Search

Backgrounds: Liver surgery has developed progressively during the last 10 years, especially in minimally invasive approaches. Robotic surgery seemed to overcome laparoscopic limitations with 3D visualization, the increased degrees of freedom given with Endowrist instruments, tremor filtering, better dexterity, and improved ergonomics for the surgeon. Methods: This work was a retrospective analysis of our first 100 robotic hepatectomies from March 2020 to July 2022. Patient demographics characteristics and intra- and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 59 males and 41 females, with a median age of 68 years, underwent a robotic liver resection. The indications for robotic liver resections were malignant lesions in 86% of patients. Anatomical resection (AR) was undertaken in 27% of cases and non-anatomical resection (NAR) in 63% of cases. None of the patients were converted to the ‘open’ approach. Postoperative complications were as follows: 1% of biliary leakage, 5% of ascites, 6% of pulmonary infections, and 3% of other sites’ infections. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed the satisfactory experience of a tertiary HPB center with its first 100 robotic liver resections. The opportunity to make the robotic approach routinary provided global growth of a surgical team, improving the quality of patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The prolonged life expectancy and increase in aging of the population have led surgeons to propose hepatectomy in the elderly population. In this study, we evaluate the surgical outcome of octogenarians in a single French center. Methods: Between 2000 and 2020, 78 patients over 80 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors of major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade IIIa) and patient performance after surgery by using textbook outcome (TO) (no surgical complications, no prolonged hospital stay (≤ 15 days), no readmission ≤90 days after discharge, and no mortality ≤90 days after surgery) were studied. Results: The main surgical indication was for malignancy (96%), including mainly colorectal liver metastases (n = 41; 53%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 22; 28%), and major hepatectomy was performed in 28 patients (36%). There were 6 (8%) postoperative mortalities. The most frequent complications were pulmonary (n = 22; 32%), followed by renal insufficiency (n = 22; 28%) and delirium (n = 16; 21%). Major complications occurred in 19 (24%) patients. On multivariate analysis, the main risk factors for major complications were the median vascular clamping time (0 vs 35; P = 0.04) and male sex (P = 0.046). TO was ultimately achieved in 30 patients (38%), and there was no prognostic factor for achievement of TO. Conclusions: Hepatectomy in octogenarians is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Meanwhile, prolonged hepatic pedicle clamping should be avoided especially if hepatectomy is planned in a male patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery has gained the acceptance of the hepatobiliary surgical community and expert teams are now advocating major laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs). In this setting, the liver hanging maneuver (LHM) has been described in numerous series. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of the LHM in LLR. Methods: We performed an electronic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases. The final search was carried out in December, 2015. Results: We found 11 articles describing a collective total of 104 surgical procedures that were eligible for this study. Laparoscopic LHM was used in LLR for both benign and malignant conditions, and also in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The LHM was used mainly in right hepatectomy and only two authors reproduced the original LHM. We investigated the intraoperative parameters, preservation of postoperative liver function, and oncological outcomes. The clear benefit of using the LHM in LLR is for better identification of the parenchymal transection plane with less blood loss. The other benefits of LHM could not be corroborated by solid data on its positive value. Conclusions: In view of the data published in the literature, our findings are not strong enough to support the systematic use of LHM in LLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstracts of the oral and poster presentations and video festivals presented at the 26th World Congress of the International Association of Surgeons, Gastroenterologists and oncologists (IASGO) that will be held on September 8-10, 2016 in Seoul, South Korea are presented.

Introduction: The majority of liver resections for malignancy are performed in older patient with major co-morbidities. There is currently no pre-operative, patient-specific method to determine the likely peri-operative mortality for each individual patient. The aim of this study was to develop a pre-operative nomogram based on the presence of co-morbidities to predict risk of peri-operative mortality following liver resections for malignancy.Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried to identify adult patients that underwent liver resection for malignancy. The pre-operative co-morbidities, identified as predictors were used and a nomogram was created with multivariate regression using Taylor expansion method in SAS software, surveylogistic procedure. Training set (years 2000-2004) was utilized to develop the model and validation set (year 2005) was utilized to validate this model.Results: A total of 3,947 and 972 patients were included in training and validation sets, respectively. The overall actual-observed peri-operative mortality rates for training and validation sets were 4.1% and 3.2%, respectively. The decile-based calibration plots for the training set revealed good agreement between the observed probabilities and nomogram-predicted probabilities. Similarly, the quartile-based calibration plot for the validation set revealed good agreement between the observed and predicted probabilities. The accuracy of the nomogram was further reinforced by a good concordance index of 0.80 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.72 and 0.87.Conclusions: This pre-operative nomogram may be utilized to predict the risk of peri-operative mortality following liver resection for malignancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Laparoscopic liver surgery is significantly limited by the technical difficulty encountered during transection of substantial liver parenchyma, with intraoperative bleeding and bile leaks. This study tested whether the use of a bioabsorble staple line reinforcement material would improve outcome during stapled laparoscopic left lateral liver resection in a porcine model. A total of 20 female pigs underwent stapled laparoscopic left lateral liver resection. In group A ( n = 10), the stapling devices were buttressed with a bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement material. In group B ( n = 10), standard laparoscopic staplers were used. Operative data and perioperative complications were recorded. Necropsy studies and histopathological analysis were performed at 6 weeks. Data were compared between groups with the Student’s t-test or the chi-square test. Operating time was similar in the two groups (64 ± 11 min in group A versus 68 ± 9 min in group B, p = ns). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in group B (185 ± 9 mL versus 25 ± 5 mL, p < 0.05). There was no mortality. There was no morbidity in the 6-week follow-up period; however, two animals in group B had subphrenic bilomas (20%) at necropsy. At necropsy, methylene blue injection via the main bile duct revealed leakage from the biliary tree in four animals in group B and none in group A ( p < 0.05). Histopathological examination of the resection site revealed minor abnormalities in group A while animals in group B demonstrated marked fibrotic changes and damaged vascular and biliary endothelium. Use of a bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement material reduces intraoperative bleeding and perioperative bile leaks during stapled laparoscopic left lateral liver resection in a porcine model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radioembolization with 90Y-microspheres has been reported to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy with simultaneous ipsilateral control of tumor growth. The aim of the present systematic review was to summarize the evidence of contralateral liver hypertrophy and oncological outcome following unilateral treatment with radioembolization. A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries for studies published between 2008 and 2020 was performed. A total of 16 studies, comprising 602 patients, were included. The median kinetic growth rate per week of the contralateral liver lobe was 0.7% and declined slightly over time. The local tumor control was 84%. Surgical resection after radioembolization was carried out in 109 out of 362 patients (30%). Although the available data suggest that radioembolization prior to major hepatectomy is safe with a promising oncological outcome, the definitive role of radioembolization requires assessment within controlled clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]