Search

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based clinical pathway designed to standardize and optimize care. We studied the impact of ERAS and sought to identify the most important recommendations to predict shorter length of stay (LOS) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing PD at our institution between January 2014 and June 2018. We compared clinicopathologic outcomes for patients before and after ERAS implementation. We defined "A-recommendations" as those that were graded "strong" and had "moderate" or "high" levels of evidence. We then compared outcomes of the ERAS group with adherence to "A-recommendations" and performed a subset analysis of "A-recommendations" over the first 72 h after surgery, which we termed "early factors". A total of 191 patients underwent PD during the study period. We excluded 87 patients who had minimally invasive PD (22), vascular reconstruction (53), or both (12). Of the 104 patients studied, 56 (54%) were pre–ERAS and 48 (46%) were ERAS. There were no differences in comorbidities or demographics between these groups, and morbidity, mortality, and readmission rates were also similar (P > 0.6). Median LOS was 3.5 d shorter in the ERAS group (7 versus 10.5 d, P < 0.001). Adherence to "A-recommendations" within ERAS was associated with a decreased LOS (r = −0.52 P = 0.0001). Patients with >5 "early factors" had a median LOS of 6 d, whereas patients with <5 "early factors" had a median LOS of 9 d (P = 0.008). ERAS is an effective protocol that standardizes care and reduces LOS after PD. Implementation of ERAS resulted in a 3.5-day reduction in our LOS with no change in morbidity, mortality, or readmissions. Adherence to ERAS protocol "A-recommendations" and ≥5 "early factors" may be predictive of shortened LOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Urologic complications are thought to be the most common surgical complication of renal transplantation. Ureteral pathology, including stenosis, urine leak, and vesicoureteral reflux, predominates. Although endourologic and interventional radiological management may be utilized, failure rates remain relatively high and surgical reconstruction remains the definitive management. Robotic ureteral reconstruction has been demonstrated to provide patient benefit in nontransplant populations, but the literature on transplant reconstruction is very limited. This study reports an additional series of patients with a focus on surgical technique, as well as reviews the available evidence for robotic reconstruction for post-transplant ureteral complications. Methods: All institutional patients undergoing robotic-assisted reconstruction for post-transplant ureteral complications for the years 2019–2022 were included. Intra- and postoperative variables, patient demographics, and follow-up data were obtained retrospectively from parsing of patient records. Statistics were tabulated descriptively. Results: Eleven patients underwent ureteral reconstruction. Of the 11, 9 (81%) were male with a mean age of 51.9 years (16–70) and BMI of 33.8 (24.3–49.1). The most common (10/11) indication for reconstruction was stricture; the most common (10/11) technique used was Lich-Gregoir reimplantation. Mean operative time was 288 minutes (143–500). There were no intra- or immediate postoperative complications. Median length of stay was 2 days (1–22). There were two incidences of mortality at 2 and 5 months postoperatively unrelated to surgery. There were four readmissions within 30 days, three for urinary tract infection (UTI) and one for a pelvic abscess which required washout. The remainder of the cohort has been followed for a mean of 14.6 months (6–41) without any incidences of graft loss or recurrence of ureteral pathology. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted ureteral reconstruction is a technically challenging but highly feasible technique that may provide the benefits of minimally invasive surgery while still allowing definitive reconstruction. Centers with extensive robotic capabilities should consider the technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At early stages of the pandemic, most organ procurements organizations considered COVID-19 infected donors to be ineligible for organ donation. The aim of this survey is to describe the current practices of the utilization of COVID-19 positive organs donors among American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) members. An anonymous 40-question redcap survey was emailed to ASTS members from June to August 2022. One hundred forty-nine surveys from 10 countries were included for analysis. The majority of the responders were men (66.7%) from North America (95%) and identified as transplant surgeons (68.5%). Most work at academic institutions (76.5%). Almost all responders (94%) were willing to accept an organ from a donor with a history of COVID-19 who tested negative at the time of donation, however, there was no consensus on the length of time after the disease was resolved. Approximately 70% indicated they accept organs from asymptomatic donors with active disease. Only 32 responders indicated they would accept an organ from an individual with a history of "severe" COVID-19 infection and less than one third of the responders would accept an organ from a donor who died from COVID-19 infection. Interestingly, 80% indicated they have protocols at their institution to guide the acceptance of such organs. Despite new evidence that the transmission of COVID-19 in non-lung organs is extremely rare, the results of this survey suggest significant heterogeneity in practice and perceptions of the use of COVID-19 positive organs across international centers. We suggest that the implementation of a standardized protocol is of paramount importance to continue safe transplant activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pernicious health disparities have been reported in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Few tools exist to screen patients in order to facilitate educational and outreach initiatives. We hypothesize that neighborhood-level socioeconomic metrics such as the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) can predict inferior outcomes in patients with early-stage HCC. A single institution's retrospective review of patients with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Stage I HCC between 2000 and 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate models were constructed to identify clinical and socioeconomic variables correlated with treatment-specific survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival differences between cohorts. A total of 558 patients were included in this study with newly diagnosed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Stage I HCC. Multivariate models demonstrated native model of end-stage liver disease, largest tumor size, insurance type, the distance to our transplant center, and the ADI score, a validated metric for a patient's socioeconomic status, are independent risk factors for worse overall survival (all P -values < 0.05). Concerningly, despite similar maximal tumor size, number of tumors, and native model of end-stage liver disease scores, patients from high ADI neighborhoods are 20% less likely to receive surgical treatment, especially liver transplantation. The ADI is a useful tool for identifying patients at the time of presentation who are at risk for inferior treatment for early stage HCC, and the ADI should be incorporated as a social vital sign. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) components for liver resection lack standardization and compliance. We evaluated our ERAS protocol and describe the association of postoperative ERAS compliance with length of stay (LOS) and complications. We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing liver resection at our institution from 2016 to 2020. Pre- and post-ERAS outcomes and compliance at 72 h were compared with LOS and complications. LOS beyond 72 h was defined as LOS72. 210 patients were included. Post-ERAS patients had significantly shorter LOS (5.1 vs. 7.3 days, p = 0.0014) with no difference in 30-day mortality, morbidity, or readmissions. ERAS components associated with shorter LOS72 were regular diet (HR 1.73), fluid discontinuation (HR 1.63), drain removal (HR 1.94), multimodal and oral analgesia (HR 1.51), and ambulation >100 ft (HR 2.23). LOS72 was 1-day for ≥9 ERAS component compliance, 4-days for 6–8 components, and 6-days for <6 components. 30-day complication rates for patients with ≥9 components by postoperative day 3 (POD3) were significantly lower than those with 6–8 (12 vs 32%). ERAS decreases LOS after liver resection. Nutritional advancement, drain discontinuation, multimodal and oral analgesia, and ambulation >100 ft by POD3 are associated with decreased LOS72. Achieving ≥6 components by POD3 predicts decreased LOS72 and complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]