Search

Background: Q fever has significant consequences for patients with persistent localized infection. A combination of doxycycline with hydroxychloroquine, for at least 18–24 months, is the first-line therapy. The use of serology as a prognostic marker during therapy is controversial. Methods: A retrospective, observational cohort study in two outpatient clinics in northern Israel. All adults with persistent Q fever (2015–2021) were included in the study. Clinical failure was defined as relapse or death related to Q fever after end of treatment (EOT). Serological cure was defined as phase 1 IgG ≤800 or a four-fold decrease at EOT. Results: Twenty-two patients were included in the study, with a median follow up of 40 months (IQR = 28.5–63.5), and median treatment duration of 28.5 months (IQR = 21.8–50.5). Clinical cure occurred in 18 patients (82%), serological cure in 10 (45%). Phase 1 IgG at presentation was significantly higher in the clinical failure group (median 9600 vs. 3200 in the clinical cure group, p = 0.019), and at 6–12 months after EOT (median 6400 vs. 800 respectively, p = 0.03). Phase 1 IgG levels at 1 year and EOT were similar in both groups. Positive phase 2 IgM after one year of therapy correlated with clinical failure (p = 0.038), but not at EOT or after EOT. Conclusion: Phase 1 IgG levels at presentation, phase 2 IgM at 1 year, and Phase 1 IgG 6–12 months after EOT were associated with clinical failure in patients with persistent Q fever. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bacterial and viral lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are often clinically indistinguishable, leading to antibiotic overuse. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of a new assay that combines 3 host-biomarkers (TRAIL, IP-10, CRP) with parameters in routine use to distinguish bacterial from viral LRTIs. Study cohort included 184 potentially eligible pediatric and adult patients. Reference standard diagnosis was based on adjudication by an expert panel following comprehensive clinical and laboratory investigation (including respiratory PCRs). Experts were blinded to assay results and assay performers were blinded to reference standard outcomes. Evaluated cohort included 88 bacterial and 36 viral patients (23 did not fulfill inclusion criteria; 37 had indeterminate reference standard outcome). Assay distinguished bacterial from viral LRTI patients with sensitivity of 0.93 ± 0.06 and specificity of 0.91 ± 0.09, outperforming routine parameters, including WBC, CRP and chest x-ray signs. These findings support the assay's potential to help clinicians avoid missing bacterial LRTIs or overusing antibiotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Determining infection etiology can be difficult because viral and bacterial diseases often manifest similarly. A host protein test that computationally integrates the circulating levels of TNF-related apoptosis-induced ligand, interferon g-induced protein-10, and C-reactive protein to differentiate between bacterial and viral infection (called MMBV) demonstrated high performance in multiple prospective clinical validation studies. Here, MMBV's diagnostic accuracy is evaluated in febrile children for whom physicians were uncertain about etiology when applied at the physician's discretion. METHODS: Patients aged 3 months to 18 years were retrospectively recruited (NCT03075111; SPIRIT study; 2014-2017). Emergency department physician's etiological suspicion and certainty level were recorded in a questionnaire at blood-draw. MMBV results are based on predefined score thresholds: viral/non-bacterial etiology (0 ≤ score <35), equivocal (35 ≤ score ≤65), and bacterial or coinfection (65 < score ≤100). Reference standard etiology (bacterial/viral indeterminate) was adjudicated by 3 independent experts based on all available patient data. Experts were blinded to MMBV. MMBV and physician's etiological suspicion were assessed against the reference standard. RESULTS: Of 3003 potentially eligible patients, the physicians were uncertain about infection etiology for 736 of the cases assigned a reference standard (128 bacterial, 608 viral). MMBV performed with sensitivity 89.7% (96/107; 95% confidence interval 82.4-94.3) and specificity 92.6% (498/538; 95% confidence interval 90.0-94.5), significantly outperforming physician's etiological suspicion (sensitivity 49/74 = 66.2%, specificity 265/368 = 72.0%; P < .0001). MMBV equivocal rate was 12.4% (91/736). CONCLUSIONS: MMBV was more accurate in determining etiology compared with physician's suspicion and had high sensitivity and specificity according to the reference standard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Waning immunity and an increased incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Omicron outbreak led the Israeli Ministry of Health to recommend a fourth vaccine dose for high-risk individuals. In this study, we assessed its effect for hospitalized patients with severe breakthrough COVID-19. Methods In this multicenter cohort study of hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 in Israel, from 15 to 31 January 2022, cases were divided according to the number of vaccinations received. Poor outcome was defined as mechanical ventilation or in-hospital death and was compared between 3- and 4-dose vaccinees using logistic regression. Results Included were 1049 patients, median age 80 years. Among them, 394 were unvaccinated, 386 and 88 had received 3 or 4 doses, respectively. The 3-dose group was older, included more males, and immunosuppressed patients but with similar outcomes, 49% vs 51% compared with unvaccinated patients (P =.72). Patients who received 4 doses were similarly older and immunosuppressed but had better outcomes compared with unvaccinated patients, 34% vs 51% (P <.01). We examined independent predictors for poor outcome in patients who received either 3 or 4 doses a median of 161 days or 14 days before diagnosis, respectively. Receipt of the fourth dose was associated with protection (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval,.3–.87), as was remdesivir. Male sex, chronic renal failure, and dementia were associated with poor outcomes. Conclusions Among hospitalized patients with severe breakthrough COVID-19, a recent fourth dose was associated with significant protection against mechanical ventilation or death compared with 3 doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]