Search

Background: Evaluation of novel compounds for COPD often relies on FEV1 for signal detection. Partial forced exhalations from end-tidal inspiration (PEFV) might complement FEV1 in identifying such a signal. We examined the prevalence of bronchodilator response (BDR) using PEFV and FEV1 in patients with COPD. Methods: 110 consecutive COPD patients were tested prospectively with PEFV and maximal expiratory flow before and after inhalation of a short-acting β2 agonist (salbutamol, 400 µg). Partial flow at 800 ml above residual volume was derived from the PEFV (PF800). Significant changes in PF800 and/or FEV1 were set at the upper 95% confidence interval after placebo (n = 28). Results: Four groups were identified by the presence (+) or absence (-) of a BDR: Group 1 [PF800 (-)FEV1(-)] when no change was observed (n = 31), Group 2 [PF800(+)FEV1(-)] when PF800 alone improved (n = 31), Group 3 [PF800(-)FEV1(+)] when FEV1 alone improved (n = 26), and Group 4 [PF800(+)FEV1(+)] when both variables improved (n = 18). There were 35 non-responders in any parameter, and 75/110 subjects who showed a response in at least one parameter. The changes in PF800 and FEV1 were not correlated suggesting these assess different airway generations. Conclusions: The use of PF800 increased detection of a BDR in COPD compared to FEV1 alone and may reflect small airway responses. The PEFV maneuver is simple, repeatable and may avoid some of the theoretical disadvantages of FEV1. The role of PF800 for evaluating novel anti-inflammatory agents remains to be determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This work was carried out to study induction with sevoflurane in adult patients with predictive signs of difficult intubation.Study design: Randomised prospective study.Patients and methods: The study had two parts. Part I : 15 patients without predictive signs of difficult intubation but with a cervical collar. Eight patients were anaesthetised with propofol 3 mg·kg–1 and fentanyl 2 μg·kg–1, seven with sevoflurane 8%. Part II : 20 patients with predictive signs of difficult intubation anaesthetised with sevoflurane 8%.Results: In part I, all patients were intubated, the time for intubation was longer with sevoflurane, 6 vs 4 min. They were apneic only in the propofol group. After intubation, 7 cases of coughing (4 severe) occurred in the propofol group and 3 moderate coughing in the sevoflurane group. In part II, one patient experienced considerable agitation after oral airway insertion and was excluded. Other patients were intubated with sevoflurane. Seven patients were intubated with a bougie, three patients through an intubating LMA and one patient with a rigid bronchoscope. The other patients were intubated with a Macintosh blade. The mean time for intubation was 10 ± 7 min and end tidal sevoflurane concentration after intubation was 4 ± 0.6%. After intubation, 7 cases of coughing (3 severe) occurred but no desaturation < 95 %. No significant haemodynamic variations occurred.Conclusion: Induction with sevoflurane 8% allowed tracheal intubation without major incidents. All patients breathed spontaneously. Sevoflurane can be recommended for induction in cases of predictive difficult intubation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]