Search

Objective: Recently, the digit triplet test was shown to be a sensitive speech-in-noise test for early high-frequency hearing loss in noise-exposed workers. This study investigates if a further improvement is achieved when using a closed set of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) speech items with the same vowel, and/or a low-pass (LP) filtered version of the standard speech-shaped noise. Design: Speech reception thresholds in noise were gathered for the digit triplet, CVC, and CVC_LP test and compared to the high-frequency pure-tone average (PTA). Study sample: 118 noise-exposed workers showing a wide range of high-frequency hearing losses. Results: For the 84 Dutch-speaking participants, the CVC test showed an increased measurement error and a decreased between-subject variation, leading to a weaker correlation with the PTA2,3,4,6 (R = 0.64) and thus a lower sensitivity compared to the digit triplet test (R = 0.86). However, the use of LP-filtered noise resulted in a sensitivity improvement (R = 0.79 versus R = 0.64) due to the large increase in between-subject spread. Similar trends were found for the 34 French-speaking workers. Conclusions: Using CVC words with the same vowel could not increase the sensitivity to detect isolated high-frequency hearing loss. With LP-filtered noise, test sensitivity improved, but it did not surpass the original digit triplet test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare results on the everyday sentence test 'FIST', the new closed-set sentence test 'FrMatrix', and the digit triplet screening test 'FrDigit3'. Design: First, the FrMatrix was developed and normative values were obtained. Subsequently, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for the three types of tests were gathered at four study centers representing different geographic regions in Belgium and France. Study sample: Fifty-seven normal-hearing listeners took part in the normative study of the FrMatrix, and 118 subjects, with a wide range of hearing thresholds, participated in the comparative study. Results: Homogenizing the individual words of the FrMatrix with regard to their intelligibility resulted in a reference SRT of −6.0 (±0.6) dB SNR and slope at the SRT of 14.0 %/dB. The within-subject variability was only 0.4 dB. Comparison of the three tests showed high correlations between the SRTs mutually (>0.81). The FrMatrix had the highest discriminative power, both in stationary and in fluctuating noise. For all three tests, differences across the participating study centers were small and not significant. Conclusions: The FIST, the FrMatrix, and the FrDigit3 provide similar results and reliably evaluate speech recognition performance in noise both in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Neonatal hearing screening programs in Flanders and the Netherlands use Natus ALGO screening devices. Since 2006 in Flanders and 2009 in the Netherlands, both programs have replaced the older ALGO Portable devices with the newer ALGO 3i devices. However, in both countries, ALGO 3i devices have a significantly higher rate of referrals than ALGO Portable devices. In Flanders, the refer rate has more than doubled with the switch to ALGO 3i devices. In the Netherlands, screening centers which used ALGO 3i devices also showed a significant increase in referrals. In both countries, the percentage of children diagnosed with permanent hearing loss remained approximately the same. Design: A technical comparison of both device types was carried out to identify possible causes for the increase in referrals. The stimulus output of two ALGO Portable and three ALGO 3i devices was recorded and analysed for stimulus level, spectral properties, and stimulus irregularities. Results: ALGO 3i devices stimulate at a peak level 4.6 dB lower than ALGO Portable devices, have a different stimulus spectrum and show unexplained stimulus irregularities during 4% of the stimulation time. Conclusions: A number of technical differences were found between both device types which could explain the increase in referrals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The etiology of developmental dyslexia remains widely debated. An appealing theory postulates that the reading and spelling problems in individuals with dyslexia originate from reduced sensitivity to slow-rate dynamic auditory cues. This low-level auditory deficit is thought to provoke a cascade of effects, including inaccurate speech perception and eventually unspecified phoneme representations. The present study investigated sensitivity to frequency modulation and amplitude rise time, speech-in-noise perception and phonological awareness in 11-year-old children with dyslexia and a matched normal-reading control children. Group comparisons demonstrated that children with dyslexia were less sensitive than normal-reading children to slow-rate dynamic auditory processing, speech-in-noise perception, phonological awareness and literacy abilities. Correlations were found between slow-rate dynamic auditory processing and phonological awareness, and speech-in-noise perception and reading. Yet, no significant correlation between slow-rate dynamic auditory processing and speech-in-noise perception was obtained. Together, these results indicate that children with dyslexia have difficulties with slow-rate dynamic auditory processing and speech-in-noise perception and that these problems persist until sixth grade. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract A French speech intelligibility screening test in noise that applies digit triplets as stimuli has been developed and evaluated for both telephone and broadband headphone use. After optimizing the speech material based on the intelligibility of the individual digits, norms for normal-hearing subjects were established. speech reception thresholds (SRTs) of −6.4 ± 0.4 and −10.5 ± 0.3 dB SNR, and slopes of 17.1 and 27.1 %/dB were obtained for telephone and broadband headphone presentation, respectively. The French digit triplet test by telephone was then implemented as an automatic self-screening test by home telephone, and further evaluated in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. A test-retest variability of 0.7 dB was found and the correlation between SRT and pure-tone average (PTA0.5,1,2,4) was 0.77. One month after launching the test, 20 000 calls were registered. It can be concluded that both versions of the newly developed test have steep slopes and small SRT differences across normal-hearing listeners. The screening test by telephone is highly reliable and proves to fulfill the need for an easily accessible and objective hearing screening. Sumario Se desarrolló y evaluó una prueba de tamiz de inteligibilidad del lenguaje en ruido, utilizando ternas de dígitos como estímulo, tanto para teléfono como para auriculares de banda ancha. Después de optimizar el material lingüístico basado en la inteligibilidad de los dígitos individuales, se establecieron las normas para los sujetos normoyentes. Se obtuvieron umbrales de recepción del lenguaje (SRTs) de -6.4 ± 0.4 y -10.5 ± 0.3dB SNR y pendientes de 17.1 y 27.1%/dB para teléfono y auriculares de banda ancha, respectivamente. Se implementó la prueba de terna de dígitos en francés por teléfono como una prueba de tamiz autoaplicable por teléfono en casa y después se evaluó en normoyentes e hipoacúsicos. Se encontró una variabilidad de test-re-test de 0.7 dB y la correlación entre SRT y el promedio de tonos puros (PTA0.5,1,2,4) fue de 0.77. Un mes después de lanzar la prueba, se registraron 20,000 llamadas. Se puede concluir que ambas versiones de la prueba recientemente desarrollada tiene pendientes pronunciadas y pequeñas diferencias del SRT entre los normoyentes. La prueba de tamiz por teléfono es altamente confiable y demuestra que satisface las necesidades de una prueba de tamiz auditivo fácil, accesible y objetiva. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the framework of the European HearCom project, promising signal enhancement algorithms were developed and evaluated for future use in hearing instruments. To assess the algorithms’ performance, five of the algorithms were selected and implemented on a common real-time hardware/software platform. Four test centers in Belgium, The Netherlands, Germany, and Switzerland perceptually evaluated the algorithms. Listening tests were performed with large numbers of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Three perceptual measures were used: speech reception threshold (SRT), listening effort scaling, and preference rating. Tests were carried out in two types of rooms. Speech was presented in multitalker babble arriving from one or three loudspeakers. In a pseudo-diffuse noise scenario, only one algorithm, the spatially preprocessed speech-distortion-weighted multi-channel Wiener filtering, provided a SRT improvement relative to the unprocessed condition. Despite the general lack of improvement in SRT, some algorithms were preferred over the unprocessed condition at all tested signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). These effects were found across different subject groups and test sites. The listening effort scores were less consistent over test sites. For the algorithms that did not affect speech intelligibility, a reduction in listening effort was observed at 0 dB SNR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) were assessed in 111 ears of 70 infants between –4 and 19 weeks of age at risk for hearing loss. ASSR thresholds obtained in infants with normal hearing (n = 69 ears) were compared with normal adult ASSR thresholds (n = 32 ears), and the linear relation between ASSR thresholds and behavioral thresholds (BHTs) was investigated in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants (n = 79 ears). Furthermore, latency estimates of significant responses to stimuli of 50 dB SPL were compared between the normal-hearing infants (n = 171 data points) and adults (n = 124 data points) and developmental changes in latency were evaluated within the infant group. Normal ASSR thresholds were on average 12 dB higher in infants compared with adults. Correlations between ASSR thresholds and BHTs were 0.75, 0.87, 0.87 and 0.79 for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. There was a significant effect of carrier frequency on ASSR latency, with higher carrier frequencies evoking shorter latencies in both infants and adults. Mean latencies in adults were 24.3 ± 1.5, 22.3 ± 1.1, 19.4 ± 1.0 and 18.0 ± 1.1 ms for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. Depending on the data fit of the infant latency estimates, mean latencies were 1.0 ms shorter or 9.5 ms longer in infants compared with adults. In infants, latencies were on average 2.0 ms longer in the youngest infant group (≤0 weeks) relative to the oldest infant group (3–8 weeks). These age-related trends, together with other arguments, point to longer latencies in infants compared with adults. The results of this study are valuable as a clinical reference for interpreting ASSR results obtained in high-risk infants within their first months of life and indicate that developmental changes occur regarding ASSR latency. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper describes low-frequency auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to speech-weighted noise stimuli. The effect of modulation frequency was evaluated within the frequency range below 40 Hz. Furthermore, objective ASSR measures were related to speech understanding performance in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The variability in ASSR recordings over independent test sessions was larger between subjects than within. Trends of increased responses around 10 and/or 20 Hz were found in all subjects. Obtained latency estimates of the responses pointed to primarily cortical sources involved in ASSR generation at low frequencies. Furthermore, significant differences between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults were found for ASSRs to stimuli related to the temporal envelope of speech. Comparing these responses with phoneme identification scores over different stimulus levels showed both measures increased with stimulus level in a similar way (ρ=0.82). At a fixed stimulus level, ASSRs were significantly correlated with speech reception thresholds for phonemes and sentences in noise (ρ from -0.45 to -0.53). These results indicate that objective low-frequency ASSRs are related to behavioral speech understanding, independently of level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Experience with dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in clinical practice is described. ASSR thresholds were assessed in a sample of 60 high-risk newborns and young children between birth and 4 years of age. Amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the ASSR were compared between normal-hearing infants and adults. Age-related changes within a group of infants younger than 3 months of age were investigated. A comparison was made between ASSR, the click-evoked auditory brainstem response and behavioral hearing thresholds in infants with a wide range of hearing threshold levels. Mean ASSR thresholds for normal-hearing infants at an average corrected age of 12 days were 42 ± 10, 35 ± 10, 32 ± 10 and 36 ± 9 dB SPL for 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz, respectively. Compared to adults, these thresholds were elevated by on average 11 dB and SNRs were 1.7 times smaller. However, based on ASSRs, reasonably accurate estimations could be made of behavioral hearing thresholds obtained at a later age (median delay of 7 months). The predicted thresholds were in 61% of the cases within 10 dB of the corresponding behavioral thresholds, and in 83% of the cases within 15 dB. In less than 1 h, thresholds at four frequencies per ear could be obtained. The optimal age of testing is between 1 week and 3 months corrected age. The dichotic multiple-stimulus ASSR technique is a valuable extension of the clinical test battery for hearing-impaired children, as a follow-up diagnostic after the neonatal hearing screening. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two approaches to assess auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are compared under similar test conditions: a monaural single-frequency technique with a detection method based on phase coherence (AUDERA), and a binaural multiple-frequency technique using the F-test (MASTER). ASSR thresholds at four frequencies were assessed with both methods in both ears of ten normal-hearing and ten hearing-impaired adult subjects, within a test duration of one hour. The test-retest reliability and the influence of prolonging the test duration are assessed. For the total subject group the multiple-frequency technique outperforms the single-frequency technique. In hearing-impaired subjects, however, both techniques perform equally well. Hearing thresholds can be estimated with a standard error of the estimate between 7 and 12 dB dependent on frequency. About 55% of the estimates are within 5 dB of the behavioral hearing threshold, and 94% within 15 dB. Prolonging the test duration improves the performance of both techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The influence of test duration on the precision of hearing thresholds estimated by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) was investigated. ASSR thresholds at four frequencies in both ears were assessed in 10 normal-hearing and 10 hearing-impaired subjects. The precision of the estimated hearing thresholds was compared for ASSR recordings of 5, 10 and 15 min per intensity level, corresponding to total test durations of approximately 30, 55 and 70 min for hearing-impaired ears. Furthermore, an intensity step size of 10 dB was compared to a step size of 5 dB. The mean difference scores averaged over the four frequencies were 15 ± 10, 12 ± 9 and 11 ± 8 dB after recordings of 5, 10 and 15 min respectively. The corresponding Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.93, 0.95 and 0.96. Increasing the length of the separate recordings increases the precision of the estimates, independent of tested frequency. A compromise between both will have to be made. With a total test duration of approximately 1 h, four hearing thresholds in both ears can be estimated with a standard error of the estimate of 8 dB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To report on clinical experience using dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) as an objective technique to estimate frequency-specific hearing thresholds in hearing-impaired infants. Methods: A comparison was made between the click-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR), auditory steady-state responses and behavioral hearing thresholds (BHTs). Both ears of 10 infants between 3 and 14 months of age were tested. ABR and ASSRs were recorded during the same test session. ABR was evoked by 100 μs clicks. ASSRs were evoked by amplitude- and frequency-modulated tones with carrier frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz and modulation frequencies ranging from 82 to 110 Hz. Eight signals (four to each ear) were presented simultaneously. ASSR thresholds were derived after separate recordings of approximately 5, 7.5 and 10 min to compare the influence of test duration. BHTs were defined in later test sessions as soon as possible after the ASSR test, dependent on medical and developmental factors. Results: For the subjects tested in this study 60% of ABR thresholds and 95% of ASSR thresholds for 1, 2 and 4 kHz were found at an average age of 7 months. Only 51% of frequency-specific BHTs could be obtained but on average 5 months later. The correlation of ABR thresholds and ASSR thresholds at 2 kHz was 0.77. The correlation of ASSRs and BHTs was 0.92. The mean differences and associated standard deviations were 4±14, 4±11, -2±14 and -1±13 dB for 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz, respectively. The average test duration was 45 min for ABR (one threshold in both ears) and 58 min for ASSR (four thresholds in both ears). By reducing the duration of the separate recordings of ASSR, the precision of the hearing threshold estimate decreased and the number of outlying and missing values increased. Correlation coefficients were 0.92, 0.89 and 0.83 for recordings of maximum 10, 7.5 and 5 min, respectively. A compromise between test duration and precision has to be sought. Conclusions: Multiple-frequency ASSRs offer the possibility to estimate frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies in a time-efficient way. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In Flanders, periodic hearing screening of school children is mandatory. Up to now, pure tone audiometry was routinely used for this purpose. However, the lack of optimal testing conditions, uniform test protocols and referral criteria prompt the need for alternative screening methodologies. Currently, the applicability of the Digit Triplet Test -- a quick, automated speech-in-noise adaptive self-test -- for large-scale hearing screening of 10 and 14 year old children is being evaluated. Pupils with an abnormal test result (based on initially set age-specific cut-off speech reception thresholds) are referred to an ENT specialist for expertise pure tone testing. The aim is to fine-tune the cut-off values for the purpose of a balanced referral and investigate test reliability. After 5 months, more than 6000 children have already been screened. According to current cut-offs, 5.5% (10y) and 5.1% (14y) were referred. Intrasubject measurement error was found to be very low in both groups (0.6 dB). Median SRTs were -9.9 dB SNR for the younger and -10.6 for the older children. Also, test duration shortens with age. ENT expertise audiograms from referrals will allow us to set uniform and accurate cut-off values in order to obtain the highest possible sensitivity to detect (minimal) hearing impairment. Due to the low measurement error, accurate follow-up is possible. Furthermore, the availability of an effective registration system for data storage will enable to link school age hearing screening results with data from previous screenings and provide insights into the prevalence of acquired hearing loss in school children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last three years, EFAS has made an overview of audiology education programs in Europe. With the inputs of many EFAS representatives and local coordinators of the teaching programs, detailed information was received about more than 130 teaching programs in more than 20 European countries. In a first step, these programs have been specified according to 17 dimensions (e.g. duration of the program, degree to be earned, contact details, website, profile and strengths of the program). The situation in the different European countries is very diverse. Some countries don't have any specific audiology education program available, others offer bachelor and master programs in Audiology (e.g. Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Portugal, Germany), some focus on training in medical audiology for physicians (e.g. Finland and France), etc. In a next step, the bachelor and master programs have been characterized in more detail. The specific courses of the individual programs were classified in a number of components (e.g. basic & applied physics, anatomy & physiology, research methodology). This more detailed characterization of the inventory helps to detect similarities and differences between the various European programs. Some programs are very technically oriented, while others are more clinically oriented. Audiology is sometimes the main focus, while it is also quite often combined with other topics like speech and language disorders. The inventory and more detailed classification of audiology teaching programs may facilitate collaboration and exchange. Moreover, it may help to identify a minimum common denominator or a core program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article describes the development of the French Intelligibility Sentence Test (FIST). The procedures include preparation of test materials, estimation of the performance-intensity function, equalization of sentence difficulty, formation of sentence lists and development of norms and reliability. Reference data have been obtained for normal-hearing listeners and the performance of Francophone listeners from France and Belgium was compared.

Adaptive speech-in-noise tests allow for the fast and/or precise assessment of supra-threshold speech perception. Screening versions like the digit triplet test (DTT) can be used for the quick detection of hearing problems or to raise awareness about noise-induced hearing loss. In this study, we discuss several variations of the currently used DTT procedure. 17 normal-hearing (NH) and 34 hearing-impaired subjects were evaluated with 5 variations of the current procedure: (1) The baseline test with broadband stimuli and a fixed step size of ±2dB per triplet, (2) a 15dB low-pass filtered version to increase sensitivity for high-frequency hearing loss, and (3-5) three digit-scoring versions with adaptive step sizes targeting the 24, 50 and 76% point of the psychometric curve. The low-pass version resulted in the same test-retest error, duration and correlation with pure-tone thresholds as the baseline version, with a 13dB decrease in speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for NH subjects. The digit-scoring version targeting the 76% point maintained the same SRT, duration and correlation, but also achieved significantly lower test-retest errors. While the low-pass DTT combines supra-threshold SRTs and puretone audiometric thresholds, no significant improved correlation with the latter could be found. Digit scoring results in lower test-retest errors than triplet scoring, allowing for a more precise or faster SRT determination. Depending on the used step sizes, different points on the psychometric curve can be targeted to quickly reconstruct the complete curve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A Dutch matrix sentence test was developed and evaluated. A matrix test is a speech-in-noise test based on a closed speech corpus of sentences derived from words from fixed categories. An example is 'Mark gives five large flowers.' Design: This report consists of the development of the speech test and a multi-center evaluation. Study sample: Forty-five normal-hearing participants. Results: The developed matrix test has a speech reception threshold in stationary noise of − 8.4 dB with an inter-list standard deviation of 0.2 dB. The slope of the intelligibility function is 10.2 %/dB and this is slightly lower than that of similar tests in other languages (12.6 to 17.1 %/dB). Conclusions: The matrix test is now also available in Dutch and can be used in both Flanders and the Netherlands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Auditory processing problems in persons with dyslexia are still subject to debate, and one central issue concerns the specific nature of the deficit. In particular, it is questioned whether the deficit is specific to speech and/or specific to temporal processing. To resolve this issue, a categorical perception identification task was administered in thirteen 11-year old dyslexic readers and 25 matched normal readers using 4 sound continua: (1) a speech contrast exploiting temporal cues (/bA/-/dA/), (2) a speech contrast defined by nontemporal spectral cues (/u/-/y/), (3) a nonspeech temporal contrast (spectrally rotated/bA/-/da/), and (4) a nonspeech nontemporal contrast (spectrally rotated/u/-/y/). Results indicate that children with dyslexia are less consistent in classifying speech and nonspeech sounds on the basis of rapidly changing (i.e., temporal) information whereas they are unimpaired in steady-state speech and nonspeech sounds. The deficit is thus restricted to categorizing sounds on the basis of temporal cues and is independent of the speech status of the stimuli. The finding of a temporal-specific but not speech-specific deficit in children with dyslexia is in line with findings obtained in adults using the same paradigm (, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107: 10389–10394). Comparison of the child and adult data indicates that the consistency of categorization considerably improves between late childhood and adulthood, particularly for the continua with temporal cues. Dyslexic and normal readers show a similar developmental progress with the dyslexic readers lagging behind both in late childhood and in adulthood. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Developmental dyslexia is characterized by severe reading and spelling difficulties that are persistent and resistant to the usual didactic measures and remedial efforts. It is well established that a major cause of these problems lies in poorly specified representations of speech sounds. One hypothesis states that this phonological deficit results from a more fundamental deficit in auditory processing. Despite substantial research effort, the specific nature of these auditory problems remains debated. A first controversy concerns the speech specificity of the auditory processing problems: Can they be reduced to more basic auditory processing, or are they specific to the perception of speech sounds? A second topic of debate concerns the extent to which the auditory problems are specific to the processing of rapidly changing temporal information or whether they encompass a broader range of complex spectrotemporal processing. By applying a balanced design with stimuli that were adequately controlled for acoustic complexity, we show that adults with dyslexia are specifically impaired at categorizing speech and nonspeech sounds that differ in terms of rapidly changing acoustic cues (i.e., temporal cues), but that they perform adequately when categorizing steady-state speech and nonspeech sounds. Thus, we show that individuals with dyslexia have an auditory temporal processing deficit that is not speech-specific. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the prevalence, type, severity, and age-dependency of hearing loss in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Method: Extensive audiological measurements were conducted in 40 persons with proven 22q11.2 deletion (aged 6-36 years). Besides air and bone conduction thresholds in the frequency range between 0.125 and 8.000 kHz, high-frequency thresholds up to 16.000 kHz were determined and tympanometry, acoustic reflex (AR) measurement, and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) testing were performed. Results: Hearing loss was identified in 59% of the tested ears and was mainly conductive in nature. In addition, a high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss with down-sloping curve was found in the majority of patients. Aberrant tympanometric results were recorded in 39% of the ears. In 85% of ears with a Type A or C tympanometric peak, ARs were absent. A DPOAE response in at least 6 frequencies was present in only 23% of the ears with a hearing threshold =30 dB HL. In patients above 14 years of age, there was a significantly lower percentage of measurable DPOAEs. Conclusion: Hearing loss in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is highly prevalent and both conductive and high-frequency sensorineural in nature. The age-dependent absence of DPOAEs in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome suggests cochlear damage underlying the high-frequency hearing loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Developmental dyslexia is characterized by severe reading and spelling difficulties that are persistent and resistant to the usual didactic measures and remedial efforts. It is well established that a major cause of these problems lies in poorly specified phonological representations. Many individuals with dyslexia also present impairments in auditory temporal processing and speech perception, but it remains debated whether these more basic perceptual impairments play a role in causing the reading problem. Longitudinal studies may help clarifying this issue by assessing preschool children before they receive reading instruction and by following them up through literacy development. The current longitudinal study shows impairments in auditory frequency modulation (FM) detection, speech perception and phonological awareness in kindergarten and in grade 1 in children who receive a dyslexia diagnosis in grade 3. FM sensitivity and speech-in-noise perception in kindergarten uniquely contribute to growth in reading ability, even after controlling for letter knowledge and phonological awareness. These findings indicate that impairments in auditory processing and speech perception are not merely an epiphenomenon of reading failure. Although no specific directional relations were observed between auditory processing, speech perception and phonological awareness, the highly significant concurrent and predictive correlations between all these variables suggest a reciprocal association and corroborate the evidence for the auditory deficit theory of dyslexia. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The possibilities of currently commercially available auditory steady-state response (ASSR) devices are mostly limited to avoid unintentional misuse and to guarantuee patient safety as such. Some setups, e.g. do not allow the application of high intensities or the use of own stimuli. Moreover, most devices generally only allow data collection using maximal two EEG channels. The freedom to modify and extend the accompagnying software and hardware is very restricted or inexistent. As a result, these devices are not suited for research and several clinically diagnostic purposes. In this paper, a research platform for multi-channel ASSR measurements is presented, referred to as SOMA (setup ORL for multi-channel ASSR). The setup allows multi-channel measurements and the use of own stimuli. It can be easily extended to facilitate new measurement protocols and real-time signal processing. The mobile setup is based on an inexpensive multi-channel RME soundcard and software is written in C++. Both hardware and software of the setup are described. An evaluation study with nine normal-hearing subjects shows no significant performance differences between a reference and the proposed platform. SOMA presents a flexible and modularly extensible mobile high-end multi-channel ASSR test platform. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]