Search

Objectives: To compare images of the aorta obtained with helical CT (HCT) scanning and MRI for the follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Design: Longitudinal study. Setting: Department of adult congenital heart disease in a tertiary university hospital. Patients: A total of 37 adults (age range, 16 to 68 years; women, 13) with CoA (after surgery, 34 patients; native, 2 patients; after balloon-angioplasty, 1 patient) Measurements and results: All patients underwent both HCT and MRI of the thoracic aorta within a mean (± SD) time interval of 1.86 ± 1.11 years. Aortic diameters measured at six intrathoracic levels showed a high correlation (r = 0.79 to 0.94). On average, slightly lower diameters were measured with MRI (1.2 mm). But there was a substantial variation between the two measurements with differences of up to 9 mm. All other pathomorphologic abnormalities were detected and classified similarly with both methods. Conclusions: HCT and MRI are similarly useful for the noninvasive evaluation of the thoracic aorta in patients with CoA. But there can be a substantial variation in two subsequent measurements without an overall substantial bias toward larger diameter in one of the two methods. In repetitive studies, changes of the diameters should be interpreted with care, especially when assessing the progression of aortic diameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study objectives: We sought to compare catheter studies using a right ventricular ejection fraction (REF) catheter together with echocardiography and MRI in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Patients and methods: We compared hemodynamic findings, echocardiography, and MRI studies in 16 patients with pulmonary hypertension. Six healthy volunteers served as control subjects for the MRI studies. Results: MRI imaging provided accurate assessment of cardiac output in all but two patients. As compared with MRI, the REF catheter constantly underestimated the REF and overestimated right ventricular volumes in patients with pulmonary hypertension. REF, end-systolic and end-diastolic right ventricular volumes, and right ventricular muscle mass, as determined by MRI, were almost identical in patients with preserved cardiac function and those with low-output failure. The only factor that was different in both groups was the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. Conclusion: Right ventricular dimensions and muscle mass do not differ in patients with pulmonary hypertension who have low cardiac output and those who do not. According to our results, the major determinant of cardiac output in these patients appears to be the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. The REF catheter provides invalid data on right ventricular dimensions in patients with pulmonary hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare images of the aorta obtained with helical CT (HCT) scanning and MRI for the follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Design: Longitudinal study. Setting: Department of adult congenital heart disease in a tertiary university hospital. Patients: A total of 37 adults (age range, 16 to 68 years; women, 13) with CoA (after surgery, 34 patients; native, 2 patients; after balloon-angioplasty, 1 patient) Measurements and Results: All patients underwent both HCT and MRI of the thoracic aorta within a mean (+/- SD) time interval of 1.86 +/- 1.11 years. Aortic diameters measured at six intrathoracic levels showed a high correlation (r = 0.79 to 0.94). On average, slightly lower diameters were measured with MRI (1.2 mm). But there was a substantial variation between the two measurements with differences of up to 9 mm. All other pathomorphologic abnormalities were detected and classified similarly with both methods. Conclusions: HCT and MRI are similarly useful for the noninvasive evaluation of the thoracic aorta in patients with CoA. But there can be a substantial variation in two subsequent measurements without an overall substantial bias toward larger diameter in one of the two methods. In repetitive studies, changes of the diameters should be interpreted with care, especially when assessing the progression of aortic diameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]