Georgas, James, Mylonas, Kostas, Bafiti, Tsabika, Poortinga, Ype H., Christakopoulou, Sophia, Kagitcibasi, Cigdem, Kwak, Kyunghwa, Ataca, Bilge, Berry, John, Orung, Sabiha, Sunar, Diane, Charalambous, Neophytos, Goodwin, Robin, Wang, Wen-Zhong, Angleitner, Alois, Stepanikova, Irena, Pick, Susan, Givaudan, Martha, Zhuravliova-Gionis, Irina, and Konantambigi, Rajani
This study investigated the relationship between culture, structural aspects of the nuclear and extended family, and functional aspects of the family, that is, emotional distance, social interaction, and communication, as well as geographical proximity. The focus was on the functional aspects of family, defined as members of the nuclear family (mother, father, and their children) and the extended family (grandmother/grandfather, aunt/uncle, cousins). Sixteen cultures participated in this study, with a total number of 2587 participants. The first hypothesis, that the pattern of scores on the psychological measures and the behavioral outcomes are similar across cultures, an indication of cultural universality, was supported. The second hypothesis, that functional relations between members of the nuclear family and their kin are maintained in high-affluent and low-affluent cultures, and that differences in functional relationships in high- and low-affluent cultures are a matter of degree, was also supported by the findings. The results suggest that it is less meaningful in cross-cultural family studies to ask questions about the structure of the family, than to ask about the functional relationships between members of the nuclear family and their kin. In looking only at the nuclear family, one focuses only on those residing in the household, but ignores those important members of the extended family who may reside nearby and their significant relationships with the members of the nuclear family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]