Search

Increases in food production to meet global food requirements lead to an increase in the demand for nitrogen (N) fertilizers, especially urea, for soil productivity, crop yield, and food security improvement. To achieve a high yield of food crops, the excessive use of urea has resulted in low urea-N use efficiency and environmental pollution. One promising alternative to increase urea-N use efficiency, improve soil N availability, and lessen the potential environmental effects of the excessive use of urea is to encapsulate urea granules with appropriate coating materials to synchronize the N release with crop assimilation. Chemical additives, such as sulfur-based coatings, mineral-based coatings, and several polymers with different action principles, have been explored and used for coating the urea granule. However, their high material cost, limited resources, and adverse effects on the soil ecosystem limit the widespread application of urea coated with these materials. This paper documents a review of issues related to the materials used for urea coating and the potential of natural polymers, such as rejected sago starch, as a coating material for urea encapsulation. The aim of the review is to unravel an understanding of the potential of rejected sago starch as a coating material for the slow release of N from urea. Rejected sago starch from sago flour processing is a natural polymer that could be used to coat urea because the starch enables a gradual, water-driven mechanism of N release from the urea–polymer interface to the polymer–soil interface. The advantages of rejected sago starch for urea encapsulation over other polymers are that rejected sago starch is one of the most abundant polysaccharide polymers, the cheapest biopolymer, and is fully biodegradable, renewable, and environmentally friendly. This review provides information on the potential of rejected sago starch as a coating material, the advantages of using rejected sago starch as coating material over other polymer materials, a simple coating method, and the mechanisms of N release from urea coated with rejected sago starch. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Besides causing environmental pollution, ammonia volatilization from nitrogenous fertilizers such as urea reduce urea-N use efficiency in agriculture. Amending urea with Clinoptilolite zeolite may reduce ammonia loss from urea as well as improving chemical properties of soils. This study was conducted to determine the effects of amending an acid soil with Clinoptilolite zeolite on ammonia loss and selected soil chemical properties. An acid soil (Typic Paleudults) was mixed with three rates of Clinoptilolite zeolite. Treatments were evaluated using closed-dynamic airflow system. Standard procedures were used to determine soil pH, total nitrogen, exchangeable ammonium, available nitrate, available phosphorus, exchangeable cations, organic matter, total organic carbon, and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Application of Clinoptilolite zeolite significantly reduced ammonia loss up to 25.33%, increased soil pH, exchangeable ammonium, available nitrate (treatment with highest amount of Clinoptilolite zeolite) and exchangeable cations. However, there was reduction in total titratable acidity, exchangeable Al3+ and H+ ions. Mixing acid soil (Typic Paleudults) with Clinoptilolite zeolite minimized ammonia loss from urea and improved selected soil chemical properties (under laboratory condition). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urea–nitrogen is commonly lost through ammonia (NH3) volatilization, denitrification, and nitrate (NO3−) leaching. Rejected sago starch (RSS), which is a by-product of sago flour extraction, could be used to minimize NH3 volatilization from urea. Urea granules were coated with different concentrations of RSS (2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, and 6%), and their effects on NH3 emission, soil pH, exchangeable ammonium (NH4+), and available NO3− were determined. The urea was coated with RSS and homogenized using a mini rotary machine. The RSS-coated urea granules were dyed to differentiate their concentrations. The effectiveness of the RSS as a coating material was determined using a closed-dynamic air flow system. The soil used in the NH3 volatilization was the Bekenu series (Sandy loam, Typic Paleudults). This study compared seven different mixture treatments: soil alone (S), 5 g of uncoated urea (U), 5 g of 2% RSS-coated urea (CU1), 5 g of 3% RSS-coated urea (CU2), 5 g of 4% RSS-coated urea (CU3), 5 g of 5% RSS-coated urea (CU4), and 5 g of 6% RSS-coated urea (CU5). Urea coated with RSS, particularly CU1, effectively minimized NH3 loss and improved the retention of soil exchangeable NH4+ and available NO3− compared with uncoated urea because the RSS serves as a barrier to minimizing the concentration of NH3 from urea hydrolysis. Urea could be coated with RSS at the 2% concentration to enhance urea–N efficiency through a reduction in NH3 emission from urea. RSS-coated urea could be an alternative for farmers because of its controlled release of N and economical benefits. Field planting using rice as a test crop to solidify the effectiveness of RSS-coated urea in improving N retention from urea is still ongoing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]