Search

Background Thromboembolic complications remain a major reason for morbidity and mortality after flow diversion, in addition to hemorrhagic complications not limited to the brain predicated on the prolonged need for dual antiplatelet therapy. Surface modification to decrease thrombogenicity and accelerate aneurysm occlusion is a promising alteration to mitigate those risks. The Pipeline embolization device with Shield Technology possesses such characteristics; however, it has not yet been approved in the United States. Case Description We present the case of a 38-year-old woman with a Spetzler-Martin grade 4 left parietal arteriovenous malformation with a total of 8 feeding vessel aneurysms and recent rupture of 1 of those aneurysms that was treated with balloon-assisted coil embolization. Four M1-segment middle cerebral artery aneurysms and 1 supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm were treated with 2 Pipeline embolization Shield devices after a compassionate use request was approved. At 3 weeks after the procedure, the patient experienced a minor ischemic stroke after having missed the prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy. At the 3-month follow-up examination, the patient was neurologically intact and all the aneurysms were occluded. Dual antiplatelet therapy was discontinued. Conclusions Flow diverters with surface modification to decrease thrombogenicity and accelerate aneurysm occlusion are promising endovascular tools for patients at high risk of complications with dual antiplatelet therapy. The present case represents one of the first cases performed in the United States using such a device. Despite the favorable outcome in the present case, the question of whether such technology obviates the need for dual antiplatelet therapy remains to be determined. Highlights • Ours is the second U.S. case performed with Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology for AVM feeding vessel aneurysms. • Rapid angiographic occlusion of the AVM feeding vessel aneurysms occurred. • A thromboembolic event occurred despite dual antiplatelet therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blood pressure monitoring is crucial during neuroendovascular procedures. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability is associated with complications, which underscores the importance of continuous monitoring. Although direct measurement with an intra-arterial catheter is the gold standard for determining arterial pressure, it is costly, time-consuming, and associated with complications. The novel ClearSight system offers a noninvasive technique for monitoring arterial pressure via a finger cuff. This study compared noninvasive arterial pressure measurements with the gold standard method. Simultaneous recording of noninvasive and invasive arterial pressure was performed in patients undergoing neuroendovascular interventions. Both techniques were compared employing linear regression, Lin's correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman, and error grid analysis. The study enrolled 24 consecutive patients. The concordance correlation coefficient between both methods was 0.3526 (95% confidence interval [0.3134, 0.3906]) for mean arterial pressure and 0.4680 (95% confidence interval [0.4353, 0.4995]) and for systolic arterial pressure. The mean (SD) of the differences was 0.81 (17.86) mm Hg (95% limits of agreement [−52.52, 54.14]) for mean arterial pressure and 5.38 (14.64) mm Hg (95% limits of agreement [−45.12, 56.08]) for systolic arterial pressure. Error grid analysis demonstrated that the majority of measurements lie in regions with no or low risk for patients (mean arterial pressure, 71.0% and 24.4%; systolic arterial pressure, 59.2% and 25.8%). The ClearSight system provided accurate measurements of arterial blood pressure compared with invasive methods and within safe clinical parameters. This method may serve as a safe and reliable alternative for invasive blood pressure monitoring during neuroendovascular procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraoperative imaging is critical in cerebrovascular surgery to assess the technical success of the operation. This case series aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3-dimensional rotational angiogram (3D-RA) in addition to 2-dimensional intraoperative angiography (2D-IOA) during cerebrovascular surgery in the hybrid operating room. All consecutive patients who underwent open cerebrovascular surgery and intraoperative 2D-IOA with 3D-RA in a hybrid operating room at 2 academic centers between August 2018 and December 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Medical charts and operative videos including intraoperative angiography were reviewed, and clinical and angiographic outcomes assessed. A total of 40 cerebrovascular surgeries in 39 patients (mean age, 53 ± 13 years; 51% female) were carried out with the addition of 3D-RA to 2D-IOA in the hybrid operating room. After 3D-RA in addition to 2D-IOA, 1 (2.5%) surgical alteration occurred in an aneurysm clipping. Other procedures were not altered with the addition of 3D-RA to 2D-IOA. There were no complications from the addition of 3D-RA to 2D-IOA. Using a combination of 3D-RA and 2D-IOA in the hybrid operating room may enhance the likelihood of achieving an optimal result when employing microsurgical cerebrovascular surgery and avoid unanticipated incomplete outcomes, complications, and returns to the operating room. Whereas the addition of 3D-RA elucidated residual aneurysm not otherwise visualized on the 2D-IOA, in other cerebrovascular procedures studied, there was no additional value of the 3D-RA over the 2D-IOA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]