Search

Hypocalcemia is a well-known complication of total thyroidectomy. Patients who have previously undergone gastric bypass surgery may be at increased risk of hypocalcemia due to gastrointestinal malabsorption, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and an underlying vitamin D deficiency. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman who underwent a total thyroidectomy for the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Her history included Roux-en-Ygastric bypass surgery. Following the thyroid surgery, she developed postoperative hypocalcemia that required large doses of oral calcium carbonate (7.5 g/ day), oral calcitriol (up to 4 µg/day), intravenous calcium gluconate (2.0 g/ day), calcium citrate (2.0 g/ day), and ergocalciferol (50,000 IU/day). Her serum calcium levels remained normal on this regimen after hospital discharge despite persistent hypoparathyroidism. Bariatric surgery patients who undergo thyroid surgery require aggressive supplementation to maintain normal serum calcium levels. Preoperative supplementation with calcium and vitamin D is strongly recommended [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible is a significant complication of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. In this condition, bone within the radiation field becomes devitalized and exposed through the overlying skin or mucosa, persisting as a non-healing wound for three months or more. In 1926, Ewing first recognized the bone changes associated with radiation therapy and described them as “radiation osteitis”. In 1983, Marx proposed the first staging system for ORN that also served as a treatment protocol. This protocol advocated that patients whose disease progressed following conservative therapy (hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), local wound care, debridement) were advanced to a radical resection with a staged reconstruction utilizing a non-vascularized bone graft. Since the introduction of Marx’s protocol, there have been advances in surgical techniques (i.e. microvascular surgery), as well as in imaging techniques, which have significantly impacted on the diagnosis and management of ORN. High resolution CT scans and orthopantamograms have become a key component in evaluating and staging ORN, prior to formulating a treatment plan. Patients can now be stratified based on imaging and clinical findings, and treatment can be determined based on the stage of disease, rather than determining the stage of disease based on a patient’s response to a standardized treatment protocol. Reconstructions are now routinely performed immediately after resection of the diseased tissue rather than in a staged fashion. Furthermore, the transfer of well-vascularized hard and soft tissue using microvascular surgery have brought the utility of HBO treatment in advanced ORN into question. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Reconstruction of the mandible has evolved significantly over the last 40years. Early attempts were often disfiguring and wrought with complications but with the introduction of free tissue transfer of well vascularized bone in the 1970’s there was a significant improvement in outcomes. In recent years the harvest, inset, and microvascular anatomosis have been refined to the point that success rates are reported as high as 99% throughout the literature. Focus has now shifted to optimizing functional and aesthetic outcomes after mandible reconstruction. This paper will be a review defect classification, goals of reconstruction, the various donor sites, dental rehabilitation, new advances, and persistent problems. Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects after ablative surgery is best accomplished using free tissue transfer to restore mandibular continuity and function. Reestablishing occlusion and optimizing tongue mobility are important to post-operative oral function. Persistent problems in oro-mandibular reconstruction relate to the effects of radiation treatment on the native tissue and include xerostomia, dysgeusia, osteoradionecrosis and trismus. These problems continue to plague the oral cancer patient despite the significant advances that allow a far more complete functional restoration than could be accomplished a mere two decades ago. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background  Collaboration has been shown to be beneficial when we have complex problems and highly specialized groups, such as in head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngology, plastic surgery, and oral maxillofacial surgeons perform head and neck reconstruction research. While the specialties represent unique backgrounds, the degree of interdisciplinary collaboration and subtopic focus is unknown. We sought to describe the frequency of interinstitutional interdisciplinary collaboration and examine the association of specialty with research subtopics. Methods  Oral presentations from 2014 to 2018 focused on head and neck reconstruction or associated principles at the main reconstructive academic meetings in otolaryngology (American Head and Neck Society), plastic surgery (American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery), and oral maxillofacial surgery (American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons) were reviewed. Author specialty and institution data were recorded. All abstracts were assigned a research subtopic, chosen based on identified themes. Subtopic frequencies among the specialties were compared. Results  Thirteen of 88 (15%) US institutions participate in interdisciplinary collaboration in head and neck reconstruction research. Of the remaining institutions, 23 (31%) have researchers performing parallel work and not collaborating. Certain research subtopics were more often presented by each specialty, representing differing interests. Conclusion  Collaboration among head and neck reconstruction research at the US institutions is low compared with the potential. Specialties focus on different research subtopics, and therefore can benefit from working together. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background context : Although cervical spine reconstruction with osteocutaneous fibular flap microvascular grafting has been described, simultaneous reconstruction of the cervical vertebral column and laryngectomy have not been described. Purpose: To present a unique case of combined cervical spine and laryngectomy reconstruction. Study design: Case report. Methods: We modified a previously reported procedure reconstituting the cervical spine and pharynx with a single fibular flap in a case of posterior pharyngeal ulceration and osteomyelitis/osteoradionecrosis without spinal deformity. Results: We present a case of simultaneous cervical stabilization and pharynx reconstruction with a fibular graft in a life-saving treatment of osteoradionecrosis complicated by acute cervical kyphosis and spinal cord compression in a 55-year-old patient with extensive head and neck cancer history and recent recurrence of hypopharyngeal cancer. Conclusions: Rigid anterior plate fixation and subsequent posterior fixation were required after corpectomy and total laryngectomy in our patient with extensive surgical scarring and radiation history because of severe spinal deformity secondary to osteoradionecrosis. We achieved successful preservation of neurologic function and resolution of pain. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: Surgical resection of oral cancer can result in altered speech, swallowing, and quality of life (QOL). To date, the oral outcome variables of tongue strength, tongue and jaw range of motion, and saliva production have not been extensively assessed. This pilot study was done to assess tongue strength along with other oral outcomes and their relationship to performance status for speech, swallowing, and QOL after partial glossectomy. Our aim was to create a norm for what should be considered a normal tongue strength value in this population. We hypothesized that patients with tongue strength of 30 kPa or greater would perform better on the performance status scale and various QOL measures than do patients with tongue strength of less than 30 kPa. Methods: We used a cross-sectional design in this study. The postoperative assessment included 1) Performance Status Scale and Karnofsky Performance Status Scale; 2) oral outcome variables of tongue strength, jaw range of motion, and saliva production; and 3) patient-rated QOL ratings via Eating Assessment Tool, M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, EORTC-H&N35, and Speech Handicap Index. Results: Patients with tongue strength of at least 30 kPa performed better on the performance status scales and various QOL measures. The cutoff score of 30 kPa for tongue strength measures revealed a trend in predicting performance on the scales and QOL measures. Conclusions: The oral outcome variables correlated with performance status for speech, swallowing, and QOL. We propose a norm for tongue strength in this population, based on the trend seen in this group of patients, as none previously existed. Future studies are under way that incorporate a larger sample size to further validate this norm. Future studies will also examine oral functional outcome measures in a larger population by including other oral and oropharyngeal sites to help predict speech and swallow performance status and QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The treatment of laryngeal cancer has evolved through several phases, starting with wide extirpative surgical resection, and evolving through an era of conservation surgery and, finally, planned treatment using modalities of irradiation, chemotherapy and surgery in various combinations. Attempts to extirpate laryngeal cancer date to the nineteenth century, but only by the mid-twentieth century did advances in anesthesia, blood transfusion and antibiotics, make this surgery safe and reliable. Techniques of partial laryngectomy by external approach developed in the second half of the twentieth century, and endoscopic use of the laser refined the concept and provided a new paradigm for surgical treatment, particularly for early lesions. During most of this era, radiation was employed as an alternative method of treatment, with surgery reserved for salvage of radiation failure. By the last decade of the twentieth century, and to the present time, the value of combined modality therapy, using planned combinations of irradiation, chemotherapy and surgery became the standard of care for advanced laryngeal cancer, permitting maximal laryngeal preservation with the highest attainable cure rates. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]