Search

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is an acquired bleeding disorder caused by neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against Coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII:C), causing sudden hemorrhagic symptoms (i.e., subcutaneous bleeding, intramuscular bleeding, and hematuria). Herein, this study is aimed at presenting a case of AHA diagnosed based on hematuria and reviewing patients who were diagnosed with AHA due to hematuria. A 67‐year‐old woman was referred to Atsugi City Hospital with painless gross hematuria that began 4 weeks before presentation. Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (eCT) revealed an approximately 2 cm mass in the right renal pelvis, and the patient's activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was elevated (61.4 s). The day after the endoscopic biopsy, the patient was in shock due to a large retroperitoneal hematoma. Although her condition stabilized after intravenous radioembolization, she underwent emergency surgeries several times because of rebleeding within the next 3 weeks. At that time, APTT was more prolonged at 106.4 s, and the FVIII:C level was 2%. Mixing tests showed an upwardly convex curve after 2‐h incubation, indicating the presence of an inhibitor. Factor VIII inhibitor titer was ≥5.1 Bethesda unit (BU)/mL. A combined product of Plasma‐Derived Factors VIIa and X (pd‐FVIIa/FX), as second‐line hemostatic therapy, as well as cyclophosphamide (CYP), were administered after Recombinant Activated Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) had been ineffective. Following this, the Factor VIII inhibitor titer was undetectable, FVIII:C levels were restored, and APTT decreased to within the normal range. Gross hematuria was significantly alleviated. However, the patient died of cytomegalovirus and fungal infections due to prolonged immunosuppressive therapy. Although AHA diagnosed based on hematuria may have a better prognosis than others, there have been occasional cases with severe outcomes. APTT, detected upon initial hematological testing in patients with hematuria, may be a potential indicator of an existing AHA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is sparse evidence regarding optimal management and prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in patients with clinical node‐positive (cN+) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 105 UTUC patients with cN1‐2M0 between June 2010 and June 2022 at multiple institutions affiliated with our university. At the time of diagnosis, all patients received standard‐of‐care treatment including radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), chemotherapy, and/or palliative care. We employed a Cox regression model to analyze the prognostic importance of various factors on overall survival (OS). Results: Of 105 patients, 54 (51%) underwent RNU, while 51 (49%) did not. RNU was likely to be selected in patients with younger and higher G8 score, resulting in better median OS in patients who underwent RNU than in those who did not (42 months vs. 15 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis among the entire cohort revealed that low G8 score (≤14) (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–3.99), elevated pretreatment C‐reactive protein (CRP) (HR: 3.35, 95%CI: 1.63–6.90), and failure to perform RNU (HR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.06–4.42) were independent prognostic factors for worse OS. In the subgroup analyses of cohorts who did not undergo RNU, elevated pretreatment CRP was the only independent prognostic factor for worse OS in cN+ UTUC patients. Conclusions: RNU seems to be a reasonable treatment option in cN+ UTUC patients where applicable. Elevated pretreatment CRP appears to be a reliable prognosticator of worse OS and may be helpful in optimizing candidate selection for intensified treatment in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The population with pathological T3 (pT3) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is heterogeneous, thereby making prognostication challenging. We assessed the clinical ramifications of subclassifying pT3 UTUC after nephroureterectomy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis including 308 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for pT3N0–1M0 UTUC. pT3 was subclassified into pT3a and pT3b based on invasion of the peripelvic and/or periureteral fat. Cox's proportional hazard models were utilized to determine the significant prognosticators of oncological outcomes, encompassing intravesical recurrence‐free survival, recurrence‐free survival (RFS), cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and overall survival. Results: Multivariate analysis elucidated that pT3b status, pathological N1 status, and lymphovascular invasion status were independent risk factors for an unfavorable RFS and CSS. Although the RFS and CSS of patients with pT3b UTUC were superior to those in patients with pT4 UTUC, no significant disparities were detected between patients with pT3a and pT2. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that pT3 UTUC with peripelvic/periureteral fat invasion is independently associated with metastasis and cancer‐specific death after nephroureterectomy. These findings provide patients and physicians with invaluable insight into the risk for disease progression in pT3 UTUC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent clinical trials have reported improved disease-free survival rates of patients with stage pT3–4/ypT2–4 or pN + upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) on adjuvant nivolumab therapy. However, the appropriateness of the patient selection criteria used in clinical practice remains uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 895 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy to treat UTUC. The patients were divided into two groups: grade pT3–4 and/or pN + without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or grade ypT2–4 and/or ypN + on NAC (adjuvant immunotherapy candidates) and others (not candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy). Kaplan–Meier curves were drawn to assess the oncological outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant prognostic factors for oncological outcomes. Results: The Kaplan–Meier curves revealed notably inferior RFS, CSS, and OS of patients who were candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that pathological T and N grade and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status were independent risk factors for poor RFS, CSS, and OS. Conclusion: In total, 44.8% of patients were candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. In addition to pathological T and N status, LVI was a significant predictor of survival, and may thus play a pivotal role in the selection of patients eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the oncologic efficacy of combining docetaxel with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) with ADT in patients with high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with focus on the effect of sequential therapy in a real-world clinical practice setting. Methods: The records of 382 patients who harbored high-volume mHSPC, based on the CHAARTED criteria, and had received ADT with either docetaxel (n = 92) or NSAA (bicalutamide) (n = 290) were retrospectively analyzed. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient demographics. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and time to second-line progression (PFS2) were compared. 2nd-line PFS defined as the time from CRPC diagnosis to progression after second-line therapy was also compared. Results: After matching, a total of 170 patients were retained: 85 patients treated with docetaxel + ADT and 85 patients treated with NSAA + ADT. The median OS and CSS for docetaxel + ADT versus NSAA + ADT were not reached (NR) vs. 49 months (p = 0.02) and NR vs. 55 months (p = 0.02), respectively. Median time to CRPC and PFS2 in patients treated with docetaxel + ADT was significantly longer compared to those treated with NSAA (22 vs. 12 months; p = 0.003 and, NR vs. 28 months; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in 2nd-line PFS between the two groups. Conclusions: Our analysis suggested that ADT with docetaxel significantly prolonged OS and CSS owing to a better time to CRPC and PFS2 in comparison to NSAA + ADT in high-volume mHSPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Among various therapeutic options available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), only apalutamide and enzalutamide have shown evidences of improved metastasis-free survival (MFS) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). However, there is a paucity of evidence to indicate who may be targeted for aggressive therapy among patients with nmCRPC. The objectives of this retrospective study were to explore predictors of metastasis in patients with nmCRPC and to identify a subpopulation of patients with nmCRPC who may benefit from aggressive therapy. Methods: A total of 115 patients with CRPC who had no metastasis detected at the time of diagnosis of CRPC were included in this retrospective study. All patients were treated at Jikei University and its affiliated hospitals. The primary outcome measure was MFS from the time of diagnosis of CRPC. Predictors of MFS were also explored with a multivariate Cox hazard model. Results: The median observation period after diagnosis of CRPC was 30 months (range 2–143 months). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a median MFS of 76. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values at diagnosis of CRPC and favorable response to primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were significant predictors of longer MFS (P = 0.011, and 0.031, respectively). Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that high ALP values at diagnosis of CRPC and poor response to primary ADT may predict the propensity of metastasis in patients with nmCRPC. Further prospective studies will be required enrolling more patients to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]