Search

To evaluate the outcome of Undifferentiated Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas (UCNT) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB), following induction chemotherapy. Between January 2006 and June 2009, 52 patients with stage II B-IVA/B UCNT were treated either with linac-IMRT or Tomotherapy. All patients were scheduled to receive three cycles of cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 38.5months (range 12.3-64.1), 3year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and DFS by T2a-2b and T3-T4-stage were 95.0%, 84.6%, 89.0%, and 78.0%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, none of the examined prognostic factors reported statistical significance. N-classification was not a significant predictive factor for either OS or development of distant metastases. T-stage alone had a borderline effect on DFS and development of metastases. No difference between Tomotherapy and linac-IMRT emerged in terms of loco-regional control and development of severe, acute, and late toxicities. The most significant severe, acute toxicities were grade 3 (32.7%) and grade 4 (7.7%) mucositis. No grades 3 and 4 late toxicities were observed. The most commonly observed late effect was xerostomia, 11.5% patients complained grade 2 xerostomia. The severity of grade 2 xerostomia diminished over time with only four patients not improving salivation. IMRT-SIB following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was very satisfactory in terms of local control, regional control, DFS and OS rates in patients with stage IIB to IVB UCNT. In our experience, adding concurrent chemotherapy to IMRT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in loco-regional widespread disease resulted to be the indicated approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G. Fanetti, V. Lupato, J. Polesel, C. Gobitti, E. Minatel, F. Matrone, A. Revelant, A. Caroli, F. Elisabetta, V. Giacomarra, E. Vaccher, G. Franchin, Poster discussion: CL: Head and neck 2 PD-0662: Can PNI and BMI predict severe radiation induced toxicities in Head and Neck cancer?. [Extracted from the article]

The aim of this study is to assess the impact of prognostic factors in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), WHO type II-III, treated with two different radiation therapy (RT) schedules: standard radiation therapy (SRT), and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HART), with or without sequential chemotherapy. Between January 1986 and December 1999, 78 consecutive NPC patients were treated either with SRT (until August 1993) or with HART (from September 1993). Of the 78 patients, 60 were males and 18 females, the median age was 56 years (range 14–83). Nine patients had a non-keratinizing carcinoma (WHO type II) and 69 an undifferentiated carcinoma (WHO type III). Five-year overall survival rate (OS) was 62%. Two months after RT, 73 patients were in complete remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 5 years were: 85% for the HART and 59% for the SRT group, respectively. A multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio, HR=4.17 for &ges; 60 vs. <50 years) and N-stage (HR=3.56 for N3a-N3b vs. N0-N1) were significant for survival, whereas N-stage (HR=8.23 for N3a-N3b vs. N0-N1) and RT schedule (HR=0.30 for HART vs. SRT) were significant for DFS. In our experience, HART achieved higher DFS rates than SRT; however, HART did not favourably affect OS. Toxicity was comparable in the two RT schedules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]