Search

Indacaterol (IND; 150 μg), glycopyrronium (GLY; 50 μg) and mometasone furoate (MF; 160 μg [high-dose ICS] and 80 μg [medium-dose ICS]) have been formulated as a once-daily (o.d.) fixed-dose combination treatment delivered via the Breezhaler® device for the treatment of patients with asthma. In this randomized (n = 116), double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, three-period cross-over study we evaluated the benefit of o.d. IND/GLY/MF versus twice daily (b.i.d.) salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC; 50/500 μg; high-dose ICS) treatment (NCT03063086). Overall, 107 patients completed the study. The study met its primary objective by demonstrating superiority of o.d. IND/GLY/MF at medium and high-dose ICS over b.i.d. SFC (high-dose ICS) in peak FEV1 after 21 days of treatment (+ 172 mL with high-dose and + 159 mL with medium-dose IND/GLY/MF versus SFC, p < 0.0001 for each comparison). We also observed that a higher percentage of patients did not need rescue medicine with IND/GLY/MF (high-dose ICS, 58%; medium-dose ICS, 52%) compared with SFC (45%) during the last week of each treatment period. Study treatments were well-tolerated with no relevant differences in tolerability between both IND/GLY/MF doses and SFC. In conclusion, both doses of IND/GLY/MF provided superior lung function benefits compared with twice-daily, standard-of-care SFC at the highest approved dose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, (Identifier: NCT03063086), EudraCT start date: May 11, 2017; First patient first visit / study initiation date: May 31, 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Bimagrumab is a human monoclonal antibody inhibitor of activin type II receptors (ActRII), with anabolic action on skeletal muscle mass by blocking binding of myostatin and other negative regulators of muscle growth. Bimagrumab is under evaluation for muscle wasting and associated functional loss in hip fracture and sarcopenia, and in obesity. Bimagrumab also blocks other endogenous ActRII ligands, such as activins, which act on the neurohormonal axes, pituitary, gonads and adrenal glands. Aim: To evaluate the effect of bimagrumab on the pituitary‐gonadal and pituitary‐adrenal axes in humans. Methods: Healthy men and women, aged 55 to 75 years, received bimagrumab intravenously 10 mg/kg or placebo on Day 1 and Day 29. Pituitary‐gonadal and pituitary‐adrenal functions were evaluated with basal hormone measurement and standard gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests at baseline, Week 8 and at the end of study (EOS)—Week 20. Results: At Week 8, follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were reduced by 42.16 IU/L (P < .001) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were increased by 2.5 IU/L (P = .08) over placebo in response to bimagrumab in women but not in men. Effects that were reversible after bimagrumab was cleared. Gonadal and adrenal androgen levels were not affected by exposure to bimagrumab. Conclusion: Bimagrumab alters the function of pituitary gonadotroph cells, consistent with blockade of activin on local ActRII. This effect is reversible with clearance of bimagrumab. Bimagrumab did not impact gonadal and adrenal androgen secretion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Pradigastat, a novel diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor, is under development to treat familial chylomicronemia syndrome. The potential impact of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of pradigastat was evaluated in this study. Methods: In this study, a single oral dose of 20 mg pradigastat was administered first to patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment ( n = 10/group) and subsequently to patients with severe hepatic impairment ( n = 6). The pharmacokinetics of pradigastat were compared between each patient group and the respective matched healthy subjects. Results: As compared with the respective matched healthy groups, the geometric mean ratios of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) (h·ng/mL) were 1.49, 1.06 and 1.99 in mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment patients, respectively; the observed maximum plasma concentration ( C) (ng/mL) values were 0.97, 1.28 and 2.74, respectively; and the total body clearance of the drug from plasma (CL/ F) (L/h) values were 0.67, 0.95 and 0.50, respectively. The elimination half-life and plasma protein binding of pradigastat were comparable among all the patients. There were no apparent relationships between AUC or C and albumin or bilirubin levels ( R < 0.3; p > 0.05). Overall, 19 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 13 patients. The incidence of AEs appeared to increase with increasing severity of hepatic impairment. Conclusion: No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of pradigastat were observed in mild and moderate hepatic impairment patients compared with healthy subjects. However, the systemic exposure of pradigastat doubled while the clearance decreased by half in patients with severe hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. All treatments were well tolerated in the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]