Search

Objective: To examine rural–urban disparities in substance use disorder treatment access and continuation. Data Sources and Study Setting: We analyzed a 2016–2018 U.S. national secondary dataset of commercial insurance claims. Study Design: This cross‐sectional study examined individuals with a new episode of opioid, alcohol, or other drug use disorders. Treatment initiation and engagement rates, and rates of using out‐of‐network providers for these services, were compared between rural and urban patients. Data Collection: We included individuals 18–64 years old with continuous employer‐sponsored insurance. Principal Findings: Patients in rural settings experienced lower treatment initiation rates for alcohol (36.6% vs. 38.0%, p < 0.001), opioid (41.2% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.001), and other drug (37.7% vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001) use disorders, relative to those in urban areas. Similarly, rural patients had lower treatment engagement rates for alcohol (15.1% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001), opioid (21.0% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001), and other drug (15.5% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) use disorders. Rural patients had higher out‐of‐network rates for treatment initiation for other drug use disorders (20.4% vs. 17.2%, p < 0.001), and for treatment engagement for alcohol (27.6% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.006) and other drug (36.1% vs. 31.1%, p < 0.001) use disorders. Conclusions: These findings indicate that individuals with substance use disorders in rural areas have lower rates of initial and ongoing treatment, and are more likely to seek care out‐of‐network. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The decision to screen for breast cancer among older adults with dementia is complex and must often be individualized, as these individuals have an elevated risk of harm from over-screening. Medicare beneficiaries with dementia are increasingly enrolling in Medicare Advantage plans, which typically promote receipt of preventive cancer screening among their enrollees. This study examined the utilization of breast cancer screening among Medicare enrollees with dementia, in Medicare Advantage and in fee-for-service Medicare. Methods We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study of women with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias or cognitive impairment who were eligible for mammogram screening. We used Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data to identify utilization of biennial mammogram screening between 2012 and 2019. Poisson regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios of mammogram utilization and to calculate adjusted mammogram rates for Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare enrollees with dementia, and further stratified by rurality and by dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid. Results Mammogram utilization was 16% higher (Prevalence Ratio [PR] 1.16; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.29) among Medicare Advantage enrollees with dementia, compared to their counterparts in fee-for-service Medicare. Rural enrollees experienced no significant difference (PR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.37) in mammogram use between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare enrollees. Among urban enrollees, Medicare Advantage enrollment was associated with a 21% higher mammogram rate (PR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.35). Dual-eligible Medicare Advantage enrollees had a 34% higher mammogram rate (PR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.63) than dual-eligible fee-for-service Medicare enrollees. Among non-dual-eligible enrollees, adjusted mammogram rates were not significantly different (PR 1.11; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.24) between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare enrollees. Conclusions Medicare beneficiaries age 65-74 with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias or cognitive impairment had a higher mammogram use rate when they were enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans compared to fee-for-service Medicare, especially when they were dual-eligible or lived in urban areas. However, some Medicare Advantage enrollees with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias or cognitive impairment may have experienced over-screening for breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The early onset of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) before age 65 can introduce life and health care complications. Preserving an early-onset ADRD patient's daily functioning longer and delaying declines in health from non-ADRD conditions become important preventive goals. This study examined the differences in utilization of preventive cancer screenings between patients with and without early-onset ADRD, and compared utilization of the screenings in rural versus urban areas among women with early-onset ADRD in the United States. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of women aged 40 to 64 years eligible for mammogram and cervical cancer screenings using commercial insurance claims from 2012 to 2018. We measured the use of biennial mammogram among women 50 to 64 years old, and the use of triennial Pap smear test among women 40 to 64 years old. We used inverse probability weighted logistic regressions to estimate the odds of receiving preventive cancer screenings by the presence of early-onset ADRD or cognitive impairments (CI). We used multivariable logistic regressions to estimate the odds of receiving preventive cancer screenings by rural or urban residence among women with early-onset ADRD/CI. Results: Among 6,349,308 women in the breast cancer screening sample (mean [SD] age, 56.52 [4.03] years), 36,131 had early-onset ADRD/CI (mean [SD] age, 57.99 [3.98] years). Among 6,583,088 women in the cervical cancer screening sample (mean [SD] age, 52.37 [6.81] years), 30,919 had early-onset ADRD/CI (mean [SD] age, 55.79 [6.22] years). Having early-onset ADRD/CI was associated with lower utilization of mammogram (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90–0.95). No significant difference was observed in Pap smear screening (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96–1.02) between patients with and without early-onset ADRD/CI. Among patients with early-onset ADRD/CI, those in rural areas were less likely than those in urban areas to have mammograms (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85–0.97) and Pap smears (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.61–0.71). Conclusions: The observed pattern of rural-urban differences in cancer screening in our study emphasizes the need for efforts to promote evidence-based, individualized decision-making processes in the early-onset ADRD population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines whether Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees with more chronic conditions were more likely to disenroll when MA enrollment grew rapidly from 2009 to 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reviews updates on the knowledge about U.S. physician satisfaction and proposes new foci to understand and study the topic that align better with the evolving U.S. healthcare delivery system, physicians' everyday work situations and medicine's internal demographic changes. It notes that U.S. physicians experience moderate to high levels of job, work and career satisfaction which have remained stable over time.

More than 150 private companies contract with the federal government to provide Part D prescription drug benefits to Medicare beneficiaries, either through stand-alone drug plans or as part of Medicare Advantage plans. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) evaluates these companies on a set of performance measures, including plan enrollees' medication adherence. We used 2012 data from CMS and data from the US Census Bureau to investigate whether these performance ratings are influenced by the socioeconomic characteristics of enrollee populations. We found that some companies have a substantial advantage over others because of their enrollees' socioeconomic characteristics, with more than a third of the variation in adherence scores tied to these characteristics. CMS should seriously consider adjusting adherence scores to account for differences in the socioeconomic characteristics of enrollee populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article explores the benefits offered by tax-exempt hospitals to their local communities. With the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), tax-exempt hospitals are required to perform assessments of community needs and address the said needs. In the national study of the level and pattern of community benefits brought by tax-exempt hospitals, the authors concluded benefits varied markedly with most allocated to patient care services.