1. INTERDISCIPLINARYNESS AND DIFFERENT APPROACHES OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS.
- Author
-
ARSENIJEVIĆ, Olja M. and PERIĆ, Nenad N.
- Subjects
- *
CRITICAL discourse analysis , *ECLECTICISM , *SOCIAL sciences , *SOCIAL theory , *SUBJECTIVITY - Abstract
Critical discourse analysis cannot be defined as one-way, nor as a specific branch of linguistics that deals with discourse studies. In the paper, the authors advocate the thesis that critical discourse analysis is not a discipline or a theory, but that eclecticism is significant for it, as it is characterized by a non-unique theoretical framework and methodological apparatus. Or, on the other hand, it can be pursued within or in combination with any approach or sub-discipline of the humanities or social sciences. The paper presents the approaches of different world authors (Vezovnik, Meyer, van Dijk, Wodak, Rasmussen, Ager, etc.) to critical discourse analysis, and through their analysis it is pointed out that critical discourse analysis is used by epistemological theories, general social theories, theories of the middle range and microsociological, social-psychological, discursive and linguistic theories. Approaches that are critically determined according to the analyzed texts are grouped under this name. Critical analysis is a key element by which critical discourse analysis approaches differ from linguistic style analyses, which do not consider language in relation to society, and therefore do not thematize the relationship between language, power and ideology. CDA critically approaches social problems by using language to expose power relations that are often hidden, while at the same time trying to reach practically relevant conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023