Search

Introduction: Virtual care using videoconference links between urban-based physical therapists and nurse practitioners in rural primary care may overcome access challenges and enhance care for rural and remote residents with chronic low back disorders (CBD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the concordance of this new model of care with two traditional models. Methods: In this cross-sectional study design, each of 27 participants with CBD were assessed by: 1) a team of a nurse practitioner (NP) located with a patient, joined by a physical therapist (PT) using videoconferencing (NP/PTteam); 2) in-person PT (PTalone); and 3) in-person NP (NPalone). Diagnostic and management concordance between the three groups were assessed with percent agreement and kappa. Results: Overall diagnostic categorization was compared for PTalone versus NPalone and NP/PTteam: percent agreement was 77.8% (k = 0.474, p = 0.001) and 74.1% (k = 0.359, p = 0.004), respectively. In terms of management recommendations, the PTalone and NPalone demonstrated strong agreement on "need for urgent surgical referral" (92.6%, k = 0.649 (p < 0.00) and slight agreement for "refer to primary physician for pharmacology, lab or imaging" (81.5%, k = 0.372 (p = 0.013). The PTalone and NP/PTteam demonstrated strong agreement on "need for urgent surgical referral" (96.3%, k = 0.649, p = 0.000) and "recommendation for PT follow up" (88.9%, k = 0.664, p = 0.000). Discussion: The diagnostic categorization and management recommendations of the team using videoconferencing for CBD were similar to decisions made by an in-person PT. This model of care may provide a method for enhancing access to PT for CBD assessment and initial management in underserved areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundAimsMethodsResultsConclusionHealthcare access for chronic low back pain is complex and should consider not only the health system, but patient care seeking experiences as well. People who live in rural and remote communities and/or identify as being Indigenous may often encounter additional barriers to accessing care for chronic low back pain; thus, these contexts must be considered to fully understand barriers and facilitators.To understand care-seeking experiences of people living with chronic back pain in Saskatchewan and determine unique experiences facing urban, rural, remote, and/or Indigenous Peoples.: Thirty-three participants with chronic low back pain completed a preliminary survey followed by individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were categorized as urban, rural, or remote including Indigenous status. A qualitative interpretive research approach with inductive thematic analysis was employed.: Three overarching themes were identified with the following subthemes: 1) Healthcare access challenges: challenges to accessing care, challenges within the health system, challenges leading to self-directed management/coping strategies. 2) Healthcare access facilitators: funded care, participant education and knowledge, patient-provider communication, care closer to home. 3) Participant recommendations for improved care provision: coordination of care, integrative and holistic care, patient-centered care and support. Rural and remote participants highlighted travel as a main barrier. Indigenous participant experiences emphasized communication with healthcare providers and past experiences influencing desire to access care.: Participants identified a range of challenges and facilitators, and recommendations for improving access to care for chronic low back pain, with unique barriers for rural, remote, and Indigenous participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rural injured workers requiring multidisciplinary assessments for musculoskeletal disorders face health access disparities, which include travel to urban centers. Virtual care can enhance access to multidisciplinary team care for musculoskeletal conditions in rural areas. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart audit of 136 multidisciplinary assessment reports of injured workers was conducted. Comprehensive management recommendations from the health care assessment team were extracted for analysis. The health care team used virtual technologies to join with patients and at least one local rural health practitioner in one of three locations. Remote presence robotics (RPR; Xpress Technology™) or laptop-based telehealth was used to complete the assessments. Results: RPR were used in 46% of assessments over two sites, with 54% using laptop-based telehealth at a third site. Frequencies of team members' assessment using technologies were as follows: physical therapist (100%), psychologist (78%), plastic surgeon (8%), and physician (43%). Spine (42%) and shoulder (32%) disorders were the most common problems. Most workers (79%) were 3 or more months postinjury. The most common management recommendation was the need for daily comprehensive rehabilitation care (76%). Travel time was saved by 89% of participants. Conclusions: Virtual care was used to unite multidisciplinary assessment teams for the evaluation of injured rural workers with complex musculoskeletal injuries. Future research recommendations include comparing between virtual and fully in-person multidisciplinary assessment and recommendation findings, and evaluation of patient and practitioner experiences with comprehensive virtual team assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rapid evolution and implementation of virtual care technologies for clinical use often exceeds the development of standardized implementation protocols, leading to gaps in the equitable and sustainable adoption of virtual care services, particularly in rural and remote areas. This paper introduces a comprehensive evaluation tool designed to assess community capacity and readiness for virtual care.The development of the tool was informed by experiences from the Virtual Care and Robotics Program at the University of Saskatchewan. It involved a collaborative, multi-stakeholder approach that engaged healthcare leaders, IT experts and community healthcare workers. This iterative process included defining evaluation categories, mapping evaluative domains and refining the tool into a user-friendly checklist manual.The tool identifies three key domains for assessing readiness: clinical needs, technology infrastructure and human resources/workflows. It was piloted in the remote community of Fond du Lac, Saskatchewan, where it successfully qualified the community for implementing telerobotic ultrasound services. The tool facilitated local engagement and highlighted the community's specific needs and readiness, enhancing the implementation process.This evaluation tool contributes to bridging the gap between the rapid deployment of virtual care technologies and the need for comprehensive, standardized implementation protocols. It offers a structured, practical approach to assessing and enhancing community readiness for virtual care while promoting successful clinical implementation and equitable access to healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]