1. Tumor rejection properties of gp100209-specific T cells correlate with T cell receptor binding affinity towards the wild type rather than anchor-modified antigen.
- Author
-
Alonso, Jesus A., Smith, Angela R., and Baker, Brian M.
- Subjects
- *
T cell receptors , *ANTIGENS , *LABORATORY mice , *CLINICAL immunology , *REVENUE accounting - Abstract
• T cell receptors distinguish between the wild type and anchor-modified gp100 209 melanoma antigens. • The clinical candidate SILv44 recognizes the WT antigen with stronger affinity and potency than the anchor-modified antigen. • Higher affinity for the wild type antigen explains the SILv44′s superior tumor control in mouse models of melanoma. • Anchor modified peptides should be used cautiously, as the presumption that they are wild type surrogates may be wrong. Although there are exceptions and outliers, T cell functional responses generally correlate with the affinity of a TCR for a peptide/MHC complex. In one recently described outlier case, the most promising clinical candidate in a series of TCRs specific for the gp100 209 melanoma antigen bound with the weakest solution affinity and produced the least amount of cytokine in vitro. Hypotheses for this outlier behavior included unusual cytokine expression patterns arising from an atypical TCR binding geometry. Studying this instance in more detail, we found here that outlier behavior is attributable not to unusual cytokine patterns or TCR binding, but the use of a position 2 anchor-modified peptide variant in in vitro experiments instead of the wild type antigen that is present in vivo. Although the anchor-modified variant has been widely used in basic and clinical immunology as a surrogate for the wild type peptide, prior work has shown that TCRs can clearly distinguish between the two. We show that when this differential recognition is accounted for, the functional properties of gp100 209 -specific TCRs track with their affinity towards the peptide/MHC complex. Beyond demonstrating the correlates with T cell function for a clinically relevant TCR, our results provide important considerations for selection of TCRs for immunotherapy and the use of modified peptides in immunology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF