Search

Low back pain (LBP) continues to be one of the most common conditions leading patients to seek medical care globally. The NP is on the frontline, playing an integral role in caring for patients with LBP. Understanding the etiology of LBP is essential in the treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe variability in spinal manipulation technique details and adverse event (AE) documentation of spinal manipulation during pregnancy. Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed investigations of spinal manipulation during pregnancy. Criteria for inclusion was as follows: high velocity, low amplitude thrust manipulation performed, subjects pregnant during manipulation, and English language. Studies were excluded when participants were not currently pregnant, and when the manipulation performed was not high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust. Data extraction included study design, number of participants, gestational age, spinal region, number of manipulations, manipulation technique details, profession of manipulator, AE reporting (Yes vs. No), type, and number of AE. Out of 18 studies included in the review, only three provide details of the spinal manipulation technique. The reported variables include patient position, practitioner position, and direction of thrust. Fourteen studies documented AE; however, only seven provide AE details. Reporting of spinal manipulation techniques and AE during pregnancy were inconsistent. Replication of methods in future investigations is limited without more detailed documentation of manipulation techniques performed. Furthermore, determining the relative risk and safety of spinal manipulation during pregnancy is not possible without more detailed reporting of AE. Due to these inconsistencies, a checklist is proposed for standardized reporting of spinal manipulation techniques and AE. With more consistent reporting of these parameters, results of future investigations may allow for more definitive and generalizable safety recommendations on spinal manipulation during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hip pain is a common and sometimes disabling condition that affects adults in the primary care setting. The NP must understand the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options for patients with hip pain. Proper care of these patients often involves conservative medical management and coordination with physical therapy. Hip pain is a common and disabling condition that affects adults in the primary care setting. The NP must understand the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options for patients with hip pain. Proper care of these patients often involves conservative medical management and coordination with physical therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examine: (1) whether variability in dry needling (DN) dosage affects pain outcomes, (2) if effect sizes are clinically important, and (3) how adverse events (AE) were documented and whether DN safety was determined. Nine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DN in symptomatic musculoskeletal disorders. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Included RCTs met PEDro criteria #1 and scored > 7/10. Data extraction included DN dosage, pain outcome measures, dichotomous AE reporting (yes/no), and AE categorization. Clinically meaningful differences were determined using the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for pain outcomes. Out of 22 identified RCTs, 11 demonstrated significant between-group differences exceeding the MCID, suggesting a clinically meaningful change in pain outcomes. Nine documented whether AE occurred. Only five provided AEs details and four cited a standard means to report AE. There was inconsistency in reporting DN dosing parameters and AE. We could not determine if DN dosing affects outcomes, whether DN consistently produces clinically meaningful changes, or establish optimal dosage. Without more detailed reporting, replication of methods in future investigations is severely limited. A standardized method is lacking to report, classify, and provide context to AE from DN. Without more detailed AE reporting in clinical trials investigating DN efficacy, a more thorough appraisal of relative risk, severity, and frequency was not possible. Based on these inconsistencies, adopting a standardized checklist for reporting DN dosage and AE may improve internal and external validity and the generalizability of results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Suboccipital myofascial trigger points are common in tension-type headaches. Compare the influence of clinical experience on the accuracy and safety of dry needle placement on the C2 laminar arch using a cranial-medial and caudal-medial technique to target obliquus capitus inferior in unembalmed cadavers. Three physical therapists inserted three 50 mm dry needles, per technique, individually toward the C2 laminar arch targeting the obliquus capitus inferior. Ultrasound video of each trial was recorded, and an investigator trained in ultrasound interpretation and blinded to experience level recorded needling accuracy. The novice, experienced and expert clinicians were accurate on 73.8%, 59.5% and 71.4% of caudal-medial trials, and 14.3%, 16.7% and 66.7% of cranial-medial trials, respectively, with each clinician striking the spinal cord at least once. The expert clinician was 10 times more likely to accurately reach the C2 laminar arch using the cranial-medial direction than the experienced and novice clinicians. Increased clinical experience improved accuracy reaching the C2 laminar arch, with all investigators being more accurate with the caudal-medial technique. Greater experience did not eliminate risk as all investigators recorded at least one incident of striking the spinal cord. Fewer spinal cord strikes occurred with the cranial-medial than the caudal-medial technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neurologic clustering of findings is recommended with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM). Hoffmann's Sign and Reverse Lhermitte's Sign have been associated with CSM, which, however, have not been discussed as the only objective findings that may cause clinical uncertainty. This case report describes how sensitizing Hoffmann's Sign following a Reverse Lhermitte's Sign guided reasoning, with a 66-year-old male presenting with a right lumbar radiculopathy diagnosis. Local lumbar symptoms and impairments were identified, however, a Reverse Lhermitte's Sign with cervical extension was the only finding that reproduced right lower extremity (LE) pain. Hoffmann's Sign, the only abnormal neurologic finding, became exaggerated when performed in cervical extension. Concern of an early presenting CSM accounting for right LE pain was considered. A neurosurgical consultation was initiated with concurrent guideline-based lumbar spine treatment and continued monitoring of neurologic status. Seven weeks after evaluation, sudden worsening of right LE symptoms, hand numbness, ataxia, and grip weakness occurred. Cervical magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated C3-6 cord compression. A multi-level cervical decompression surgery was performed. Using a sensitized Hoffmann's Sign-in response to a Reverse Lhermitte's Sign aided differential diagnosis of an early presenting CSM with reports of LE pain. The diagnostic utility of a sensitized Hoffmann's Sign is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myofascial trigger points are not an isolated neuromusculoskeletal phenomenon and have been implicated in systemic, visceral, and metabolic pathology, as a side effect of some medications and in the presence of psychological risk factors. This complexity can complicate adequate screening of patients prior to choosing dry needling as a treatment intervention. Regardless of whether clinicians practice in a direct access setting, they should be cognizant of medical conditions, comorbidities, and risk factors that will influence clinical decisions for dry-needling appropriateness, technique chosen, and potential adverse responses to treatment. Of primary concern are conditions that can either manifest with myalgia and/or myopathy or masquerade as a more common musculoskeletal condition. This clinical commentary reviews system-specific considerations and other common disorders that should be screened for and discusses not only whether dry needling is appropriate but comments on technique and dosage considerations when initiating dry needling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this anatomic investigation is to (1) establish accuracy of dry needle placement into the medial third of the piriformis muscle as it exits the pelvis from the greater sciatic notch in unembalmed cadaveric specimens, while avoiding puncture of the sciatic nerve, and (2) establish guidelines for dry needle length selection. Methods: Dry needles were placed in nineteen unembalmed cadaveric posterior hips. Dissection of the posterior hip musculature was performed to confirm location of the needle. A binary decision (yes/no) was made to determine whether the needle reached the piriformis muscle, went through the piriformis muscle, and/or pierced the sciatic nerve. Additionally, mean adipose tissue thickness, gluteus maximus muscle thickness, and perpendicular distance from the needle to the exiting sciatic nerve were recorded. Results: The needle reached the medial third of the piriformis in 16 out of 19 hips (84.2% accuracy) and never punctured the sciatic nerve. There was a fair (r = 0.493) and good (r = 0.759) correlation between the needle length and the mean fat thickness for the left and right hips, respectively. Discussion: A physical therapist was able to use bony landmark palpation to locate the piriformis muscle and use estimated adipose tissue thickness to choose a sufficient needle length to reach the medial third of the piriformis muscle. While the needle placement technique was safe and no sciatic nerve puncture occurred, the proximity of the piriformis muscle to the sciatic nerve warrants caution during needle placement. Level of Evidence: 2c [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This case report describes the effectiveness of thrust manipulation to the elbow and carpals in the management of a patient referred with a medical diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). The patient was a 45-year-old woman with a 6-week history of right medial elbow pain, ulnar wrist pain, and intermittent paresthesia in the ulnar nerve distribution. Upon initial assessment, she presented with a positive elbow flexion test and upper limb neurodynamic test with ulnar nerve bias. A biomechanical assessment of the elbow and carpals revealed a loss of lateral glide of the humerus on the ulna and a loss of palmar glide of the triquetral on the hamate. After the patient received two thrust manipulations of the elbow and one thrust manipulation of the carpals over the course of four sessions, her pain and paresthesia were resolved. This case demonstrates that the use of thrust manipulation to the elbow and carpals may be an effective approach in the management of insidious onset CuTS. This patient was successfully treated with thrust manipulation when joint dysfunction of the elbow and wrist were appropriately identified. This case report may shed light on the examination and management of insidious onset CuTS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the pathophysiology, assessment techniques, and management of hip pain in adults and the role of nurses in caring for patients with hip pain. Hip pain is a common complaint in older adults and adult athletes. This article discusses the pathophysiology, assessment techniques, and management of hip pain in adults and the role of nurses in caring for patients with hip pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]