Search

A 36-year-old transgender man (assigned female at birth) on exogenous testosterone therapy was found to have stage IIA ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, and underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Diffuse androgen receptor expression in the tumor initiated a multidisciplinary discussion regarding the safety of continuing exogenous testosterone as gender-affirming hormone therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlight the challenges associated with managing breast cancer in female‐to‐male (FtM) transgender individuals. This is a rare entity, requiring nuanced decision‐making regarding surgery as well as adjuvant therapies given the unique hormonal environment seen in individuals taking exogenous androgen as part of their gender identity. Contemporary case report derived from our clinical experience. Discussion focuses on a brief summation of all known cases of female‐to‐male breast cancer in FtM individuals described in the literature. A 48‐year‐old FtM transgender individual on exogenous testosterone for 19 years with stage IIA (pT1cN1M0), ER+(8/8), PR+(8/8), Androgen Receptor(AR)+(5%‐8%), Her‐2‐negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Due to AR positivity in tumor, cessation of testosterone was chosen after careful consideration of potential ramifications from both a cancer treatment as well as gender identity standpoint. Endocrinology consultation reassured the patient that identity affirming changes of facial hair growth and voice depth would persist after cessation of testosterone. Patient did not wish to undergo chemotherapy and as such was treated with combination of radiation to the axilla, adjuvant Anastrozole and testosterone cessation. Although breast cancer is rare in FtM transgender individuals, it can occur. Many FtM individuals take exogenous testosterone. It is important to test the tumor for the androgen receptor as this may have important implications for both gender identity and treatment. Additionally, the mastectomy commonly performed for "top" surgery in this population is not adequate for oncologic control by itself and at present there is no guidance regarding postsurgical screening in this population, especially in those individuals with a strong family history of breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lifetime risk is a relatively straightforward measure used to communicate disease burden, representing the cumulative risk of an outcome during the remainder of an individual's life starting from a disease-free index age. We estimated the lifetime risk of diabetes among men and women in both First Nations and non-First Nations populations using a cohort of adults in a single Canadian province.Methods: We used a population-based cohort consisting of Alberta residents from 1997 to 2008 who were free of diabetes at cohort entry to estimate the lifetime risk of diabetes among First Nations and non-First Nations people. We calculated age-specific incidence rates with the person-year method in 5-year bands. We estimated the sex- and index-age-specific lifetime risk of incident diabetes, after adjusting for the competing risk of death.Results: The cohort included 70 631 First Nations and 2 732 214 non-First Nations people aged 18 years or older. The lifetime risk of diabetes at 20 years of age was 75.6% among men and 87.3% among women in the First Nations group, as compared with 55.6% among men and 46.5% among women in the non-First Nations group. The risk was higher among First Nations people than among non-First Nations people for all index ages and for both sexes. Among non-First Nations people, men had a higher lifetime risk of diabetes than women across all index ages. In contrast, among First Nations people, women had a higher lifetime risk than men across all index ages.Interpretation: About 8 in 10 First Nations people and about 5 in 10 non-First Nations people of young age will develop diabetes in their remaining lifetime. These population-based estimates may help health care planners and decision-makers set priorities and increase public awareness and interest in the prevention of diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. COPD is often diagnosed at an advanced stage because symptoms go unrecognized. Furthermore, spirometry is often not done. Methods. Study was conducted in diverse family medicine practice settings. Patients were targeted if respiratory symptoms were present. Patients had a spirometry to confirm the presence of airflow obstruction and COPD diagnosis. An evaluation of the process was done to better understand facilitating/limiting factors to the implementation of a primary care based spirometry program. Results. 12 of 19 primary care offices participated. 196 of 246 (80%) patients targeted based on the presence of smoking and respiratory symptoms did not have COPD; 18 (7%) and 32 (13%) had COPD, respectively, GOLD I and ≥II. There was no difference in the type and number of respiratory symptoms between non-COPD and COPD patients. Most of the clinics did not have access to a trained healthcare professional to accomplish spirometry. They agreed that giving access to a trained healthcare professional was the easiest and most reliable way of doing spirometry. Conclusion. Spirometry, a simple test, is recommended in guidelines to make the diagnosis of COPD. The lack of allocated time and training of healthcare professionals makes its implementation challenging in family medicine practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Case reports have suggested that the use of statins may be associated with an increase in the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods Within a large cohort of users of respiratory medications identified in the Quebec health administrative databases during 1990-2005, we carried out a nested case-control analysis of the relationship between statins and the risk of ILD as defined by specialist visits or hospitalisations. Results The cohort included over 1.4 million patients, of which 6665 possible or probable cases of ILD were identified during follow-up. These were compared with 26 660 controls matched for age, gender and calendar time. After adjustment for confounders and comorbid conditions, there was no association between current use of statins and risk of ILD (adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.08). The results were similar when any use of statins within the previous 1 or 2 years was considered or when the analysis was limited to more definite cases. Conclusions This large cohort study did not find an association between statin use and the incidence of ILD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals face unclear but potentially significant cardiovascular health inequities, yet no TNB-specific evidence-based interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction currently exist. To address this gap, we propose a road map to improve the inclusion of TNB individuals in the planning, completion, and mobilization of cardiovascular research. In doing so, the adoption of inclusive practices would optimize cardiovascular health surveillance and care for TNB communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transgender women (individuals assigned male sex at birth who identify as women) and nonbinary and gender-diverse individuals receiving gender-affirming estrogen therapy (GAET) are at increased cardiovascular risk. Nonoral (i.e., patch, injectable) compared with oral estrogen exposure in cisgender women (individuals assigned female sex at birth who identify as women) may be associated with lower cardiovascular risk, though whether this applies to transgender women and/or gender-diverse individuals is unknown. We sought to determine the association between the route of estrogen exposure (nonoral compared with oral) and cardiovascular risk in transgender women and gender diverse individuals. Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO) and supporting relevant literature were searched from inception to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting cardiovascular outcomes, such as all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, adverse cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals using nonoral compared with oral gender-affirming estrogen therapy were included. The search strategy identified 3,113 studies, 5 of which met inclusion criteria (3 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 1 cross-sectional study; n = 259 participants, range of duration of exposure of 2 to 60 mo). One out of five studies reported on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality or adverse cardiovascular events. All five studies reported lipid levels [low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC)], whereas only two studies reported systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Limited studies have examined the effect of the route of GAET on all-cause cardiovascular mortality, morbidity, and risk factors. In addition, there is significant heterogeneity in studies examining the cardiovascular effects of GAET. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to summarize the potential effect of nonoral versus oral gender-affirming estrogen therapy use on cardiovascular risk factors in transgender women or nonbinary or gender-diverse individuals. Heterogeneity of studies in reporting gender-affirming estrogen therapy formulation, dose, and duration of exposure limits quantification of the effect of gender-affirming estrogen therapy on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, adverse cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular risk factors. This systematic review highlights the needs for large prospective cohort studies with appropriate stratification of gender-affirming estrogen therapy by dose, formulation, administration route, and sufficient follow-up and analyses to limit selection bias to optimize the cardiovascular care of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-diverse individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objective: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) persons experience health inequities compared to their cisgender peers, which is in part related to limited evidence informing their care. Thus, we aimed to describe the literature informing care provision of TGD individuals. Data source, eligibility criteria, and synthesis methods: Literature cited by the World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care Version 8 was reviewed. Original research articles, excluding systematic reviews (n = 74), were assessed (n = 1809). Studies where the population of interest were only caregivers, providers, siblings, partners, or children of TGD individuals were excluded (n = 7). Results were synthesized in a descriptive manner. Results: Of 1809 citations, 696 studies met the inclusion criteria. TGD-only populations were represented in 65% of studies. White (38%) participants and young adults (18 to 29 years old, 64%) were the most well-represented study populations. Almost half of studies (45%) were cross-sectional, and approximately a third were longitudinal in nature (37%). Overall, the median number of TGD participants (median [IQR]: 104 [32, 356]) included in each study was approximately one third of included cisgender participants (271 [47, 15405]). In studies where both TGD and cisgender individuals were included (n = 74), the proportion of TGD to cisgender participants was 1:2 [1:20, 1:1]. Less than a third of studies stratified results by sex (32%) or gender (28%), and even fewer included sex (4%) or gender (3%) as a covariate in the analysis. The proportion of studies with populations including both TGD and cisgender participants increased between 1969 and 2023, while the proportion of studies with study populations of unspecified gender identity decreased over the same time period. Conclusions: While TGD participant-only studies make up most of the literature informing care of this population, longitudinal studies including a diversity of TGD individuals across life stages are required to improve the quality of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gender-affirming estrogen therapy (GAET) is commonly used for feminization in transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals, yet the optimal rate of change (ROC) in estradiol levels for cardiovascular health is unclear. We examined the association between serum estradiol levels and cardiovascular-related mortality, adverse events, and risk factors in TNB adults using GAET. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were systematically searched (inception–April 2023) for original articles reporting serum estradiol levels and cardiovascular-related mortality, adverse events, and risk factors in TNB adults using GAET. Data extraction was completed in duplicate following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Stratified random effect meta-analyses using serum estradiol ROC (serum estradiolbaseline − serum estradiolfollow-up/study duration) was used to assess longitudinal studies (low, 0 < ROC ≤ 1 pg/mL/mo; moderate, 1 < ROC ≤ 3 pg/mL/mo; high, ROC ≥ 3 pg/mL/mo). Thirty-five studies (13 cross-sectional, 19 cohort, and 3 trials) were included. Two studies collectively reported 50 cardiovascular-related deaths, and four collectively reported 23 adverse cardiovascular events. Nineteen studies reporting cardiovascular risk factors were meta-analyzed by ROC stratum (low = 5; moderate = 6; high = 8), demonstrating an association between moderate [0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22, 0.59 kg/m2, I2 = 28.2%] and high (0.46, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.78 kg/m2; I2 = 0.0%) serum estradiol ROC and increased body mass index. High (−6.67, 95% CI: −10.65, −2.68 mg/dL; I2 = 0.0%) serum estradiol ROC was associated with decreased low-density lipoproteins. Low (−7.05, 95% CI: −10.40, −3.70 mmHg; I2 = 0.0%) and moderate (−3.69, 95% CI: −4.93, −2.45 mmHg; I2 = 0.0%) serum estradiol ROCs were associated with decreases in systolic blood pressure. In TNB adults using GAET, serum estradiol ROC may influence cardiovascular risk factors, which may have implications for clinical cardiovascular outcomes. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 studies involving 7,745 participants, high rates of serum estradiol change were associated with small increases in body mass index. Moderate to high rates of change were associated with decreases in low-density lipoprotein. Low rates of change were associated with small decreases in systolic blood pressure. Rate of serum estradiol change in adults using gender-affirming estrogen therapy may influence cardiovascular risk factors, though further research is warranted. Listen to this article's corresponding podcast at https://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/serum-estradiol-and-cardiovascular-health-among-transgender-and-nonbinary-adults-using-gender-affirming-estrogen-therapy/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study described the participation in daily and social activities and the perceived barriers and facilitators to participation of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Individuals, recruited from outpatient clinics, responded to a survey on their participation in, and barriers and facilitators towards, 26 daily and social activities, divided into 3 categories: (1) physical activity and movement (PAM); (2) self-care; and (3) social engagement. For each activity, chi-square analyses were used to examine participation differences by individuals': quartiles of airflow obstruction [percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1%predicted)] and breathlessness burden and exacerbation risk. Of the 200 participants (47% women; mean ± standard deviation age = 68 ± 9 years), most wanted to increase their participation in PAM activities (range 21–75%) and significant differences were found in 5/10 PAM activities for individuals' breathlessness burden and exacerbation risk (e.g., more individuals than expected in group A (modified Medical Research Council breathlessness score <2 and 0–1 exacerbations in past 12 months) participated in regular exercise as much as they wanted (χ(9)2=20.43, Cramer's V=.23)). Regardless of the degree of airflow obstruction or breathlessness burden and exacerbation risk, the most common barrier to participation was breathlessness (p<.001, η2p=.86) and the most common facilitator was engaging as part of their routine (p<.001, η2p=.75). Individuals with COPD want to increase their participation in daily and social activities but are limited by breathlessness. Strategies to alleviate breathlessness should be identified/prioritized and incorporated into individuals' daily routines to meet their self-reported participation objectives in daily and social activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To determine and quantify the prevalence of patient, provider and system level barriers to achieving diabetes care goals; and to examine whether barriers were different for people with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 10%; 86 mmol/mol) compared to fair glycemic control (7 to <8%; 53–64 mmol/mol). Methods: We administered a survey by telephone to community-dwelling patients with diabetes, to examine patient-reported barriers and facilitators to care. We compared responses in individuals with HbA1c ≥ 10% (86 mmol/mol) against those with HbA1c between 7–8% (53–64 mmol/mol). We examined associations between HbA1c group and barriers to care, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and diabetes duration. Results: The survey included 805 people with HbA1c ≥ 10% (86 mmol/mol), and 405 people with HbA1c 7–8% (53–64 mmol/mol). Participants with HbA1c ≥ 10% (86 mmol/mol) reported good access to care, however 20% of participants with HbA1c ≥ 10% (86 mmol/mol) felt that their care was not well-coordinated and 9.6% reported having an unmet health care need. In adjusted analysis, patients with HbA1c ≥10% (86 mmol/mol) were more likely to report lack of confidence and inadequate social support, compared to patients with HbA1c 7–8% (53–64 mmol/mol). They were also significantly more likely not to have drug insurance nor to have received recommended treatments because of cost. Conclusions: These results reinforce the importance of an individualized, yet multi-faceted approach. Specific attention to financial barriers seems warranted. These findings can inform the development of programs and initiatives to overcome barriers to care, and improve diabetes care and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite a low prevalence of chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m²), First Nations people have high rates of kidney failure requiring chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation. We sought to examine whether the presence and severity of albuminuria contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure among First Nations people. Methods: We identified all adult residents of Alberta (age = 18 yr) for whom an outpatient serum creatinine measurement was available from May 1, 2002, to Mar . 31, 2008. We determined albuminuria using urine dipsticks and categorized results as normal (i.e., no albuminuria), mild, heavy or unmeasured. Our primary outcome was progression to kidney failure (defined as the need for chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation, or a sustained doubling of serum creatinine levels). We calculated rates of progression to kidney failure by First Nations status, by estimated GFR and by albuminuria category. We determined the relative hazard of progression to kidney failure for First Nations compared with non-First Nations participants by level of albuminuria and estimated GFR. Results: Of the 1 816 824 participants we identified, 48 669 (2.7%) were First Nations. First Nations people were less likely to have normal albuminuria compared with non-First Nations people (38.7% v. 56.4%). Rates of progression to kidney failure were consistently 2- to 3-fold higher among First Nations people than among non-First Nations people, across all levels of albuminuria and estimated GFRs. Compared with non-First Nations people, First Nations people with an estimated GFR of 15.0-29.9 mL/min per 1.73 m had the highest risk of progression to kidney failure, with similar hazard ratios for those with normal and heavy albuminuria. Interpretation: Albuminuria confers a similar risk of progression to kidney failure for First Nations and non-First Nations people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]