Search

Despite their effectiveness in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease risk, high-intensity statins are underutilized among adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL. This study determined whether a safety net program (SureNet) facilitating medication and laboratory test orders improved statin initiation and laboratory test completions after (SureNet period: April 2019–September 2021) and before implementation (pre-SureNet period: January 2016–September 2018). Kaiser Permanente Southern California members aged 20–60 years with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL and no statin use in previous 2–6 months were included in this retrospective cohort study. Statin orders within 14 days and statin fills, laboratory test completions, and improved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol within 180 days of the high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (pre-SureNet) or outreach (SureNet period) were compared. Analyses were conducted in 2022. Overall, 3,534 and 3,555 adults were eligible for statin initiation during the pre-SureNet and SureNet periods, respectively. Overall, 759 (21.5%) and 976 (27.5%) had a statin approved by their physician during pre-SureNet and SureNet periods, respectively (p <0.001). After multivariable adjustment for demographics and clinical characteristics, adults during the SureNet period had a higher likelihood of receiving a statin order (prevalence ratio=1.36, 95% CI=1.25, 1.48), filling their statin (prevalence ratio=1.32, 95% CI=1.26, 1.38), completing their laboratories (prevalence ratio=1.41, 95% CI=1.26, 1.58), and improving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (prevalence ratio=1.21, 95% CI=1.07, 1.37) than in pre-Surenet period. The SureNet program was able to improve prescription orders, fills, laboratory test completions, and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Optimizing both physician adherence to treatment guidelines; and patient adherence to the program may improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent decades, the rates of incident acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have declined in the United States, yet disparities by sex remain. In an integrated healthcare delivery system, we examined temporal trends in incident AMI among women and men.Methods: We identified hospitalized AMI among members ≥35 years of age in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. The first hospitalization for AMI overall, and for ST-segment-elevation MI and non-ST-segment-elevation MI was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification primary discharge diagnosis codes in each calendar year from 2000 through 2014. Age- and sex-standardized incidence rates per 100 000 person-years were calculated by using direct adjustment to the 2010 US Census population. Average annual percent changes (AAPCs) and period percent changes were calculated, and trend tests were conducted using Poisson regression.Results: We identified 45 331 AMI hospitalizations between 2000 and 2014. Age- and sex-standardized incidence rates of AMI declined from 322.4 (95% CI, 311.0-333.9) in 2000 to 174.6 (95% CI, 168.2-181.0) in 2014, representing an AAPC of -4.4% (95% CI, -4.2 to -4.6) and a period percent change of -46.6%. The AAPC for AMI in women was -4.6% (95% CI, -4.1 to -5.2) between 2000 and 2009 and declined to -2.3% (95% CI, -1.2 to -3.4) between 2010 and 2014. The AAPC for AMI in men was stable over the study period (-4.7% [95% CI, -4.4 to -4.9]). The AAPC for ST-segment-elevation MI hospitalization overall was -8.3% (95% CI, -8.0% to -8.6%).The AAPC in ST-segment-elevation MI changed among women in 2009 (2000-2009: -10.2% [95% CI, -9.3 to -11.1] and in 2010-2014: -5.2% [95% CI, -3.1 to -7.3]) while remaining stable among men (-8.0% [95% CI, -7.6 to -8.4]). The AAPC for non-ST-segment-elevation MI hospitalization was smaller than for ST-segment-elevation MI among both women and men (-1.9% [95% CI, -1.5 to -2.3] and -2.8% [95% CI, -2.5 to -3.2], respectively).Conclusions: These results suggest that the incidence of hospitalized AMI declined between 2000 and 2014; however, declines in AMI have slowed among women in comparison with men in recent years. Determining unmet care needs among women may reduce these sex-based AMI disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an automated telephone system reminding patients with hypertension and/or cardiovascular disease to obtain overdue medication refills. The authors compared the intervention with usual care among patients with an overdue prescription for a statin or lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide (lisinopril-HCTZ). The primary outcome was refill rate at 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes included time to refill and change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure. Significantly more patients who received a reminder call refilled their prescription compared with the usual-care group (statin cohort: 30.3% vs 24.9% [P<.0001]; lisinopril-HCTZ cohort: 30.7% vs 24.2% [P<.0001]). The median time to refill was shorter in patients receiving the reminder call (statin cohort: 29 vs 36 days [P<.0001]; lisinopril-HCTZ cohort: 24 vs 31 days [P<.0001]). There were no statistically significant differences in mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure. These findings suggest the need for interventions that have a longer-term impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on a study that evaluated an automated outreach intervention to decrease primary nonadherence to statins for lowering cholesterol. The study revealed the effectiveness of intervention in reducing primary nonadherence to statin medications. The researchers used intent-to-treat analysis and Fisher exact test to determine intervention effectiveness.

Introduction: The Kaiser Permanente ASCVD Risk Estimator (KPARE) was developed to address the systematic overestimation of actual ASCVD risk by the ACC/AHA ASCVD Pooled Cohort Equation (ACC/AHA PCE) in contemporary populations. We evaluated the accuracy and generalizability of KPARE for estimating 10-year ASCVD risk in eligible primary prevention, community-based populations in the U.S. and Canada, as compared with the ACC/AHA PCE. Methods: We identified adults 40-79 years old in 3 contemporary U.S. populations (Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Southern California (KPSC) and Northwest (KPNW), as well as adults 66-79 years old in Ontario, Canada who had LDL-C 70-189 mg/dL, no known ASCVD, diabetes or lipid-lowering therapy and had complete follow-up. Non-fatal and fatal ASCVD events were ascertained from health system electronic health records and death certificates using validated algorithms. We examined observed ASCVD event rates within deciles of predicted 10-year risk using the KPARE vs. the ACC/AHA PCE predicted risk, and calculated metrics of discrimination and calibration. Results: In eligible primary prevention validation cohorts of KPNC (N=151,409), KPSC (N=246,815), KPNW (N=46,784), and Ontario, Canada (N=60,612 adults), the KPARE showed both better discrimination and calibration (Figure) compared to the ACC/AHA PCE to predict 10-year risk of ASCVD events, with c-statistics of 0.78, 0.78, 0.79, and 0.65, respectively. Categorical net reclassification index showed the KPARE improved ASCVD risk prediction over the ACC/AHA PCE by 23% in the KPNC validation cohort, 24% in KPSC, 33% in KPNW, and 25% in Ontario, Canada. Results were similar when stratified by race-gender subgroups. Conclusions: The new Kaiser Permanente ASCVD Risk Estimator provides more accurate ASCVD risk estimates in various community populations than the ACC/AHA PCE and may provide greater utility in shared decision-making for primary prevention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]