Search

Abstract Purpose: To examine the fluorescence patterns of macular drusen using indocyanine green (ICG) angiography in human subjects of different ages. Methods: A total of 180 eyes in 100 consecutive patients aged 34-90 years with macula drusen were evaluated with ICG angiography using the Topcon 1024 ImageNet system. Eyes were divided into two groups depending on age. The older group (subjects over the age of 55 years) comprised 170 eyes. The younger group (subjects 55 years or younger) comprised 10 eyes. The fluorescence patterns of the drusen were graded as hyper­fluorescent (brighter than the background fluorescence), hypofluorescent (darker than the background fluorescence) or isofluorescent (unable to be distinguished from the background fluorescence). The ICG angiogram appearances were correlated with the clinical types of drusen in differing age groups. Results: An age-dependent difference in the fluorescence pattern of drusen was observed. Drusen in the older group were hypofluorescent or isofluorescent (169/170 eyes). In contrast, drusen in the younger group (55 years or younger) were hyperfluorescent (10/10 eyes). Conclusions: This study defines the distinct age-dependent differences in the ICG fluorescence pattern of drusen. This heterogeneity might be due to differential binding of extravasated ICG to the constituents and histological site of the drusen deposits. Furthermore, ICG angiography is able to differentiate drusen types not possible by clinical and fluorescein angiographic evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: PurposeTo report optical coherence tomography findings in nicotinic acid maculopathy.: DesignObservational case report.: MethodsThe patient was examined with ophthalmoscopy, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography.: ResultsA 71-year-old man presented with bilateral decreased visual acuity with metamorphopsia. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated cystoid spaces in the outer plexiform layer and inner nuclear layer. Fluorescein angiography did not show leakage. Two weeks after stopping the nicotinic acid, the cystoid spaces resolved.: ConclusionsNiacin maculopathy causes cystoid spaces in the inner nuclear and outer plexiform layers that resolve with discontinuation of the drug. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Aptamers are oligonucleotide ligands that are selected for high-affinity binding to molecular targets. Pegaptanib sodium (Macugen; Eyetech Pharmaceuticals/Pfizer) is an RNA aptamer directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-165, the VEGF isoform primarily responsible for pathological ocular neovascularization and vascular permeability. After nearly a decade of preclinical development to optimize and characterize its biological effects, pegaptanib was shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration. Pegaptanib therefore has the notable distinction of being the first aptamer therapeutic approved for use in humans, paving the way for future aptamer applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pegaptanib, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, was evaluated in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: We conducted two concurrent, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, dose-ranging, controlled clinical trials using broad entry criteria. Intravitreous injection into one eye per patient of pegaptanib (at a dose of 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, or 3.0 mg) or sham injections were administered every 6 weeks over a period of 48 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who had lost fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity at 54 weeks. Results: In the combined analysis of the primary end point (for a total of 1186 patients), efficacy was demonstrated, without a dose-response relationship, for all three doses of pegaptanib (P<0.001 for the comparison of 0.3 mg with sham injection; P<0.001 for the comparison of 1.0 mg with sham injection; and P=0.03 for the comparison of 3.0 mg with sham injection). In the group given pegaptanib at 0.3 mg, 70 percent of patients lost fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity, as compared with 55 percent among the controls (P<0.001). The risk of severe loss of visual acuity (loss of 30 letters or more) was reduced from 22 percent in the sham-injection group to 10 percent in the group receiving 0.3 mg of pegaptanib (P<0.001). More patients receiving pegaptanib (0.3 mg), as compared with sham injection, maintained their visual acuity or gained acuity (33 percent vs. 23 percent; P=0.003). As early as six weeks after beginning therapy with the study drug, and at all subsequent points, the mean visual acuity among patients receiving 0.3 mg of pegaptanib was better than in those receiving sham injections (P<0.002). Among the adverse events that occurred, endophthalmitis (in 1.3 percent of patients), traumatic injury to the lens (in 0.7 percent), and retinal detachment (in 0.6 percent) were the most serious and required vigilance. These events were associated with a severe loss of visual acuity in 0.1 percent of patients. Conclusions: Pegaptanib appears to be an effective therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Its long-term safety is not known. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report the effects of photodynamic therapy using verteporfin in the treatment of patients with subfoveal idiopathic choroidal vascularization (CNV).Design: Interventional case series.Methods: In a retrospective study, eight eyes of eight consecutive patients aged 55 years or younger with subfoveal idiopathic CNV treated with photodynamic therapy using verteporfin were evaluated. Visual acuity was considered to be improved if the visual angle was halved, while acuity was thought to be worse if the visual angle doubled.Results: The eight patients included three men and five women with a mean (+/- SD) age of 34.6 (+/- 9.7) years (range 25-53 years). The mean follow-up time was 13.5 months. At the end of the follow-up period the visual acuity improved in five eyes (62.5%), remained unchanged in one (12.5%), and decreased in two (25%). The mean acuity improvement was 3.6 lines of Snellen acuity by the end of the follow-up period, a change that was statistically significant (P =.027, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No patient had any complication from the treatment.Conclusions: There is no widely accepted method for treating subfoveal idiopathic CNV and all previously investigated methods have had a significant number of serious side effects. Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this pilot study were limited, the encouraging results and lack of complications suggest that further study is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To determine if oral hydration decreases the incidence of verteporfin infusion-associated pain and to find out if other factors play a role in predisposing to this undesired complication.METHODS: Nonrandomized clinical trial. We prospectively examined 250 consecutive patients who have been diagnosed with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration and received photodynamic therapy using verteporfin. One hundred twenty-five patients were assigned to receive 500 ml of water orally administered 30 minutes before beginning the verteporfin infusion, and the remaining 125 consecutive patients were used as controls. Historical and clinical factors in these patients were evaluated for their association with the presence of verteporfin infusion-associated pain.RESULTS: Out of 125 patients receiving water before treatment 12 (9.6%) experienced verteporfin infusion-associated pain. Among the 125 patients who did not get hydration before therapy 12(9.6%) experienced verteporfin infusion-associated pain. There was no statistical difference between the incidence of pain in the two groups (P = 1.0). No statistically significant association was evidenced between the presence of pain and participant’s baseline characteristics, except for pain on previous administration of verteporfin (P < .001). Out of 250 total patients 24 (9.6%) developed verteporfin infusion-associated pain. Back pain was the most common and occurred in 21 (8.4%) patients, but other sites included leg, groin, chest, buttock, arm, and shoulder pain concurrently or independently. All patients had resolution of their pain, including chest pain, on cessation of the infusion.CONCLUSIONS: Verteporfin infusion-associated pain may be more common than has been previously reported and is not limited to the back area. It appears to be an idiosyncratic reaction to the drug. It does not seem to be prevented by oral hydration before infusion of verteporfin, and no baseline characteristics, other than a history of pain on previous infusion, seem to be predictive of verteporfin infusion-associated pain. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Pegaptanib, an anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, was evaluated in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: We conducted two concurrent, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, dose-ranging, controlled clinical trials using broad entry criteria. Intravitreous injection into one eye per patient of pegaptanib (at a dose of 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, or 3.0 mg) or sham injections were administered every 6 weeks over a period of 48 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who had lost fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity at 54 weeks. Results: In the combined analysis of the primary end point (for a total of 1186 patients), efficacy was demonstrated, without a dose–response relationship, for all three doses of pegaptanib (P<0.001 for the comparison of 0.3 mg with sham injection; P<0.001 for the comparison of 1.0 mg with sham injection; and P=0.03 for the comparison of 3.0 mg with sham injection). In the group given pegaptanib at 0.3 mg, 70 percent of patients lost fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity, as compared with 55 percent among the controls (P<0.001). The risk of severe loss of visual acuity (loss of 30 letters or more) was reduced from 22 percent in the sham-injection group to 10 percent in the group receiving 0.3 mg of pegaptanib (P<0.001). More patients receiving pegaptanib (0.3 mg), as compared with sham injection, maintained their visual acuity or gained acuity (33 percent vs. 23 percent; P=0.003). As early as six weeks after beginning therapy with the study drug, and at all subsequent points, the mean visual acuity among patients receiving 0.3 mg of pegaptanib was better than in those receiving sham injections (P<0.002). Among the adverse events that occurred, endophthalmitis (in 1.3 percent of patients), traumatic injury to the lens (in 0.7 percent), and retinal detachment (in 0.6 percent) were the most serious and required vigilance. These events were associated with a severe loss of visual acuity in 0.1 percent of patients. Conclusions: Pegaptanib appears to be an effective therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Its long-term safety is not known. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2805-16. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]