Search

Strategies to reduce liver biopsy (LB) screen failures through better patient selection are needed for clinical trials. Standard fibrosis biomarkers were not derived to detect "at-risk" metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; MASH with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease score ≥4 and fibrosis stage ≥2). We compared the performance of screening pathways that incorporate NIS2+™, an optimized version of the blood-based NIS4® technology designed to identify at-risk MASH, with those incorporating fibrosis (FIB)-4 within the RESOLVE-IT clinical trial (NCT02704403), aiming for optimized selection of patients for LB. A retrospective simulation analysis was conducted in the RESOLVE-IT screening pathway (RSP) cohort. LB failure rate (LBFR), number of patients needed to screen, and overall cost estimations of different pathways were calculated for a range of NIS2+™ and FIB-4 cut-offs and compared with those of the RSP, which relied on investigators' local practices. An analysis of potential recruitment bias based on histology, sex, age, or comorbidities was performed. The analysis cohort included 1,929 patients, 765 (40%) with at-risk MASH. The NIS2+™ pathway resulted in a significantly lower LBFR (39%) compared with the FIB-4 pathway (58%) or the RSP (60%) when using cost-optimized cut-offs (NIS2+™, 0.53; FIB-4, 0.58). For every 1,000 inclusions, NIS2+™ significantly reduced unnecessary LBs (632 vs. 1,522; -58%) and screening costs (US$12.7 million vs. US$15.0 million) vs. the RSP, while the number of patients needed to screen increased moderately (3,220 to 4,033). NIS2+™ alone is better than FIB-4 alone or combined with FIB-4. This analysis demonstrated that patient selection for LB using NIS2+™ significantly reduced unnecessary biopsies and screening costs, which could greatly improve the feasibility of MASH clinical trials. Simple and accurate non-invasive strategies to optimize the selection of patients who should be referred for liver biopsy for inclusion in MASH clinical trials is critical to reduce the high liver biopsy failure rates. While the use of the Fibrosis-4 index alone did not lead to a significant improvement of the screening process, selecting patients using NIS2+™, a recently developed optimization of the NIS4® technology for the detection of at-risk MASH, showed improved performance by simultaneously reducing liver biopsy failure rates and the overall cost of the trial, while maintaining the number of patients needed to screen at a manageable level and not generating any bias in included patients' characteristics. This makes NIS2+™ an accurate and reliable screening tool that could improve the recruitment of patients in future MASH clinical trials, and would lead to increased patient comfort and security, ensuring timely and cost-efficient trial completion. [Display omitted] • The liver biopsy failure rate in MASH clinical trials is unacceptably high. • We used NIS2+™, a two-biomarker test, to refer patients with at-risk MASH for liver biopsy. • NIS2+™ reduced liver biopsy failure rates and screening costs. • NIS2+™ screening performance was superior to that of FIB-4. • The profile of patients included with NIS2+™ screening pathway was not impacted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The worldwide prevalence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing, causing a significant medical burden, but no approved therapeutics are currently available. NASH drug development requires histological analysis of liver biopsies by expert pathologists for trial enrolment and efficacy assessment, which can be hindered by multiple issues including sample heterogeneity, inter-reader and intra-reader variability, and ordinal scoring systems. Consequently, there is a high unmet need for accurate, reproducible, quantitative, and automated methods to assist pathologists with histological analysis to improve the precision around treatment and efficacy assessment. Digital pathology (DP) workflows in combination with artificial intelligence (AI) have been established in other areas of medicine and are being actively investigated in NASH to assist pathologists in the evaluation and scoring of NASH histology. DP/AI models can be used to automatically detect, localise, quantify, and score histological parameters and have the potential to reduce the impact of scoring variability in NASH clinical trials. This narrative review provides an overview of DP/AI tools in development for NASH, highlights key regulatory considerations, and discusses how these advances may impact the future of NASH clinical management and drug development. This should be a high priority in the NASH field, particularly to improve the development of safe and effective therapeutics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive form of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with steatosis, hepatocellular injury, inflammation and fibrosis. In a Phase 2 trial in adults with NASH (NCT02912260), resmetirom, an orally administered, liver‐targeted thyroid hormone receptor‐β selective agonist, significantly reduced hepatic fat (via imaging) and resolved NASH without worsening fibrosis (via liver biopsy) in a significant number of patients compared with placebo. Aims: To present the design of the Phase 3 MAESTRO clinical programme evaluating resmetirom for treatment of NASH (MAESTRO‐NAFLD‐1 [NCT04197479], MAESTRO‐NAFLD‐OLE [NCT04951219], MAESTRO‐NASH [NCT03900429], MAESTRO‐NASH‐OUTCOMES [NCT05500222]). Methods: MAESTRO‐NASH is a pivotal serial biopsy trial in up to 2000 adults with biopsy‐confirmed at‐risk NASH. Patients are randomised to a once‐daily oral placebo, 80 mg resmetirom, or 100 mg resmetirom. Liver biopsies are conducted at screening, week 52 and month 54. MAESTRO‐NAFLD‐1 is a 52‐week safety trial in ~1400 adults with NAFLD/presumed NASH (based on non‐invasive testing); ~700 patients from MAESTRO‐NAFLD‐1 are enrolled in MAESTRO‐NAFLD‐OLE, a 52‐week active treatment extension to further evaluate safety. MAESTRO‐NASH‐OUTCOMES is enrolling 700 adults with well‐compensated NASH cirrhosis to evaluate the potential for resmetirom to slow progression to hepatic decompensation events. Non‐invasive tests (biomarkers, imaging) are assessed longitudinally throughout, in addition to validated patient‐reported outcomes. Conclusion: The MAESTRO clinical programme was designed in conjunction with regulatory authorities to support approval of resmetirom for treatment of NASH. The surrogate endpoints, based on week 52 liver biopsy, serum biomarkers and imaging, are confirmed by long‐term clinical liver‐related outcomes in MAESTRO‐NASH (month 54) and MAESTRO‐NASH‐OUTCOMES (time to event). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a first-in-class farnesoid X receptor agonist and antifibrotic agent in development for the treatment of pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to validate the original 18-month liver biopsy analysis from the phase III REGENERATE trial of OCA for the treatment of NASH with a consensus panel analysis, provide additional histology data in a larger population, and evaluate safety from >8,000 total patient-years' exposure with nearly 1,000 participants receiving study drug for >4 years. Digitized whole-slide images were evaluated independently by panels of three pathologists using the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system. Primary endpoints were (1) ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH or (2) NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Safety was assessed by laboratory values and adverse events. Prespecified efficacy analyses included 931 participants. The proportion of participants achieving a ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH was 22.4% for OCA 25 mg vs. 9.6% for placebo (p <0.0001). More participants receiving OCA 25 mg vs. placebo achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis (6.5% vs. 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.093). Histology data in a larger population of 1,607 participants supported these results. Safety data included 2,477 participants. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and deaths was not substantively different across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most common TEAE. Rates of adjudicated hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular events were low and similar across treatment groups. These results confirm the antifibrotic effect of OCA 25 mg. OCA was generally well tolerated over long-term dosing. These data support a positive benefit:risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH. Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often have liver scarring (fibrosis), which causes an increased risk of liver-related illness and death. Preventing progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis or reversing fibrosis are the main goals of drug development for NASH. In this clinical trial of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with NASH (REGENERATE), we reaffirmed our previous results demonstrating that OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis using a more rigorous consensus panel analysis of liver biopsies taken at month 18. We also showed that OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum liver biochemistries and liver stiffness measurements compared with placebo, even in participants in whom histologic fibrosis did not change at 18 months, providing evidence that the benefit of OCA extends beyond what is captured by the ordinal NASH CRN scoring system. OCA was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile supporting a positive benefit: risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH. [Display omitted] • OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis by ≥1 stage with no worsening of NASH. • OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum ALT levels. • OCA reduced liver stiffness compared to placebo regardless of histologic response. • OCA was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

NIS4® is a blood-based non-invasive test designed to effectively rule in/rule out at-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), defined as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 and significant fibrosis (stage ≥2), among patients with metabolic risk factors. Robustness of non-invasive test scores across characteristics of interest including age, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and sex, and optimised analytical aspects are critical for large-scale implementation in clinical practice. We developed and validated NIS2+™, an optimisation of NIS4®, specifically designed to improve score robustness. A well-balanced training cohort (n = 198) included patients from the GOLDEN-505 trial. The validation (n = 684) and test (n = 2,035) cohorts included patients from the RESOLVE-IT trial. Well-matched subgroups were created to avoid potential confounding effects during modelling and analysis of score robustness. Models were trained using logistic regressions for at-risk NASH detection and compared using Bayesian information criteria. Performance of NIS2+™ was compared with that of NIS4®, Fibrosis-4, and alanine aminotransferase using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and robustness was analysed through score distribution. Using the training cohort to compare all combinations of NIS4® biomarkers, NIS2 (miR-34a-5p, YKL-40) was identified as the best combination of parameters. To correct for the sex effect on miR-34a-5p (validation cohort), sex and sex ∗ miR-34a-5p parameters were added, creating NIS2+™. In the test cohort, NIS2+™ exhibited a statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.813) vs. NIS4® (0.792; p = 0.0002), Fibrosis-4 (0.653; p <0.0001), and alanine aminotransferase (0.699; p <0.0001). NIS2+™ scores were not affected by age, sex, BMI, or type 2 diabetes mellitus status, providing robust clinical performances irrespective of patient characteristics. NIS2+™ constitutes a robust optimisation of NIS4® technology for the detection of at-risk NASH. The development of non-invasive tests for accurate, large-scale detection of patients with at-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH; defined as NASH with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 and fibrosis stage ≥2) – who are at higher risk for disease progression and for developing liver-related life-threatening outcomes – is critical for identifying this patient population in the clinical setting and improving the screening process of NASH clinical trials. We report the development and validation of NIS2+™, a diagnostic test designed as an optimisation of NIS4® technology, a blood-based panel currently used to detect at-risk NASH in patients with metabolic risk factors. NIS2+™ showed improved performance for the detection of at-risk NASH compared with NIS4® and other non-invasive liver tests that was not impacted by patients' characteristics of interest, such as age, sex, type 2 diabetes mellitus, BMI, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension. This makes NIS2+™ a robust and reliable tool for the diagnosis of at-risk NASH among patients with metabolic risk factors, and an effective candidate for large-scale implementation in clinical practice and clinical trials. [Display omitted] • Non-invasive tools for large-scale diagnosis of at-risk NASH are needed. • We developed NIS2+™, a two-biomarker test corrected for sex, to detect at-risk NASH. • NIS2+™ clinical performance was superior to that of NIS4®. • NIS2+™ showed a strong performance to rule in/out at-risk NASH at fixed cutoffs. • NIS2+™ was not impacted by patients' characteristics of interest for NAFLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

So far without an approved therapy, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) remains at the beginning of its therapeutic cycle, whereby many pharmacological agents are initially developed as monotherapies. Given the complex pathogenesis of NASH, the prevailing opinion is that combination therapy will be key to its treatment and that therapeutic efforts should be aimed at developing combinations rather than monotherapies. However, the development of combination therapies is associated with multiple challenges, which we attempt to describe here, and which extend beyond the perceived biological rationale of combining two different mechanisms of action. Important hurdles include predicting the added benefit of a specific combination regimen over monotherapies, given the limited data provided by early phase trials. Regulatory requirements for approving a combination span from preclinical models, through initial demonstration of the efficacy of the combination, to complex late-stage therapeutic trials. Development pathways for combination therapies are, in this paradigm, highly demanding in terms of patient and sponsor resources. In light of recent, negative, late-stage trials of monotherapies, well-designed combination development programmes could be essential to avoid additional failures that may hold back therapeutic research and access to treatment for patients. Enthusiasm for combination therapies should be maintained but realistically balanced against the complexity of demonstrating their therapeutic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The LIVIFY trial investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of vonafexor, a second-generation, non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor agonist in patients with suspected fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This double-blind phase IIa study was conducted in two parts. Patients were randomised (1:1:1:1) to receive placebo, vonafexor 100 mg twice daily (VONA-100BID), vonafexor 200 mg once daily (VONA-200QD), or 400 mg vonafexor QD (VONA-400QD) in Part A (safety run-in, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics) or placebo, vonafexor 100 mg QD (VONA-100QD), or VONA-200QD (1:1:1) in Part B. The primary efficacy endpoint was a reduction in liver fat content (LFC) by MRI-proton density fat fraction, while secondary endpoints included reduced corrected T1 values and liver enzymes, from baseline to Week 12. One hundred and twenty patients were randomised (Part A, n = 24; Part B, n = 96). In Part B, there was a significant reduction in least-square mean (SE) absolute change in LFC from baseline to Week 12 for VONA-100QD (-6.3% [0.9]) and VONA-200QD (-5.4% [0.9]), vs. placebo (-2.3% [0.9], p = 0.002 and 0.012, respectively). A >30% relative LFC reduction was achieved by 50.0% and 39.3% of patients in the VONA-100QD and VONA-200QD arms, respectively, but only in 12.5% in the placebo arm. Reductions in body weight, liver enzymes, and corrected T1 were also observed with vonafexor. Creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate improved in the active arms but not the placebo arm. Mild to moderate generalised pruritus was reported in 6.3%, 9.7%, and 18.2% of participants in the placebo, VONA-100QD, and VONA-200QD arms, respectively. In patients with suspected fibrotic NASH, vonafexor was safe and induced potent liver fat reduction, improvement in liver enzymes, weight loss, and a possible renal benefit. 2018-003119-22. NCT03812029. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become a leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Affected patients are also at higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease. There are no approved therapies and only few options to treat this population. The phase IIa LIVIFY trial results show that single daily administration of oral vonafexor, an FXR agonist, leads in the short term to a reduction in liver fat, liver enzymes, fibrosis biomarkers, body weight and abdominal circumference, and a possible improvement in kidney function, while possible mild moderate pruritus (a peripheral FXR class effect) and an LDL-cholesterol increase are manageable with lower doses and statins. These results support exploration in longer and larger trials, with the aim of addressing the unmet medical need in NASH. [Display omitted] • Vonafexor is an FXR agonist in development for patients with NASH and at-risk liver fibrosis. • In this randomized trial, vonafexor was safe, induced liver fat reduction and weight loss, and improved liver enzymes and renal function. • As NASH increases the risk of kidney problems, these results support development of vonafexor for patients with liver and kidney disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to evaluate the accuracy of noninvasive diagnostic tools in detecting significant or advanced (F2/F3) fibrosis among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) in the US healthcare context. Methods: The SLR was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science, with an additional hand search of public domains and citations, in line with the PRISMA statement. The study included US-based original research on diagnostic test sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Results: Twenty studies were included in qualitative evidence synthesis. Imaging techniques with the highest diagnostic accuracy in F2/F3 detection and differentiation were magnetic resonance elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography. The most promising standard blood biomarkers were NAFLD fibrosis score and FIB-4. The novel diagnostic tools showed good overall accuracy, particularly a score composed of body mass index, GGT, 25-OH-vitamin D, and platelet count. The novel approaches in liver fibrosis detection successfully combine imaging techniques and blood biomarkers. Conclusions: While noninvasive techniques could overcome some limitations of liver biopsy, a tool that would provide a sufficiently sensitive and reliable estimate of changes in fibrosis development and regression is still missing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Initially a condition that received limited recognition and whose clinical impact was controversial, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become a leading cause of chronic liver disease. Although there are no approved therapies, major breakthroughs, which will be reviewed here, have paved the way for future therapeutic successes. The unmet medical need in NASH is no longer disputed, and progress in the understanding of its pathogenesis has resulted in the identification of many pharmacological targets. Key surrogate outcomes for therapeutic trials are now accepted by regulatory agencies, thus creating a path for drug registration. A set of non-invasive measurements enabled early-stage trials to be conducted expeditiously, thus providing early indications on the biological and possibly clinical actions of therapeutic candidates. This generated efficacy results for a number of highly promising compounds that are now in late-stage development. Intense research aimed at further improving the assessment of histological endpoints and in developing non-invasive predictive biomarkers is underway. This will help improve the design and feasibility of successful trials, ultimately providing patients with therapeutic options that can change the course of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

EDP-305 is an oral farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist under development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Herein, we aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of EDP-305 in patients with fibrotic NASH. In this double-blind phase II study, patients with fibrotic NASH (without cirrhosis), diagnosed by historical biopsy or phenotypically, were randomized to EDP-305 1 mg, EDP-305 2.5 mg, or placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to Week 12, and the key secondary endpoint was mean change in liver fat content from baseline to Week 12. Between January 2018 and July 2019, 134 patients were randomized and 132 were evaluated. At Week 12, the least squares mean reductions from baseline in ALT for patients receiving 2.5 mg EDP-305 and 1 mg EDP-305 were -27.9 U/L (95% CI 0.03 to 24.9; p = 0.049) and -21.7 U/L (-5.8 to 18.3: p = 0.304), respectively, compared to -15.4 U/L for those receiving placebo. Absolute liver fat reduction was -7.1% (2.0-7.5; p = 0.0009) with 2.5 mg EDP-305, -3.3% with EDP-305 1 mg, and -2.4% with placebo. The most common (≥5%) adverse events were pruritus, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and dizziness. Pruritus occurred in 50.9%, 9.1%, and 4.2% of patients in the 2.5 mg, 1 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, and led to study drug discontinuation in 20.8% of patients in the 2.5 mg group and 1.8% in the 1 mg group. EDP-305 reduced ALT levels and liver fat content, providing support for a longer-term trial assessing histological endpoints in patients with NASH. NCT03421431 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a chronic hepatic disease that can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and liver cancer. Results from this phase II study support continued development of EDP-305, an oral farnesoid X receptor agonist, for the treatment of patients with NASH. [Display omitted] • EDP-305 is an oral farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist being developed to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). • In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, 12 weeks of EDP-305 reduced ALT levels and MRI-PDFF. • These results support further development of EDP-305 for patients with NASH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) deficiency is an ultra-rare, progressive, autosomal recessive disorder. Functional mutations in LIPA , the gene that encodes LAL, result in accumulation of cholesteryl esters and triglycerides in hepatocytes and in the macrophages of the intestines, vascular endothelial system, and numerous other organs. LAL deficiency has a broad clinical spectrum; children and adults can present with dyslipidemia, liver enzyme elevations, hepatosplenomegaly, hepatic steatosis, liver fibrosis and/or cirrhosis, and vascular disease, which may lead to significant morbidity and premature mortality in some patients. Given the systemic involvement and the wide range of healthcare specialists who manage patients with LAL deficiency, there is a need for guidelines to assess and monitor disease involvement. To provide a set of recommendations for the initial assessment and ongoing monitoring of patients with LAL deficiency to help physicians in various disciplines effectively manage the disease based on the observed presentation and progression in each case. A group of internationally recognized healthcare specialists with expertise in clinical genetics, pathology, hepatology, gastroenterology, cardiology, and lipidology convened to develop an evidence-based consensus of best practices for the initial assessment and ongoing monitoring of children and adults with LAL deficiency, regardless of treatment status; infants with LAL deficiency have been excluded from these guidelines because they require specialized care. The authors present guidance for the assessment and monitoring of patients with LAL deficiency based on age and disease manifestations that include the hepatic, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems. A schedule for ongoing monitoring of disease progression is provided. In addition, the need to establish an interdisciplinary and integrated care team to optimize the approach to managing this systemic disease is highlighted. There is currently no published guidance on the assessment and monitoring of patients with LAL deficiency. These consensus recommendations for the initial assessment and ongoing monitoring of children and adults with LAL deficiency are intended to help improve the management of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common type of chronic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has been shown to improve the histological features of NASH. Here we report results from a planned interim analysis of an ongoing, phase 3 study of obeticholic acid for NASH.Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adult patients with definite NASH, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score of at least 4, and fibrosis stages F2-F3, or F1 with at least one accompanying comorbidity, were randomly assigned using an interactive web response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive oral placebo, obeticholic acid 10 mg, or obeticholic acid 25 mg daily. Patients were excluded if cirrhosis, other chronic liver disease, elevated alcohol consumption, or confounding conditions were present. The primary endpoints for the month-18 interim analysis were fibrosis improvement (≥1 stage) with no worsening of NASH, or NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis, with the study considered successful if either primary endpoint was met. Primary analyses were done by intention to treat, in patients with fibrosis stage F2-F3 who received at least one dose of treatment and reached, or would have reached, the month 18 visit by the prespecified interim analysis cutoff date. The study also evaluated other histological and biochemical markers of NASH and fibrosis, and safety. This study is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02548351, and EudraCT, 20150-025601-6.Findings: Between Dec 9, 2015, and Oct 26, 2018, 1968 patients with stage F1-F3 fibrosis were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment; 931 patients with stage F2-F3 fibrosis were included in the primary analysis (311 in the placebo group, 312 in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 308 in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group). The fibrosis improvement endpoint was achieved by 37 (12%) patients in the placebo group, 55 (18%) in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group (p=0·045), and 71 (23%) in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group (p=0·0002). The NASH resolution endpoint was not met (25 [8%] patients in the placebo group, 35 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group [p=0·18], and 36 [12%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group [p=0·13]). In the safety population (1968 patients with fibrosis stages F1-F3), the most common adverse event was pruritus (123 [19%] in the placebo group, 183 [28%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 336 [51%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group); incidence was generally mild to moderate in severity. The overall safety profile was similar to that in previous studies, and incidence of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups (75 [11%] patients in the placebo group, 72 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 93 [14%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group).Interpretation: Obeticholic acid 25 mg significantly improved fibrosis and key components of NASH disease activity among patients with NASH. The results from this planned interim analysis show clinically significant histological improvement that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. This study is ongoing to assess clinical outcomes.Funding: Intercept Pharmaceuticals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditionally, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has been associated with insulin resistance-related clinical conditions, such as overweight and type 2 diabetes. They report an early reduction in liver fat content, with a mean difference from baseline over placebo of -22-5% (95% CI -32-9 to -12-2, p<0-0001) at 12 weeks, and a significant improvement in the pro-atherogenic lipid profile of NASH patients treated with resmetirom. Whether resmetirom works better in patients with more pronounced hepatic hypothyroidism is unknown, and most patients in this trial presumably had low rather than high normal baseline thyroid stimulating hormone concentrations. [Extracted from the article]

Summary Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is a disease without a single, specific, diagnostic marker, hence multiple indicators are required to measure therapeutic efficacy. Moreover, drug candidates for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis target many distinct mechanisms that are believed to promote hepatic injury. Therefore, a wide range of endpoints must be reached, sequentially, as required by the drug development process. Some of these endpoints validate the mechanism of action, others are used to anticipate histological efficacy. Histological endpoints are still considered the best predictors of clinical outcome, but they can only be reliably tested in larger, late phase trials. Herein, we will review the rationale and clinical data supporting the use of specific endpoints at different stages of therapeutic trials. We will also discuss the validity and limitations of current phase IIb histological endpoints, particularly a one stage reduction in fibrosis, for their ability to predict progression to cirrhosis, which is the ultimate outcome measure in therapeutic trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favour of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panellists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140–350 g/wk and 210–420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and non-stigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease have unhealthy diets, sedentary behaviour and not enough physical activity. This lifestyle triggers liver disease and probably favours its progression. It also has significant deleterious effects on health and longevity and should therefore be corrected by first-line therapy at all stages of the disease. However, important questions remain: is weight loss alone beneficial or do particular diets have beneficial effects beyond weight loss? Which specific micro- or macronutrients are clearly harmful? Does exercise without weight loss improve hepatic histology and what type of exercise is optimal? Does moderate or only vigorous exercise have metabolic and hepatic benefits? What is the efficacy of lifestyle measures outside of clinical trials? And most importantly, what is the turning point in the natural history of liver disease when non-pharmacological measures should be combined with drug therapy? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While simple to recommend, diet and lifestyle measures as a first-line therapy for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are hardly a model of successful therapy, as most clinicians can testify. They can be complex to implement, hard to sustain, and of limited efficacy in advanced stages of the disease. The need for specific pharmacotherapy is now acknowledged by practitioners, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulators and is largely expected by patients. The result is a clear move away from products developed second hand for NASH (such as pioglitazone or metformin) or from generic, non-specific hepatoprotectors (such as pentoxifylline, ursodeoxycholic acid, or antioxidants) toward molecules developed and tested specifically for NASH that aim to correct one or several of the pathways of liver injury in this disease. The two most advanced molecules, obeticholic acid and elafibranor, have shown encouraging data on improving hepatic histology. Both compounds appear to clear NASH, with obeticholic acid improving liver fibrosis and elafibranor improving the glycemic and lipid profile. Much larger trials, currently ongoing, will need to confirm these preliminary data and better characterize the safety and tolerability profile. Meanwhile, other compounds are being tested, a few in phase 2b studies (cenicriviroc, aramchol for NASH, and simtuzumab for NASH fibrosis) and many more in earlier, smaller trials. Most of these drug candidates target different pathways, which speaks to the diversity and dynamism of the NASH pipeline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study focusing on the non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) disease. Topics discussed include the role of NASH in causing liver mortality and disease such as cirrhosis, the fibrosis of the liver, and the use of multivariate analyses in the study. Also mentioned are the findings that show that steatohepatitis drives fibrogenesis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) through necroinflammation.

Background & Aims Asunaprevir is a selective HCV NS3 protease inhibitor, active against genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6 in vitro . We evaluated asunaprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin (PegIFNα/RBV) for genotype 1 and 4 chronic HCV. Methods In this phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, treatment-naive adults with genotype 1 (n = 213) or 4 (n = 25) were randomly assigned (3:1) to asunaprevir 200 mg or placebo twice daily plus PegIFNα/RBV. Asunaprevir recipients, achieving protocol-defined response (HCV-RNA below quantification limit at week 4 and undetectable at week 10), were rerandomized at week 12 to continue asunaprevir-based triple therapy or receive placebo plus PegIFNα/RBV for weeks 13–24. Patients without protocol-defined response (PDR) and placebo recipients continued PegIFNα/RBV through week 48. Co-primary end points were undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 and 12 (eRVR) and 24 weeks posttreatment (SVR 24 ). Results Most patients were male (64.3%), white (83.6%), and had non-CC IL28B genotypes (71.3%). Among genotype 1 patients, eRVR rates (asunaprevir vs. placebo) were 67% (80% CI 62, 72) vs. 6% (80% CI 2, 10); corresponding SVR 24 rates were 64% (80% CI 59, 68) vs. 44% (80% CI 36, 53). SVR 24 among genotype 4 patients was 89% (asunaprevir) vs. 43% (placebo). Rates of rash and haematologic adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Five asunaprevir-treated patients had grade 4 alanine aminotransferase elevations that resolved following discontinuation (n = 4) or with continued dosing (n = 1). Conclusions Addition of asunaprevir to PegIFNα/RBV in treatment-naive genotype 1- or 4-infected patients improves response rates and is well tolerated, with aminotransferase elevations that were manageable with appropriate monitoring. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01030432. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Most studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) originate from tertiary care centers with an academic interest. How this emerging entity is accepted and managed by a wider body of gastroenterologists is unknown, despite significant implications for the diagnosis of at-risk subjects and the utilization of healthcare resources. Methods: We conducted a survey among 352 French, board-certified gastroenterologists from a large variety of practices to understand the clinical burden, perceived severity, and management patterns of NAFLD. Results: Half of participants saw >30 new cases (equal to HCV) of NAFLD and 40% >5 new cases of NASH-cirrhosis yearly. Only 20% of patients were referred by endocrinologists; conversely, gastroenterologists overwhelmingly referred NAFLD patients for assessment of metabolic co-morbidities. In patients with metabolic risk factors, a majority of physicians considered the diagnosis of NAFLD, even if other liver diseases co-existed. The diagnosis heavily relies on aminotransferases, hence patients with normal ALT are usually not diagnosed. Liver biopsy is performed for fibrosis staging but not for the diagnosis/grading of steatohepatitis, and mainly decided based on non-invasive fibrosis procedures. Pharmacological treatment is used despite a lack of clear evidence of efficacy. Physicians monitor patients themselves, usually twice a year. Conclusions: NAFLD is recognized and accepted as a disease in itself with potentially severe outcomes. Most at-risk patients are currently missed because of non-referral by endocrinologists and no exploration of those with normal aminotransferases. The medical need for the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD is real in the community of gastroenterologists at large. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background & Aims: Long-term viral suppression is a major goal to prevent disease progression in patients with HBV. Aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of entecavir plus tenofovir combination in 57 CHB partial responders or multidrug resistant patients. Methods: Investigator-initiated open-label cohort study. Quantitative HBV-DNA measurement and resistance testing (line-probe-assays and direct-sequencing) at baseline and every 3months. Results: Fifty seven patients (37 HBeAg+), median age 45years, previously treated with a median of three lines of antiviral therapy (range 1–6), 24/57 with advanced liver disease, were included. Median ALT at baseline was 1.0ULN (range 0.3–22) and HBV-DNA 1.5×104 IU/ml (range 500–1×1011 IU/ml). Median treatment duration of combination therapy was 21months. HBV-DNA level dropped 3 logs (median, range 0–8log; p <0.0001), 51/57 patients became HBV-DNA undetectable, median after 6months (95% CI, 4.6–7). The probability for HBV DNA suppression was not reduced in patients with adefovir or entecavir resistance or in patients with advanced liver disease. Viral suppression led to decline in ALT (median 0.7ULN; range 0.2–2.4; p =0.001). Five patients lost HBeAg (after 15, 18, 20, 21, and 27months, respectively), one patient showed HBs-seroconversion. Patients with advanced disease did not show clinical decompensation, two patients with cirrhosis and undetectable HBV DNA developed HCCs. No death, newly induced renal impairment or lactic acidosis were reported. Conclusions: Rescue therapy with entecavir and tenofovir in CHB patients harboring viral resistance patterns or showing only partial antiviral responses to preceding therapies was efficient, safe, and well tolerated in patients with and without advanced liver disease (249). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]