0.05), and the social functioning scales on the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (F = 4.08, p < 0.05); however, all three arms showed similar improvement. There were significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and locus of control scales, but no significant differences among the treatment groups were detected.: ConclusionCognitive behavior and relaxation therapy seem not to be superior to standard care alone in IBS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]