Search

Objective The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study clarified the indications and contraindications for postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). We studied the impact of the WHI results on the risk of fatal stroke in HT users in Finland. Study design Retrospective analysis setting : Nationwide registers on postmenopausal HT use and causes of death between 1995 and 2009. Population Women ≥40 years ( n = 290,272) using systemic estradiol-based postmenopausal HT. Methods Follow-up started from the first HT purchase during the pre-WHI era (1995–2001) and post-WHI era (2002–2009). Main outcome measures Stroke deaths in HT users were compared with that in the age-matched background population and expressed as standardized mortality ratio (SMR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Overall, 311 HT users died due to stroke. The exposure to HT ≤1 year was associated with a similarly reduced 22% (0.67–0.91) risk of stroke death in the pre-WHI era and in the post-WHI era 27% (0.55–0.94). The risk reductions for HT exposure of 1–8 years in the pre-WHI era (47%, 0.42–0.65) did not differ from that in the post-WHI era (32%, 0.48–0.94). The discontinuation of HT was accompanied by a significant 33% (1.02–1.72) increase in stroke death risk in the pre-WHI era and a non-significant 32% (0.84–1.99) increase in the post-WHI era within the first post-treatment year, but no longer after 1–8 years. Conclusions The change in prescribing policy after the WHI study did not affect the risk of fatal stroke in Finnish HT users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether coronary heart ahhdisease mortality in Finnish hormone therapy (HT) users differed before and after 2002 when the Women's Health Initiative study was published. METHODS: The risks of coronary heart disease death in HT users in relation to the age-matched background population were compared between the pre- (1995-2001) and post- (2002-2009) Women's Health Initiative eras. We used a nationwide register on HT (ie, estradiol with or without progestin) reimbursement and linked them to causes of death in 290,272 women aged 40 years or older. RESULTS: Exposure to HT for 1 year or less was accompanied by a 29% reduction (0.71; 0.63-0.80; three per 10,000 fewer deaths) and an exposure of 1-8 years with a 43% reduction (0.57; 0.48-0.66; three per 10,000 fewer deaths) in the risk of coronary heart disease death in the pre-Women's Health Initiative era. In the post- Women's Health Initiative era, HT use of 1 year or less was associated with an 18% reduction (0.82; 0.76-1.00; one per 10,000 fewer deaths) and an exposure of 1-8 years with a 54% reduction (0.46; 0.32-0.64; two per 10.0 fewer deaths) in coronary heart disease mortality. Discontinuation of HT was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death of 42% (1.42; 1.17-1.71; seven per 10.0 extra deaths) in the pre-Women's Health Initiative era and 31% (1.31; 0.92-1.82; two per 10,000 extra deaths) in the post-Women's Health Initiative era during the first posttreatment year. This risk increase vanished in further follow-up during both eras. CONCLUSION: Changes in HT use after the Women's Health Initiative failed to affect coronary heart disease mortality of HT users in this nationwide study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Insufficient data exist on the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy as the risk factor for uterine sarcomas. We therefore evaluated the association of estradiol–progestin therapy (EPT) with the risk of uterine sarcoma in nation-wide cohort study. Methods: All Finnish women (>50years of age) who had used EPT during the years 1994–2008 for at least 6months (n=243,857) were identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry. Their incidence of uterine stromal and leiomyosarcoma among the EPT users was compared to that in the background population with the aid of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Results: A total of 76 uterine sarcomas were encountered in the EPT cohort; 45 (59%) were leiomyosarcomas, 24 (32%) stromal sarcomas and 7 (9%) other sarcomas. The exposure to EPT for less than 5years did not associate with significant rises in the sarcoma risk but longer exposure was accompanied with significant risk elevations for all uterine sarcomas: the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for 5–10years of use was 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–2.9 and for ≥10years of use 3.0 (1.3–5.9): the SIRs were highest for leiomyosarcoma. The sequential and continuous uses of progestin were associated with similar increased SIRs for uterine sarcoma. Conclusions: The use of EPT for 5years or more is associated with an increased risk for uterine sarcomas. This turns to an absolute excess risk of 2–3 extra uterine sarcoma cases per 10,000 long-time EPT users followed for 10years. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a study which aims to estimate the risk of endometrial cancer in all Finnish postmenopausal women with the use of various forms of estradiol-progestin therapy. The study identified 224,015 women who used estradiol-progestin therapy from 1994-2006. A total of 1,364 incidence of endometrial cancer in therapy users was compared with the general population. It reveals that the use of a continuous estradiol-progestin regimen decreases the risk of endometrial cancer.

The article offers information on the risk of breast cancer in women undergoing progestogen therapy, using estradiol. A study was conducted among Finnish women using postmenopausal estradiol. The result of the study revealed that the use of estradiol in progestogen therapy has increased the risk for breast cancer.

The article discusses a study of Finnish women aged above 50 years which evaluated whether the risk of estrogen-only therapy on breast cancer varies by dose, constituent, and route of administration. It notes two to three extra cases of breast cancer per 1,000 women for orally or transdermally administered estradiol for five years or more. No risks of breast cancer were associated with oral estradiol use for less than five years, oral estradiol, or vaginal estrogens.

Study Question: Does the use of post-menopausal vaginal estradiol (VE) affect the mortality risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke.Summary Answer: The use of VE reduces the risk for cardiovascular mortality.What Is Known Already: A growing number of women use VE for post-menopausal genitourinary symptoms. Although this therapy is intended to have only local effects, estrogen is absorbed into the blood circulation and thus VE use may also have systemic effects.Study Design, Size, Duration: We studied a nationwide cohort in Finland 1994-2009 during which post-menopausal women (n = 195 756) initiated the use of VE (age [mean ± SD] 65.7 ± 10.9 years). Follow-up data gathered 1.4 million women-years and we assessed the mortality risk due to CHD (n= 9656) or stroke (n = 4294).Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: The mortality risk in VE users was compared with that in the age-matched background population (standardized mortality ratio; [SMR]; 95% confidence interval) and related to various durations of exposure to VE (1 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, >5 to ≤10 and >10 years).Main Results and the Role Of Chance: The use of VE was accompanied by decreases in the risk for CHD and stroke death. The risk reduction for CHD death was highest for >3 to ≤5 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.70) and for stroke for >5 to ≤10 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.72). The risk reductions for both CHD and stroke mortality were detected in all age groups with the highest risk reduction being in women aged 50-59 years (SMR 0.43; 0.19-0.88 and SMR 0.21; 0.06-0.58, respectively).Limitations, Reasons For Caution: Our series lack a placebo arm and thus, may harbor a healthy woman bias. Moreover, data on clinical variables such as weight, smoking, blood pressure and family background were unobtainable for this study. Women using both VE and systemic hormone therapy (HT) were included in the comparator background population. This should not cause any significant error because the proportion of women using VE or other HT was modest (<10% in age-matched population) and because the use of systemic HT also reduces death risks in the same population. Our data cannot be directly applied for local regimens containing conjugated equine estrogens, because they are absorbed differently and may show effects that differ from those of estradiol.Wider Implications Of the Findings: In 1000 women using VE for up to 10 years, a maximum of 24 fewer CHD deaths and 18 fewer stroke deaths is likely to occur.Study Funding/competing Interests: This work was supported by unrestricted grants from the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Orion Farmos Research Foundation, the Paavo Nurmi Foundation and a special governmental grant for health sciences research. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data handling or manuscript preparation. EPID Research is a company that performs financially supported studies for several pharmaceutical companies. Dr Korhonen, Dr Hoti and MSc Vattulainen, employed by Epid Research, report financial activities from several other pharmaceutical companies outside the submitted work. Dr Mikkola has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Mylan and Novo Nordisk. Dr Tuomikoski has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Orion and Mylan. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is a rare malignancy and only sparse data exist on its possible association with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). We therefore studied this association in a nationwide cohort of Finnish HT users. Methods: All women>50years using systemic estradiol-only therapy (ET) (n=117,820 hysterectomized women) or estradiol–progestin therapy (EPT) (n=247,781 nonhysterectomized women) for ≥6months during 1994–2008 were identified from the national medical reimbursement register. The incidence of PFTC in HT users was compared to that in the comparable background population (standardized incidence ratio, SIR, with 95% confidence interval, CI). Results: A total of 160 cases of PFTC were encountered in users of ET (n=34) or EPT (n=126). The use of EPT≥5years was accompanied by an increased risk for PFTC (SIR 2.15; 95% CI 1.66–2.72). The SIR increased further to 3.36 (95% CI 2.02–5.24) when EPT use lasted ≥10years. The EPT-related risk for PFTC was restricted to the sequential EPT and it was not seen for continuous EPT. Two leading progestins in EPT, norethisterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate, associated with comparable risk elevations. ET use was not associated with the risk for PFTC. Conclusions: The long-term, sequential use of EPT associates with an increased risk for PFTC. In absolute terms, 4 additional cases of PFTC would be detected in 10-year follow-up of 10,000 women who have used EPT for at least 5years. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The authors conducted a nationwide cohort study to evaluate the association between postmenopausal hormone therapy and meningioma incidence in Finland. All women who had used hormone therapy at least for 6 months at the age of 50 years or older during 1994–2009 were included. Women who had used postmenopausal hormone therapy were identified from the medical reimbursement register of the Social Insurance Institution (131,480 estradiol users and 131,248 estradiol-progestin users), and meningioma cases were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. During the average 9 years of follow-up, 289 estradiol users and 196 estradiol-progestin users were diagnosed with meningioma. Ever use of estradiol-only therapy was associated with an increased risk of meningioma (standardized incidence ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.15, 1.44). Among women who had been using estradiol-only therapy for at least 3 years, the incidence of meningioma was 1.40-fold higher (95% confidence interval: 1.18, 1.64; P < 0.001) than in the background population. In contrast, this risk was not increased in users of combination therapy (standardized incidence ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.80, 1.06). There was no difference in risk between continuous and sequential use of hormone therapy. Estradiol-only therapy was accompanied with a slightly increased risk of meningioma. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: The role of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) in the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been studied extensively, but less is known of the impact of HT on the mortality risk due to an ACS.Study Design and Main Outcome Measures: We extracted from a population-based ACS register, FINAMI, 7258 postmenopausal women with the first ACS. These data were combined with HT use data from the National Drug Reimbursement Register; 625 patients (9%) had used various HT regimens. The death risks due to ACS before admission to hospital, 2-28, or 29-365days after the incident ACS were compared between HT users and non-users with logistic regression analyses.Results: In all follow-up time points, the ACS death risks in HT ever-users were smaller compared to non-users. Of women with HT ever use, 42% died within one year as compared with 52% of non-users (OR 0.62, p<0.001). Most deaths (84%) occurred within 28days after the ACS, and in this group 36% of women with ever use of HT (OR 0.73, p=0.002) and 30% of women with ≥5year HT use (OR 0.54, p<0.001) died as compared to 43% of the non-users. Age ≤60 or >60 years at the HT initiation was accompanied with similar reductions in ACS mortality risk.Conclusions: Postmenopausal HT use is accompanied with reduced mortality risk after primary ACS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To estimate the risk of endometrial cancer in all Finnish postmenopausal women using various forms of estradiol-progestin therapy.Methods: All Finnish women (aged more than 50 years) who had used estradiol-progestin therapy in 1994-2006 for at least 6 months (n=224,015) were identified from the national medical Reimbursement Registry and linked to the Finnish Cancer Registry. A total of 1,364 type I and 38 type II endometrial cancers were recorded by the end of 2006. The incidence of endometrial cancer in estradiol-progestin therapy users was compared with that in the general population in this cohort study.Results: The use of a continuous estradiol-progestin therapy regimen for 3 years or more was associated with a 76% reduction of the risk for type 1 cancer (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-60%). In contrast, the use of a sequential estradiol-progestin therapy regimen for at least 5 years was accompanied with a 69% elevation (95% CI 43-96%) if the progestin was added monthly, and with a significantly higher, 276% risk elevation (95% CI 190-379%) if progestin was added at 3-month intervals. Sequential regimens containing norethisterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate or dydrogesterone administered orally showed no significant differences in the endometrial safety. Oral and transdermal norethisterone acetate were associated with similar risk elevations. Women using a monthly sequential estradiol-progestin regimen tended to be diagnosed with endometrial cancer in an earlier stage than the background population.Conclusion: Use of a continuous rather than a sequential estradiol-progestin regimen decreases the risk of endometrial cancer, whereas the route of administration or type of progestin does not differ in terms of endometrial cancer risk.Level Of Evidence: II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]