Search

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a widely recognized vestibular disorder which occurs with short periods of paroxysmal vertigo produced in specific positions. This investigation targets contrasting the adequacy of two unique moves utilized in the management of posterior canal BPPV (PC-BPPV). One is traditional procedure, Epley repositioning maneuver (ERM) and another is Gans Repositioning maneuver (GRM). To compare the efficacy of maneuvers on vertigo and dizziness for people with posterior canal BPPV using Dix hallpike test, Vertigo Analogue Scale (VAS) and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), 100 people will be recruited confirming to eligibility criteria for this two group (ERM group and GRM group) participant and assessor blinded randomized control study. After Participants will be randomly assigned to either group, the respective maneuver will be performed one or two times until the symptoms resolve. Post maneuver instructions will be demonstrated to each subject nicely. Then, family history will be taken using a questionnaire. Outcomes will be taken once after giving maneuver and then, once after 1 month of treatment. Main outcome variables include VAS, DHI, and Dix hallpike test negativity. If the results indicate that Gans Manoeuvre is equivalent to Epley manoeuvre, then in older and postural compromised BPPV patients who has cervical related neck stiffness and pain or any other disorder, where Epley manoeuvre can not be given as it involves neck extension and rotation, Gans manoeuvre can be given. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI/2019/10/021681). October 16, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: BPPV (benign paroxysmal positional vertigo) is a syndrome marked by brief bouts of vertigo accompanied by rapid changes in head position. Recent ongoing therapeutic approaches used are vestibular rehabilitation exercises and physical maneuvers like the Epley maneuver, Semont maneuver. Gans repositioning maneuver (GRM) is a new hybrid maneuver, consisting of safe and comfortable series of postures that can be conveniently applied on patients with any spinal pathology or even in elderly. Methods: Randomized controlled/clinical trials of the Gans maneuver were identified. The proportion of patients who improved as a result of each intervention was assessed, as well as the conversion of a 'positive' Dix–Hallpike test to a 'negative' Dix–Hallpike test. Results: Improvement was seen in almost all patients with the Gans maneuver and the Epley Maneuver in three trials with the pooled estimate for random effect model is 1.12 [0.87; 1.43: 100%]. There were no significant side effects from the treatment. Discussion: This study shows that the Gans maneuver is a safe and effective treatment for patients suffering from posterior canal BPPV. Trial registration: The review is registered in Prospero with no. CRD42021234100. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The Bobath approach, also known as neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT), is a widely used concept in the rehabilitation of stroke patients with hemiparesis in many countries. This technique is being used since years all over the world; however, strong evidence of its usefulness is still not present. This review is aimed to find out its effectiveness based on the randomized controlled trials in the rehabilitation of stroke patients with motor disability and to compare it with other therapeutic techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search on PubMed Central, Science-Direct, Cochrane, Scopus, Clinical Trial Database, and Indian Clinical Trial Registry in English till 31st July 2021 was undertaken. The review is published in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration number "CRD42019125400." Physiotherapy Evidence-based Database (PEDro) score has been used for the quality assessment of the studies. Randomized clinical trials that studied the comparative effect of the NDT/Bobath concept on motor activity outcomes and cognition/behavior in stroke patients in comparison with other rehabilitative techniques were included. Results: No strong documentation describing the effectiveness of this neuro-developmental treatment or its supporting neuro-developmental treatment in comparison with other advanced neuro-physiotherapeutic techniques has been found so as to consider it as the recommended treatment for post-stroke hemiplegia/hemiparesis. Methodological aspects of selected studies for further research are suggested. Interpretation and Conclusions: This study is inconclusive in determining the effectiveness of the Bobath approach for the movement rehabilitation of stroke patients. These results are similar to the results of previous reviews done on the same topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]