Search

Abstract: Background: Previous studies have described an “obesity paradox” with heart failure, whereby higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with lower mortality. However, little is known about the impact of obesity on survival after acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Data from 2 registries of patients hospitalized in the US with acute myocardial infarction between 2003-2004 (PREMIER) and 2005-2008 (TRIUMPH) were used to examine the association of BMI with mortality. Patients (n=6359) were categorized into BMI groups (kg/m2) using baseline measurements. Two sets of analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression with fractional polynomials to model BMI as categorical and continuous variables. To assess the independent association of BMI with mortality, analyses were repeated, adjusting for 7 domains of patient and clinical characteristics. Results: Median BMI was 28.6. BMI was inversely associated with crude 1-year mortality (normal, 9.2%; overweight, 6.1%; obese, 4.7%; morbidly obese; 4.6%; P <.001), which persisted after multivariable adjustment. When BMI was examined as a continuous variable, the hazards curve declined with increasing BMI and then increased above a BMI of 40. Compared with patients with a BMI of 18.5, patients with higher BMIs had a 20% to 68% lower mortality at 1 year. No interactions between age (P =.37), sex (P =.87), or diabetes mellitus (P =.55) were observed. Conclusions: There appears to be an “obesity paradox” among patients after acute myocardial infarction such that higher BMI is associated with lower mortality, an effect that was not modified by patient characteristics and was comparable across age, sex, and diabetes subgroups. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Considerable attention has been devoted to the effect of social support on patient outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, little is known about the relation between patient living arrangements and outcomes. Thus, we used data from PREMIER, a registry of patients hospitalized with AMI at 19 United States centers from 2003 through 2004, to assess the association of living alone with outcomes after AMI. Outcome measurements included 4-year mortality, 1-year readmission, and 1-year health status using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Short Form-12 Physical Health Component scales. Patients who lived alone had higher crude 4-year mortality (21.8% vs 14.5%, p <0.001) but comparable rates of 1-year readmission (41.6% vs 38.3%, p = 0.79). Living alone was associated with lower unadjusted quality of life (mean SAQ −2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] −4.44 to −0.35, p = 0.02) but had no impact on Short Form-12 Physical Health Component (−0.45, 95% CI −1.65 to 0.76, p = 0.47) compared to patients who did not live alone. After multivariable adjustment, patients who lived alone had a comparable risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.93) and readmission (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.28) as patients who lived with others. Mean quality-of-life scores remained lower in patients who lived alone (SAQ −2.91, 95% CI −5.56 to −0.26, p = 0.03). In conclusion, living alone may be associated with poorer angina-related quality of life 1 year after MI but is not associated with mortality, readmission, or other health status measurements after adjusting for other patient and treatment characteristics. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Prior research reports black patients have lower medication use for hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and diabetes.Objective: To assess whether patient race influences physicians' prescribing.Design: Web-based survey including three clinical vignettes (hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes), with patient race (black, white) randomized across vignettes.Subjects: A total of 716 respondents from 5,141 eligible sampled primary care physicians (14% response rate).Interventions: NoneMeasurements: Medication recommendation (any medication vs none, on-patent branded vs generic, and therapeutic class) and physicians' treatment adherence forecast (10-point Likert scale, 1-definitely not adhere, 10-definitely adhere).Results: Respondents randomized to view black patients (n = 371) and white patients (n = 345) recommend any medications at comparable rates for hypercholesterolemia (100.0% white vs 99.5% black, P = 0.50), hypertension (99.7% white vs 99.5% black, P = 1.00), and diabetes (99.7% white vs 99.7% black, P = 1.00). Patient race influenced medication class chosen in the hypertension vignette; respondents randomized to view black patients recommended calcium channel blockers more often (20.8% black vs 3.2% white) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors less often (47.4% black vs 62.6% white) (P < 0.001). Patient race did not influence medication class for hypercholesterolemia or diabetes. Respondents randomized to view black patients reported lower forecasted patient adherence for hypertension (P < 0.001, mean: 7.3 black vs 7.7 white) and diabetes (P = 0.05 mean: 7.4 black vs 7.6 white), but race had no meaningful influence on forecasted adherence for hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.15, mean: 7.2 black vs 7.3 white).Conclusion: Racial differences in outpatient prescribing patterns for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes are likely attributable to factors other than prescribing decisions based on patient race. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current guidelines recommend patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 minutes of admission, although there are conflicting data regarding the relation between time to treatment and mortality in these patients. We used logistic regression analyses employing a fractional polynomial model to evaluate the association between door-to-balloon time and 1-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction ≥65 years old undergoing primary PCI from 1994 to 1996 (n = 1,932). Median door-to-balloon time was 128 minutes (interquartile range 92 to 178, 24.2% treated within 90 minutes). Overall 1-year mortality was 21.1%. Longer door-to-balloon times were associated with higher 1-year mortality in a continuous, nonlinear fashion (30 minutes 10.9%, 60 minutes 13.6%, 90 minutes 16.5%, 120 minutes 19.5%, 150 minutes 22.5%, 180 minutes 25.3%, 210 minutes 27.9%). The nature of the association between door-to-balloon time and 1-year mortality was best modeled by a second-degree fractional polynomial (p <0.001). Findings were similar after multivariable adjustment as any increase in door-to-balloon time was associated with successive increases in patients'' 1-year mortality (30 minutes 8.8%, 60 minutes 12.9%, 90 minutes 16.6%, 120 minutes 19.9%, 150 minutes 22.9%, 180 minutes 25.5%, 210 minutes 27.7%). In conclusion, any delay in primary PCI is associated with increased 1-year mortality, suggesting efforts should focus on decreasing time to treatment as much as possible, even among those centers currently providing primary PCI within 90 minutes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective To evaluate the association between door-to- balloon time and mortality in hospital in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction to assess the incremental mortality benefit of reductions in door-to- balloon times of less than 90 minutes. Design Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2005-6. Setting Acute care hospitals. Participants 43 801 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Main outcome measure Mortality in hospital. Results Median door-to-balloon time was 83 minutes (interquartile range 6-109, 57.9% treated within 90 minutes). Overall mortality in hospital was 4.6%. Multivariable logistic regression models with fractional polynomial models indicated that longer door-to-balloon times were associated with a higher adjusted risk of mortality in hospital in a continuous non-linear fashion (30 minutes=3.0%, 60 minutes=3.5%, 90 minutes=4.3%, 120 minutes=5.6%, 150 minutes=7.0%, 180 minutes =8.4%, P<0.001). A reduction in door-to-balloon time from 90 minutes to 60 minutes was associated with 0.8% lower mortality, and a reduction from 60 minutes to 30 minutes with a 0.5% lower mortality. Conclusion Any delay in primary percutaneous coronary intervention after a patient arrives at hospital is associated with higher mortality in hospital in those admitted with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Time to treatment should be as short as possible, even in centres currently providing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 90 minutes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A uniform policy for regionalization of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care raises several concerns. Transferring all STEMI patients to obtain primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be less effective than transferring only high-risk STEMI patients. Delays in time to treatment >60 min associated with transferring patients for primary PCI may result in increased mortality for the average patient as compared with providing immediate fibrinolytic therapy at their initial hospital; yet more than 95% of patients transferred for primary PCI in the U.S. exceed this 60-min benchmark. Superior outcomes associated with treatment at higher-volume regional STEMI centers are inconsistent among centers, and there is no direct evidence that patients will benefit by a transfer to a high-volume hospital from a low-volume hospital. Published data suggest as many as 800 PCI patients would need to be transferred to a high-volume PCI hospital to avoid a single death at a low-volume PCI hospital. Although European randomized trial data suggest transferring patients with STEMI for primary PCI may be superior to immediate fibrinolytic therapy, these findings are unlikely to generalize to the U.S. health care system given size, geography, and organization. ST segment elevation myocardial infarction care regionalization would require a massive redistribution of health care resources, depriving several hospitals of advanced cardiac care facilities, expertise, and associated revenue. Clearer evidence of the benefits and discussion of potential harms are needed before adopting a national STEMI regionalization policy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the relationship between hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and outcomes in older persons with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Acute care hospitals in the United States from April 1998 to June 2001. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare patients aged 65 and older with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI (N=65,020) who did and did not receive a discharge prescription for statins. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality at 3 years after discharge. RESULTS: Of 23,013 patients with AMI assessed, 5,513 (24.0%) were receiving a statin at discharge. Nearly 40% of eligible patients (n=8,452) were aged 80 and older, of whom 1,310 (15.5%) were receiving a statin at discharge. In a multivariable model taking into account demographic, clinical, physician and hospital characteristics, and propensity score, discharge statin therapy was associated with significantly lower 3-year mortality (hazard ratio (HR)=0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.83–0.96)). In an analysis stratified by age, discharge statins were associated with lower mortality in patients younger than 80 (HR=0.84, 95% CI=0.76–0.92) but not in those aged 80 and older (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.87–1.09). CONCLUSION: Statin therapy is associated with lower mortality in older patients with AMI younger than 80 but not in those aged 80 and older, as a group. This finding questions whether statin efficacy data in younger patients can be broadly applied to the very old and indicates the need for further study of this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients and purchasers prefer board-certified physicians, but whether these physicians provide better quality of care and outcomes for hospitalized patients is unclear.Objective: We evaluated whether care by board-certified physicians after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was associated with higher use of clinical guideline recommended therapies and lower 30-day mortality.Subjects and Methods: We examined 101,251 Medicare patients hospitalized for AMI in the United States and compared use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and 30-day mortality according to the attending physicians' board certification in family practice, internal medicine, or cardiology.Results: Board-certified family practitioners had slightly higher use of aspirin (admission: 51.1% vs 46.0%; discharge: 72.2% vs 63.9%) and beta-blockers (admission: 44.1% vs 37.1%; discharge: 46.2% vs 38.7%) than nonboard-certified family practitioners. There was a similar pattern in board-certified Internists for aspirin (admission: 53.7% vs 49.6%; discharge: 78.2% vs 68.8%) and beta-blockers (admission: 48.9% vs 44.1%; discharge: 51.2% vs 47.1). Board-certified cardiologists had higher use of aspirin compared with cardiologists certified in internal medicine only or without any board certification (admission: 61.3% vs 53.1% vs 52.1%; discharge: 82.2% vs 71.8% vs 71.5%) and beta-blockers (admission: 52.9% vs 49.6% vs 41.5%; discharge: 54.7% vs 50.6% vs 42.5%). In multivariate regression analyses, board certification was not associated with differences in 30-day mortality.Conclusions: Treatment by a board-certified physician was associated with modestly higher quality of care for AMI, but not differences in mortality. Regardless of board certification, all physicians had opportunities to improve quality of care for AMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Whether specialty care improves survival among patients with heart failure remains controversial. Methods: We evaluated specialty care and outcomes in 25869 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with heart failure in the United States from 1998 through 1999. Patients were classified based on the specialty of their attending physician: cardiologist, internist, general physician, or family physician. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality within 30 days of admission. Results: Cardiologists were attending physicians for 26%, internists for 50%, and general and family physicians cared for the remainder. Mortality at 30 days was lowest for patients cared for by cardiologists (8.8%), higher for patients cared for by internists (10.0%, relative risk [RR] = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97 to 1.19; P = 0.059) and general physicians (11.1%, RR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.58; P = 0.086), and highest for patients cared for by family physicians (12.0%, RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.49; P <0.001). Patients cared for by family physicians remained at higher 30-day mortality rates whether with (RR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.52) or without consultation with cardiologists (RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.52). Conclusion: Hospitalized patients with heart failure had lower 30-day mortality when treated by cardiologists than when they were treated by other physicians. Although these differences were modest (RR = 1.07) for internists, they were substantial for general physicians (RR = 1.26) and family physicians (RR = 1.31); of note was that inpatient cardiology consultation did not appear to change this relation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Comments on the push for regional treatment centers for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Planning for regionalized care begun by the State of Maryland; Presentation of concerns for this approach to patient care and possible unintended consequences; Arguments for the benefits of the ACS centers, which are based on studies with notable limitations; Lack of clear consensus on the specific nature of ACS regionalization; Risks to patients; Concerns about how the direct admission of ACS patients will be handled; Economic implications; Concern that regionalization may be the end of quality care at non-ACS facilities; Conclusion and belief there is not enough data to support the value of these centers at this time.

Background: We sought to estimate the numbers of patients affected and deaths avoided by adopting the Leapfrog Group's recommended hospital procedure volume minimums for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In addition to hospital risk-adjusted mortality standards, the Leapfrog Group recommends annual hospital procedure minimums of 450 for CABG and 400 for PCI to reduce procedure-associated mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a national hospital discharge database to evaluate in-hospital mortality among patients who underwent PCI (n = 2,500,796) or CABG (n = 1,496,937) between 1998 and 2001. We calculated the number of patients treated at low volume hospitals and simulated the number of deaths potentially averted by moving all patients to high volume hospitals under best-case conditions (i.e., assuming the full volume-associated reduction in mortality and the capacity to move all patients to high volume hospitals with no related harms). Results: Multivariate adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality were higher for patients treated in low volume hospitals compared with high volume hospitals for CABG (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10-1.24) and PCI (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20). A policy of hospital volume minimums would have required moving 143,687 patients for CABG and 87,661 patients for PCI from low volume to high volume hospitals annually and prevented an estimated 619 CABG deaths and 109 PCI deaths. Thus, preventing a single death would have required moving 232 CABG patients or 805 PCI patients from low volume to high volume hospitals. Conclusion: Recommended hospital CABG and PCI volume minimums would prevent 728 deaths annually in the United States, fewer than previously estimated. It is unclear whether a policy requiring the movement of large numbers of patients to avoid relatively few deaths is feasible or effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Racial differences in the treatment of patients with myocardial infarction are often presented as nationally consistent patterns of care, despite known regional variations in quality of care. We sought to determine whether racial differences in myocardial infarction treatment vary by U.S. census region.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical record data from 138,938 elderly fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with myocardial infarction between 1994 and 1996. Patients were evaluated for the use (admission, discharge) of aspirin and beta-blockers, and cardiac procedures (cardiac catheterization, any coronary revascularization) within 60 days of admission.Results: Nationally, black patients had lower crude rates of aspirin and beta-blocker use, cardiac catheterization, and coronary revascularization than did white patients. Racial differences in treatment, however, varied by region. Black patients in the Northeast had rates of aspirin use that were similar to those of white patients on admission (50.6% vs. 49.8%, P = 0.58) and at discharge (77.5% vs. 74.2%, P = 0.07), whereas racial differences were observed in the South (admission: 43.7% vs. 48.8%, P <0.001; discharge: 69.5% vs. 73.2%, P <0.001), Midwest (admission: 48.4% vs. 52.3%, P = 0.004), and West (admission: 49.2% vs. 56.2%, P <0.001; discharge: 70.7% vs. 76.2%, P = 0.02). Racial differences in beta-blocker use were comparable across regions (admission: P = 0.59, discharge: P = 0.89). There were no differences in cardiac catheterization use among black and white patients in the Northeast (38.9% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.24), as opposed to the Midwest (43.3% vs. 48.9%, P <0.001), South (39.2% vs. 48.5%, P <0.001), and West (38.3% vs. 48.6%, P <0.001). Similarly, racial differences in any coronary revascularization use were smallest in the Northeast (22.1% vs. 26.7%, P <0.001), greater in the Midwest (24.7% vs. 33.5%, P <0.001), and largest in the South (20.7% vs. 32.0%, P <0.001) and West (22.9% vs. 33.7%, P <0.001). Regional variations in racial differences persisted after multivariable adjustment for aspirin on admission (P = 0.09) and any coronary revascularization (P = 0.10).Conclusion: Racial differences in the use of some therapies for myocardial infarction in patients hospitalized between 1994 and 1996 varied by region, suggesting that national evaluations of racial differences in health care use may obscure potentially important regional variations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies documenting racial differences in health care use are common in the medical literature. However, observational studies of racial differences in health care use lack a framework for interpreting reports of variations in health care use, leading to various terms, ranging from "variations" to "bias," that suggest different causes, consequences, and, ultimately, remedies for such variations in treatment. We propose criteria to assess racial differences in health care use by using a clinical equity (equal treatment based on equal clinical need) framework. This framework differentiates between initial reports of racial differences and subsequent classifications of their findings as racial disparities or racial bias in health care use. Racial variations in health care use may be considered disparities after demonstrating that racial differences are not attributable to treatment eligibility, clinical contraindications, patient preferences, or confounding by other clinical factors and are associated with adverse consequences. Racial bias with adverse consequences in health care may be inferred if a racial variation in treatment that has been characterized as a disparity persists after accounting for health care system factors (for example, type of hospital at which the patient was treated). We apply this framework to published reports of racial differences in treatment to determine which studies provide evidence of differences, disparities, and bias. We discuss the use of such a framework in directing policy interventions for alleviating inappropriate racial variations in health care use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume minimum recommendations.Background: In order to reduce procedure-associated mortality, ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that hospitals offering PCIs perform at least 400 PCIs annually. It is unclear whether this volume standard applies to current practice.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality''s Nationwide In-patient Sample hospital discharge database to evaluate in-hospital mortality among patients (n = 362,748) who underwent PCI between 1998 and 2000 at low (5 to 199 cases/year), medium (200 to 399 cases/year), high (400 to 999 cases/year), and very high (1,000 cases or more/year) PCI volume hospitals.Results: Crude in-hospital mortality rates were 2.56% in low-volume hospitals, 1.83% in medium-volume hospitals, 1.64% in high-volume hospitals, and 1.36% in very high-volume hospitals (p < 0.001 for trend). Compared with patients treated in high-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, referent), patients treated in low-volume hospitals remained at increased risk for mortality after adjustment for patient characteristics (OR 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.28). However, patients treated in medium-volume hospitals (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14) and patients treated in very high-volume hospitals (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03) had a comparable risk of mortality. Findings were similar when high- and very high-volume hospitals were pooled together.Conclusions: We found no evidence of higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing PCI at medium-volume hospitals compared with patients treated at hospitals with annual PCI volumes of 400 cases of more, suggesting current ACC/AHA PCI hospital volume minimums may merit reevaluation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Determines if there are sex differences in the use of coronary revascularization in elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and if sex differences vary by type of revascularization therapy. Patient characteristics; Indication that among Medicare patients hospitalized with AMI, women are slightly less likely to undergo coronary revascularization after cardiac catherization.

Context: Black patients hospitalized with heart failure reportedly receive poorer quality of care and have worse outcomes than white patients. Because previous studies have been based on selected patient populations treated more than a decade ago, it is unclear if racial differences in quality of care and outcomes currently exist in the United States. Objective: To evaluate differences in quality of care and patient outcomes between black and white Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with heart failure. Design: Retrospective analysis of medical record data systematically collected for the National Heart Failure Project. Setting and Patients: Nationwide US sample of 29 732 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with heart failure in 1998 and 1999. Main Outcome Measures: Prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), readmission within 1 year of discharge, and mortality within 30 days and 1 year of admission. Results: Black patients and white patients had similar crude rates of LVEF assessment (67.8% black vs 66.6% white; P = .29). Among patients classified as ideal for ACE inhibitor use, black patients had higher crude rates of ACE inhibitor use than white patients (81.0% vs 73.8% white; P<.001) but had similar rates of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use (85.7% black vs 82.5% white; P = .08). After multivariable adjustment, black patients had comparable rates of LVEF assessment (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.03). Black patients remained more likely to be prescribed ACE inhibitors (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.28) than were white patients in an adjusted analysis, but there were no significant racial differences in the prescription of ACE inhibitors or ARBs (black vs white, RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.07). Black patients had higher rates of readmission within 1 year of discharge (68.2% vs 63.0%; P<.001) but had lower crude 30-day (6... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine the proportion of older patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) incorporated in a commonly used set of AMI quality indicators. Design: Retrospective analysis of a medical record database. Setting: Nongovernmental U.S. acute care hospitals. Participants: Medicare patients hospitalized for AMI between January 1994 and February 1996. Measurements: Proportion of patients aged 65 and older classified as ideal candidates (without absolute or relative contraindications) for six Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services AMI quality indicators: aspirin (admission, discharge), beta-blocker (admission, discharge), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors at discharge, and time to reperfusion therapy. Results: Of the 149,996 patients eligible for admission therapies, 10.1% were ideal candidates for reperfusion therapy, 65.0% for aspirin, and 34.7% for beta-blockers. Of the 116,919 patients eligible for discharge therapies, 47.7% were ideal candidates for aspirin, 17.6% for beta-blockers, and 15.2% for ACE inhibitors. More than one-quarter (26.8%) of all patients were ineligible for any of the six quality indicators; this proportion increased with age, ranging from 23.7% of patients aged 65 to 69 to 30.2% of patients aged 85 and older. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of older patients were not included in AMI process quality measurement, with the proportion excluded higher in successively older age groups. The data highlight the need for additional research to determine effective treatment strategies for patients for whom the evidence base for clinical decision-making remains weak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines the association between U.S. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) accreditation of hospitals, quality of care and survival among Medicare patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Requirements under the JCAHO accreditation program; Quality of AMI care and outcomes; Mortality rates of hospitals accredited with commendation.

: PurposeOlder patients are less likely to receive guideline-recommended medical therapies during acute myocardial infarction. However, it is unclear whether the lower rates of treatment reflect elderly patients’ increased number of comorbid conditions, physician or hospital effects, or true age-associated variation. Furthermore, it is unclear whether age-associated variations in care are similar or vary among treatments.: MethodsWe evaluated 146,718 Medicare patients from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized between 1994 and 1996 with a confirmed myocardial infarction, to ascertain whether rates of acute reperfusion therapy and use of aspirin (admission, discharge), beta-blockers (admission, discharge), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors varied among patients aged 65 to 69 years, 70 to 74 years, 75 to 79 years, 80 to 84 years, and ≥85 years. We identified patients who were considered eligible for each therapy and who had no treatment contraindications. Associations between age and use of therapy were assessed, adjusting for patient, physician, hospital, and geographic factors.: ResultsAdjusted treatment rates were higher for patients aged 65 to 69 years than for patients aged ≥85 years for acute reperfusion therapy (54.4% vs. 31.2%, P <0.0001 for trend), beta-blockers (admission: 52.2% vs. 43.8%, P <0.0001 for trend; discharge: 61.8% vs. 55.3%, P <0.0001 for trend), aspirin at admission (73.8% vs. 71.0%, P <0.0001 for trend), and ACE inhibitors (61.6% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.02 for trend); there were no differences in the prescription of aspirin at discharge (76.0% vs. 73.6%, P = 0.05).: ConclusionElderly patients are less likely to receive guideline-indicated therapies when hospitalized with myocardial infarction. The effects of age were largest for acute reperfusion and smallest for aspirin. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial reported that digoxin provided no overall mortality benefit and only a modest reduction in hospitalizations among patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular systolic function. The clinical outcomes associated with digoxin therapy at different serum concentrations in the DIG trial have not been assessed. Our objective was to assess variations in serum digoxin concentration (SDC) and their association with mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure. Post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled DIG trial, conducted from August 1991 to December 1995, with the main analysis restricted to men with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or less (n = 3782). Patients randomly assigned to receive digoxin were divided into 3 groups based on SDC at 1 month (0.5-0.8 ng/mL, n = 572; 0.9-1.1 ng/mL, n = 322; and ≥1.2 ng/mL, n = 277) and compared with patients randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 2611). All-cause mortality at a mean follow-up of 37 months. Results: Higher SDCs were associated with increased crude all-cause mortality rates (0.5-0.8 ng/mL, 29.9%; 0.9-1.1 ng/mL, 38.8%; and ≥1.2 ng/mL, 48.0%; P = .006 for trend). Patients with SDCs of 0.5 to 0.8 ng/mL had a 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1%-10.5%) lower mortality rate compared with patients receiving placebo. Digoxin was not associated with a reduction in mortality among patients with SDCs of 0.9 to 1.1 ng/mL (2.6% increase; 95% CI, - 3.0% to 8.3%), whereas patients with SDCs of 1.2 ng/mL and higher had an 11.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-18.0%) higher absolute mortality rate than patients receiving placebo. The association between SDC and mortality persisted after multivariable adjustment (SDC 0.5-0.8 ng/mL hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI, 0.68-0.94; SDC 0.9-1.1 ng/mL HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; SDC ≥1.2 ng/mL HR 1.16, 95% CI, 0... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines whether cardiac catheterization use after acute myocardial infarction in men and women varied by sex and the appropriateness of the procedure, as determined by clinical guidelines. Lower rates of cardiac catheterization use after an acute myocardial infarction among elderly women compared to men.

Context: Health care "report cards" have attracted significant consumer interest, particularly publicly available Internet health care quality rating systems. However, the ability of these ratings to discriminate between hospitals is not known. Objective: To determine whether hospital ratings for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality from a prominent Internet hospital rating system accurately discriminate between hospitals' performance based on process of care and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Patients: Data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, a retrospective systematic medical record review of 141 914 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older hospitalized with AMI at 3363 US acute care hospitals during a 4- to 8-month period between January 1994 and February 1996 were compared with ratings obtained from HealthGrades.com (1-star: worse outcomes than predicted, 5-star: better outcomes than predicted) based on 1994-1997 Medicare data. Main Outcome Measures: Quality indicators of AMI care, including use of acute reperfusion therapy, aspirin, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; 30-day mortality. Results: Patients treated at higher-rated hospitals were significantly more likely to receive aspirin (admission: 75.4% 5-star vs 66.4% 1-star, P for trend = .001; discharge: 79.7% 5-star vs 68.0% 1-star, P = .001) and β-blockers (admission: 54.8% 5-star vs 35.7% 1-star, P = .001; discharge: 63.3% 5-star vs 52.1% 1-star, P = .001), but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (59.6% 5-star vs 57.4% 1-star, P = .40). Acute reperfusion therapy rates were highest for patients treated at 2-star hospitals (60.6%) and lowest for 5-star hospitals (53.6% 5-star, P = .008). Risk-standardized 30-day mortality rates were lower for patients treated at higher-rated than lower-rated hospitals (21.9% 1-star vs 15.9% 5-star, P = .001). However, there was marked heterogeneity within rating groups and substantial overlap o... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reports on a study to investigate the relationship between patient sex, physician sex, and the use of cardiac procedures, specifically whether sex differences in cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarcation (AMI) were greater when patients were treated by male attending physicians compared with female physicians. Methods; Results; Conclusion suggesting that factors other than sexual bias by male physicians toward women account for sex differences in cardiac procedure use.

Background: A paced rhythm can mask the electrocardiographic features of an acute myocardial infarction, complicating timely recognition and treatment.Objective: To evaluate characteristics, treatment, and outcomes among patients presenting with paced rhythms during myocardial infarction.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: U.S. acute care hospitals.Patients: 102 249 Medicare beneficiaries at least 65 years of age who were treated for acute myocardial infarction between 1994 and 1996.Measurements: Provision of three treatments for acute myocardial infarction (emergent reperfusion, aspirin, and beta-blockers), death at 30 days, and long-term follow-up.Results: 1954 patients (1.9%) presented with paced rhythms during myocardial infarction. These patients were older; were predominantly male; and had higher rates of congestive heart failure, diabetes, and previous infarction. They were significantly less likely to receive emergent reperfusion (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.33]), aspirin (RR at admission, 0.91 [CI, 0.88 to 0.94]; RR at discharge, 0.87 [CI, 0.83 to 0.92]), and beta-blockers at admission (RR, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.96]). In addition, there was a trend toward decreased use of beta-blockers at discharge (RR, 0.91 [CI, 0.76 to 1.06]). Crude mortality rates were higher among patients with paced rhythms than among those without at 30 days (25.8% vs. 21.3%; P = 0.001) and at 1 year (47.1% vs. 36.1%; P = 0.001). Among patients with paced rhythms, risk for death at 30 days decreased after adjustment for illness severity and decreased use of therapy (RR, 1.03 [CI, 0.93 to 1.14]). Patients with paced rhythms remained at additional risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.12 [CI, 1.06 to 1.18]).Conclusions: Patients with paced rhythms were less likely than those without to receive treatment for acute myocardial infarction and had poorer short- and long-term outcomes. However, this mortality risk diminished after adjustment for treatment. This suggests that improved recognition and treatment of myocardial infarction may improve outcomes, particularly in the short term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although previous studies have examined race and sex differences in health care, few studies have investigated the possible role of physician bias. We evaluated the influence of race and sex on medical students' perceptions of patients' symptoms to determine if there are differences in these perceptions early in medical training.Subjects and Methods: One-hundred sixty-four medical students were randomly assigned to view a video of a black female or white male actor portraying patients with identical symptoms of angina. We evaluated students' perceptions of the actors' health state (based on their assessment of quality of life) using a visual analog scale and a standard rating technique, as well as the type of chest pain diagnosis.Results: Students assigned a lower value (indicating a less desirable health state) to the black woman than to the white man with identical symptoms [visual scale (mean +/- SD): 72 +/- 13 vs 67 +/- 12, P <0.02; standard gamble: 87 +/- 10 vs 80 +/- 15, P < 0.001). Nonminority students reported higher mean values for the white male patient (standard gamble: 89 +/- 8 vs 81 +/- 14 for the black female patient), whereas minority students' assessments did not differ by patient. Male students assigned a slightly lower value to the black female patient (standard gamble: 76 +/- 16 vs 87 +/- 10 for the white male patient). Students were less likely to characterize the black female patient's symptoms as angina (46% vs 74% for the white male patient, P = 0.001).Conclusions: The way that medical students perceive patient symptoms appears to be affected by nonmedical factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Determines physician willingness to deceive a third-party payer and physician attitudes toward deception of third-party payers. Survey of physicians willing to use deception in six classifications of diseases; Physician ratings of justifiability of deception; Contradiction between traditional ethic of patient advocacy and ethic of cost control.

We sought to evaluate whether residency application statements regarding expected career paths are accurate predictors of early postresidency career paths. We evaluated 162 residents who completed a categorical medicine residency at Georgetown University Hospital between 1990 and 1998 to determine if their stated career plans (generalist practice, subspecialization, or undecided) at application predicted activity immediately after residency. Of 130 residents with defined postresidency plans at application, most 78 (60%) followed those career paths after graduation; 18 (67%) of 27 pursued their initial interest in generalist practice, and 60 (58%) of 103 pursued their stated interest in subspecialty training. We also noted a movement of residents toward generalism (79 [49%] of 162), despite low initial interest (27 [17%] of 162). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a reply to a letter to the editor of "The Journal of the American Medical Association" regarding acute coronary syndromes and regionalization of care. Discussion of an article by Rathore and colleagues found in a previous issue of the journal.

Evaluates the recruitment for clinical research candidates based on race or ethnic group. Concerns raised by the low participation by minorities in random trials; Efforts to standardize clinical research in the U.S., Japan and Europe; View that studies should be conducted to ascertain reasons for low participation of minorities.

Presents the experiences of a Canadian student with Pakistani heritage in interviewing for medical school, and lessons he learned about the medical establishment. Insensitive racial comments which were made by his interviewers; His thoughts on the bigotry and idiocy in the professional world.

Background: Although increased attention has been paid to sex and racial differences in the management of myocardial infarction, it is unknown whether these differences have narrowed over time. Methods: With the use of data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, we examined sex and racial differences in the treatment of patients who were deemed to be “ideal candidates” for particular treatments and in deaths among 598,911 patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction between 1994 and 2002. Results: In the unadjusted analysis, sex and racial differences were observed for rates of reperfusion therapy (for white men, white women, black men, and black women: 86.5, 83.3, 80.4, and 77.8 percent, respectively; P<0.001), use of aspirin (84.4, 78.7, 83.7, and 78.4 percent, respectively; P<0.001), use of beta-blockers (66.6, 62.9, 67.8, and 64.5 percent; P<0.001), and coronary angiography (69.1, 55.9, 64.0, and 55.0 percent; P<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, racial and sex differences persisted for rates of reperfusion therapy (risk ratio for white women, black men, and black women: 0.97, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, as compared with white men) and coronary angiography (relative risk, 0.91, 0.82, and 0.76) but were attenuated for the use of aspirin (risk ratio, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.94) and beta-blockers (risk ratio, 0.98, 1.00, and 0.96); all risks were unchanged over time. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was similar among white women (risk ratio, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.07) and black men (risk ratio, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.00), as compared with white men, but was higher among black women (risk ratio, 1.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.16) and was unchanged over time. Conclusions: Rates of reperfusion therapy, coronary angiography, and in-hospital death after myocardial infarction, but not the use of aspirin and beta-blockers, vary according to race and sex, with no evidence that the differences have narrowed in recent years. N Engl J Med 2005;353:671-82. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes," by Sunil Rao and colleagues.

Comments on the article by Vittinghoff et.al on the risk factors and secondary prevention in women with heart disease. Emphasis on the undertreatment of women; Treatment rates; Opportunities for improving treatment.

Presents a reply from the authors of an article about racial disparities in the care of heart failure which appeared in a previous issue of the 'Journal of the American Medical Association.'

Presents a reply by the authors of an article previously published in the 'Journal of the American Medical Association,' about the use of digoxin in the treatment of heart failure.

A response by Saif S. Rathore and colleagues to several letters to the editor about their article concerning the use of the drug digoxin for the treatment of heart failure, which appeared in the October 31, 2002 issue, is presented.

Background: The Digitalis Investigation Group trial reported that treatment with digoxin did not decrease overall mortality among patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular systolic function, although it did reduce hospitalizations slightly. Even though the epidemiologic features, causes, and prognosis of heart failure vary between men and women, sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin were not evaluated. Methods: We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis to assess whether there were sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin therapy among the 6800 patients in the Digitalis Investigation Group study. The presence of an interaction between sex and digoxin therapy with respect to the primary end point of death from any cause was evaluated with the use of Mantel–Haenszel tests of heterogeneity and a multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. Results: There was an absolute difference of 5.8 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 11.1) between men and women in the effect of digoxin on the rate of death from any cause (P=0.034 for the interaction). Specifically, women who were randomly assigned to digoxin had a higher rate of death than women who were randomly assigned to placebo (33.1 percent vs. 28.9 percent; absolute difference, 4.2 percent, 95 percent confidence interval, –0.5 to 8.8). In contrast, the rate of death was similar among men randomly assigned to digoxin and men randomly assigned to placebo (35.2 percent vs. 36.9 percent; absolute difference, –1.6 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, –4.2 to 1.0). In the multivariable analysis, digoxin was associated with a significantly higher risk of death among women (adjusted hazard ratio for the comparison with placebo, 1.23; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.47), but it had no significant effect among men (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.02; P=0.014 for the interaction). Conclusions: The effect of digoxin therapy differs between men and women. Digoxin therapy is associated with an increased risk of death from any cause among women, but not men, with heart failure and depressed left ventricular systolic function. (N Engl J Med 2002;347:1403-11.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A response by Saif S. Rathore and colleagues to a letter to the editor about their article on the benefits of blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction in the in the October 25, 2001 issue is presented.

Background: Anemia may have adverse effects in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the benefit of blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and various degrees of anemia is uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of data on 78,974 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years old or older who were hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Patients were categorized according to the hematocrit on admission (5.0 to 24.0 percent, 24.1 to 27.0 percent, 27.1 to 30.0 percent, 30.1 to 33.0 percent, 33.1 to 36.0 percent, 36.1 to 39.0 percent, or 39.1 to 48.0 percent), and data were evaluated to determine whether there was an association between the use of transfusion and 30-day mortality. Results: Patients with lower hematocrit values on admission had higher 30-day mortality rates. Blood transfusion was associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality among patients whose hematocrit on admission fell into the categories ranging from 5.0 to 24.0 percent (adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.45) to 30.1 to 33.0 percent (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.89). It was not associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality among those whose hematocrit values fell in the higher ranges. In one of seven subgroup analyses (among patients who survived at least two days), transfusion was not associated with a reduction in mortality for patients with hematocrit values of 30.1 percent or higher. Conclusions: Blood transfusion is associated with a lower short-term mortality rate among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction if the hematocrit on admission is 30.0 percent or lower and may be effective in patients with a hematocrit as high as 33.0 percent on admission. (N Engl J Med 2001;345:1230-6.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]