Pandolpho, Bruna Teixeira, da Fontoura Klein, Antonio Henrique, Dutra, Isadora, Mahiques, Michel M., Viana, Adriano R., Bueno, Gilmar Vital, Machado, Arthur Antonio, Camargo, Yuri L., Hercos, Cízia M., Lima, Yhaohannah, Filho, Antonio Fernando H.F., and Theodoro, Carlos E.
A new mixed turbidite-contourite system is described in the northern Campos Basin, southeastern Brazilian margin. This system is developed in a middle slope setting, and was formed through non-synchronous interaction between the turbidity current and a contour current in the same stratigraphic interval (Miocene). Depositional cycles were differentiated based on diagnostic seismic features. Seismic attributes, seismic facies, and isochron maps were used to identify alternating cycles of downslope and alongslope processes in the study area, along with the intermediate stage with features from both processes (mixed system). Seismic units were then associated with the dominant type of current. Alongslope current activity can be distinguished from the downslope current based on its acoustic characteristics (mainly low root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude values), internal architecture (clinoforms), and external geometry pattern (alongslope trend). On the other hand, downslope gravity currents develop deposits with high-amplitude or chaotic seismic facies, usually higher values of RMS amplitude, channel or channel-lobe features, erosive surfaces, and a basinward depositional trend. The first and oldest seismic unit (S1) was interpreted as a dominantly alongslope system, with vertical aggrading sigmoidal clinoforms and high-frequency, low-amplitude reflections commonly associated with fine-grained sedimentary deposits, typical of a plastered drift, along with a basinward mass transport deposit (MTD) from previous drift instability. Seismic unit S2 represents the intermediate stage where both gravity-driven and along-slope currents act asynchronously. Its is refered to as a mixed turbidite-contourite sequence that shows high-amplitude sediment waves migrating upslope and a moat feature that is carved in its upslope front. The interfingering between high- and low-amplitude reflectors, distal chaotic facies, together with sediment waves and a channel moat, points to a sand-rich deposit reworked by northward-flowing contour currents. Seismic units S3 and S4 show downslope features with chaotic facies (S3) and paleochannels with coarse basal lag deposits (high RMS amplitude values) (S4). In S4, a series of long-lived submarine channels formed. Last, seismic unit S5, referred to as the second plastered drift sequence, is marked by low-amplitude clinoforms that thin basinward. At the seafloor, submarine channel banks (formed at S4) covered by fine sediment deposits (from S5) show asymmetrical features with a slight northward depositional trend, indicating a northward-flowing bottom current, as the deposits are known to pile up in a downcurrent trend. Important information on the paleocurrents' direction was also made based on the final deposits display (e.g. terraces, sediment waves, paleochannels). Research on alternating dominant processes and transitional stages or mixed depositional systems, with both turbidites and contour currents, may provide a better understanding of deep-water depositional processes. Because these processes do not always fit previous depositional models that are mainly described for synchronous systems, new insights on cyclic non-synchronous mixed systems can improve our understanding of how mixed systems are organized through time and space. Being able to determine which were the dominant processes that controlled the sedimentation by indicating periods where the margin was mostly submitted to sediment transfer from continent to the basin and periods where the oceanic currents prevailed by redistributing sediments along the isobaths and replacing the axis of downslope transfer conduits. Setting new models on cyclic deposits and intermediate stages can have a future economic impact on potential hydrocarbon reservoir architecture. • A new description of a non-synchronous Mixed Turbidite-Contourite System. • Alternated and cyclic deposits of down-slope and along-slope processes with a transitional stage of flow interaction. • Dominant flow depositional systems identification based on seismic response. • How mixed systems are organized through time and space. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]