Search

Background: Proper evaluation of ocular fundi is an integral part of neurological examination. Unfortunately, neurology residents are increasingly uncomfortable performing fundoscopy and interpreting findings because of diminishing skills and lack of experience. This became more prominent during the COVID-19 pandemic as fundoscopy requires proximity to the patient. With the recent dramatic improvement of smartphone cameras, fundus photography using the PanOptic Ophthalmoscope (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY) with a smartphone adapter offered an alternative to direct fundoscopic examination. We present the first experience with our own design of a universal smartphone adapter.Methods: This is a single-center case series, consecutive for a single user and certain presenting neurological symptoms, which is aimed to evaluate the feasibility and practicality of a new, universal PanOptic smartphone adapter. Presenting symptoms included headache, ocular symptoms, seizure, or encephalopathy. We used 3D modeling and printing techniques to create the adapter. We also developed a methodology of capturing stereoscopic images of the optic disc using a single smartphone camera, but the method was not systematically evaluated in this paper.Results: Here we present our initial experience of fundus video/photography in patients, who presented with encephalopathy, headache, seizure, vision loss, and other ocular symptoms. Fundoscopic abnormalities were discovered in 11 out of 100 patients. Some were incidental findings and were unrelated to the presentation. In one case, fundoscopy played a critical role in establishing the correct diagnosis.Conclusions: Our custom-designed smartphone adapter allowed obtaining high-quality video and photo recordings using PanOptic Ophthalmoscope. The acquisition of high-quality photos enables a high-yield diagnostic tool and allows revisiting the image in the patient's chart. Improvement of smartphone cameras opens vast horizons for stereo-fundoscopy and 3D reconstruction of the ocular fundus without using sophisticated and costly equipment. Microscopic eye movements allow taking snapshots of two side-by-side photos for 3D reconstruction and stereoscopic image viewing, which is the next level of optic disc assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• End-stage renal disease and dialysis are associated with poor quality of life and long-term outcomes, and renal transplantation improves long-term mortality and quality of life. • Patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are less likely to be selected for renal transplantation despite small studies demonstrating improvement in LVEF after transplantation. • In patients with impaired LVEF, renal transplantation resulted in improvement of cardiac function in most patients regardless of coronary artery disease status. • There was no statistically significant difference for graft failure or mortality between patients with pretransplant LVEF <50% vs LVEF ≥50%. • Patients on dialysis tend to develop left ventricular dysfunction but can experience positive outcomes after renal transplantation. Renal transplantation improves long-term outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are less likely to be selected for renal transplantation. We sought to evaluate the effect of renal transplantation in this population. We retrospectively evaluated 181 patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2011 and 2016. For patients with pretransplant LVEF <50% (cohort 1) and ≥50% (cohort 2), we evaluated the effect of renal transplantation on LVEF, graft failure, and mortality. Cohort 1 comprised 24 patients (mean age, 47 years; pretransplant LVEF 38%). Cohort 2 comprised 157 patients (mean age, 53 years; pretransplant LVEF 64%). Forty-six percent of cohort 1 experienced significant improvement in LVEF posttransplant, with mean LVEF improvement from 38% to 66%. There was no significant association between pretransplant LVEF and graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-11.4; P =.1) or mortality (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.3-3.6; P =.9). Coronary artery disease predicted mortality (HR = 3.12; 95% CI, 1.2-8.4; P =.02). Older age trended toward higher mortality (HR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P =.05). Younger age predicted graft failure (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9; P =.02). In patients with ESRD undergoing renal transplantation, there was no significant association between pretransplant LVEF and mortality or graft failure, suggesting that patients with ESRD with impaired LVEF can experience positive posttransplant outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed as a viable and in some cases superior alternative to warfarin. These agents have overcome some of the limitations of warfarin, which has a narrow therapeutic window and many food and drug interactions. DOACs have been demonstrated to have a more predictable and reliable pharmacology and, unlike warfarin, do not require frequent monitoring of anticoagulant effect. For these reasons, the use of DOACs is increasing. Despite the many positive attributes of these agents, limitations and contraindications do exist. An understanding of the pharmacology, indications, and contraindications is therefore crucial for effective patient management. We review the available agents to aid in effective drug utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]