Search

A young woman with Rogers syndrome (thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anaemia, diabetes mellitus and sensorineural deafness) presented with headache, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia and features of an upper gastrointestinal bleed, 1 month after radiofrequency cardiac ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. She deteriorated rapidly after endoscopy and subsequently died. Brain imaging during the acute deterioration showed diffuse intracranial air embolism and hypoxic-ischaemic injury. Postmortem examination showed an atrio-oesophageal fistula, a rare complication of cardiac ablation. Clinicians should suspect this condition in patients with acute neurological deterioration after cardiac ablation who have diffuse air embolism on imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaccination against viruses has rarely been associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and an association with the COVID-19 vaccine is unknown. We performed a population-based study of National Health Service data in England and a multicentre surveillance study from UK hospitals to investigate the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and GBS. Firstly, case dates of GBS identified retrospectively in the National Immunoglobulin Database from 8 December 2021 to 8 July 2021 were linked to receipt dates of COVID-19 vaccines using data from the National Immunisation Management System in England. For the linked dataset, GBS cases temporally associated with vaccination within a 6-week risk window of any COVID-19 vaccine were identified. Secondly, we prospectively collected incident UK-wide (four nations) GBS cases from 1 January 2021 to 7 November 2021 in a separate UK multicentre surveillance database. For this multicentre UK-wide surveillance dataset, we explored phenotypes of reported GBS cases to identify features of COVID-19 vaccine-associated GBS. Nine hundred and ninety-six GBS cases were recorded in the National Immunoglobulin Database from January to October 2021. A spike of GBS cases above the 2016–2020 average occurred in March–April 2021. One hundred and ninety-eight GBS cases occurred within 6 weeks of the first-dose COVID-19 vaccination in England [0.618 cases per 100,000 vaccinations; 176 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), 21 tozinameran (Pfizer) and one mRNA-1273 (Moderna)]. The 6-week excess of GBS (compared to the baseline rate of GBS cases 6–12 weeks after vaccination) occurred with a peak at 24 days post-vaccination; first-doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 accounted for the excess. No excess was seen for second-dose vaccination. The absolute number of excess GBS cases from January–July 2021 was between 98–140 cases for first-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. First-dose tozinameran and second-dose of any vaccination showed no excess GBS risk. Detailed clinical data from 121 GBS patients were reported in the separate multicentre surveillance dataset during this timeframe. No phenotypic or demographic differences identified between vaccine-associated and non-vaccinated GBS cases occurring in the same timeframe. Analysis of the linked NID/NIMS dataset suggested that first-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination is associated with an excess GBS risk of 0.576 (95% confidence interval 0.481–0.691) cases per 100 000 doses. However, examination of a multicentre surveillance dataset suggested that no specific clinical features, including facial weakness, are associated with vaccination-related GBS compared to non-vaccinated cases. The pathogenic cause of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 specific first dose link warrants further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In clinical neurology practice, there are few sensitive, specific and responsive serological biomarkers reflecting pathological processes affecting the peripheral nervous system. Instead, we rely on surrogate multimodality biomarkers for diagnosis and management. Correct use and interpretation of the available tests is essential to ensure that appropriate treatments are used and adjusted in a timely fashion. The incorrect application or interpretation of biomarkers can result in misdiagnosis and delays in appropriate treatment. Here, we discuss the uses and limitations of such biomarkers and discuss possible future developments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patient‐reported outcome measures engage patients in disease severity measurement and the metrics reported can be meaningful to their lives. The Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal protein and Skin changes syndrome (POEMS) is a complex multisystem disorder with disabling neuropathy which is distinct from other acquired inflammatory neuropathies. No current POEMS‐specific validated disability scales exist. To address this, we have produced a Rasch‐built overall disability scale (RODS) specific to POEMS. A 146‐item preliminary questionnaire containing relevant activity and participation items for neuropathic disability was applied to 49 clinically stable patients with POEMS from the UK national POEMS cohort. A total of 123 items not fulfilling Rasch model expectations were sequentially removed. The final 23‐item POEMS‐RODS fulfilled Rasch model expectations and showed acceptable test‐retest reliability. The 23‐item POEMS‐RODS is a disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure able to detect activity limitations within the range of ability demonstrated by the UK POEMS cohort. Larger international studies are needed to confirm the broader applicability and responsiveness of this scale in other countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunoglobulin (Ig) is used to treat chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMNCB). Regular infusions may be used for symptom control. Disease activity is monitored with clinical outcome measurements. We examined outcome measure variation during clinically stable periods in Ig‐treated CIDP and MMNCB patients. We explored utility of serial outcome measurement in long‐term outcome prediction. Retrospective longitudinal analysis of a single neuroscience centre's Ig‐treated CIDP and MMNCB patients, 2009‐2020, was performed. Mean and percentage change for grip strength, Rasch‐built overall disability scales (RODS) and MRC sum scores (MRC‐SS) during periods of clinical stability were compared to score‐specific minimal clinically important differences (MCID). Latent class mixed modelling (LCMM) was used to identify longitudinal trends and factors influencing long‐term outcome. We identified 85 CIDP and 23 MMNCB patients (1423 datapoints; 5635 treatment‐months). Group‐averaged outcome measures varied little over time. Intra‐individual variation exceeded MCID for RODS in 44.2% CIDP and 16.7% MMNCB datapoints, grip strength in 10.6% (CIDP) and 8.8%/27.2% (MMNCB right/left hand) and MRC‐SS in 43.5% (CIDP) and 20% (MMNCB). Multivariate LCMM identified subclinical trends towards improvement (32 patients) and deterioration (73 patients) in both cohorts. At baseline, CIDP 'deteriorators' were older than 'improvers' (66.2 vs 57 years, P =.025). No other individual factors predicted categorisation. The best model for 'deteriorator' identification was contiguous sub‐MCID decline in more than one outcome measure (CIDP: sensitivity 74%, specificity 59%; MMNCB: sensitivity 73%, specificity 88%). Outcome measure interpretation determines therapeutic decision‐making in Ig‐dependent neuropathy patients, but intra‐individual variation is common, often exceeding MCID. Here we show sub‐MCID contiguous changes in more than one outcome measurement are a better predictor of long‐term outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Individualized dosing is an established approach in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment for inflammatory neuropathies. There is less experience in effective dosing strategies for subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulin. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with inflammatory neuropathies transferring from IVIg to SCIg in two UK peripheral nerve services. I-RODS and grip strength were used to measure outcome. Dose and clinical progress were documented at 1 year and at last review. Results: 44/56 patients remained on maintenance SCIg beyond 1 year (mean 3.3 years, range 1–9 years) with stable clinical outcomes. Clinical deteriorations were corrected by small increases in SCIg dose in 20 patients at 1 year, a further 9 requiring subsequent further up-titrations. Sixteen tolerated dose reduction. Mean dose change was + 2.4% from baseline. Two patients required IVIg bolus rescue (2 g/kg). Three patients successfully discontinued Ig therapy. Nine patients returned to IVIg due to clinical relapse or patient preference. Overall tolerance was good. Discussion: Dose titration to clinical response is an effective approach in SCIg maintenance therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Valid, responsive blood biomarkers specific to peripheral nerve damage would improve management of peripheral nervous system (PNS) diseases. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is sensitive for detecting axonal pathology but is not specific to PNS damage, as it is expressed throughout the PNS and CNS. Peripherin, another intermediate filament protein, is almost exclusively expressed in peripheral nerve axons. We postulated that peripherin would be a promising blood biomarker of PNS axonal damage. We demonstrated that peripherin is distributed in sciatic nerve, and to a lesser extent spinal cord tissue lysates, but not in brain or extra-neural tissues. In the spinal cord, anti-peripherin antibody bound only to the primary cells of the periphery (anterior horn cells, motor axons and primary afferent sensory axons). In vitro models of antibody-mediated axonal and demyelinating nerve injury showed marked elevation of peripherin levels only in axonal damage and only a minimal rise in demyelination. We developed an immunoassay using single molecule array technology for the detection of serum peripherin as a biomarker for PNS axonal damage. We examined longitudinal serum peripherin and NfL concentrations in individuals with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS, n = 45, 179 time points), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP, n = 35, 70 time points), multiple sclerosis (n = 30), dementia (as non-inflammatory CNS controls, n = 30) and healthy individuals (n = 24). Peak peripherin levels were higher in GBS than all other groups (median 18.75 pg/ml versus < 6.98 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). Peak NfL was highest in GBS (median 220.8 pg/ml) and lowest in healthy controls (median 5.6 pg/ml), but NfL did not distinguish between CIDP (17.3 pg/ml), multiple sclerosis (21.5 pg/ml) and dementia (29.9 pg/ml). While peak NfL levels were higher with older age (rho = +0.39, P < 0.0001), peak peripherin levels did not vary with age. In GBS, local regression analysis of serial peripherin in the majority of individuals with three or more time points of data (16/25) displayed a rise-and-fall pattern with the highest value within the first week of initial assessment. Similar analysis of serial NfL concentrations showed a later peak at 16 days. Group analysis of serum peripherin and NfL levels in GBS and CIDP patients were not significantly associated with clinical data, but in some individuals with GBS, peripherin levels appeared to better reflect clinical outcome measure improvement. Serum peripherin is a promising new, dynamic and specific biomarker of acute PNS axonal damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and the role of peripherin as a biomarker of axonal damage. The authors acknowledge the historical and clinical literature that has contributed to our understanding of GBS, but emphasize the need for modern data to further enhance our knowledge. They discuss the neurophysiological classification of GBS and the concept of nodo-paranodopathies, where immunological attack at or around the nodes of Ranvier can result in various forms of damage. The authors also mention ongoing research on peripherin and its potential correlations with different aspects of GBS. Overall, while progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of GBS, there is still much to learn. [Extracted from the article]

Reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have emerged during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This epidemiological and cohort study sought to investigate any causative association between COVID-19 infection and GBS. The epidemiology of GBS cases reported to the UK National Immunoglobulin Database was studied from 2016 to 2019 and compared to cases reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were stratified by hospital trust and region, with numbers of reported cases per month. UK population data for COVID-19 infection were collated from UK public health bodies. In parallel, but separately, members of the British Peripheral Nerve Society prospectively reported incident cases of GBS during the pandemic at their hospitals to a central register. The clinical features, investigation findings and outcomes of COVID-19 (definite or probable) and non-COVID-19 associated GBS cases in this cohort were compared. The incidence of GBS treated in UK hospitals from 2016 to 2019 was 1.65-1.88 per 100 000 individuals per year. GBS incidence fell between March and May 2020 compared to the same months of 2016-19. GBS and COVID-19 incidences during the pandemic also varied between regions and did not correlate with one another (r = 0.06, 95% confidence interval: -0.56 to 0.63, P = 0.86). In the independent cohort study, 47 GBS cases were reported (COVID-19 status: 13 definite, 12 probable, 22 non-COVID-19). There were no significant differences in the pattern of weakness, time to nadir, neurophysiology, CSF findings or outcome between these groups. Intubation was more frequent in the COVID-19 affected cohort (7/13, 54% versus 5/22, 23% in COVID-19-negative) attributed to COVID-19 pulmonary involvement. Although it is not possible to entirely rule out the possibility of a link, this study finds no epidemiological or phenotypic clues of SARS-CoV-2 being causative of GBS. GBS incidence has fallen during the pandemic, which may be the influence of lockdown measures reducing transmission of GBS inducing pathogens such as Campylobacter jejuni and respiratory viruses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) involves the extracorporeal separation of plasma from the cellular components of blood with replacement fluid, such as human albumin or fresh frozen plasma. A number of studies across the world revealed that more than one third of TPE procedures were performed for neurological disorders. Myasthenia gravis (MG), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) were the most frequently cited indications for TPE, followed by multiple sclerosis (MS). However, treatments of these conditions have evolved over the years and it is likely that this has impacted on clinical practice. Here we present our experience of using TPE to treat neurological disorders. We reviewed the medical records of all 63 patients who received 349 procedures over 70 therapeutic cycles between 2012 and 2015 in a tertiary neurology centre. In total only 2 patients with GBS and MG were treated with TPE. The commonest indication was voltage gated potassium channel (VGKC) complex antibody associated disorders followed by CIDP and MS. There were 11 patients with limbic encephalitis. Nine of them had antibodies against VGKC complex and two had N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antibodies. Sixty four percent of patients with limbic encephalitis and overall 78% of patients responded to TPE. The complication rate associated with this procedure was 8.6 per 100 therapeutic cycle. There was no treatment related mortality. We observed a change in indications of TPE compared to historical studies. It was less frequently used to treated GBS and MG. It was found to be safe and effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]