Search

Purpose: To compare dermal regenerative template (DRT), with and without split-thickness skin-grafting (STSG), and urinary bladder matrix (UBM) for coverage of lower extremity wounds. Methods: A retrospective review of 56 lower extremity wounds treated with either DRT and STSG (DRT-S) (n = 18), DRT only (n = 17), or UBM only (n = 21). Patient characteristics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, injury characteristics, wound characteristics, use of negative pressure wound therapy, surgical details, postoperative care, and failure of primary wound coverage procedure were documented. Results: The DRT group, compared to the DRT-S group, was older [median difference (MD) 17.4 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1–25.7; p = 0.0008], more diabetic (proportional difference (PD) 54.2%, CI 21.2–76.1%; p = 0.002), had smaller wounds (MD − 91.0 cm2, CI − 125.0 to − 38.0; p = 0.0008), more infected wounds (PD 49.0%, CI 16.1–71.7%; p = 0.009), a shorter length of stay after coverage (MD − 5.0 days, CI − 29.0 to − 1.0; p = 0.005), and no difference in primary wound coverage failure (41.2% vs. 55.6%; p = 0.50). The UBM group, compared to the DRT group, was younger (MD − 6.8 years; CI − 13.5 to − 0.1; p = 0.04), had fewer patients with an ASA > 2 (PD − 35.0%, CI − 55.2% to − 7.0%; p = 0.02), diabetes (PD − 49.2%, CI − 72.4% to − 17.6%; p = 0.003), and had no difference in primary wound coverage failure (36.4% vs. 41.2%; p = 1.0). Failure of primary wound coverage was found to only be associated with larger wound surface areas (MD 22.0 cm2, CI 4.0–90.0; p = 0.01). Conclusions: DRT and UBM coverage had similar rates of primary wound coverage failure for lower extremity wounds. Level of evidence: Diagnostic, Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Distal humeral fractures represent approximately 2% of fractures in adults and are often treated operatively to restore stable humeral columns and allow early elbow motion. Diagnosis is made with orthogonal radiographs. The traction view radiograph and computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction can be helpful in preoperative planning. Treatment options include: (1) nonoperative management, which is reserved for lower-demand, medically unwell, elderly patients, (2) surgical osteosynthesis, which remains the treatment of choice for most fractures, and (3) prosthetic replacement with either hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty, which is indicated for distal complex comminuted fracture patterns in elderly, low-demand patients with poor bone quality. A thorough understanding of the anatomy around the elbow is critical when planning surgical approach and reduction. Controversies exist in the following areas: (1) surgical approach, (2) management of the ulnar nerve, (3) plating technique—parallel versus orthogonal, and (4) whether osteosynthesis or prosthetic elbow replacement is superior in the elderly population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A dorsal wrist-spanning plate (DWSP) can be affixed to the second or third metacarpal, depending on the morphology of the distal radial fracture (DRF) and on surgeon preference, but comparative biomechanical analyses between these methods are limited. This biomechanical study compared fixation to the second metacarpal versus the third metacarpal as measured by lunate facet fragment displacement in a cadaveric model of an axially loaded intra-articular DRF. The construct rigidity with the addition of an intrafragmentary lunate facet locking screw was also evaluated.Methods: A sample size of 14 cadaveric matched pairs was calculated to achieve 81.7% power. The 28 limbs were randomized to DWSP fixation to the second metacarpal (Group 1) or third metacarpal (Group 2); each wrist underwent an osteotomy simulating an unstable intra-articular DRF. Limbs were tested at axial loads of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 N. Lunate facet displacement from the metaphyseal fragment at each load was measured with use of differential variable reluctance transducers. After initial testing, a locking screw was placed through the plate into the lunate facet fragment in the third metacarpal group (Group 3). Displacement measurements were repeated for all loads. Paired 2-tailed t tests with Bonferroni correction (significance, p < 0.008) were performed to assess differences in fragment stability between groups.Results: The average fracture displacement at 300 N was 0.8 mm in Group 1, 0.4 mm in Group 2, and 0.2 mm in Group 3. Plating to the third metacarpal more effectively resisted displacement compared with the second metacarpal at all axial loads (p < 0.008). The addition of a lunate facet screw further stiffened the construct at loads of ≥200 N (p < 0.008).Conclusions: Plate fixation to the third metacarpal with an intrafragmentary screw was the most biomechanically favorable construct, although other factors may favor an alternative distal fixation site. Mean displacement of the lunate facet fragment at 300 N was <1 mm in all groups.Clinical Relevance: The present study demonstrated that a DWSP affixed to the third metacarpal with an intrafragmentary screw provides the most effective stabilization of the lunate facet fragment in intra-articular DRFs. This study validates the use of intrafragmentary screws to increase stability in DWSP fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case: A 35-year-old man sustained a Grade I open right mid-diaphyseal humerus fracture and high radial nerve transection from a motor vehicle accident. Acute humeral plate osteosynthesis and radial nerve reconstruction using an intercalary 4-cm processed nerve allograft (PNA) was performed. Five years postoperatively, elbow extension, forearm supination, and wrist extension were 5/5 strength and independent digital extension was 52/5. Radial nerve sensation recovered to 90% of the uninjured side. Conclusions: Use of PNA resulted in outcomes comparable with or superior to autograft reconstruction or secondary tendon transfers and is a reasonable reconstructive option for similar acute, mixed sensorimotor nerve injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Changes in intra-articular pressure have not been previously described in relation to the management of radial head fractures. We hypothesized that pressure within the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints would increase with progressive radial head resection, mimicking a displaced radial head fracture, in a cadaveric model. Methods: Ten cadaveric specimens were tested. Intra-articular pressure sensors were used to measure pressure within the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints with the forearm in full supination. The elbow was loaded to 100 N in extension, 45° of flexion, and 90° of flexion under the following conditions: (1) intact radial head, (2) 20% radial head resection, (3) 40% radial head resection, and (4) 100% radial head resection. Results: The distribution of pressure between the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints did not change with sequential, partial resection of the radial head (radiocapitellar joint, between 48.92% and 53.79%; ulnotrochlear joint, between 46.21% and 51.08%). After 20% resection, radiocapitellar peak contact pressure (PCP) increased by 22% (from 1,410 to 1,721.5 kPa) and ulnotrochlear PCP increased by 36% (from 1,319 to 1,797.5 kPa). After 40% resection, radiocapitellar PCP increased by 123% (from 1,410 to 3,145 kPa; p = 0.0003) and ulnotrochlear PCP increased by 105% (from 1,319 to 2,702 kPa; p = 0.007). Ulnotrochlear PCP increased by a total of 159% after complete radial head resection (from 1,319 to 3,415.5 kPa; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Pressures in the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints were equally distributed with an intact radial head and after partial resection. Radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear pressures increased with increasing radial head resection, significantly exceeding 100% of normal after radial head resection of 40% of the anterolateral diameter. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The modified Kocher and extensor digitorum communis (EDC)-splitting intervals are commonly utilized to approach the lateral elbow. Iatrogenic injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament may result in posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). in the present cadaveric study, we (1) evaluated lateral elbow stability following the use of these approaches and (2) assessed the accuracy of static lateral elbow radiographs as a diagnostic tool for PLRI. Methods: Tenmatched-pair cadaveric upper-extremity specimens (n = 20) were randomly assigned to Kocher or EDC-splitting approaches. Specimens underwent evaluation pre-dissection, post-dissection, and following repair of the surgical interval. Clinical evaluation of lateral elbow stability was performed with the lateral pivot-shift maneuver. Radiographic radiocapitellar displacement was evaluated with the fully extended hanging arm test and on lateral elbow 30° flexion radiographs. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction were utilized to compare groups. Results: AllKocher group specimens (10 of 10) developed PLRI on the pivot-shift maneuver following dissection.No EDC-splitting group specimens (0 of 10) developed instability with pivot-shift testing. The fully extended hanging arm test showed no difference in radiocapitellar displacement between groups (p > 0.008). Lateral elbow 30° flexion radiographs in the Kocher group showed an increased radiocapitellar displacement difference (mean, 8.46 mm) following dissection compared with the pre-dissection baseline (p < 0.008). Following repair of the Kocher interval, the radiocapitellar displacement (mean, 6.43 mm) remained greater than pre-dissection (mean, 2.26 mm; p < 0.008). In the EDC-splitting group, no differences were detected in radiocapitellar displacement on lateral elbow radiographs with either the fully extended hanging arm or lateral elbow 30° flexion positions. Conclusions: The Kocher approach produced PLRI that did not return to baseline conditions following repair of the surgical interval. The EDC-splitting approach did not cause elbow instability clinically or radiographically. The hanging arm test was not reliable for the detection of PLRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Carpal tunnel (CT) syndrome continues to be a commonly treated hand pathology. We aimed to evaluate several CT injection techniques for (1) spatial accuracy within the CT and (2) risk of median nerve (MN) injury. Our purpose was to evaluate for any significant differences in accuracy of needle placement within the carpal tunnel and final distance between the needle tip and the MN with each technique. Methods: Fifteen fresh frozen cadaveric arms were used for this study. Six different injection techniques for CT injection were performed on each specimen, including palmaris longus, ulnar to flexor carpi radialis, trans-flexor carpi radialis, volar radial, volar ulnar, and direct through the palm techniques. After needle placement, a standard open CT release was performed to assess for accuracy of placement within the CT and measure needle position in relation to the MN and other anatomic structures. Results: Accurate intra-CT needle placement was seen in 91% of injections. While there was no significant difference between injection techniques for distance to nearest tendon (p = 0.1531), the trans-flexor carpi radialis (tFCR), volar radial (VR), and volar ulnar (VU) techniques consistently provided the greatest intra-CT distance from needle tip to median nerve (p = 0.0019). The least incidence of intraneural needle placement was found with the tFCR and VR approaches. Conclusion: All six injection techniques reliably enter the CT space. The lowest risk to the MN was found with tFCR and VR techniques, and we recommend these techniques for safe and effective needle placement to avoid iatrogenic intraneural injection. Level of evidence: Level V: Cadaveric Study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dr. Miller Edwin Preston was a surgeon with a deep interest in trauma and orthopaedics who practiced in Denver in the early 1900s. Dr. Preston arrived in Denver shortly after the creation of Denver's first city hospital in 1860. This hospital would later be renamed to Denver General Hospital and then Denver Health Medical Center. It excels for the quality of its emergency medicine residency program, a very high survival rate for severely injured patients and the clinical pathways and algorithms pertinent to the management of haemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries among others. Today, Dr. Preston's legacy of excellence in the management of trauma patients is alive and well at Denver Health Medical Center, the city's only level-one safety net hospital and academic affiliate of the University of Colorado Medical School. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]