1. α-Trialkoxysilyl Functionalized PolycyclooctenesSynthesized by Chain-Transfer Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization.
- Author
-
AbdouKhadri Diallo, Xiaolu Michel, Stéphane Fouquay, Guillaume Michaud, Frédéric Simon, Jean-Michel Brusson, Jean-François Carpentier, and Sophie M. Guillaume
- Subjects
- *
CYCLOOCTENONE , *METATHESIS reactions , *RING-opening polymerization , *CHAIN transfer (Chemistry) , *MACROMOLECULES - Abstract
Ring-opening metathesis polymerization/cross-metathesis(ROMP/CM)of cyclooctene (COE) or 3-alkyl-substituted COEs (3R-COEs, R = ethyl, n-hexyl) using several trialkoxysilyl monofunctionalizedalkenes as chain-transfer agents (CTAs; vinyl trimethoxysilane (1), allyl trimethoxysilane (2), and 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propylacrylate (3)) and various Ru–carbene–alkylidenecatalysts afforded several trialkoxysilyl mono- and difunctionalizedpolyolefins. The formation of α-monofunctional (MF), α,ω-difunctional(DF), isomerized α-monofunctional (IMF), linear nonfunctional(LNF), isomerized linear nonfunctional (ILNF), and cyclic nonfunctional(CNF) PCOEs is rationalized by a two-stage mechanism. First, formationof monofunctionalized (MF) and nonfunctionalized (LNF, CNF) macromoleculestakes place through a ROMP/CM along with RCM (ring-closing metathesis)process. Subsequently, CC isomerization (ISOM) combined witha second CM process give isomerized (ILNF, IMF) and difunctionalized(DF) macromolecules. The nonfunctionalized polymers (CNF, LNF, andILNF) were formed in minor quantities compared to the trialkoxysilyl-functionalizedpolymers (MF, IMF, and DF), as evidenced by NMR and MALDI-ToF MS analysesand fractionation experiments. The rate and selectivity of the reactionvaried with the nature of the CTA, COE substituent, catalyst, andto a lesser extent of the solvent. The use of 1,4-benzoquinone (BZQ)as additive allowed inhibiting completely the ISOM process. Alternatively,steric hindrance in 3-RCOEs substituted monomers resulted in an ISOM-freeprocess with selective formation of MF polymers. The reactive Grubbs’second-generation catalyst (G2) afforded the best compromisein terms of productivity, reactivity, and selectivity. Under optimizedconditions favoring the formation of MF/DF, i.e., in CH2Cl2at 40 °C for 24 h with [COE]0/[CTA 3]0/[G2]0/[BZQ]0= 2000:20–200:1:100, the polymerization was rather well-controlled.While CTAs 1and 3selectively gave mixturesof MF and DF, allyl CTA 2resulted in a mixture of IMF,MF, and DF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF