Search

The scenario of the Colombian post-agreement raises the need to make nature a victim of armed conflict more public, by intervening new conceptions of justice beyond the eminently anthropocentric view. To take up this debate, we address the types of violence suffered by the nature of the non-human, from the categories of structural and cultural violence to the category of direct violence associated with the armed conflict. Likewise, the approach to biocultural rights is addressed as one of the foundations for recognizing nature as a victim of the armed conflict, but with the problem of continuing to reproduce narratives, which are typical of cultural and structural violence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This reflection article offers a critique of management that the Constitutional Court has given the actions for protection against diplomatic missions in labor, because the thesis of relative immunity in labor matters currently holds the Constitutional Court, it has not been sufficient to ensure the immediate protection of the fundamental rights of applicants and instead has created cumbersome mechanisms that disfigure the ultimate goal of guardianship. Also in practical terms, the current position of the highest constitutional court does something different to shift the grounds of breach of public burdens previously located in the diplomatic immunity to personal inviolability and immunity from execution, which prevent compliance Case protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]