Search

Selpercatinib is the first targeted therapy for rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion‐positive unresectable non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main adverse effects of selpercatinib include hypertension, liver dysfunction, diarrhea, and QT prolongation on electrocardiograms. However, instances of drug‐induced interstitial lung disease (DI‐ILD) are infrequently reported. We describe the first case of a patient with RET fusion‐positive NSCLC treated with selpercatinib who developed DI‐ILD, confirmed pathologically. The patient, a 72‐year‐old woman, initiated selpercatinib treatment following the postoperative recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma. After 15 months of treatment, computed tomography scans revealed multiple infiltrates and ground‐glass opacities in both lungs. A thoracoscopic lung biopsy identified organizing pneumonia, attributed to DI‐ILD caused by selpercatinib. Although she was asymptomatic, the patient's selpercatinib treatment was discontinued, leading to a gradual improvement in the lung infiltrates. Despite the lack of detailed reports, DI‐ILD with selpercatinib represents a potentially serious adverse event and should be approached with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The application of adjuvant treatment has significantly enhanced the survival of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying driver gene mutations. However, adjuvant-targeted therapy remains controversial for some NSCLC patients carrying rare gene mutations such as RET, as there is currently a lack of confirmed randomized controlled trials demonstrating efficacy. In this report, we describe the case of a 58-year-old man with stage IIIA NSCLC who underwent complete lobectomy with selective lymph node dissection. Postoperative next-generation sequencing revealed that the patient harbored a rare KIF13A-RET fusion. The patient elected to receive adjuvant treatment with pralsetinib monotherapy and underwent serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring after surgery. During follow-up, despite experiencing dose reduction and irregular medication adherence, the patient still achieved a satisfactory disease-free survival (DFS) of 27 months. Furthermore, ctDNA predicted tumor recurrence 4 months earlier than imaging techniques. The addition of bevacizumab to the original regimen upon recurrence continued to be beneficial. Pralsetinib demonstrated promising efficacy as adjuvant therapy, while ctDNA analysis offered a valuable tool for early detection of tumor recurrence. By leveraging targeted therapies and innovative monitoring techniques, we aim to improve outcomes and quality of life for NSCLC patients in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rearranged during transfection (RET) gene is one of the receptor tyrosine kinases and cell‐surface molecules responsible for transmitting signals that regulate cell growth and differentiation. In non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion is a rare driver gene alteration associated with a poor prognosis. Fortunately, two selective RET inhibitors (sRETi), namely pralsetinib and selpercatinib, have been approved for treating RET fusion NSCLC due to their remarkable efficacy and safety profiles. These inhibitors have shown the ability to overcome resistance to multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are investigating several second‐generation sRETis that are specifically designed to target solvent front mutations, which pose a challenge for first‐generation sRETis. The effective screening of patients is the first crucial step in the clinical application of RET‐targeted therapy. Currently, four methods are widely used for detecting gene rearrangements: next‐generation sequencing (NGS), reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Each of these methods has its advantages and limitations. To streamline the clinical workflow and improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for RET fusion NSCLC, our expert group has reached a consensus. Our objective is to maximize the clinical benefit for patients and promote standardized approaches to RET fusion screening and therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pralsetinib is a potent, selective RET inhibitor targeting oncogenic RET alterations. As part of the global, phase 1/2 ARROW trial (NCT03037385), the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in Chinese patients with advanced RET fusion‐positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated. Methods: Adult patients with advanced, RET fusion–positive NSCLC with or without prior platinum‐based chemotherapy were enrolled into two cohorts receiving 400‐mg once‐daily oral pralsetinib. Primary end points were objective response rates assessed by blinded independent central review and safety. Results: Of 68 patients enrolled, 37 had received prior platinum‐based chemotherapy (48.6% with ≥3 prior systemic regimens) and 31 were treatment‐naïve. As of March 4, 2022 (data cutoff), of the patients with measurable lesions at baseline, a confirmed objective response was observed in 22 (66.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.2–82.0) of 33 pretreated patients, including 1 (3.0%) complete response and 21 (63.6%) partial responses; and in 25 (83.3%; 95% CI, 65.3–94.4) of 30 treatment‐naïve patients, including two (6.7%) complete responses and 23 (76.7%) partial responses. Median progression‐free survival was 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.7–not estimable) in pretreated patients and 12.7 months (95% CI, 8.9–not estimable) in treatment‐naïve patients. The most common grade 3/4 treatment‐related adverse events in 68 patients were anemia (35.3%) and decreased neutrophil count (33.8%). Eight (11.8%) patients discontinued pralsetinib because of treatment‐related adverse events. Conclusion: Pralsetinib showed robust and durable clinical activity with a well‐tolerated safety profile in Chinese patients with RET fusion‐positive NSCLC. Clinical trial registration: NCT03037385. This study assessed efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in Chinese patients with RET fusion‐positive non–small cell lung cancer who had previously received platinum‐based chemotherapy (n = 37) or were treatment‐naïve (n = 31). Pralsetinib has demonstrated a robust, rapid antitumor activity and an overall well‐tolerated safety profile in Chinese patients with RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This paper presents results from Cohort B (rearranged during transfection [RET], fusion-positive) of the Blood First Assay Screening Trial in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) screened for genetic alterations using blood-based next-generation sequencing. Material and methods: Adults with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC received alectinib 900 mg twice daily (BID) in Phase I. Enrolment closed prematurely with Phase II uninitiated. Results: Among eight treated patients, confirmed best overall responses in evaluable patients were stable disease (4/5) and progressive disease (1/5). One dose-limiting toxicity (death, unknown cause) was considered by the investigator to be related to treatment and underlying disease. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in five patients, and SAEs that may be related to treatment occurred in two patients. Conclusions: Alectinib showed limited activity in advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and further investigation was not conducted due to the development of selective RET inhibitors pralsetinib and selpercatinib. No new safety signals were observed, and the safety profile of alectinib was in line with previous reports at the 600 mg BID dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Changes in the RET gene (like mutations or fusions) are often found in lung and thyroid cancers but are also found in other cancer types. New drugs called "selective RET inhibitors", like selpercatinib and pralsetinib, are effective in treating tumors with RET gene changes. These drugs have been tested in "basket trials" that treat patients based on gene changes in their cancer instead of cancer type. In this review, we discuss how RET gene changes cause cancer, which cancers have these changes, what tests to use, and how well targeted therapies work. RET alterations, such as fusions or mutations, drive the growth of multiple tumor types. These alterations are found in canonical (lung and thyroid) and non-canonical (e.g., gastrointestinal, breast, gynecological, genitourinary, histiocytic) cancers. RET alterations are best identified via comprehensive next-generation sequencing, preferably with DNA and RNA interrogation for fusions. Targeted therapies for RET-dependent cancers have evolved from older multikinase inhibitors to selective inhibitors of RET such as selpercatinib and pralsetinib. Prospective basket trials and retrospective reports have demonstrated the activity of these drugs in a wide variety of RET-altered cancers, notably those with RET fusions. This paved the way for the first tumor-agnostic selective RET inhibitor US FDA approval in 2022. Acquired resistance to RET kinase inhibitors can take the form of acquired resistance mutations (e.g., RET G810X) or bypass alterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions are important genetic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective RET inhibitors are setting a new paradigm in RET-driven NSCLC. However, the real-world treatment patterns, outcomes and toxicity remain largely unknown. Methods: Data from RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients treated in our centre were retrospectively analysed. Of them, patients diagnosed before and after August 2018 were included in analysis of treatment patterns; and patients received selective RET inhibitors were eligible for analysis of adverse events (AEs). Results: Patients diagnosed before August 2018 (n = 30) predominantly received chemotherapy and immunotherapy (83%) as initial therapy, while patients diagnosed after August 2018 (n = 39) mainly received selective RET inhibitors (38.5% at first-line; 50.0% at second-line). In the total 69 patients, overall survival (OS) was prolonged in patients treated with selective RET inhibitors versus untreated patients (median 34.3 versus 17.5 months; p = 0.002) during a median follow-up of 28.7 months. But there was no difference between patients treated with immunotherapy versus untreated patients. In the 38 patients received selective RET inhibition, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.9 months. AEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 42.1% patients and were not associated with PFS (p = 0.63) or OS (p = 0.60). Haematological toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 31.6% patients and was the leading cause of drug discontinuation. Conclusion: Selective RET inhibitors are increasingly being adopted into clinical practice and are associated with improved OS. However, treatment-related ≥ grade 3 AEs, especially haematologic AEs, occur frequently in real-world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An 83‐year‐old woman with RET fusion‐positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma was administered selpercatinib 320 mg/day. Despite the shrinking of the tumour, fever, fatigue, and anorexia developed on day 17. Selpercatinib administration was interrupted. On day 21, elevated blood aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were observed. On day 28, AST and ALT levels increased to demonstrate Grade 4 in CTCAE Ver.5. The patient received a glycyrrhizin‐compounding agent and steroid treatment, and AST and ALT levels gradually decreased. On day 63, selpercatinib 160 mg/day was restarted after improvement of the hepatic disorder. Since then, selpercatinib was continued without any severe adverse events. Selpercatinib is a reasonable treatment option for RET fusion‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer even in older patients. However, old age may be a risk factor for adverse events including hepatic disorders. For safe treatment in such patients, careful follow‐up is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thyroid cancer is the most frequent malignancy of the endocrine system, of which papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the predominant form with a rapid increasing incidence worldwide. Rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions are common genetic drivers of PTC and the potent RET inhibitor selpercatinib has been recently approved for treating advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer. In this study we aimed to develop a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) system to accurately detect RET fusion in PTC samples. Methods: The frequency and distribution of RET fusions in PTC were analyzed using genomic data of 402 PTC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. To establish the ddPCR system for detecting CCDC6::RET fusion, a plasmid containing CCDC6::RET infusion fragment was constructed as standard template, the annealing temperature and concentrations of primers and probe were optimized. The analytical performance of ddPCR and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) were assessed in standard templates and tissue samples from 112 PTC patients. Sanger sequencing was performed in all the RET fusion-positive samples identified by ddPCR. Results: RET fusions were observed in 25 (6.2%) of the 402 TCGA samples, and 15 (60%) of the RET fusion-positive patients had the CCDC6::RET fusion. Compared with qRT-PCR, the ddPCR method showed a lower limit of detection (128.0 and 430.7 copies/reaction for ddPCR and qRT-PCR, respectively). When applying the two methods to 112 tissue samples of PTC, eleven (9.8%) CCDC6::RET fusion-positive samples were detected by qRT-PCR, while ddPCR identified 4 additional positive samples (15/112, 13.4%). All the CCDC6::RET fusion-positive cases identified by ddPCR were confirmed by Sanger sequencing except for one case with 0.14 copies/uL of the fusion. Conclusion: The accurate and sensitive ddPCR method reported here is powerful to detection CCDC6::RET fusion in PTC samples, application of this method would benefit more RET fusion-positive patients in the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RET-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selpercatinib and pralsetinib have revolutionized the landscape of RET-positive (RET+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, thanks to their efficacy and safety profiles. This class of medications currently represents the standard of care for both naïve and patients that have not received selective RET-TKIs in the first-line setting. However, we presently lack a satisfactory understanding of resistance mechanism developing after selective RET-TKIs usage, as well as a specific treatment for patients progressing on selpercatinib or pralsetinib. Chemotherapy ± immunotherapy is considered as a recommended subsequent second-line regimen in these patients. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to better define and understand the resistance mechanisms triggered by RET-TKIs. With this in mind, the present review article has been conceived to provide a comprehensive overview about RET+ advanced NSCLC, both from a therapeutic and molecular point of view. Besides comparing the clinical outcome achieved in RET+ advanced NSCLC patients after multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) and/or RET-selective TKIs' administration, we focused on the molecular mechanisms accountable for their long-term resistance. Finally, a critical perspective on many of today's most debated issues and concerns is provided, with the purpose of shaping the possible pharmacological approaches for tomorrow's therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• RET fusion accounted for1%-2% NSCLC. • Pralsetinib is effective for advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion. • A favorable safety profile was observed for pralsetinib. Pralsetinib, a selective RET targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC in adults who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy in China. In this retrospective analysis conducted at Hunan Cancer Hospital in China, we examined 36 patients with advanced NSCLC with RET fusion, who were treated with pralsetinib between January 2021 and December 2023. The study focused on assessing the efficacy (Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) and safety profile of pralsetinib in these patients. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. The results revealed that pralsetinib exhibited significant activity in this patient cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a median PFS of 10.7 months and a median OS of 21.2 months. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 55.6 % and 72.2 %, respectively. Pralsetinib was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild to moderate (grades 1–2). The most common serious adverse events (≥grade 3) observed were lymphopenia (13.9 %), hypertension (11.1 %), leukopenia (8.3 %), neutropenia (8.3 %), and creatine kinase elevation (8.3 %). Pralsetinib demonstrated promising activity in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion with a favorable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RET fusions are present in 1%-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib, a highly potent, oral, central nervous system-penetrant, selective RET inhibitor, previously demonstrated clinical activity in patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC in the phase I/II ARROW study, including among treatment-naive patients. We report an updated analysis from the ARROW study. ARROW is a multi-cohort, open-label, phase I/II study. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (later 0-1). Patients initiated pralsetinib at the recommended phase II dose of 400 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerance, consent withdrawal, or investigator's decision. The co-primary endpoints (phase II) were overall response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review and safety. Between 17 March 2017 and 6 November 2020 (data cut-off), 281 patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC were enrolled. The ORR was 72% [54/75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 60% to 82%] for treatment-naive patients and 59% (80/136; 95% CI 50% to 67%) for patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy (enrolment cut-off for efficacy analysis: 22 May 2020); median duration of response was not reached for treatment-naive patients and 22.3 months for prior platinum-based chemotherapy patients. Tumour shrinkage was observed in all treatment-naive patients and in 97% of patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy; median progression-free survival was 13.0 and 16.5 months, respectively. In patients with measurable intracranial metastases, the intracranial response rate was 70% (7/10; 95% CI 35% to 93%); all had received prior systemic treatment. In treatment-naive patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC who initiated pralsetinib by the data cut-off (n = 116), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (18%), hypertension (10%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (9%), and lymphopenia (9%). Overall, 7% (20/281) discontinued due to TRAEs. Pralsetinib treatment produced robust efficacy and was generally well tolerated in treatment-naive patients with advanced RET fusion–positive NSCLC. Results from the confirmatory phase III AcceleRET Lung study (NCT04222972) of pralsetinib versus standard of care in the first-line setting are pending. • Pralsetinib produced an ORR of 72% in treatment-naive patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC. • Pralsetinib was generally well tolerated and there were no new safety signals. • The confirmatory phase III AcceleRET Lung study (NCT04222972) of pralsetinib versus standard of care in the first-line setting is ongoing [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standard treatment for unresectable papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is a multi-kinase inhibitor, including lenvatinib and sorafenib. Rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions are found in approximately 10% of PTC. Here, we present a case of metastatic RET fusion-positive PTC with long-term disease control by selective RET inhibition. A 72-year-old woman with PTC and multiple lymph nodes and lung metastases progressed after initial lenvatinib and subsequent sorafenib treatment. Reintroduction of lenvatinib led to marked tumour shrinkage. During the rechallenge with lenvatinib, molecular screening of the tumour specimen revealed a CCDC6-RET gene fusion. The patient was enrolled in a phase 1/2 trial of the potent and specific RET inhibitor selpercatinib. All target and non-target lesions responded to selpercatinib in parallel with a remarkable decrease in serum thyroglobulin levels. Although a new lesion appeared in the right adrenal gland 14 months after the initiation of selpercatinib, ongoing stable disease was observed in all lesions over 28 months, including the new adrenal lesion. Adverse events included grade 3 fatigue, grade 2 anorexia, and grade 4 thrombocytopaenia but were easily manageable by suspension and dose reduction of selpercatinib. Selective kinase inhibition with selpercatinib provides RET fusion-positive PTC with clinical benefits, even in patients heavily pre-treated with multi-kinase inhibitors. This case supports the importance of routine molecular profiling in patients with PTC to identify uncommon but actionable gene alterations, such as RET gene fusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate genetic variations and the relationships between these genetic variations and clinicopathological features of high-recurrence risk papillary thyroid carcinoma in a southern Chinese population. Methods: One hundred sixty-eight patients of high-recurrence risk papillary thyroid carcinoma were recruited for this study from 2017 to 2018. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and the data of clinicopathological characteristics were all collected and analyzed from these patients. We used next-generation sequencing technology to investigate the targeted gene mutations and gene fusions of the pathology specimens. Results: The frequency of candidate tumor driver gene mutation was 85.1% in 143 patients, including BRAF V600E mutation in 119 patients(70.8%), RET fusion in 13 patients(7.7%), TERT promoter mutations in 11 patients(6.5%), RAS (HRAS, NRAS, KRAS) gene mutations in 10 patients(6.0%), and other mutations involving TP53, PIK3CA, AKT1, PTEN and NTRK1. Concomitant presence of more than two genetic aberrations was seen in 27 patients (16.1%). Our study showed that BRAF V600E mutation is highly correlated with conventional PTC (p < 0.001), BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutation duet was associated with older patient age (> 45, p = 0.003) and higher disease stage of III or IV (p = 0.002). RAS gene and BRAF V600E co-mutations were only seen in multifocal PTC (p = 0.015). Conclusion: In our high-recurrence risk PTC cohort, most patients had more than one driver gene aberration. Coexistence of BRAF V600E with TERT promoter mutations or with RAS mutations were significantly correlated with worse clinicopathological characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ongoing investigations of targeted therapeutic agents and their increased clinical applications, together with research in genomics and proteomics, have explored a variety of novel approaches for treatment of lung cancer, and 'molecular subtypes' have been defined based on specific actionable genetic aberrations. Liquid biopsies, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing, are of value for cancer diagnosis and comprehensive genomic profiling, such as the identification of cancer subtypes and major genetic alterations in cancer cells. The case of a 66-year-old male patient with newly-diagnosed driver mutation-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent conventional therapy is described in the present report. The patient underwent regular monitoring, including continuous ctDNA analysis, imaging and assessment of tumor marker levels such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The patient initially presented with deep vein thrombosis which affected both lower extremities and without any symptoms in the lung, with a positron emission tomography scan identifying irregular pulmonary nodules in the right lower lobe and enlarged right supraclavicular lymph nodes. Subsequent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with nodule biopsy indicated advanced unresectable disease at stage IIIB based on the Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system by the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue and peripheral blood confirmed driver mutation-negative genes, including epidermal growth factor receptor, rat sarcoma, ALK receptor tyrosine kinase, ROS1 proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase and rearrangement during transfection (RET). After 5 years of chemoradiotherapy and surveillance of ctDNA and CEA levels, detectable kinesin family member 5B (KIF5B)-RET fusion in ctDNA and rising CEA levels prompted early scans, which identified disease progression. The patient subsequently received the oral RET inhibitor pralsetinib, with treatment being currently ongoing for ≥17 months without detectable KIF5B-RET ctDNA or elevated CEA levels, with an ongoing minor response and stable disease based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 on imaging. The present case illustrates the potential role of on-therapy circulating tumor biomarker monitoring as a non-traumatic method to evaluate therapy response and detect early disease progression in patients with advanced NSCLC. Integration of circulating tumor biomarker testing into the management of patients with advanced NSCLC requires additional prospective studies to actively assess and elucidate optimal treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives RET fusions have been reported in 1–2% of lung adenocarcinomas, and represent an actionable target. Patients whose tumors possess RET fusion are associated with clinical benefit from the treatment with multi-kinase inhibitors such as cabozantinib and vandetanib. Further molecular screening for RET fusions is warranted. Novel KIF13A-RET fusion containing an intact RET kinase domain involving exons 1–18 of KIF13A and exons 12–20 of RET was identified in a lung cancer specimen from an 74-year-old Asian never smoker by next-generation sequencing (NGS) during clinical care. The patient was negative for EGFR , ALK , ROS1 and other putative driver alterations. Fusion analysis is consistent with other described RET fusions and is predicted to result in aberrant constitutive activation caused by dimerization and sensitivity to RET-directed therapies. We describe a novel RET-fusion with molecular characteristics consistent with RET-driven non-small cell lung cancer. Our case expands the spectrum of RET fusion partners and supports broad molecular profiling in non-small cell lung cancer optimizing patient therapeutic options. The new RET fusion has immediate clinical implications for cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]