Search

Pathologies such as cancer metastasis and osteoporosis strongly affect the mechanical properties of the vertebral bone and increase the risk of fragility fractures. The prediction of the fracture risk with a patient-specific model, directly generated from the diagnostic images of the patient, could help the clinician in the choice of the correct therapy to follow. But before such models can be used to support any clinical decision, their credibility must be demonstrated through verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification. In this study we describe a procedure for the generation of such patient-specific finite element models and present a first validation of the kinematics of the spine segment. Quantitative computed tomography images of a cadaveric lumbar spine segment presenting vertebral metastatic lesions were used to generate the model. The applied boundary conditions replicated a specific experimental test where the spine segment was loaded in compression-flexion. Model predictions in terms of vertebral surface displacements were compared against the full-field experimental displacements measured with Digital Image Correlation. A good agreement was obtained from the local comparison between experimental data and simulation results (R2 > 0.9 and RMSE% <8%). In conclusion, this work demonstrates the possibility to apply the developed modelling pipeline to predict the displacement field of human spine segment under physiological loading conditions, which is a first fundamental step in the credibility assessment of these clinical decision-support technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Agent‐based models (ABMs) are a powerful class of computational models widely used to simulate complex phenomena in many different application areas. However, one of the most critical aspects, poorly investigated in the literature, regards an important step of the model credibility assessment: solution verification. This study overcomes this limitation by proposing a general verification framework for ABMs that aims at evaluating the numerical errors associated with the model. A step‐by‐step procedure, which consists of two main verification studies (deterministic and stochastic model verification), is described in detail and applied to a specific mission critical scenario: the quantification of the numerical approximation error for UISS‐TB, an ABM of the human immune system developed to predict the progression of pulmonary tuberculosis. Results provide indications on the possibility to use the proposed model verification workflow to systematically identify and quantify numerical approximation errors associated with UISS‐TB and, in general, with any other ABMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Given the lack of a harmonised standard to assess the credibility of a computational in the EU, ASME V&V-2018 standard is here employed to prove the credibility of a model to be employed in a regulatory decision process. • The risk-based credibility assessment contained in ASME V&V40 is here applied on BBCT-hip in silico methodology, which is a biophysical model able to predict the risk of fracture at the femur. • All the steps to be followed, from the context of use definition to the V&V activities performance, are described in detail as carried out on BBCT-hip. When a computational model aims to be adopted beyond research purposes, e.g. to inform a clinical or regulatory decision, trust must be placed in its predictive accuracy. This practically translates into the need to demonstrate its credibility. In fact, prior to its adoption for regulatory purposes, an in silico methodology should be proven credible enough for the scope. This has become especially relevant as, although evidence of the safety and efficacy of new medical products or interventions has been traditionally provided to the regulator experimentally, i.e., in vivo or ex vivo, recently the idea to inform a regulatory decision in silico has made its way in the regulatory scenario. While a harmonised technical standard is currently missing in the EU regulatory system, in 2018 the ASME issued V&V40–2018, where a risk-based framework to assess the credibility of a computational model through the performance of predefined credibility activities is provided. The credibility framework is here applied to Bologna Biomechanical Computed Tomography (BBCT) solution, which predicts the absolute risk of fracture at the femur for a subject. BBCT has recently been the object of a qualification advice request to the European Medicine Agency. The full implementation of ASME V&V40–2018 framework on BBCT is shown. Starting from BBCT proposed context of use the whole credibility plan is presented and the credibility activities (Verification, Validation, Applicability) described together with the achieved credibility levels. BBCT risk is judged medium, and the credibility levels achieved considered acceptable. The uncertainties intrinsically present in the material properties assignment affected BBCT predictions to the highest extent. This work provides the practical application of the ASME V&V40–2018 risk-based credibility assessment framework, which could be applied to demonstrate model credibility in any field and support future regulatory submissions and foster the adoption of In Silico Trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The hip-spine relationship is a critical consideration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. While THA is generally successful in patient, complications such as instability and dislocation can arise. These issues are significantly influenced by the alignment of implant components and the overall balance of the spine and pelvis, known as spinopelvic balance. Patients with alteration of those parameters, in particular rigid spines, often due to fusion surgery, face a higher risk of THA complications, with an emphasis on complications in instability, impingement and dislocation. For these reasons, over the years, computer modelling and simulation techniques have been developed to support clinicians in the different steps of surgery. The aim of the current review is to present current knowledge on hip-spine relationship to serve as a common platform of discussion among clinicians and engineers. The offered overview aims to update the reader on the main critical aspects of the issue, from both a theoretical and practical perspective, and to be a valuable introductory tool for those approaching this problem for the first time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The STriTuVaD project, funded by Horizon 2020, aims to test through a Phase IIb clinical trial one of the most advanced therapeutic vaccines against tuberculosis. As part of this initiative, we have developed a strategy for generating in silico patients consistent with target population characteristics, which can then be used in combination with in vivo data on an augmented clinical trial. Results: One of the most challenging tasks for using virtual patients is developing a methodology to reproduce biological diversity of the target population, ie, providing an appropriate strategy for generating libraries of digital patients. This has been achieved through the creation of the initial immune system repertoire in a stochastic way, and through the identification of a vector of features that combines both biological and pathophysiological parameters that personalise the digital patient to reproduce the physiology and the pathophysiology of the subject. Conclusions: We propose a sequential approach to sampling from the joint features population distribution in order to create a cohort of virtual patients with some specific characteristics, resembling the recruitment process for the target clinical trial, which then can be used for augmenting the information from the physical the trial to help reduce its size and duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]