Search

Although dosing regimens of targeted therapies (TT) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are guided by market authorizations and clinical guidelines, little is known about clinical guideline adherence or outcomes in patients receiving escalated doses of TT due to lack of response. This real-world study explored the prevalence of dose escalation and compared outcomes between patients receiving standard and escalated TT doses. Data were from the 2020–2021 Adelphi Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists and their UC and CD patients across five European countries and the US. Physicians provided retrospective data collection of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment history, and satisfaction; patients reported quality-of-life and work productivity. Patients were grouped by TT maintenance dose; standard and escalated dose groups were compared. Outcomes were adjusted for time on current TT and severity at current TT initiation using regression analyses. Of 1,241 UC and 1,477 CD patients, 19.1% and 24.1%, respectively, received escalated TT doses. Despite escalation, a substantial proportion of patients had not achieved remission, had moderate or severe disease activity, or were flaring. Most physicians were not fully satisfied with treatment in the escalated dose group and were more likely to switch patients to another treatment regimen than patients on standard dose. Dose escalation is not always an effective approach to resolve inadequate or loss of response in UC and CD, highlighting a need for more therapeutic options or alternative treatment strategies in patients unresponsive to TT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The non-interventional PROPER study generated real-world evidence on clinical outcomes following transition in routine practice from reference adalimumab to the EMA-approved SB5 biosimilar adalimumab in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Methods: Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Crohn's disease (CD), or ulcerative colitis (UC) were enrolled at 63 sites across Europe. Eligible patients received ≥ 16 weeks of routine treatment with reference adalimumab before transitioning to SB5, and were followed for 48 weeks post-transition. The primary objective was to evaluate candidate predictors (clinically relevant baseline variables with incidence ≥ 15% by indication cohort) associated with persistence on SB5 at 48 weeks post-initiation. Key primary outcome measures were persistence on SB5 (estimated by Kaplan–Meier methodology) and clinical characteristics and disease activity scores at the time of transition to SB5 treatment (baseline). Results: A total of 955 eligible patients were enrolled (RA, n = 207; axSpA, n = 127; PsA, n = 162; CD, n = 447; UC, n = 12), of whom 932 (97.6%) completed follow-up and 722 (75.6%) were still receiving SB5 at week 48. Kaplan–Meier estimates (95% confidence interval, CI) of persistence on SB5 at week 48 for RA, axSpA, PsA, and CD were 0.86 (0.80–0.90), 0.80 (0.71–0.86), 0.81 (0.74–0.86), and 0.72 (0.67–0.76), respectively. The single candidate predictor associated with probability of SB5 discontinuation before week 48 was female sex [RA, axSpA, and CD cohorts; HR (95% CI): 3.53 (1.07–11.67), 2.38 (1.11–5.14), and 2.21 (1.54–3.18), respectively]. Disease activity scores remained largely unchanged throughout the study, with proportions by cohort in remission at baseline versus week 48 being 59.2% versus 57.2%, 81.0% versus 78.0%, 94.7% versus 93.7%, and 84.0% versus 85.1% for patients with RA, axSpA, PsA, and CD, respectively. Similarly, the SB5 dosing regimen remained unchanged for the majority of patients from baseline to week 48, the most common regimen being 40 mg every 2 weeks. In total, 232 patients (24.3%) reported at least one adverse drug reaction, and most events were mild; eight patients (3.9%) in the RA cohort experienced nine serious adverse events (SAEs; two possibly related to SB5); eight patients (4.9%) in the PsA cohort experienced nine SAEs (one possibly related to SB5); 22 patients (4.9%) in the CD cohort experienced 27 SAEs (four possibly related to SB5); and no SAEs were observed in the UC cohort. Conclusions: With the exception of female sex in RA, axSpA, and CD, none of the candidate predictors were associated with SB5 discontinuation. Persistence on SB5 was high, treatment effectiveness was maintained, and no safety signals were detected. Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04089514. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: With the introduction of novel therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), 'treat‐to‐target' strategies are increasingly discussed to improve short‐ and long‐term outcomes in patients with IBD. Aim: To discuss opportunities and challenges of a treat‐to‐target approach in light of the current 'Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease' (STRIDE‐II) consensus Methods: The 2021 update of STRIDE‐II encompasses 13 evidence‐ and consensus‐based recommendations for treat‐to‐target strategies in adults and children with IBD. We highlight the potential implications and limitations of these recommendations for clinical practice. Results: STRIDE‐II provides valuable guidance for personalised IBD management. It reflects scientific progress as well as increased evidence of improved outcomes when more ambitious treatment goals such as mucosal healing are achieved. Conclusions: Prospective studies, objective criteria for risk stratification, and better predictors of therapeutic response are needed to potentially render 'treating to target' more effective in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To understand current thinking and clinical decision-making in the treatment and management of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). This multinational, survey-based study was conducted in 2021. Two meetings were held, involving 11 IBD specialists, that used a series of questions and discussion to identify all factors possibly related to the management of UC. The importance of identified factors was assessed using an online questionnaire covering three scenarios – active disease, remission and patient empowerment. Each factor was scored on a scale of 0 (very-unimportant) to 100 (very-important) within each scenario, by a separate group of healthcare professionals working in IBD. A total of 157 individual factors were identified by the 11 IBD specialists and scored in the three scenarios by 56 respondents (52; 93% specialist gastroenterologists) from Europe and North America (25; 45%), South America (19; 34%) and the Middle East, Asia and Australia (12; 21%). For all scenarios, factors related to educating patients regarding UC and its treatment and understanding of patient goals ranked highest, ahead of clinical considerations regarding disease activity and treatment history. Setting realistic short-term treatment targets was a key consideration. 5-ASA optimisation and use of faecal calprotectin monitoring were core strategies across the three scenarios tested. Support for patients during longer-term management of their disease, starting from initial flare, was an important recurring theme. The current management approach for mild-to-moderate UC was found to be guided primarily by the patient's perspectives and goals, alongside assessment of their medical and disease history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

LINKED CONTENT: This article is linked to Dignass et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17622 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17717 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to improve the care of patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the currently valid guidelines of the German Society for Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) on Crohnʼs disease and ulcerative colitis were extended within a virtual conference to include current and practically relevant recommendations. The addendum addresses in particular the risk of COVID-19 infections in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, the diagnostics under the conditions of the pandemic, the consequences for the pharmacotherapy and operative treatment of the underlying disease. It also addresses general measures for protection against infections and for adjunctive treatment of patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

LINKED CONTENT: This article is linked to Dignass et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17622 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17640 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of vedolizumab with adalimumab in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective medication for moderate to severe UC. Since no comparative trials are available for direct comparison of vedolizumab vs adalimumab in UC, a systematic review of literature databases was conducted to identify randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the two drugs in patients with moderate to severe UC after failure of conventional treatment. Studies were screened for eligibility by two reviewers based on predefined inclusion criteria. Bucher's adjusted indirect comparison was used to compare vedolizumab and adalimumab indirectly through placebo as common comparator. Results: One vedolizumab study (GEMINI 1) and three adalimumab studies (ULTRA 1, ULTRA 2 and M10-447) met the eligibility criteria. Baseline characteristics of the included populations were similar in biologic-naïve UC patients across study arms. Although no statistically significant differences between treatments were found for induction efficacy endpoints, there was a trend toward a benefit of vedolizumab over adalimumab. There were also no significant differences between treatments for any maintenance efficacy endpoints, with no clear trend favoring either agent. Vedolizumab exhibited statistically superior maintenance safety compared with adalimumab, with significant reductions in risks of adverse events (relative risk 0.67 [95% confidence interval 0.57–0.80]; p <.0001), serious adverse events (0.20 [0.09–0.42]; p <.0001) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (0.14 [0.05–0.43]; p =.0006). Conclusion: This analysis indicates that vedolizumab has comparable efficacy to adalimumab with improved safety in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Selective patient recruitment can produce discrepancies between clinical trial results and real-world effectiveness.Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess vedolizumab real-world effectiveness and safety in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for real-world studies of vedolizumab in adult patients with UC/CD reporting clinical response, remission, corticosteroid-free remission, UC/CD-related surgery or hospitalization, mucosal healing, or safety published from May 1, 2014-June 22, 2017. Response and remission rates were combined in random-effects meta-analyses.Results: At treatment week 14, 32% of UC patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-39%] and 30% of CD patients (95% CI 25-34%) were in remission; and at month 12, 46% for UC (95% CI 37-56%) and 30% for CD (95% CI 20-42%). For UC, the rates of corticosteroid-free remission were 26% at week 14 (95% CI 20-34%) and 42% at month 12 (95% CI 31-53%); for CD they were 25% at week 14 (95%, CI 20-31%) and 31% at month 12 (95%, CI 20-45%). At month 12, 33-77% of UC and 6-63% of CD patients had mucosal healing. Nine percent of patients reported serious adverse events.Conclusions: Vedolizumab demonstrated real-world effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severely active UC or CD, with approximately one-half and one-third of patients, respectively, in remission at treatment month 12. These findings are consistent with clinical trial data and support the long-term benefit-risk profile of vedolizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Current options for patients with steroid-dependent, chronic-active ulcerative colitis (UC) with insufficient response/intolerance to immunosuppressants (ISs) and/or biologics are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of granulocyte/monocyte adsorptive (GMA) apheresis (Adacolumn®) in this population. Materials and methods: Ninety five adults with steroid-dependent active UC and insufficient response/intolerance to IS and/or TNF inhibitors received 5-8 aphereses in a single induction series of ≤10 weeks. Endpoints included rates of remission (clinical activity index [CAI] ≤ 4) at weeks 24 and 48. Results: Of 94 patients (ITT population), remission and response rates were 34.0% and 44.7% at week 24, and 33.0% and 39.4% at week 48. Among 30 patients with prior failure of IS and biologics, 33.3% and 20.0% were in remission at weeks 24 and 48. At both weeks, 19.2% of patients achieved steroid-free remission. Sustained remission or response occurred in 27.7% of patients at 48 weeks. The cumulative colectomy rate at week 96 was 23.4%. Safety was consistent with previous findings. Conclusions: This study confirms findings of the 12-week interim analysis and demonstrates that GMA apheresis provides a safe and beneficial long-term outcome for patients with chronic active UC resistant/intolerant to IS and/or TNF inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mucosal surface of the digestive tract is a critical barrier between a broad spectrum of noxious and immunogenic substances present in the gastrointestinal lumen and the underlying mucosal immune system. Its preservation following various forms of injury or physiological damage is essential to prevent the invasion of harmful luminal factors into the host, which subsequently may lead to inflammation, uncontrolled immune response, and a disequilibrium of the homeostasis of the host. The preservation of this barrier following injuries is regulated by a broad spectrum of structurally distinct regulatory molecules, including phospholipids. Phospholipids play a pivotal role in the modulation of intestinal inflammation. They have been demonstrated to both promote and inhibit inflammation, and their overall impact in an individual setting seems to be dependent on several factors, including the level of immune cell activation and the presence of other mediators. Modulation of lipid mediators through administration of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) or lisofylline (LSF), inhibitors of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) biosynthesis or monoclonal antibodies against thromboxane (TBX) or platelet-activating factor (PAF) as a therapeutic approach have been used in several models of inflammation; however, beneficial effects were not always convincing and further studies are warranted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Interleukin-23 inhibition is effective in treating ulcerative colitis. Guselkumab is a dual-acting, human IgG1, interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor that potently neutralises interleukin-23 and can bind to CD64. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. The primary populations of these two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (QUASAR phase 3 induction and maintenance) included randomised and treated adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (induction baseline modified Mayo score from 5 to 9) with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or advanced ulcerative colitis therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to receive guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 8 (phase 3 induction study). All patients were randomly assigned using web-based interactive response technology. Patients in clinical response 12 weeks after guselkumab induction given intravenously (from QUASAR phase 2b and phase 3 induction studies) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) at maintenance week 0 to guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks or 100 mg every 8 weeks or placebo for 44 weeks (maintenance). Primary endpoints were clinical remission at induction week 12 and maintenance week 44. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04033445. The induction study primary population included 701 patients (guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously 60% [421 patients]; placebo 40% [280 patients]). The maintenance study primary population included 568 guselkumab induction responders randomly assigned to receive guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (190 [33%] patients) or 100 mg every 8 weeks (188 [33%] patients) or placebo (guselkumab withdrawal 190 [33%] patients). A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab given intravenously had clinical remission at induction week 12 (23% [95 of 421 patients]) than did placebo-treated patients (8% [22 of 280 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 15%, 95% CI 10–20; p<0·0001). Clinical remission at maintenance week 44 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (50% [95 of 190 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 30%, 95% CI 21–38; p<0·0001) and 100 mg every 8 weeks (45% [85 of 188 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 25%, 16–34; p<0·0001) than with placebo (19% [36 of 190 patients]). The overall safety profile was favourable and consistent with that of guselkumab in approved indications. In the induction study, adverse events were reported by 49% of patients in both groups (208 of 421 guselkumab-treated patients and 138 of 280 placebo-treated patients), serious adverse events were reported by 3% (12 of 421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 7% (20 of 280) of placebo-treated patients, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported by 2% (seven of 421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 4% (11 of 280) of placebo-treated patients. In the maintenance study, adverse event rates were similar among groups, and the most frequently reported adverse events in all groups were ulcerative colitis, COVID-19, and arthralgia. No active tuberculosis, anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or clinically important hepatic disorders were reported in either study. Guselkumab was effective and safe as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Janssen Research and Development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractIntravenous iron sucrose has been used to treat iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia associated with different chronic diseases for several decades. Despite the complex structure of iron sucrose, copies called iron sucrose similars (ISSs) have been approved according to the generic approach and therefore, therapeutic equivalence is taken for granted. In February 2011, three patients who previously tolerated well the prescribed iron sucrose originator experienced urticaria, oedema and headache within 1 hour after infusion of an ISS that had been substituted for the originator at the pharmacy level. One patient collapsed due to severe hypovolaemic dysregulation and required hospitalisation. Due to emerging evidence that ISSs differ from the iron sucrose originator in safety and efficacy profiles, it seems prudent for physicians as well as patients who require intravenous (i.v.) iron to have available data on therapeutic equivalence of new ISS preparations versus the originator. This may be especially important in patients who are chronically ill and need iron supplementation on a regular, long-term basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: STARDUST, a phase 3b randomised trial, compared ustekinumab therapeutic strategies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) using early endoscopic assessment and treat‐to‐target (T2T) versus standard of care (SoC). Aim: To assess the efficacy of ustekinumab extended treatment in a long‐term extension (LTE) of up to 104 weeks with dosing adapted according to clinical, biomarker and endoscopy outcomes. Methods: Adults with moderately‐to‐severely active CD received intravenous ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at Week 0 and subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 8. At Week 16, 440 ≥70‐point responders were randomised to T2T or SoC and 323 entered the LTE. At Week 48, a unified, protocol‐defined ustekinumab dose frequency escalation/de‐escalation was applied based on achieving endoscopic remission and corticosteroid‐free clinical remission. Achieving corticosteroid‐free clinical remission and biomarker remission at consecutive visits determined ustekinumab dosing frequency. Dichotomous variables were analysed using non‐responder imputation. Results: Among patients who entered the LTE, 7.7%, 48.6% and 43.7% received doses every 4, 8 and 12 weeks, respectively. Ustekinumab dose frequency was escalated in 23.5% and de‐escalated in 19.7%. Endoscopic response and remission rates were 28.9% and 10.73% (all randomised) and 39.3% and 14.6% (patients entering the LTE), respectively, at Week 104. Clinical remissiona rates at week 104 were 50.2% (all randomised) and 68.4% (patients entering the LTE). There were no new safety signals. Conclusion: STARDUST LTE is the first interventional ustekinumab efficacy study to show a favourable benefit–risk profile with preservation of clinical and endoscopic outcomes through Week 104 using flexible, algorithm‐driven dose adjustment including de‐escalation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bowel urgency (BU), the sudden or immediate need for a bowelmovement, is one of the mostcommonanddisruptive symptoms experienced by patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Distinct from the separate symptom of increased stool frequency, BU has a substantial negative impact on quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Among patients with UC, BU is one of the top reasons for treatment dissatisfaction and one of the symptoms patientsmost want improved. Patients may not discussBUoften due to embarrassment, and healthcare providers may not address the symptom adequately due to the lack of awareness of validated tools and/or knowledge of the importance of assessing BU. The mechanism of BUinUC ismultifactorial and includes inflammatory changes in the rectum that may be linked to hypersensitivity and reduced compliance of the rectum. Responsive and reliable patient-reported outcomemeasures ofBUare needed to provide evidence of treatment benefits in clinical trials and facilitate communication inclinical practice. This reviewdiscusses the pathophysiologyandclinical importance ofBUinUCand its impact on the quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Patient-reported outcome measures developed to assess the severity of BU in UC are discussed alongside overviews of treatment options and clinical guidelines. Implications for the future management of UC from the perspective of BU are also explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the patents for biologic originator drugs expire, biosimilars are emerging as cost-effective alternatives within healthcare systems. Addressing various challenges in the clinical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains crucial. To shed light on physicians' current knowledge, beliefs, practical approaches, and concerns related to biosimilar adoption—whether initiating a biosimilar, transitioning from an originator to a biosimilar, or switching between biosimilars (including multiple switches and reverse switching)—a global survey was conducted. Fifteen physicians with expertise in the field of IBD from 13 countries attended a virtual international consensus meeting to develop practical guidance regarding biosimilar adoption worldwide, considering the survey results. This consensus centered on 10 key statements covering biosimilar effectiveness, safety, indications, rationale, multiple switches, therapeutic drug monitoring of biosimilars, non-medical switching, and future perspectives. Ultimately, the consensus affirmed that biosimilars are equally effective and safe when compared to originator drugs. They are considered suitable for both biologic-naïve patients and those who have previously been treated with originator drugs, with cost reduction being the primary motivation for transitioning from an originator drug to a biosimilar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The i Support Therapy–Access to Rapid Treatment (iSTART) was an initiative to improve patient-centered management in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Our aim was to update the iSTART recommendations in order to include fecal calprotectin (FC) in the monitoring of patients with UC and improve their management. Twelve physicians from nine countries worldwide attended a virtual international consensus meeting on 4 May 2022. Data from three systematic reviews were analyzed, and a new systematic review investigating all studies reporting measurement of FC at home was conducted. Based on literature evidence, statements were formulated, discussed, and approved by voting. Statements were considered approved if at least 75% of participants agreed with a proposed statement. Fourteen statements were approved. Based on this consensus, FC measurement should be routinely performed for monitoring patients with mild-to-moderate UC to identify disease relapses early and initiate an appropriate treatment. Further studies are needed to assess whether self-monitoring of FC is associated with better disease control and improved patients' quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The phase 3 True North (TN) study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of oral ozanimod 0.92 mg once daily (equivalent to ozanimod HCl 1 mg) in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Results: Of 131 patients in clinical response at TN Week 52, 83 (63%) were in clinical remission and 48 (37%) were in clinical response only (but not clinical remission) upon entry to the OLE. There were higher rates of clinical remission (73% vs 55%), endoscopic improvement (82% vs 58%), and corticosteroid-free remission (71% vs 50%) among patients entering the OLE in clinical remission versus clinical response only (OC analysis). [Extracted from the article]

Background: To describe variations in treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and physician and patient satisfaction in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with tofacitinib in a real-world setting. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi UC Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of physicians and their consulting patients in the US and Europe. For inclusion in this analysis, gastroenterologists completed medical record forms for the next seven consecutive consulting patients with confirmed UC, plus a further two patient record forms for patients treated with tofacitinib. Those same patients then completed a patient-reported questionnaire. Results: Gastroenterologists (n = 340) provided data for 2049 patients with UC, including 642 patients receiving tofacitinib. Physicians' most frequent reason for choosing tofacitinib was overall efficacy (71.3% of patients). The proportion of patients in remission increased with length of treatment, from 13.7% at [0, 4) weeks to 68.3% at [52+] weeks. Both physicians and patients reported that the Mayo components of stool frequency and blood in stool were reduced with time on treatment. Improvement in symptoms (bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain/cramps, urgency, rectal bleeding, fatigue/tiredness) was reported in the first weeks of treatment, and increased with time. At week [52+], mean score reductions from treatment initiation to current in overall symptom severity, pain, and fatigue were 2.2 (to a current mean score of 1.1), 2.2 (to 0.9), and 2.1 (to 1.0), respectively. Comparing patients at weeks [0, 4) and [52+] (all PROs, p < 0.0001), the increase in EQ-5D-5L index total score was 0.29 points and in SIBDQ total score was 20.5 points; percent reductions in WPAI absenteeism was 34.4%, presenteeism 26.8%, overall work impairment 40.9% and activity impairment was 28.3%. These changes reached the thresholds for minimally clinically important differences. The majority of physicians (91.9%) and patients (93.5%) were satisfied with tofacitinib at week [52+]. Conclusion: Patients with moderate-to-severe UC treated with tofacitinib show considerable improvement in symptoms and quality of life from tofacitinib initiation to one year and beyond, with high rates of remission. Physicians and patients report satisfaction with UC control at recommended doses in a mostly biologic experienced population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess composite and aggregate outcomes of observational studies in Crohn's disease and to evaluate whether the number and type of variables included affect the frequency of the outcome. Methods: MEDLINE [via PubMed], Scopus and Web of Science were searched to identify observational studies that enrolled patients with Crohn's disease and evaluated a composite or aggregate outcome. The proportion of patients achieving the outcome was determined and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate how the frequency of each outcome varies according to the reporting of predefined variables. Results: From 10,257 identified records, 46 were included in the qualitative analysis and 38 in the meta-analysis. The frequency for composite and aggregate outcomes was 0.445 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.389–0.501] and 0.140 (95% CI: 0.000–0.211), respectively. When comparing composite outcomes by number of included variables, the frequency was 0.271 (95% CI: 0.000–0.405) and 0.698 (95% CI: 0.651–0.746), for one and six variables, respectively. The frequency of the composite outcome varied according to the identity of the variables being reported. Specific pairs of predefined variables had a significant effect in the frequency of composite outcomes. Conclusion: Composite outcomes with increasing number of predefined variables show an increase in frequency. Outcomes including variables such as 'Surgery' and 'Steroids' had higher frequencies when compared with the ones that did not include these variables. These results show that the frequency of composite outcomes is dependent on the number and type of variables being reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite the excellent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive action of glucocorticoids (GCs), their use for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) still carries significant risks in terms of frequently occurring severe side effects, such as the impairment of intestinal tissue repair. The recently-introduced selective glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonists (SEGRAs) offer anti-inflammatory action comparable to that of common GCs, but with a reduced side effect profile. Methods: The in vitro effects of the non-steroidal SEGRAs Compound A (CpdA) and ZK216348, were investigated in intestinal epithelial cells and compared to those of Dexamethasone (Dex). GR translocation was shown by immunfluorescence and Western blot analysis. Trans-repressive effects were studied by means of NF-κB/p65 activity and IL-8 levels, trans-activation potency by reporter gene assay. Flow cytometry was used to assess apoptosis of cells exposed to SEGRAs. The effects on IEC-6 and HaCaT cell restitution were determined using an in vitro wound healing model, cell proliferation by BrdU assay. In addition, influences on the TGF-β- or EGF/ERK1/2/MAPK-pathway were evaluated by reporter gene assay, Western blot and qPCR analysis. Results: Dex, CpdA and ZK216348 were found to be functional GR agonists. In terms of trans-repression, CpdA and ZK216348 effectively inhibited NF-κB activity and IL-8 secretion, but showed less trans-activation potency. Furthermore, unlike SEGRAs, Dex caused a dose-dependent inhibition of cell restitution with no effect on cell proliferation. These differences in epithelial restitution were TGF-β-independent but Dex inhibited the EGF/ERK1/2/MAPK-pathway important for intestinal epithelial wound healing by induction of MKP-1 and Annexin-1 which was not affected by CpdA or ZK216348. Conclusion: Collectively, our results indicate that, while their anti-inflammatory activity is comparable to Dex, SEGRAs show fewer side effects with respect to wound healing. The fact that SEGRAs did not have a similar effect on cell restitution might be due to a different modulation of EGF/ERK1/2 MAPK signalling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stress has long been postulated to influence the progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our current understanding of the relationship between stress and IBD is still limited, and hence explanation for the occurrence of relapses has remained largely speculative. Stress affects the immune system, the neuroendocrine system and the intestinal epithelia. Stress induces the release of pro-inflammatory Th1 cytokines and neuropeptides, such as tachykinins. Thereby, stress may induce alterations of the intestinal epithelium via the interaction of the neuroendocrine and immune system and may induce relapses of IBD. The present review focuses on this network and highlights the role of distinct mediators and mechanisms, i.e. neurotransmitters, hormones and immune cells, which are involved in the response to stress on the one hand, and contribute to the onset, progression or relapses of IBD on the other.Copyright © 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article "Psychosocial distress in acute cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The available COVID‐19 literature has focused on specific disease manifestations, infection control, and delivery or prioritization of services for specific patient groups in the setting of the acute COVID‐19 pandemic. Local health systems aim to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic and hospitals and health‐care providers rush to provide the capacity for a surge of COVID‐19 patients. However, the short, medium‐term, and long‐term outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases without COVID‐19 will be affected by the ability to develop locally adapted strategies to meet their service needs in the COVID‐19 setting. To mitigate risks for patients with GI diseases, it is useful to differentiate three phases: (i) the acute phase, (ii) the adaptation phase, and (iii) the consolidation phase. During the acute phase, service delivery for patients with GI disease will be curtailed to meet competing health‐care needs of COVID‐19 patients. During the adaptation phase, GI services are calibrated towards a "new normal," and the consolidation phase is characterized by rapid introduction and ongoing refinement of services. Proactive planning with engagement of relevant stakeholders including consumer representatives is required to be prepared for a variety of scenarios that are dictated by thus far undefined long‐term economic and societal impacts of the pandemic. Because substantial changes to the delivery of services are likely to occur, it is important that these changes are embedded into quality and research frameworks to ensure that data are generated that support evidence‐based decision‐making during the adaptation and consolidation phases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biologics have transformed the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Biosimilars—biologic medicines with no clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy from licensed originators—can stimulate market competition and have the potential to expand patient access to biologics within the parameters of treatment recommendations. However, maximizing the benefits of biosimilars requires cooperation between multiple stakeholders. Regulators and developers should collaborate to ensure biosimilars reach patients rapidly without compromising stringent quality, safety, or efficacy standards. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations and payer policies should be updated following biosimilar market entry, minimizing the risk of imposing nonmedical barriers to biologic treatment. In RA, disparities between treatment guidelines and national reimbursement criteria could be addressed to ensure more uniform patient access to biologics and enable rheumatologists to effectively implement treat-to-target strategies. In IBD, the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatment earlier in the disease course is likely to improve when biosimilars are incorporated into pharmacoeconomic analyses. Patient understanding of biosimilars is crucial for treatment success and avoiding nocebo effects. Full understanding of biosimilars by physicians and carefully considered communication strategies can help support patients initiating or switching to biosimilars. Developers must operate efficiently to be sustainable, without undermining product quality, the reliability of the supply chain, or pharmacovigilance. Developers should also facilitate information sharing to meet the needs of other stakeholders. Such collaboration will help to ensure a sustainable future for both the biosimilar market and healthcare systems, supporting the availability of effective treatments for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although growing evidence underlines the benefits of physical activity as supportive intervention for cancer patients, sparse data are available for exercise in patients with advanced disease stages, in particular for gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) patients who experience specific disease-associated limitations. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of home-based moderate intensity exercise on functional capacity, activities of daily living (ADL) and body composition in patients with advanced GIC during first-line chemotherapy.Methods: Participants (GIC, UICC III-IV; n = 44) were randomly assigned to home-based physical activity programme of 150 min moderate walking per week or a control group (CG). Functional status (SPPB: gait speed, balance, lower extremity muscle strength), postural sway, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, nutritional state (Mini Nutritional Assessment, MNA) and lean body mass were assessed according to established recommendations. All tests were performed before chemotherapy (T0), after two chemotherapy cycles (T1) and after 12 weeks (T2).Results: SPPB changes from T1 to T2 differed between groups with a comparably greater decrease in the CG (p < .05), but no changes or group differences over the whole study period (T0 to T2) were found. Exercise improved postural sway (T0 to T1; T0 toT2) and lean body mass (T1 to T2; T0 to T2) compared to the control group (p < .05). Gait speed, peripheral neuropathy and strength did not differ between groups (p > .05).Conclusions: Our results indicate that a home-based physical activity improves postural sway and body composition and might stabilize functional capacity in patients with advanced GIC during chemotherapy. Although the other outcomes did not differ between groups, aforementioned effects might contribute to a maintenance of independency in ADL and a better treatment tolerance and thus enhance patients' quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Iron deficiency has a high prevalence in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, with negative impact on quality of life and work capacity. Aim: To propose an innovative approach based on early intervention, treating to target and tight monitoring in the management of iron deficiency in IBD patients. Methods: We conducted a literature review on PubMed and Medline using pre‐defined keywords and terms to identify relevant studies on iron deficiency in IBD. Results: Many physicians are focused on treating anaemia; however, anaemia is one of the consequences of iron deficiency. Hence, our therapeutic goal for these patients should evolve towards prevention of anaemia by screening and treating iron deficiency. Early diagnosis of iron deficiency is based on a combination of ferritin concentration and transferrin saturation. We consider that normalisation of these biomarkers reflects iron stores replenishment and should be considered as a major therapeutic goal. Treating iron deficiency regardless of the presence of anaemia seems to improve quality of life in several chronic conditions and should be considered as an innovative approach in IBD although strong evidence is still lacking. Tight monitoring is required to allow early detection of iron deficiency recurrence and to consider prompt additional iron supplementation. Conclusion: We propose to extrapolate a three‐step strategy (early detection and intervention, treating‐to‐target and tight monitoring) to the management of iron deficiency in IBD patients. Universally applied, this proactive approach is expected to result in better outcomes in IBD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), who are often treated with intravenous iron. This observational study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of iron isomaltoside in routine practical care of IDA in IBD patients. Methods: The study included 197 IBD patients designated for treatment with iron isomaltoside. Treatment was administered according to routine practice. Data were recorded at baseline and after approximately 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Efficacy data included haemoglobin (Hb) levels and haematinics, while safety data included adverse drug reactions and safety laboratory variables. Results: Patients received a mean (range) cumulative dose of 1304 (100-3500) mg iron isomaltoside. Hb increased from 10.7(±1.6) g/dL at baseline to 13.1(±1.5) g/dL at the final visit. In addition, serum iron, ferritin and transferrin saturation increased and soluble transferrin receptor decreased. Calprotectin decreased, as did IBD symptom scores, Harvey-Bradshaw Index (Crohn’s disease) and partial Mayo score (Ulcerative colitis). About 8% of patients reported transient adverse reactions, most commonly skin reactions, nausea and vomiting, and 2% SAEs, most frequently tachycardia. Conclusion: Iron isomaltoside was demonstrated to be effective and had a good safety profile in IBD patients in everyday clinical practice in Germany. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Vedolizumab (VDZ) drug monitoring strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have not been systematically investigated so far. We evaluated the correlation between VDZ trough levels (VTL) and the treatment response in IBD. Methods: Fifty-one patients with active IBD on or starting a therapy with VDZ were enrolled in this prospective and observational single centre study. Disease activity indices, blood tests, and anthropometric parameters were assessed over a time period of 6 months. One hundred and fifty-five VDZ serum trough levels were measured directly before the next scheduled application using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: VDZ treatment was found to be clinically effective (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) dropping from 10 to 5.5 points (p < .0005) in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients; partial Mayo score (pMS) from 4.4 to 2.1 points (p < .0005) in ulcerative colitis patients (UC). CRP levels tended to decrease and haemoglobin levels to increase under VDZ therapy. CD patients with a serum CRP level lower than 5 mg/l exhibited significantly higher VTL than those with elevated CRP levels (34.9 versus 21.7 µg/ml, p = .00153). UC patients with haemoglobin levels higher 12 g/dl at the time of VTL measurement had significantly higher VTL compared to patients with lower haemoglobin levels (35.4 versus 15.6 µg/ml, p < .0005). Conclusions: Our data suggest a significant correlation between VTL and response to therapy in IBD patients (higher VTL associated with better response). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses on the quality of life of active ulcerated colitis (UC) patients healed with selective leukocyte apheresis known as Adacolumn, a selective granulocyte/monocyte adsorptive medical device. It was said that the substantial symptom in UC and the side effects of medical treatment can have a fundamental consequence on the health-related quality of life of patients. Moreover, significant improvements in patients have been seen with the apheresis treatment.

Background: Complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease are challenging to treat. Allogeneic, expanded, adipose-derived stem cells (Cx601) are a promising new therapeutic approach. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Cx601 for treatment-refractory complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease.Methods: We did this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study at 49 hospitals in seven European countries and Israel from July 6, 2012, to July 27, 2015. Adult patients (≥18 years) with Crohn's disease and treatment-refractory, draining complex perianal fistulas were randomly assigned (1:1) using a pre-established randomisation list to a single intralesional injection of 120 million Cx601 cells or 24 mL saline solution (placebo), with stratification according to concomitant baseline treatment. Treatment was administered by an unmasked surgeon, with a masked gastroenterologist and radiologist assessing the therapeutic effect. The primary endpoint was combined remission at week 24 (ie, clinical assessment of closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline, and absence of collections >2 cm of the treated perianal fistulas confirmed by masked central MRI). Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT populations; safety was assessed in the safety population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01541579.Findings: 212 patients were randomly assigned: 107 to Cx601 and 105 to placebo. A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with Cx601 versus placebo achieved combined remission in the ITT (53 of 107 [50%] vs 36 of 105 [34%]; difference 15·2%, 97·5% CI 0·2-30·3; p=0·024) and modified ITT populations (53 of 103 [51%] vs 36 of 101 [36%]; 15·8%, 0·5-31·2; p=0·021). 18 (17%) of 103 patients in the Cx601 group versus 30 (29%) of 103 in the placebo group experienced treatment-related adverse events, the most common of which were anal abscess (six in the Cx601 group vs nine in the placebo group) and proctalgia (five vs nine).Interpretation: Cx601 is an effective and safe treatment for complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease who did not respond to conventional or biological treatments, or both.Funding: TiGenix. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a humanised monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting α4β7 integrin. Aim To investigate the real-world efficacy of vedolizumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease ( CD) and ulcerative colitis ( UC). Methods A consecutive cohort of 212 adult IBD patients with active disease ( HBI >7/partial Mayo >4) newly receiving VDZ was prospectively recruited from 7 academic and 17 community centres. The primary endpoint was clinical remission ( CRM) ( CD HBI ≤4, UC pMayo ≤1) in week 14. Secondary endpoints included steroid-free remission ( SFCRM), clinical response ( CRS) ( HBI/pMayo score drop ≥3), vedolizumab impact on CRP, calprotectin and haemoglobin. Results Data of 97 CD (71.1% female, HBI 11) and 115 UC (42.6% female, pMayo 6) patients were analysed. Only 5.2% CD and 24.3% UC were anti- TNFα naïve. Most had extensive mucosal involvement (Montreal L3 69.1%/E3 53.9%). At week 14, 23.7% vs. 23.5% of CD vs. UC patients achieved CRM, 19.6% vs. 19.1% SFCRM and 60.8% vs. 57.4% CRS, respectively (all based on NRI). Week 14 CRM in CD was significantly associated with no history of extraintestinal manifestations ( P = 0.019), no prior adalimumab use ( P = 0.011), no hospitalisation in the past 12 months ( P = 0.015) and low HBI score ( P = 0.02) and in UC with active or previous smoking ( P = 0.044/0.028) and no anti- TNFα ( P = 0.023) use. Low HBI ( P = 0.019) and no hospitalisation in the past 12 months ( P = 0.01) predict CD CRM. The three most common AE were joint pain, acne and nasopharyngitis. Conclusion Vedolizumab is effective in routine use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background and aim: Left-sided colitis is the most prevalent subtype of ulcerative colitis, a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon. The standard of care for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis is mesalazine. The PODIUM study compared a once daily to a twice daily dosing regimen of a slow-release mesalazine (Pentasa®); here we assess the efficacy, in terms of maintenance of remission and mucosal healing, of both regimens in patients with left-sided disease. Patients and methods: Eligible patients were randomised to once daily (1×2g) or twice daily (2×1g) oral treatment with mesalazine, for 12months. Disease activity was assessed clinically and endoscopically at baseline and at 12months using the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index, without endoscopic assessment at months 4 and 8. Results: The study met the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in terms of remission, for once daily versus twice daily dosing, in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis; an 8% difference was reported in the 12-month clinical and endoscopic remission rates (69% [95% CI: 59.5–76.5] and 61% [95% CI: 51.4–69.6] with once daily and twice daily dosing, respectively; p =0.310). Mucosal healing scores after 12months were 0 or 1 for 84.4% of the once daily and 78.8% of the twice daily population. Slow-release mesalazine was well tolerated in both dosing regimens, with no difference in reported adverse events. Conclusions: Once daily slow-release mesalazine is similarly effective to the standard twice daily schedule in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis for the maintenance of remission in mild-to-moderate disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Introduction: Interferon γ (IFNγ) has been originally identified by its anti-viral activity and has been demonstrated to act as potent modulator of the immune system with a range of target cells limited largely to immune cell populations. Although IFNγ has been shown to directly affect the barrier function of intestinal epithelial cells, only limited information is available about other functional effects of IFNγ on intestinal epithelial cells. Methods: The effects on intestinal epithelial cell migration were studied using a previously described in-vitro model of epithelial restitution in confluent IEC-6 cell monolayers. Intestinal epithelial cell proliferation rates were assessed in various human and rat intestinal and colon epithelial cell lines using colorimetric MTT assays. Apoptosis of IEC-6 cells exposed to IFNγ was assessed by flow cytometry. In addition, transforming growth factor β mRNA expression after IFNγ treatment of IEC-6 cells was assessed by Northern blot analysis. Results: IFNγ significantly stimulated intestinal epithelial cell migration in an in-vitro wounding model. Furthermore, IFNγ caused a significant dose-dependent inhibition of epithelial cell proliferation in non-transformed small intestinal IEC-6 cells and human colon cancer-derived HT-29 cells and no significant rates of apoptosis were detected in the exposed epithelial cells. The effect of IFNγ on epithelial cell migration and proliferation could be completely blocked by neutralizing antibodies against TGFβ indicating that these effects are mediated through a TGFβ dependent pathway. In addition, increased expression of TGFβ1 mRNA by IEC-6 cells after treatment with IFNγ supports the hypothesis that IFNγ modulates intestinal epithelial cell function through a TGFβ-dependent pathway. Conclusion: These studies suggest that IFNγ produced by constituents of the mucosal immune system modulates epithelial cell functions with relevance for intestinal wound healing and may play a role in preserving the integrity of the intestinal epithelium following various forms of injuries. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: The identification of psychosocial stress in cancer patients has remained a challenging task especially in an acute care environment. The aims of the present study were to apply a short expert rating scale for the assessment of distress during the acute treatment phase and to identify potential sociodemographic and disease-related predictors.Methods: Four hundred seventy-eight ward cancer patients were assessed with the short form of the psycho-oncological basis documentation and its breast-cancer-specific version. In addition, they completed a self-rating questionnaire on stress in cancer patients. We recorded sociodemographic and disease-related variables and assessed their predictive value for psychosocial distress.Results: According to the expert rating scale, 56.3% of patients were rated distressed. While only 31.3% of patients were classified as distressed according to a patient self-rating, both approaches showed a good degree of concurrence with a consistent classification of 69% of patients. Younger age, current psychotropic medication, and past psychological treatment were associated with higher distress levels. Patients with metastases and those with a poorer functional status were more distressed. Interestingly, having an operation was associated with a better psychological well-being.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a substantial proportion of cancer patients in acute care are psychosocially distressed. A short expert rating scale proved to be a feasible tool for the assessment of distress in an acute care setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity has been under experimental investigation in recent years as a method of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). In this study our team, consisting of surgeons and gastroenterologists, focused on training techniques with currently available instruments to perform transgastric procedures. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the learning process during the establishment of a training program for NOTES. Therefore several procedures were tested in terms of training issues such as the applicability of instruments and techniques for both gastroenterologists and surgeons. After initial testing of the basic steps, a defined training program was initialized in an animal facility of a medical company. Permission for animal training was applied for and granted by the local government. Ten training sessions were performed on a porcine model using animals with a median weight of 65 kg (40–85 kg). General anesthesia was performed in all cases. Transgastric tube resection (TTR), cholecystectomy (TCE), cardiomyotomy (TMY), and small bowel segmental resection (TSBR) were performed. The learning process was evaluated, including handling issues for flexible instruments, access, closure problems, and special technical issues. Procedure duration, as a marker of the learning curve effect, was evaluated. Intra-esophageal friction, lack of platform stability, lack of precision in tissue retraction, and lack of independence of endoscopic vision were the most difficult technical problems encountered. The operative time range was 25–85 min for TTR, 75–185 min for TCE, 95–220 min for TMY, and 100–260 min for TSBR. A learning curve was demonstrated for each investigated technique. These results are promising in terms of the ability of surgeons and gastroenterologists to develop these procedures into a clinical applicable version. Technical limitations were more important than differences in medical education, providing that there is a certain level of experience in both flexible endoscopy and laparoscopy, as well as a team approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nutritional support is an established element of therapy for various indications. However, its impact on the mucosal barrier function is not well understood. We investigated the influence of EN and PN on intestinal epithelial cells and peripheral blood (PBMC) and lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMC), all of which are involved in the mucosal defense against bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation. Integrity of epithelial cells was measured as transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) of confluent Caco-2 monolayers in the presence of 1% EN, PN and a parenteral amino acid mixture (AM). To determine wound healing capacities, an established migration model with IEC-6 cells was used. Furthermore, we investigated apoptosis, cell activation, proliferation and cytokine secretion of Caco-2, HT29 and of stimulated PBMC and LPMC cultured with or without 1 and 5% EN, AM or PN. We demonstrated that EN, AM and PN promoted the integrity of the epithelial monolayer and reconstituted epithelial cell continuity TGF-β-dependently and -independently. Interestingly, only PN induced apoptosis and decreased the mitochondrial membrane potential. The activation status of PBMC was significantly reduced by EN and AM. Specifically, EN leads to an increased apoptosis rate, inhibited cell cycle progression and increased pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion. Both EN and PN reduced the activation status and the release of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Our study provides evidence that by promoting wound healing and regulating T cell function, EN, AM, and PN potently interact with the intestinal barrier and immune system, thus justifying its use in diseases accompanied by impaired mucosal barrier function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Galectins have recently emerged as central regulators of the immune system. We have previously demonstrated that carbohydrate-dependent binding of galectin-2 induces apoptosis in activated T cells. Here, we investigate the potential therapeutic effect of galectin-2 in experimental colitis. Galectin-2 expression and its binding profile were determined by immunohistochemistry. Acute and chronic colitis was induced by dextran sodium sulfate administration and in a T-cell transfer colitis model. Apoptosis was assessed by TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling, and cytokine secretion was determined by cytometric bead array. We show that galectin-2 was constitutively expressed mainly in the epithelial compartment of the mouse intestine and bind to lamina propria mononuclear cells. During colitis, galectin-2 expression was reduced, but could be restored to normal levels by immunosuppressive treatment. Galectin-2 treatment induced apoptosis of mucosal T cells and thus ameliorated acute and chronic dextran-sodium-sulfate-induced colitis and in a T-helper-cell 1-driven model of antigen-specific transfer colitis. Furthermore, the pro-inflammatory cytokine release was inhibited by galectin-2 treatment. In preliminary toxicity studies, galectin-2 was well tolerated. Our study provides evidence that galectin-2 induces apoptosis in vivo and ameliorates acute and chronic murine colitis. Furthermore, galectin-2 has no significant toxicity over a broad dose range, suggesting that it may serve as a new therapeutic agent in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Galectin-4 is a carbohydrate-binding protein belonging to the galectin family. Here we provide novel evidence that galectin- 4 is selectively expressed and secreted by intestinal epithelial cells and binds potently to activated peripheral and mucosal lamina propria T-cells at the CD3 epitope. The carbohydrate-dependent binding of galectin-4 at the CD3 epitope is fully functional and inhibited T cell activation, cycling and expansion. Galectin-4 induced apoptosis of activated peripheral and mucosal lamina propria T cells via calpain-, but not caspase-dependent, pathways. Providing further evidence for its important role in regulating T cell function, galectin-4 blockade by antisense oligonucleotides reduced TNF-alpha inhibitor induced T cell death. Furthermore, in T cells, galectin-4 reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion including IL-17. In a model of experimental colitis, galectin-4 ameliorated mucosal inflammation, induced apoptosis of mucosal T-cells and decreased the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Our results show that galectin-4 plays a unique role in the intestine and assign a novel role of this protein in controlling intestinal inflammation by a selective induction of T cell apoptosis and cell cycle restriction. Conclusively, after defining its biological role, we propose Galectin-4 is a novel anti-inflammatory agent that could be therapeutically effective in diseases with a disturbed T cell expansion and apoptosis such as inflammatory bowel disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]