Search

Background: Controversy remains regarding the results of all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with the mini-open approach. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and mini-open rotator cuff repairs.Hypothesis: There is no difference between the clinical results obtained from all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with mini-open repairs.Study Design: Meta-analysis.Methods: A computerized search of articles published between 1966 and July 2006 was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed. Additionally, a search of abstracts from 4 major annual meetings each held between 2000 and 2005 was performed to identify Level I to III studies comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open repair. Studies that included follow-up of an average of over 2 years and a minimum of 1 year and included the use of 1 of 4 validated functional outcome scores used to study shoulder injuries were included in the present meta-analysis. All outcome scores were converted to a 100-point scale to allow for outcome comparison.Results: Five studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified. There was no difference in functional outcome scores or complications between the arthroscopic and mini-open repair groups.Conclusion: Based on current literature, there was no difference in outcomes between the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed treadmill exercise magnetic resonance imaging in 27 patients with exertional chest pain who were referred for contrast coronary angiography to determine the feasibility of this method to identify severe coronary artery stenoses. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting >70% coronary artery luminal diameter narrowings on contrast coronary angiography were 79% and 85%, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Little is known about the rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD), atherosclerosis, and their risk factors among Canada's Aboriginal people. To establish the relative prevalence of risk factors, atherosclerosis, and CVD, we undertook a population-based study among people of Aboriginal and European ancestry in Canada.Methods: We randomly recruited 301 Aboriginal people from the Six Nations Reservation, and 326 people of European origin from Hamilton, Toronto, and Edmonton, Canada. Clinical CVD was defined by history or electrocardiographic findings, atherosclerosis was measured by B-mode carotid ultrasonography, and conventional and new CVD risk factors were measured using standardised methods.Findings: Aboriginal people had significantly more carotid atherosclerosis (mean of the maximum intimal-medial thickness 0.82 (SD 0.20) mm vs 0.78 (0.20) mm, p=0.027), and had a higher frequency of CVD (18.5% vs 7.6%, p=0.00002) compared with Europeans. Aboriginal people had significantly higher rates of smoking, glucose intolerance, obesity, abdominal obesity, and substantially higher concentrations of fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Aboriginal people had significantly higher rates of unemployment and a lower annual household income. For any given income level, Aboriginal people had higher rates of risk factors and CVD compared with the Europeans.Interpretation: A significant proportion of Aboriginal people live in poverty which is associated with high rates of CVD and CVD risk factors. Improvement of the socioeconomic status of Aboriginal people might be a key to reduce CVD in this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]