Search

Purpose: To analyze the progression of structural and functional retinal impairment in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with no clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy (DR) during a 3-year follow-up. Methods: This was an observational longitudinal study. Post-pediatric T1DM patients without clinical signs of DR, and sex- and age-matched healthy subjects were recruited at San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy). Each patient underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological evaluation, including optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-angiography (OCT-A), retinal static and dynamic vessel analysis (DVA), and microperimetry. Results: 21 eyes of 21 T1DM patients (10 females; 24 ± 2 years old), and 21 age and sex-matched healthy subjects were enrolled. At baseline, T1DM eyes revealed a significantly decreased vessel length density using OCT-A (p < 0.001 and p = 0.046 in 3 × 3 and 6 × 6 mm images) and a significantly increased vessel density index (p = 0.013 and p = 0.087 in 3 × 3 and 6 × 6 mm images) of deep capillary plexus. DVA detected a significantly decreased vessel response to flicker light (p = 0.002). A significantly increased thickness of ganglion cellular layer 6-mm-diameter subfields in inferior and superior quadrants was found in diabetic patients (p < 0.001 in both subfields). At 3-years-follow-up no significant longitudinal changes were disclosed in all analyses. Conclusions: Concomitant subclinical microvascular and neurodegenerative damages could be early signs of DR onset that precede functional alterations and clinical signs of DR development. These alterations demonstrated a stable trend over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To determine the presence of sectoral changes in vessel density (VD) patterns induced by vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: Prospective, interventional study. A total of 43 patients (63 eyes) were initially enrolled in the study. We performed swept source (SS) OCT and sectorial OCTA measurement to determine parafoveal VD at baseline and after six months of anti-VEGF treatment. In the locations with statistically significant differences in VD between baseline and month 6, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses to determine which, if any, of the baseline variables were associated with the observed changes. Results: A total of 34 patients (48 eyes) were included in the final analysis. Mean VD decreased from baseline to month 6 (from 45.2 (± 3.5) to 44.6 (± 3.2) % in the SCP and from 50 (± 3.3) to 49 (± 3.9) % in the DCP). The only significant changes in VD were observed in the nasal sector of the deep capillary plexus, with a decrease of 2.9% (p = 0.001). On univariate and multivariate analyses, the only variable significantly associated with changes in VD in the nasal sector after 6 months of treatment was baseline VD in the same sector. Conclusions: Anti-VEGF therapy has a small impact on VD values over time. These variations observed after treatment seems to be related to changes over areas of vascular anomalies and displaced vessels adjacent to cystic areas, with no significant changes over ischemic areas. No correlation was observed between this trend and other clinical baseline features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a microvascular complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is a leading cause of blindness and has detrimental effects on patients' quality of life. We compared the risk of DR diagnosis with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients with T2DM in Japan. Methods: This Japanese retrospective cohort study used the JMDC Claims Database (data collected from January 2015 to September 2022). Patients with T2DM and no record of microvascular or macrovascular diseases who were newly treated with an SGLT2i (23,061 patients) or a DPP-4i (53,986 patients) were matched 1:1 using propensity score (10,166 per matched group). Incidence rates (IRs) and cumulative IRs of DR diagnosis were calculated for each treatment group; hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models to compare the risk between the groups. Results: The IR of DR diagnosis was 46.23 and 57.12 per 1000 person-years in the SGLT2i and DPP-4i groups, respectively, with a significantly lower risk in the SGLT2i group than in the DPP-4i group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.92, P = 0.0003). Conclusions: In this study, the risk of DR diagnosis was lower with SGLT2i compared with DPP-4i in patients with T2DM without microvascular and macrovascular diseases in Japan. Findings suggest that early SGLT2i treatment may be beneficial in preventing DR development in early-stage T2DM. Graphical abstract available for this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) are multifactorial disorders that affect the macula and cause significant vision loss. Although inflammation and neoangiogenesis are hallmarks of DME and nAMD, respectively, they share some biochemical mediators. While inflammation is a trigger for the processes that lead to the development of DME, in nAMD inflammation seems to be the consequence of retinal pigment epithelium and Bruch membrane alterations. These pathophysiologic differences may be the key issue that justifies the difference in treatment strategies. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors have changed the treatment of both diseases, however, many patients with DME fail to achieve the established therapeutic goals. From a clinical perspective, targeting inflammatory pathways with intravitreal corticosteroids has been proven to be effective in patients with DME. On the contrary, the clinical relevance of addressing inflammation in patients with nAMD has not been proven yet. We explore the role and implication of inflammation in the development of nAMD and DME and its therapeutical relevance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the correlation between the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). The retrospective 2-year cohort study included eyes with DME confirmed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, between 2010 and 2020. All the eyes were treated with an intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) during regular follow-up around 2 years. They were categorized into 3 different groups: an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 (mL/min per 1.73 m2) (group A), < 60 (group B), and patients undergoing hemodialysis (group C). The main outcome measures were (1) visual improvement, (2) structural improvement, and (3) the injection frequency of anti-VEGF in the different groups. In this study, 167 eyes from 120 patients were enrolled. Compared with groups B and C, the eyes in group A experienced the only significant visual improvement at month 3, month 6, and month 12 (P = 0.0001, 0.0002, 0.0013, respectively). The presence of subretinal fluid and intraretinal cysts was significantly decreased in groups A and B. In the treatment frequency analysis, the number of injections was the highest in group A and lowest in group C during the study period (P = 0.04). The severity of CKD had an impact on the DME treatment. The less severe CKD was, the greater the visual improvement that could be achieved. In addition, relatively poor renal function required a lower anti-VEGF injection frequency. The active prevention of the progression of CKD may play a key role in DME treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To explore the efficacy of treating diabetic macular edema with aflibercept and ranibizumab. and to compare the effects of these two drugs on central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular volume (CMV). Methods From February 2021 to February 2023.100 patients with diabetic macular edema were admitted to the hospital and randomly divided into two groups using the envelope method: the observation group (50 patients, 50 eyes) treated with aflibercept, and the control group (50 patients, 50 eyes) treated with ranibizumab. The efficacy, CMT, BCVA,CMV, and com- plications of the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the overall efficacy between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the pre-treatment values of CMT and CMV between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the CMT and CMV values at 4 and 8 months post-treatment were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in BCVA values before treatment, and at 4 and 8 months after treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). The rates of complications such as cataract, vitreous hemorrhage. and conjunctivitis were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both aflibercept and ranibizumab can be effective in treating diabetic macular edema. However, aflibercept has a more pronounced advantage in reducing CMT and decreasing CMV, with fewer complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzes the dynamics of short-term treatment response to the first intravitreal faricimab injection in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). This retrospective, single-center, clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich. Patients with treatment-naïve and pretreated DME were included. Patient chart data and imaging were analyzed. Safety and efficacy (corrected visual acuity (CVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and signs of intraocular inflammation (IOI)) of the first faricimab intravitreal therapy (IVT) were evaluated weekly until 4 weeks after injection. Forty-three eyes (81% pretreated) of 31 patients were included. Four weeks after the first faricimab IVT, CVA remained stable and median CST (µm) decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 325.0 (293.5–399.0) at baseline to 304.0 (286.5–358.0). CVA at week 4 was only associated with baseline CVA (p < 0.001). CST was the only predictive variable (p = 0.002) between baseline and week 4 CST. Weekly safety assessments did not show any sign of clinically significant IOI. This study suggests faricimab is an effective treatment for (pretreated) DME, showing structural benefit 1 month following the first injection without short-term safety signals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) causes vision impairment and significant vision loss. Portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the potential to enhance the accessibility and frequency of DME screening, facilitating early diagnosis and continuous monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a portable OCT device (ACT100) in assessing DME compared with a traditional stationary OCT device (Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT plus). Methods: This prospective clinical investigation included 40 eyes of 33 patients with DME. Participants with significant refractive errors (myopia > −6.0 diopters or hyperopia > +3.0 diopters), vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment, or other ocular diseases affecting imaging were excluded. Spectral-domain OCT was performed by a single examiner using both devices to capture macular volume scans under mydriasis. Central macular thickness (CMT) was evaluated using the analysis software for each device: Cirrus used version 6.0.4, and ACT100 used version V20. We analyzed inter-evaluator and inter-instrument agreements for qualitative assessments of the intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) using Cohen's kappa coefficient, whereas quantitative CMT assessments were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Substantial inter-evaluator agreement for IRF/SRF (κ = 0.801) and ERM (κ = 0.688) with ACT100 and inter-instrument agreement (κ = 0.756 for IRF/SRF, κ = 0.684 for ERM) were observed. CMT values measured using ACT100 were on average 29.6 μm lower than that of Cirrus (285.8 ± 56.6 vs. 315.4 ± 84.7 μm, p < 0.0001) but showed a strong correlation (R = 0.76, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: ACT100 portable OCT demonstrated high reliability for DME evaluations, comparable to that of stationary systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Classification and identification of eye diseases using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) has been a challenging task and a trending research area in recent years. Accurate classification and detection of different diseases are crucial for effective care management and improving vision outcomes. Current detection methods fall into two main categories: traditional methods and deep learning-based approaches. Traditional approaches rely on machine learning for feature extraction, while deep learning methods utilize data-driven classification model training. In recent years, Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have become essential tools, particularly in medical image classification, and are widely used to classify and identify various diseases. However, due to the high spatial similarities in OCT images, accurate classification remains a challenging task. In this paper, we introduce a novel model called "OCTNet" that integrates a deep learning model combining InceptionV3 with a modified multi-scale attention-based spatial attention block to enhance model performance. OCTNet employs an InceptionV3 backbone with a fusion of dual attention modules to construct the proposed architecture. The InceptionV3 model generates rich features from images, capturing both local and global aspects, which are then enhanced by utilizing the modified multi-scale spatial attention block, resulting in a significantly improved feature map. To evaluate the model's performance, we utilized two state-of-the-art (SOTA) datasets that include images of normal cases, Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV), Drusen, and Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). Through experimentation and simulation, the proposed OCTNet improves the classification accuracy of the InceptionV3 model by 1.3%, yielding higher accuracy than other SOTA models. We also performed an ablation study to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The model achieved an overall average accuracy of 99.50% and 99.65% with two different OCT datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the efficacy of suprachoroidal versus intravitreal injection of triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Ziauddin Hospital Kemari, Karachi. Period: 1st November 2022 and 30th October 2023. Methods: The study observed 71 eyes of 59 patients diagnosed with Diabetic macular edema. All patients that met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups, Group A Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone and Group B Intravitreal Triamcinolone. Results: This research encompasses 71 eyes from 59 patients diagnosed with diabetic macular edema, divided into two groups based on their chosen treatment. Group A consisted of 34 patients, whereas Group B comprised 37 patients. The average age of patients in both groups was 43.6±6.2. Baseline visual acuity and macular thickness were recorded in both groups and compared after treatment. Significant improvement was observed in both groups, particularly notable in the 3rd month. The suprachoroidal triamcinolone injection exhibited a more stable response, accompanied by lower complication rate. Conclusion: In conclusion, the comparative analysis of Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone acetate and Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetate showed a more significant improvement in IOP and CMT in the suprachoroidal group as compared to intravitreal. Hence Suprachoroidal injection was seen as the treatment of choice in treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intraocular dexamethasone implant (DEXi) is an efficient treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). However, it may be unavailable or contraindicated. Triamcinolone acetonide is another corticosteroid that has proved to be safe and effective in treating macular edema complicating various diseases including diabetes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of a switch from DEXi to subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) and back, in eyes with DME. Methods: Retrospective study. DME eyes that had been treated with DEXi and switched to STTA between October 2018 and February 2019 (stock shortage of DEXi) were included. The functional and anatomical outcomes of the switch and switch-back were studied. Results: 26 eyes of 17 patients (mean age 67.1 ± 8.2 years) were considered. The mean baseline visual acuity (VA) was 0.35 ± 0.17 decimals remaining stable after DEXi, STTA and switch-back to DEXi. The mean central macular thickness (CMT) was 492.7 ± 32.8 µm initially, decreasing to 294.3 ± 133.4 µm after DEXi, 369.9 ± 182.3 µm after STTA and 297.6 ± 72.0 µm after switching back to DEXi (all p < 0.05 versus baseline). Compared to baseline, the CMT reduction was numerically better after DEXi and switching back to DEXi than after STTA (mean reduction: -200.4 µm, -167.7 µm, and -95.08 µm respectively, p = 0.13). Intraocular pressure was comparable after DEXi and STTA. Conclusion: DEXi is the steroid of choice in DME. However, STTA can be a cost-effective alternative when DEXi is unavailable or contraindicated. This study suggests that STTA may be used in the context of a step therapy in DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in addition to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for studies that compared anti-VEGF with SML and anti-VEGF monotherapy for DME. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and the number of anti-VEGF injections. Results: Eight studies including 493 eyes were selected. Four studies were randomized controlled, and the other four were retrospective. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in BCVA (mean difference [MD] -0.04; 95%CI -0.09 to 0.01 logMAR; P = 0.13;). CMT was thinner in the group of anti-VEGF with SML (MD -11.08; 95%CI -21.04 to -1.12 µm; P = 0.03); however, it was due to a single study that weighed higher, and the sensitivity and subcategory analyses did not support the finding. The number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly decreased in the group of anti-VEGF with SML (MD -2.22; 95%CI -3.02 to -1.42; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that adding SML to anti-VEGF therapy could significantly reduce the number of anti-VEGF injections compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy, while achieve similar BCVA and CMT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeMethodsResultsConclusionGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) by augmenting insulin release and sensitivity. We assessed the overall risk for development of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and diabetic macular edema (DME), among GLP-1RA users.A retrospective cohort of patients with NPDR newly started on a GLP-1RA from a national insurance claims database was compared to a cohort of patients treated with other oral anti-diabetic agents and matched for age, sex, race, index year, and number of active diabetic medications. Exclusions occurred for < 2 years in the database before diagnosis; prior diagnoses of PDR, DME, vitreous hemorrhage, and/or other retinal vascular diseases; and prior intraocular treatment for VTDR.A total of 6093 users of GLP-1RA were matched to 14,122 controls. In the GLP-1RA cohort, 632 (10.1%), 76 (1.2%), and 544 (8.9%) patients progressed to VTDR, PDR, or DME, respectively. This is compared to 1332 (9.5%) VTDR, 165 (1.2%) PDR, or 1148 (8.1%) DME in the control group. Accounting for underlying DM severity with IPTW, no difference in hazard was seen in the GLP-1RA cohort compared to controls for progression to VTDR (HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.92–1.14 p = 0.69), DME (HR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.95–1.1.9, p = 0.31), or PDR (HR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.58–1.12, p = 0.20).We found no difference in the risk for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy, nor for its component diseases, DME or PDR, with GLP-1RA use compared to other oral anti-hyperglycemic agents in patients with NPDR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was intended to investigate the macular vascular and photoreceptor changes for diabetic macular edema (DME) at the early stage. A total of 255 eyes of 134 diabetes mellitus patients were enrolled and underwent an ophthalmological and systemic evaluation in this cross-sectional study. Early DME was characterized by central subfoveal thickness (CST) value between 250 and 325 μm, intact ellipsoid zone, and an external limiting membrane. While non-DME was characterized by CST < 250 μm with normal retinal morphology and structure. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area ≤ 0.3 mm2 (P < 0.001, OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.67 in the multivariate analysis) and HbA1c level ≤ 8% (P = 0.005, OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.19–0.74 in multivariate analysis) were significantly associated with a higher risk of early DME. Meanwhile, no significant differences exist in cone parameters between non-DME and early DME eyes. Compared with non-DME eyes, vessel diameter, vessel wall thickness, wall-to-lumen ratio, the cross-sectional area of the vascular wall in the upper side were significantly decreased in the early DME eyes (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.005, P = 0.003 respectively). This study suggested a vasospasm or vasoconstriction with limited further photoreceptor impairment at the early stage of DME formation. CST ≥ 250 μm and FAZ ≤ 0.3 mm2 may be the indicator for early DME detection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a prevalent exudative maculopathy, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first-line choice for treatment. Faricimab, a novel anti-VEGF and anti-angiopoietin-2 bispecific agent, has recently been approved for the treatment of DME. In this study, we systematically reviewed the real-world evidence of the efficacy of faricimab for the treatment of DME. Methods: We searched 11 databases for eligible studies. Study selection and data extraction were made independently by two authors in duplicate. Eligible studies were reviewed qualitatively. Results: We identified 10 eligible studies that summarized data from a total of 6054 eyes with a mean follow-up of between 55 days and 12 months. Five studies reported outcomes in a population of both treatment-naïve and previously treated eyes, and five studies reported outcomes exclusively in relation to eyes that were previously treated. Faricimab improved the best-corrected visual acuity and macular thickness. The extension of the treatment interval was possible in 61–81% of treatment-naïve eyes and 36–78% of previously treated eyes. Conclusions: Faricimab for DME yields clinical outcomes similar to those known from previous anti-VEGF treatments but with extended treatment intervals, thus lowering the burden of therapy for patients. Long-term real-world studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetic retinopathy. Treatment with intravitreal injections is effective in most cases but is associated with a high therapeutic burden for patients. This implies the need for long-term treatments, such as the fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant. A review of basic science, pharmacology, and clinical data was conducted to provide a state-of-the-art view of the FAc implant in 2024. Although generally well tolerated, the FAc implant has been associated with ocular hypertension and cataract, and caution should be advised to the patients in this regard. By synthesizing information across these domains, a comprehensive evaluation can be attained, facilitating informed decision-making regarding the use of the FAc implant in the management of DME. The main objective of this review is to provide clinicians with guidelines on how to introduce and use the FAc implant in a patient with DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of visual impairment, often treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, some patients do not respond adequately to this treatment. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant as a second-line treatment in DME patients with insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy or with high treatment burden. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across seven clinical sites in Switzerland. The study included eyes with active DME that had been pretreated with anti-VEGF for at least six months before receiving DEX therapy. Data were extracted from electronic patient records, focusing on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and injection frequency. Results: A total of 95 eyes from 89 patients (38.8% females, mean age 65.6 ± 9.1 years, follow-up time 80.6 ± 38.5 [13.5–166.7] months) were analyzed. Prior to the first DEX implant, eyes had undergone an average of 16.0 ± 13.3 anti-VEGF injections over 32.5 ± 22.4 months. Post-DEX treatment, 22.1% of eyes received DEX monotherapy, 44.2% received a combination of DEX and anti-VEGF, 25.3% continued with anti-VEGF monotherapy, and 8.4% received no further treatment. The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased significantly from 6.4 ± 3.1 in the year before DEX to 1.6 ± 2.4 in the year after DEX (p < 0.001). BCVA remained stable (0.4 ± 0.3 logMAR at baseline, 0.4 ± 0.5 logMAR at 24 months, p = 0.2), while CST improved from 477.7 ± 141.0 to 320.4 ± 125.5 μm (p < 0.001), and the presence of retinal fluid decreased from 98.0% to 61.1% (p = 0.021). During follow-up, 26.3% of eyes required glaucoma medication, 4.2% underwent glaucoma surgery, and 1.1% needed cataract surgery. Conclusions: In real-world clinical settings, the addition of DEX to anti-VEGF therapy in DME patients significantly reduces treatment burden and retinal fluid while maintaining visual function. Treatment decisions should balance anatomical and functional outcomes, considering individual patient needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup. Study design: YOSEMITE/RHINE (NCT03622580/NCT03622593) subgroup analysis: global, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-comparator–controlled, phase 3 faricimab trials. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to intravitreal faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) and per treat-and-extend (T&E) dosing, or aflibercept 2.0 mg Q8W. Outcomes were assessed through year 2 for the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup (N = 60) and the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE global cohort (N = 1891). Results: In the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup, 21, 19, and 20 patients were randomized to faricimab Q8W, faricimab T&E, and aflibercept Q8W, respectively (632, 632, and 627 patients in the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort). Vision gains and anatomic improvements with faricimab at year 1 were maintained over 2 years and were generally consistent between groups. Mean best-corrected visual acuity changes from baseline at year 2 (weeks 92–100 average) for the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup were +12.5, +9.0, and +5.0 letters in the faricimab Q8W, faricimab T&E and aflibercept Q8W arms, respectively (+10.8, +10.4, and +10.3 letters in the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort). At week 96, 61.1% of the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup and 78.1% of the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort were on ≥ Q12W dosing. Faricimab was well-tolerated with a safety profile comparable with aflibercept. Conclusion: Faricimab up to Q16W offered durable vision gains and anatomic improvements up to 2 years in patients with DME in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup. Outcomes were generally consistent with the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a vision-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Anterior chamber (AC) flare and intraocular cytokines are potent biomarkers reflecting the intraocular immune status in PDR. This study aimed to elucidate the complex interrelationship between AC flare and intraocular cytokines in PDR eyes. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 19 PDR eyes of 19 patients with type 2 DM, and on 19 eyes of 19 patients with idiopathic macular hole or epiretinal membrane as controls. AC flare was measured before pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Aqueous humor (AH) and vitreous fluid (VF) samples were collected at the time of PPV, and the quantities of 27 cytokines in both intraocular fluids were analyzed. In the PDR and control groups, Spearman's rank correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between AC flare and IL-8 level in both AH and VF. Additionally, IL-8 levels in AH correlated positively with IL-8 levels in VF. In the PDR group, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified IL-8 level in AH as a significant predictor for both diabetic macular edema (DME) and vitreous hemorrhage (VH) complications. The cut-off values of IL-8 were established at ≥26.6 pg/mL for DME and ≥7.96 pg/mL for VH. Given the positive correlation between AC flare and AH IL-8 level, the present findings suggest that AC flare value may potentially be a non-invasive biomarker for predicting DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the clinical relevance of The European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO) classification in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after their first dexamethasone implant (DEXI) treatment. Methods: Retrospective real-world study conducted on consecutive DME patients who underwent DEXI treatment and were controlled at month-2. Subjects were initially classified according to the ESASO classification stages. The outcomes were anatomical biomarkers with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: A total of 128 patients were classified according to ESASO classification stages as early (7; 5.5%), advanced (100; 78.1%), and severe (21; 16.4%). At baseline, there were significant differences between stages in BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), and tomography anatomical biomarkers (p < 0.05). Initial BCVA (logMAR) was 0.33 ± 0.10, 0.58 ± 0.34, and 0.71 ± 0.35 in the early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively (p < 0.05). At month-2, BCVA was 0.17 ± 0.15, 0.46 ± 0.29, and 0.69 ± 0.27 in those classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively. At month-2, DME was resolved or improved in 6 (85.7%), 60 (60%), and 12 (60%) patients classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively. Conclusions: There was a good correlation between BCVA and ESASO classification stages. Patients in the severe stage did not achieve visual acuity improvement over the study period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/Introduction: Severe diabetic macular edema (DME) is often resistant to anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Steroids are particularly effective at reducing edema by suppressing inflammation; they are also used as an alternative to expensive anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in some patients. Therefore, the use of steroids in DME reflects an unmet need for anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Notably, triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections are widely used in Japan. Here, we evaluated the frequency of TA as an indicator of the efficacy of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in DME treatment using a health insurance claims database. Materials and Methods: In this cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed the health insurance claims data of 11 million Japanese individuals from 2005 to 2019. The frequency and duration of TA injection after the initiation of SGLT2is or other antidiabetic drugs were analyzed. Results: Among the 2,412 matched patients with DME, the incidence rate of TA injection was 63.8 times per 1,000 person‐years in SGLT2i users and 94.9 times per 1,000 person‐years in non‐users. SGLT2is reduced the risk for the first (P = 0.0024, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.50–0.87), second (P = 0.0019, hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.35–0.80) and third TA (P = 0.0053, hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.25–0.80) injections. A subanalysis of each baseline characteristic of the patients showed that SGLT2is were effective regardless of the background factors. Conclusions: The use of SGLT2is reduced the frequency of TA injection in patients with DME. Therefore, SGLT2i therapy might be a novel, noninvasive and low‐cost adjunctive therapy for DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) are both serious eye conditions associated with diabetes and if left untreated, and they can lead to permanent blindness. Traditional methods for screening these conditions rely on manual image analysis by experts, which can be time-consuming and costly due to the scarcity of such experts. To overcome the aforementioned challenges, we present the Modified CornerNet approach with DenseNet-100. This system aims to localize and classify lesions associated with DR and DME. To train our model, we first generate annotations for input samples. These annotations likely include information about the location and type of lesions within the retinal images. DenseNet-100 is a deep CNN used for feature extraction, and CornerNet is a one-stage object detection model. CornerNet is known for its ability to accurately localize small objects, which makes it suitable for detecting lesions in retinal images. We assessed our technique on two challenging datasets, EyePACS and IDRiD. These datasets contain a diverse range of retinal images, which is important to estimate the performance of our model. Further, the proposed model is also tested in the cross-corpus scenario on two challenging datasets named APTOS-2019 and Diaretdb1 to assess the generalizability of our system. According to the accomplished analysis, our method outperformed the latest approaches in terms of both qualitative and quantitative results. The ability to effectively localize small abnormalities and handle over-fitted challenges is highlighted as a key strength of the suggested framework which can assist the practitioners in the timely recognition of such eye ailments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine whether the types and rates of post-surgical complications associated with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) are comparable with those reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera. Methods: Systematic literature reviews were conducted to determine the long-term (≥ 18-month) safety of ocular implants that cross the sclera in clinical trials and real-world studies. Complication types and rates were compared with those reported for the PDS in phase III clinical trials (Archway, Pagoda, and Pavilion). Results: Sixteen clinical trials (24 publications) and 43 real-world studies were identified reporting 30 complications in eyes with 15 implant types and 8 ocular diseases. Implants were associated with an acceptable, well-characterized safety profile, with most complications resolving spontaneously or with treatment. Device-related complications were reported in 0.7% (0.0–5.0%) of study eyes in clinical trials and 1.3% (0.0–14.5%) of eyes in real-world studies. Rates of conjunctival complications were 2.1% (0.0–22.8%) and 2.2% (0.9–4.6%), respectively. The overall types and rates of adverse events of special interest reported for the PDS in phase III trials (cataract, conjunctival bleb, vitreous hemorrhage, conjunctival erosion, conjunctival retraction, endophthalmitis, implant dislocation, retinal detachment, and hyphema) were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants. Conclusions: The rates of complications reported in phase III clinical trials for the PDS were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera. This suggests that the long-term safety of the PDS is consistent with other ocular devices established in ophthalmology clinical practice. Trial Registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD5202234129, CRD42022343129. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) require frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment and monitoring visits. We aimed to understand the burden of treatment on caregivers. Methods: This multinational, noninterventional study used a cross-sectional survey of adult patients with DME or nAMD treated with anti-VEGF injections in the USA, Canada, France, Italy, Spain, and the UK. The survey assessed caregivers’ sociodemographic characteristics, patient relationships, patients’ clinical history and treatment experiences, caregivers’ experiences, and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment of caregiving burden. Results: Caregivers for patients with DME (n = 30) and nAMD (n = 95) completed surveys. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 64.0 ± 13.4 years, and most were female (71.2%), white (70.4%), married (66.4%), and from Europe (67.2%). Most were caring for their mother/father or partner/spouse (85.6%). Mean ± SD length of time as a caregiver was 9.1 ± 10.0 years. Caregivers estimated they provided support for 4.2 ± 2.9 days/week and 6.0 ± 7.1 h/day on average. Nearly half of caregivers (45.6%) reported some impairment in daily activities, and more than two-thirds (70.5%) of working caregivers (n = 44) reported work absenteeism due to anti-VEGF treatment/monitoring appointments. At least one treatment barrier was reported by 66.7% and 50.5% of caregivers of patients with DME and nAMD, respectively, which were related to coronavirus disease 2019- (38.4%), clinic- (18.4%), social-/health- (13.6%), treatment- (10.4%), or financial-related factors (4.8%). Caregiver Reaction Assessment scores indicated mild-to-moderate burden, with higher caregiver schedule disruption scores associated with an increasing number of anti-VEGF treatment/monitoring visits among DME caregivers (r = 0.61). Conclusion: Caregivers devote substantial time to caregiving, leading to schedule disruptions and absenteeism for some working caregivers. Positive and negative impacts on caregiver mental health were reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the primary cause of visual impairment in individuals with diabetes. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the current first-line treatment for DME owing to its effectiveness. However, frequent anti-VEGF injections may be inconvenient for patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the addition of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) to anti-VEGF therapy could reduce the requirement for anti-VEGF injections while maintaining the treatment efficacy for DME. Methods: Clinical trials retrieved from the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were evaluated to determine the effectiveness of combination treatment with SML and anti-VEGF medication compared with that of anti-VEGF treatment alone. The primary outcome measures were the changes in CMT, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the total number of intravitreal injections (IVIs). Results: The IVI + SML group revealed a substantial increase in the logarithm of the minimum angle of the resolution BCVA and a reduction in CMT at the 12-month follow-up (BCVA: random-effects; mean difference [MD], −0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.10 to −0.01; p-value = 0.28, and CMT: random-effects; MD, −18.27; 95% confidence interval, −27.36 to −9.18; p-value = 0.20). The number of required IVIs in the IVI + SML group was lower than that in the IVI only group (random-effects; MD, −2.22; 95% CI: −3.13 to −1.31; p-value < 0.01). Conclusions: Combining SML therapy with anti-VEGF injections may reduce the total number of injections required, improve VA, and reduce CMT at the 12-month follow-up. Although the included studies used different SML regimens and anti-VEGF agents, this review indicates that the application of additional SML therapy results in positive clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal faricimab (IVF) injections on the blood flow of retinal vessels in the peripapillary region and optic nerve head (ONH) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) using laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG). Patients and Methods: This study included 20 eyes of 18 patients treated with IVA and 15 eyes of 11 patients treated with IVF for DME. The mean blur rate (MBR) of the ONH and retinal artery and vein of the peripapillary region were measured using LSFG at baseline and 1 month after injection. Central retinal thickness (CRT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured for all patients. Results: CRT decreased significantly in both IVA-treated (p = 0.0003) and IVF-treated groups (p = 0.0004). Some of the MBR-related parameters of the ONH, such as MBR of all areas (MA), MBR of vascular areas (MV), and MBR of tissue areas (MT), decreased significantly 1 month after IVA and IVF compared to baseline values (MA of IVA, p < 0.0001; MT of IVA, p = 0.0220; MA of IVF, p = 0.0002; MT of IVF, p = 0.0461). MBR of the retinal artery (MBR-A) and vein (MBR-V) also decreased significantly 1 month after IVA and IVF compared with baseline values (MBR-A of IVA, p = 0.0002; MBR-V of IVA, p = 0.0010; MBR-A of IVF, p = 0.0368). No significant difference in ocular perfusion was observed between the IVA-treated and IVF-treated groups. Conclusion: Intravitreal injection led to a reduction in ocular blood flow in both retinal peripapillary vessels and the ONH in both IVA-treated and IVF-treated groups. No significant difference was observed in MBR reduction between the IVA-treated and IVF-treated groups. Our findings warrant further long-term investigations to reveal differences between aflibercept and faricimab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With this study, we investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) after switching to intravitreal Faricimab (IVF) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients treated for DME with IVF who showed insufficient responses to prior anti-VEGF therapy. Data collected included baseline patient demographics, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central retinal volume (CRV). We analyzed functional and structural measures before and after IVF, compared baseline demographics and treatment factors between Faricimab-responders and reduced-responders and assessed influencing factors of the follow-up BCVA and CRT. Results: This study included 25 eyes from 16 patients. After switching to IVF, the mean BCVA showed no significant improvement, changing from 59.4 ± 13.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 61.4 ± 12.8 ETDRS letters at follow-up (p = 0.26). CRT significantly reduced from 414.4 ± 126.3 µm to 353.3 ± 131.1 µm (p < 0.011), and the 3 mm CRV significantly decreased from 2.8 ± 0.5 mm3 to 2.6 ± 0.6 mm3 (p < 0.012). Seven patients met the responder criteria, exhibiting an improvement of at least 5 ETDRS letters and a simultaneous CRT reduction of at least 30 µm. Further analysis showed that higher BCVA at baseline (p < 0.001) was associated with better BCVA following IVF, while higher baseline CRT (p < 0.003), a higher number of prior anti-VEGF agents (p < 0.034) and prior corticosteroid injections (p < 0.019) were associated with greater CRT at follow-up. Conclusions: Following the initial IVF injection series, we observed a clear improvement of anatomical measures. No functional improvement was observed, although visual acuity remained stable. Higher baseline BCVA was associated with better post-IVF BCVA, while higher baseline CRT, a greater number of prior anti-VEGF agents and prior corticosteroid injections were linked to higher CRT post-IVF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To evaluate the association between subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A retrospective or prospective study comparing SFCT in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients with and without DME was included. The data were collected from published studies retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Library. The final search was conducted on July 2, 2023. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and a random-effects model was used for the meta analysis. This study calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for SFCT. Results: A total of 26 relevant studies were identified, involving a combined sample size of 3201 eyes (1302 DR-DME eyes and 1899 DR-no DME eyes). The results showed no significance between DR-DME and DR-no DME (WMD = − 3.57 μm; 95% CI −26.54 to 19.41 μm; P = 0.76). Sub-analysis based on nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) subgroups showed that the SFCT of NPDR-DME was significantly thinner than that of NPDR-no DME eyes (WMD = − 19.80 μm; 95% CI − 34.55 to − 5.04 μm; P = 0.009), while there was no significance in SFCT between PDR-DME and PDR-no DME (WMD = − 26.45 μm; 95% CI − 104.00 to 51.11 μm; P = 0.50). Conclusion: The SFCT was thinner in NPDR-DME eyes compared to NPDR-no DME eyes. Thinning SFCT might cause retinal hypoxia, and play an important role in DME occurrence. Additionally, this study highlights the importance of considering DR grades and treatment history when evaluating SFCT between DME and no DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of two intravitreal antiangiogenic drugs, ranibizumab and aflibercept, in a Mexican population over a period of 5 years, evaluating the improvement in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in a real-world scenario. This is a retrospective study with subjects diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy (DR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and/or aflibercept. In this study, we analyzed 588 eyes of 294 patients who received intravitreal antiangiogenic injections. The results showed an improvement regardless of antiangiogenic treatment or diagnosis in both VA and CRT. We found that both aflibercept and ranibizumab improved VA, while subjects with DME responded less to antiangiogenic treatment (p < 0.05), and that this difference did not correspond to the CRT measured by OCT. These results support evidence that intravitreal antiangiogenic medications are effective for ophthalmic complications of diabetes in our population; however, damage to visual structures is not reversed in most patients. And that the perception by the patient (VA) and that of the ophthalmologist (CRT) do not completely correlate in our study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify factors for meeting prespecified criteria for switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and moderate vision loss initially treated with bevacizumab in DRCR Retina Network protocol AC. Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. Two hundred seventy participants with one or both eyes harboring CI-DME with visual acuity (VA) letter score of 69 to 24 (Snellen equivalent, 20/50–20/320). Eligible eyes were assigned to receive intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy (n = 158) or bevacizumab followed by aflibercept if prespecified criteria for switching were met between 12 weeks and 2 years (n = 154). Meeting switching criteria: (1) at any time, (2) at 12 weeks, and (3) after 12 weeks. Associations between meeting the criteria for switching and factors measured at baseline and 12 weeks were evaluated in univariable analyses. Stepwise procedures were used to select variables for multivariable models. In the group receiving bevacizumab first, older participants showed a higher risk of meeting the switching criteria at any time, with a hazard ratio (HR) for a 10-year increase in age of 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.58). Male participants or eyes with worse baseline VA were more likely to switch at 12 weeks (for male vs. female: odds ratio [OR], 4.84 [95% CI, 1.32–17.81]; 5-letter lower baseline VA: OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.03–1.63]). Worse 12-week central subfield thickness (CST; 10-μm greater: HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04–1.07]) was associated with increased risk of switching after 12 weeks. The mean ± standard deviation improvement in visual acuity after completing the switch to aflibercept was 3.7 ± 4.9 letters compared with the day of switching. The identified factors can be used to refine expectations regarding the likelihood that an eye will meet protocol criteria to switch to aflibercept when treatment is initiated with bevacizumab. Older patients are more likely to be switched. At 12 weeks, thicker CST was predictive of eyes most likely to be switched in the future. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of SSPiM (suspended scattering particles in motion), systemic risk factors, ocular findings, progression characteristics, and treatment response in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients. Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 109 eyes of 109 patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) were included. Demographic characteristics and systemic data of the patients were recorded. In addition to a detailed ophthalmological examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) imaging were performed. According to the OCTA images, the patients were divided into two categories: SSPiM detected (SSPiM +) and undetected (SSPiM −). The patients were followed up at 0, 3, and 6 months. Treatment responses at 6 months in treatment-administered patients with and without SSPiM were examined. Results: The frequency of SSPiM in DME cases was found to be 34.9%. No significant correlation was found between SSPiM and demographic characteristics, systemic, and biochemical parameters (p > 0.05). It was observed that SSPIM was most frequently localized in the outer nuclear layer adjacent to the outer plexiform (81.6%). SSPiM appearance disappeared in 7 (19.4%) of 36 patients with SSPiM who had regular follow-up for 6 months. In 4 (11.1%) of these seven patients, hard exudate plaques developed in the areas where SSPiM disappeared. Regarding treatment response at 6 months, the decrease in CMT was statistically significantly lower in the SSPiM group compared to cases without SSPiM. Conclusion: SSPiM is a finding seen in approximately one-third of DME patients and may adversely affect the response to the treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

By inhibiting xanthine oxidase, subsequent inflammatory cytokine release and the resulting breakdown of the blood–retina barrier, allopurinol may limit the inflammation-driving diabetic macular edema (DME). We examined the relationship between allopurinol and DME among type 2 diabetic United States veterans using a retrospective cohort study. We used propensity score matching and Cox hazard models to estimate the risk of DME. Propensity score-matched Cox models revealed allopurinol was associated with a 24.6% reduction in the risk of DME (HR = 0.754; 95% CI = (0.684–0.831)). Allopurinol could reduce the risk of DME, one of the major causes of visual disturbance among diabetic patients. Further research into the effects of allopurinol on DME is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several studies published so far used highly selective image datasets from unclear sources to train computer vision models and that may lead to overestimated results, while those studies conducted in real-life remain scarce. To avoid image selection bias, we stacked convolutional and recurrent neural networks (CNN-RNN) to analyze complete optical coherence tomography (OCT) cubes in a row and predict diabetic macular edema (DME), in a real-world diabetic retinopathy screening program. A retrospective cohort study was carried out. Throughout 4-years, 5314 OCT cubes from 4408 subjects who attended to the diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening program were included. We arranged twenty-two (22) pre-trained CNNs in parallel with a bidirectional RNN layer stacked at the bottom, allowing the model to make a prediction for the whole OCT cube. The staff of retina experts built a ground truth of DME later used to train a set of these CNN-RNN models with different configurations. For each trained CNN-RNN model, we performed threshold tuning to find the optimal cut-off point for binary classification of DME. Finally, the best models were selected according to sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). An ensemble of the best models was also explored. 5188 cubes were non-DME and 126 were DME. Three models achieved an AUROC of 0.94. Among these, sensitivity, and specificity (95%CI) ranged from 84.1–90.5 and 89.7–93.3, respectively, at threshold 1, from 89.7–92.1 and 80–83.1 at threshold 2, and from 80.2–81 and 93.8–97, at threshold 3. The ensemble model improved these results, and lower specificity was observed among subjects with sight-threatening DR. Analysis by age, gender, or grade of DME did not vary the performance of the models. CNN-RNN models showed high diagnostic accuracy for detecting DME in a real-world setting. This engine allowed us to detect extra-foveal DMEs commonly overlooked in other studies, and showed potential for application as the first filter of non-referable patients in an outpatient center within a population-based DR screening program, otherwise ended up in specialized care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The goal of the study was to analyze variations in central, perifoveal, and peripheral retinal thickness (RT) and choroidal thickness (CT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) measured with ultra-wide-field optical coherence tomography (UWF-OCT). Additionally, correlations between RT and CT in the central, perifoveal, and peripheral sectors and the presence of selected systemic factors were evaluated. Methods: A total of 74 consecutive adult diabetic patients with DME and 75 healthy controls were included. Study participants were divided into three groups: DME patients without panretinal photocoagulation (PRP; 84 eyes), DME patients after PRP (56 eyes), and healthy controls (125 eyes). RT and CT were analyzed in three zones: a central circle of 3 mm diameter (central), a ring contained between a centered 9 mm circle and the central 3 mm circle (perifoveal), and a second, more peripheral ring between centered 18 mm and 9 mm circles (peripheral). Additionally, DME subgroups were analyzed according to the correlation of RT and CT with age, axial length, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), diabetes duration, insulin therapy duration, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values, intravitreal injection (IVI) count, and the advancement of retinopathy assessed by the simplified diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS). Results: The increase in RT in the far peripheral sectors in DME patients was not significant. The increases in central and perifoveal RT and lower values of CT in PRP-naive DME patients were strongly associated with poorer BCVA. Patients with DME after PRP presented with BCVA improvements significantly related to the number of IVIs. The amount of DME and RT in peripheral sectors were both independent of systemic factors such as BMI, duration of diabetes, duration of insulin intake, retinopathy severity, and HbA1c levels. Conclusions: Peripheral retinal sectors in DME patients are less affected in terms of increase in their thickness compared to central ones. Functional and morphological associations of DME with UWF-OCT testing refer to central and perifoveal sectors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The objective of this study was to examine the association between retinal thickness (RT) fluctuations and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with neovascular AMD, macular edema secondary to RVO, and DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy. Methods: A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed from January 2006 to March 2024. Studies comparing visual or anatomic outcomes of patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy, stratified by magnitudes of RT fluctuation, were included. ROBINS-I and Cochrane RoB 2 tools were used to assess risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were final BCVA and change in BCVA relative to baseline. Results: 15,725 articles were screened; 15 studies were identified in the systematic review and 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Final ETDRS VA was significantly worse in eyes with the highest level of RT fluctuation (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 7.86 letters; 95% CI, 4.97, 10.74; p < 0.00001; I2 = 81%; 3,136 eyes). RT at last observation was significantly greater in eyes with high RT fluctuations (WMD = −27.35 μm; 95% CI, −0.04, 54.75; p = 0.05; I2 = 88%; 962 eyes). Conclusions: Final visual outcome is associated with magnitude of RT fluctuation over the course of therapy. It is unclear whether minimizing RT fluctuations would help optimize visual outcomes in patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy. These findings are limited by a small set of studies, risk of bias, and considerable heterogeneity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the clinical effect of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation (LP) in treating diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 118 patients with DME admitted to The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2021 to March 2023. Among them, 38 patients received LP alone (Lasergroup), 39 patients received ranibizumab alone (Ranibizumab-group), and 41 patients received LP combined with ranibizumab (Combined-group). The improvement of macular edema (ME), visual acuity, and complications between the groups were compared. Results: The time of ME regression, exudation absorption and fundus hemorrhage absorption in the Combined-group was shorter than in the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). After treatment, the CMT and RNV of the three groups decreased compared to pretreatment levels and were lower in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). BCVA increased after the treatment in all groups, and was markedly higher in the Combined-group than in the Laser and the Ranibizumab-groups (P<0.05). NO were higher in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group. The post-treatment VEGF levels decreased in all groups, and were significantly lower in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumabgroup (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the Combined-group was lower than in the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared to ranibizumab or LP alone, ranibizumab combined with LP is more effective in reducing ME in patients with DEM, and is associated with fewer complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This study aims to develop an advanced model for the classification of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) using deep learning techniques. Specifically, the objective is to introduce a novel architecture, SSCSAC-Net, that leverages self-supervised learning and category-selective attention mechanisms to improve the precision of DME classification. Methods: The proposed SSCSAC-Net integrates self-supervised learning to effectively utilize unlabeled data for learning robust features related to DME. Additionally, it incorporates a category-specific attention mechanism and a domain-specific layer into the ResNet-152 base architecture. The model is trained using an ensemble of unsupervised and supervised learning techniques. Benchmark datasets are utilized for testing the model's performance, ensuring its robustness and generalizability across different data distributions. Results: Evaluation of the SSCSAC-Net on multiple datasets demonstrates its superior performance compared to existing techniques. The model achieves high accuracy, precision, and recall rates, with an accuracy of 98.7%, precision of 98.6%, and recall of 98.8%. Furthermore, the incorporation of self-supervised learning reduces the dependency on extensive labeled data, making the solution more scalable and cost-effective. Conclusions: The proposed SSCSAC-Net represents a significant advancement in automated DME classification. By effectively using self-supervised learning and attention mechanisms, the model offers improved accuracy in identifying DME-related features within retinal images. Its robustness and generalizability across different datasets highlight its potential for clinical applications, providing a valuable tool for clinicians in diagnosing DME effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The present study evaluated the efficacy of suprachoroidal injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide (SCTA) in diabetic macular edema (DME) following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a modified microneedle. Patients and methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted on 60 eyes of 60 patients with centrally involved diabetic macular edema following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). SCTA was performed at the baseline and repeated after 3 months in case of persistent subretinal or intraretinal fluid, central macular thickness (CMT) more than 300 μm or visual loss by more than one line of the Snellen chart. Results: The present study detected significant reduction of the CMT from 498.3 ± 94.8 μm at the baseline to 212.3 ± 11.9 μm after 12 months of injection with p < 0.001 and a significant improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from 1 (0.9– 1.2) at the baseline to 0.5 (0.3– 0.7) after 12 months of injection with p < 0.001. The intraocular pressure (IOP) increased significantly after 3 months of injection with p < 0.001 and then gradually declined to its normal level after 6 months. Inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) disruption was the only significant predictor of the final CMT; however, the number of injections, IS/OS disruption, baseline BCVA and the HbA1C level were the significant predictors of the final BCVA after injection. Conclusion: Suprachoroidal injection of TA using this microneedle resulted in significant anatomical and functional improvement in previously vitrectomized diabetic macular edema patients with no recorded ocular or systemic adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of intravitreally injected biologic medicines (biologics) acting against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with common VEGF-driven retinal diseases. The relatively high cost of branded agents, however, represents a financial burden for most healthcare systems and patients, likely resulting in impaired access to treatment and poorer clinical outcomes for some patients. Biosimilar medicines (biosimilars) are clinically equivalent, potentially economic alternatives to reference products. Biosimilars approved by leading health authorities have been demonstrated to be similar to the reference product in a comprehensive comparability exercise, generating the totality of evidence necessary to support analytical, pre-clinical, and clinical biosimilarity. Anti-VEGF biosimilars have been entering the field of ophthalmology in the US since 2022. We review regulatory and scientific concepts of biosimilars, the biosimilar development landscape in ophthalmology, with a specific focus on anti-VEGF biosimilars, and discuss opportunities and challenges facing the uptake of biosimilars. • Biologics against VEGF are crucial for the treatment of many retinal diseases. • Ophthalmic anti-VEGF reference biologics typically impose high financial burden. • Approved anti-VEGF biosimilars are clinically equivalent to reference products. • Biosimilars can bring substantial benefits to patients and healthcare systems by reducing cost. • Realization of biosimilar benefits depend, in part, on their successful uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Τhis study aims to assess changes in the fovea avascular zone (FAZ) in treatment naïve patients receiving aflibercept or ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular edema (DME). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, OCT, and OCT-angiography imaging were performed at baseline and 1 month after each injection. Injections of either aflibercept or ranibizumab were administered monthly for 6 consecutive months. FAZ in the superficial (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) using OCT angiography was recorded for each visit. Fifty eyes from fifty patients with a mean age of 67.0 ± 10.7 years were included in the study. Twenty-five patients received aflibercept and twenty-five received ranibizumab. BCVA was 40.8 ± 10.0 and increased to 52.1 ± 7.9 ETDRS letters at the last visit (p < 0.001). CRT was 295.6 ± 34.0 at baseline and 247.9 ± 29.7 at the last study visit (p < 0.001). SCP FAZ was 350.6 ± 79.5 μm2 at baseline and 339.0 ± 71.3 μm2 after sox monthly injections (p = 0.132). DCP FAZ was 558.6 ± 199.0 μm2 at baseline and 459.5 ± 156.1 μm2 after six monthly injections (p < 0.001). There was no effect of the choice of ranibizumab or aflibercept on DCP FAZ change (p = 0.277). In conclusion, treatment with 6 monthly injections of ranibizumab and aflibercept led to an increase in BCVA and a decrease in CRT and DCP FAZ area. Both drugs led to an improvement in DCP ischemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Methods Results Conclusions To report the incidence of post‐injection endophthalmitis (PIE) and the cumulative risk associated with repeated injections of intravitreal anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF).We employed nationwide registries in Denmark to include all individuals aged ≥40 years who received at least one intravitreal anti‐VEGF injection in 2007–2022. Our primary endpoint PIE was identified using specific diagnostic codes for endophthalmitis and procedure codes for vitreous biopsy within 10 days prior to and 120 days post‐injection. Patients were stratified according to the underlying diagnoses for which they received the treatment. The relative risk (RR) for PIE was calculated between groups based on the number of injections received by the patients.We identified 60 825 patients who received intravitreal anti‐VEGF treatment during study time, with a median age of 77.2 years and females constituting 58.1%. We identified 232 cases of PIE after 1 051 549 injections during follow‐up, resulting in an incidence of 0.022% [95% CI 0.019%–0.025%]. Despite a linear growth in annual anti‐VEGF use, the incidence remained stable at 0.020% [95% CI 0.017%–0.023%] from 2013 to 2022. Compared to patients receiving 1–3 injections, RR for patients receiving 4–20, 21–40, and >40 injections were 0.46 [95% CI 0.34–0.63], 0.32 [95% CI 0.21–0.50], and 0.54 [95% CI 0.36–0.81], respectively. Findings were similar across the different diagnoses.Based on 16 years of nationwide registry data, this study identified a low and stable incidence of PIE. Notably, the highest risk of endophthalmitis was within the first three anti‐VEGF injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Among working-age people, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema are currently considered the main causes of blindness. Nowadays, intravitreal injections are widely acknowledged as a significant milestone in ophthalmology, especially for the treatment of several retinal diseases, including diabetic macular edema. In particular, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are typically the first line of treatment; however, monthly injections are required, at least, during the loading dosage. Notably, an intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex®, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA) is considered a legitimate substitute treatment for diabetic eyes that have not responded to anti-VEGF treatment. In fact, clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of an intravitreal DEX implant in treating such conditions over a period of three to six months. For this reason, wisely selecting diabetic patients might be crucial to decreasing the load of injections in clinics and hospitals. The purpose of this review is to analyze the available scientific literature to highlight the benefits, efficacy, and clinical criteria for choosing whether to switch from intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy to an intravitreal DEX implant in diabetic macular edema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Previous studies simply linearized the relationship between low density lipoprotein (LDL) and diabetic macular edema's (DME) probability, ignoring the possibility of a nonlinear relationship between them. We aimed to investigate the nonlinear relationship between LDL and DME probability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients and methods: The study recruited 431 T2DM patients who attended Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from December 2017 to November 2018. A multivariate logistic regression model was conducted to evaluate the association between LDL and DME probability. The nonlinear relationship was identified by generalized additive model. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the consistency of the association in different subgroups. Results: LDL was positively associated with DME probability (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.10~2.34, P=0.0145) after adjusting for covariates. A nonlinear relationship between LDL and DME probability was discovered, with an inflection point for LDL around 4.85 mmol/L (95% CI: 4.18~4.93, P=0.037). The effect sizes and the confidence intervals on the left and right sides of inflection point were 2.17 (1.31 to 3.58) and 0.26 (0.04 to 1.77), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed other variables had no effect on the association between them. Conclusion: Our finding suggested LDL was positively correlated with DME probability in T2DM patients. And the relationship between LDL and DME probability was nonlinear. Our findings need to be confirmed by further causal researches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of dual angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A pathway inhibition with intravitreal faricimab according to a personalized treat-and-extend (T&E)-based regimen with up to every-16-week dosing in the YOSEMITE and RHINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03622580 and NCT03622593, respectively) phase 3 trials of diabetic macular edema (DME). Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority phase 3 trials. Adults with visual acuity loss (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 25–73 letters) due to center-involving DME. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6.0 mg T&E (previously referred to as personalized treatment interval), or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks. The T&E up to every-16-week dosing regimen was based on central subfield thickness (CST) and BCVA change. Included changes from baseline in BCVA and CST, number of injections, durability, absence of fluid, and safety through week 100. In YOSEMITE and RHINE (n = 940 and 951, respectively), noninferior year 1 visual acuity gains were maintained through year 2; mean BCVA change from baseline at 2 years (weeks 92, 96, and 100 average) with faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE and RHINE, +10.7 letters and +10.9 letters, respectively) or T&E (+10.7 letters and +10.1 letters, respectively) were comparable with aflibercept every 8 weeks (+11.4 letters and +9.4 letters, respectively). The median number of study drug injections was lower with faricimab T&E (YOSEMITE and RHINE, 10 and 11 injections, respectively) versus faricimab every 8 weeks (15 injections) and aflibercept every 8 weeks (14 injections) across both trials during the entire study. In the faricimab T&E arms, durability was improved further during year 2, with > 60% of patients receiving every-16-week dosing and approximately 80% receiving every-12-week or longer dosing at week 96. Almost 80% of patients who achieved every-16-week dosing at week 52 maintained every-16-week dosing without an interval reduction through week 96. Mean CST reductions were greater (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92/96/100 average: faricimab every 8 weeks –216.0/–202.6 µm, faricimab T&E –204.5/–197.1 µm, aflibercept every 8 weeks –196.3/–185.6 µm), and more patients achieved absence of DME (CST < 325 μm; YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92–100: faricimab every 8 weeks 87%–92%/88%–93%, faricimab T&E 78%–86%/85%–88%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 77%–81%/80%–84%) and absence of intraretinal fluid (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92–100: faricimab every 8 weeks 59%–63%/56%–62%, faricimab T&E 43%–48%/45%–52%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 33%–38%/39%–45%) with faricimab every 8 weeks or T&E versus aflibercept every 8 weeks through year 2. Overall, faricimab was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of aflibercept. Clinically meaningful visual acuity gains from baseline, anatomic improvements, and extended durability with intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks were maintained through year 2. Faricimab given as a personalized T&E-based dosing regimen supports the role of dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A inhibition to promote vascular stability and to provide durable efficacy for patients with DME. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Animal studies have suggested that Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) may increase vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-related retinopathies, but this effect is unclear in humans. This study evaluates the risk of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), defined as either diabetic macular edema (DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), in patients exposed to an ESA. Two analyses were performed. First, a retrospective matched-cohort study was designed using a de-identified commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database. The ESA cohort of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients who were new users of an ESA from 2000 to 2022 was matched to controls up to a 3:1 ratio. Exclusion criteria included less than 2 years in the plan, history of VTDR or history of other retinopathy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse proportional treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to assess the hazard of developing VTDR, DME, and PDR. The second analysis was a self-controlled case series (SCCS) evaluating the incidence rate ratios (IRR) of VTDR during 30-day periods before and after initiating an ESA. After inclusion of 1502 ESA-exposed patients compared with 2656 controls, IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios found the ESA cohort had an increased hazard of progressing to VTDR (HR = 3.0 95%CI:2.3–3.8;p <.001) and DME (HR = 3.4,95%CI:2.6–4.4,p <.001), but not PDR (HR = 1.0,95%CI:0.5–2.3,p =.95). Similar results were found within the SCCS which demonstrated higher IRRs for VTDR (IRRs = 1.09–1.18;p <.001) and DME (IRRs = 1.16–1.18;p <.001), but not increased IRRs in PDR (IRR = 0.92–0.97,p =.02–0.39). ESAs are associated with higher risks for VTDR and DME, but not PDR. Those studying ESAs as adjunctive therapy for DR should be cautious of possible unintended effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate anterior flare intensity (AFI) after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (IVBr) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), and to identify the factors associated with the change of AFI after IVBr. Methods: This prospective multicenter study was conducted at five sites in Japan for patients with DME who underwent a single IVBr. AFI and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured using a laser flare meter and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, respectively, at weeks 0 and 6. Results: Sixty-five patients (phakia, 37 eyes; pseudophakia, 28 eyes) were enrolled. Six weeks after IVBr, CRT and best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved (p < 0.0001). AFI (p = 0.0003) and age (p = 0.0054) were significantly higher in patients with pseudophakic eyes than those with phakic eyes. The AFI of the phakic eyes decreased after IVBr (p = 0.043). As the AFI before injection is higher (p = 0.0363) and the age is lower (p = 0.0016), the AFI decreases after IVBr. There was a significant positive correlation between the rates of change in CRT and AFI (p = 0.024). Conclusion: After IVBr, AFI decreases in phakic eyes but not in pseudophakic eyes. The age, AFI and CRT before injection and changes of CRT are involved in the change in AFI after IVBr. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between the macular values of fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity (LAC) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images and the presence of peripheral retina non-perfusion areas (NPAs) on fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Fifty patients with treatment-naïve DME underwent a full ophthalmic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity measurement, FA, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and OCTA. Specifically, FA was performed to detect the presence of retinal NPAs, whereas fractal OCTA analysis was used to determine macular FD and LAC values at the level of the superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP and DCP). FA montage frames of the posterior pole and peripheral retina, as well as macular OCTA slabs of the SCP and DCP, were obtained. Results: Thirty (60%) eyes with FA evidence of peripheral retinal NPAs in at least one quadrant showed significantly lower FD and higher LAC in both SCP and DCP, when compared with eyes presenting a well-perfused peripheral retina. Furthermore, macular FD and LAC values were found to be significantly associated with the extent of retinal NPAs. Conclusions: Macular FD and LAC of both SCP and DCP seem to be strongly associated with the extent of peripheral retinal NPAs, thus suggesting that may be useful predictive biomarkers of peripheral ischemia in treatment-naïve DME eyes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this work is to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rate of an automated retinal image analysis system (ARIAS) in diagnosing active diabetic macular edema (DME) and to identify factors associated with true and false positives. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of prospectively enrolled patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) referred to a tertiary medical retina center for screening or management of DME. All patients underwent two-field fundus photography (macula- and disc-centered) with a true-color confocal camera; images were processed by EyeArt V.2.1.0 (Woodland Hills, CA, USA). Active DME was defined as the presence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Sensitivity and specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Variables associated with true (i.e., DME labeled as present by ARIAS + fluid on SD-OCT) and false positives (i.e., DME labeled as present by ARIAS + no fluid on SD-OCT) of active DME were explored. Results: A total of 298 eyes were included; 92 eyes (31%) had active DME. ARIAS sensitivity and specificity were 82.61% (95% CI 72.37–89.60) and 84.47% (95% CI 78.34–89.10). The misclassification rate was 16%. Factors associated with true positives included younger age (p = 0.01), shorter DM duration (p = 0.006), presence of hard exudates (p = 0.005), and microaneurysms (p = 0.002). Factors associated with false positives included longer DM duration (p = 0.01), worse diabetic retinopathy severity (p = 0.008), history of inactivated DME (p < 0.001), and presence of hard exudates (p < 0.001), microaneurysms (p < 0.001), or epiretinal membrane (p = 0.06). Conclusions: The sensitivity of ARIAS was diminished in older patients and those without DME-related fundus lesions, while the specificity was reduced in cases with a history of inactivated DME. ARIAS performed well in screening for naïve DME but is not effective in surveillance inactivated DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The goal of early detection has not yet achieved due to a lack of fast and convenient methods. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate a prediction model to identify DME in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using easily accessible systemic variables, which can be applied to an ophthalmologist-independent scenario. Methods: In this four-center, observational study, a total of 1994 T2DM patients who underwent routine diabetic retinopathy screening were enrolled, and their information on ophthalmic and systemic conditions was collected. Forward stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors of DME. Machine learning and MLR (multivariable logistic regression) were both used to establish prediction models. The prediction models were trained with 1300 patients and prospectively validated with 104 patients from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH). A total of 175 patients from Zhujiang Hospital (ZJH), 115 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (FAHKMU), and 100 patients from People's Hospital of JiangMen (PHJM) were used as external validation sets. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performance in DME prediction. Results: The risk of DME was significantly associated with duration of DM, diastolic blood pressure, hematocrit, glycosylated hemoglobin, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio stage. The MLR model using these five risk factors was selected as the final prediction model due to its better performance than the machine learning models using all variables. The AUC, ACC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.80, 0.69, 0.80, and 0.67 in the internal validation, and 0.82, 0.54, 1.00, and 0.48 in prospective validation, respectively. In external validation, the AUC, ACC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.84, 0.68, 0.90 and 0.60 in ZJH, 0.89, 0.77, 1.00 and 0.72 in FAHKMU, and 0.80, 0.67, 0.75, and 0.65 in PHJM, respectively. Conclusion: The MLR model is a simple, rapid, and reliable tool for early detection of DME in individuals with T2DM without the needs of specialized ophthalmologic examinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Complications from diabetic retinopathy such as diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) constitute leading causes of preventable vision loss in working-age patients. Since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a major role in the pathogenesis of these complications, VEGF inhibitors have been the cornerstone of their treatment. Anti-VEGF monotherapy is an effective but burdensome treatment for DME. However, due to the intensive and burdensome treatment, most patients in routine clinical practice are undertreated, and therefore, their outcomes are compromised. Even in adequately treated patients, persistent DME is reported anywhere from 30% to 60% depending on the drug used. PDR is currently treated by anti-VEGF, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or a combination of both. Similarly, a number of eyes, despite these treatments, continue to progress to tractional retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage. Clearly there are other molecular pathways other than VEGF involved in the pathogenesis of DME and PDR. One of these pathways is the angiopoietin–Tie signaling pathway. Angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) plays a major role in maintaining vascular quiescence and stability. It acts as a molecular brake against vascular destabilization and inflammation that is usually promoted by angiopoietin 2 (Ang2). Several pathological conditions including chronic hyperglycemia lead to Ang2 upregulation. Recent regulatory approval of the bi-specific antibody, faricimab, may improve long term outcomes in DME. It targets both the Ang/Tie and VEGF pathways. The YOSEMITE and RHINE were multicenter, double-masked, randomized non-inferiority phase 3 clinical trials that compared faricimab to aflibercept in eyes with center-involved DME. At 12 months of follow-up, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains, improved anatomic outcomes and a potential for extended dosing when compared to aflibercept. The 2-year results of the YOSEMITE and RHINE trials demonstrated that the anatomic and functional results obtained at the 1 year follow-up were maintained. Short term outcomes of previously treated and treatment-naive eyes with DME that were treated with faricimab during routine clinical practice suggest a beneficial effect of faricimab over other agents. Targeting of Ang2 has been reported by several other means including VE-PTP inhibitors, integrin binding peptide and surrobodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]