Search

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study using a sheep cervical spine interbody fusion model. OBJECTIVE: To compare allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells combined with hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) with HA/TCP alone or iliac crest autograft (AG) for cervical interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We investigated the effect of mesenchymal precursor cells on cervical fusion because of the shortcomings of using iliac crest (donor site morbidity), bone substitute (poor osteoinductive properties), and bone morphogenic proteins (serious complications). METHODS: Thirty ewes were divided randomly into four groups of six having C3-C4 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a Fidji cage packed with, AG, HA/TCP, HA/TCP containing 5 million MPCs, and HA/TCP containing 10 million MPCs. MPCs were derived from a single batch of immuno-selected and culture-expanded MPCs isolated from bone marrow of out-bred sheep. The fifth group were nonoperated controls. Safety, fusion parameters, and biomechanics were assessed. RESULTS: No cell-related adverse events were observed. No significant differences were found between the five or 10 million MPC groups. Evaluation of fusion by CT scan at 3 months showed that 9 of 12 (75%) MPC-treated animals had continuous bony bridging compared with only 1 of 6 AG and 2 of 6 HA/TCP (P = 0.019 and P = 0.044, respectively). By quantitative CT, density of new bone in MPC-treated animals was 121% higher than in HA/TCP (P = 0.017) and 128% higher than in AG (P < 0.0001). Functional radiology at 3 months revealed that MPC-treated animals had significantly reduced macromotion at C3/4 compared with AG and HA/TCP groups combined (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Implantation of allogeneic MPCs when combined with HA/TCP and an interbody spacer facilitates new bone formation after discectomy without any cell-related complications. The earlier and dense new bone formation observed with MPCs relative to autograft and HA/TCP alone suggest that this approach may offer therapeutic benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of thoracoscopic drainage with open drainage of empyema in children. A retrospective case history audit was done of children presenting to a single major paediatric centre who underwent thoracoscopy drainage and decortication or open decortication and drainage (thoracotomy) between January 2000 and September 2002. Time to resolution of infection, duration of intercostal catheter (ICC) drainage, postoperative morphine requirements, and length of hospital admission were compared as primary measures of outcome. Thirty-three patients, 17 male and 16 female, aged between 1 month and 21 years were included in the study. Median age at surgery was 2.6 years. The location of the empyema was right-sided in 17 patients and left-sided in 16 patients. The empyema was drained by thoracoscopy in 11 patients, and 22 patients underwent thoracotomy. Two patients had thoracoscopy converted to thoracotomy for late-stage disease requiring greater surgical access. There were no differences between treatment groups with respect to duration of ICC drainage (p=0.6), duration of fever (p=0.6), length of stay (p=0.9), or postoperative morphine use (p=0.2). However, overall pain scores were lower in the thoracoscopy group, particularly on days 2 and 3; this approached statistical significance (p=0.07). This study has demonstrated that thoracoscopic drainage is an effective procedure for treating empyema in children. It is less invasive than open thoracotomy and is associated with less patient discomfort and less severe pain as measured by objective pain scores. We advocate thoracoscopic drainage for the majority of patients with empyema, except for those with advanced disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]