Search

PURPOSE: Genetic testing has clinical utility in the management of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. However, the increased likelihood of encountering a variant of uncertain significance in individuals of non-European descent such as Asians may be challenging to both clinicians and patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of variant reclassification in an Asian country with variants of uncertain significance reported in cancer predisposition genes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients seen at the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between February 2014 and March 2020 was conducted. The frequency, direction, and time to variant reclassification were evaluated by comparing the reclassified report against the original report. RESULTS: A total of 1,412 variants of uncertain significance were reported in 49.9% (845 of 1,695) of patients. Over 6 years, 6.7% (94 of 1,412) of variants were reclassified. Most variants of uncertain significance (94.1%, 80 of 85) were downgraded to benign or likely benign variant, with a smaller proportion of variants of uncertain significance (5.9%, 5 of 85) upgraded to pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Actionable variants of uncertain significance upgrades and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant downgrades, which resulted in management changes, happened in 31.0% (39 of 126) of patients. The median and mean time taken for reclassification were 1 and 1.62 year(s), respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose a clinical guideline to standardize management of patients reported to have variants of uncertain significance. Management should be based on the patient's personal history, family history, and variant interpretation. For clinically relevant or suspicious variants of uncertain significance, follow-up is recommended every 2 years, as actionable reclassifications may happen during this period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: Genetic testing has clinical utility in the management of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. However, the increased likelihood of encountering a variant of uncertain significance in individuals of non-European descent such as Asians may be challenging to both clinicians and patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of variant reclassification in an Asian country with variants of uncertain significance reported in cancer predisposition genes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients seen at the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between February 2014 and March 2020 was conducted. The frequency, direction, and time to variant reclassification were evaluated by comparing the reclassified report against the original report. RESULTS: A total of 1,412 variants of uncertain significance were reported in 49.9% (845 of 1,695) of patients. Over 6 years, 6.7% (94 of 1,412) of variants were reclassified. Most variants of uncertain significance (94.1%, 80 of 85) were downgraded to benign or likely benign variant, with a smaller proportion of variants of uncertain significance (5.9%, 5 of 85) upgraded to pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Actionable variants of uncertain significance upgrades and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant downgrades, which resulted in management changes, happened in 31.0% (39 of 126) of patients. The median and mean time taken for reclassification were 1 and 1.62 year(s), respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose a clinical guideline to standardize management of patients reported to have variants of uncertain significance. Management should be based on the patient's personal history, family history, and variant interpretation. For clinically relevant or suspicious variants of uncertain significance, follow-up is recommended every 2 years, as actionable reclassifications may happen during this period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although CDKN2A is well-known as a susceptibility gene for melanoma and pancreatic cancer, germline variants have also been anecdotally associated with a broader range of neoplasms including neural system tumors, head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, breast carcinomas, as well as sarcomas. The CDKN2A gene encodes for two distinct tumor suppressor proteins, p16INK4A and p14ARF, however, the independent association of germline alterations affecting these two proteins with cancer is under-appreciated. Here, we reviewed CDKN2A germline alterations reported among individuals and families with cancer in the literature, specifically addressing the cancer phenotypes in relation to the molecular consequence on p16INK4A and p14ARF. While melanoma is observed to associate with variants affecting both p16INK4A and p14ARF transcripts, it is noted that variants affecting p14ARF are more frequently observed with a heterogenous range of cancers. Finally, we reflected on the implications of this inferred genotype-phenotype association in clinical practice and proposed that clinical management of CDKN2A germline variant carriers should involve dedicated cancer genetics services, with multidisciplinary input from various healthcare professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyzed the prognostic factors for treatment outcomes amongst 34 patients with adult Burkitt lymphoma (BL) who received rituximab with standard first-line chemotherapy. Seven patients had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated BL. Overall, we observed a complete remission (CR) rate of 91.2%, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 84.8 and 88.2%, respectively. In patients with concomitant HIV, the prognosis was not different with 10-year PFS of 100% and OS of 88.2%. The majority (71.4%) of HIV-associated BL patients received dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) and had excellent outcomes with 100% CR and no relapses. Central nervous system (CNS) disease, bone marrow involvement and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels more than 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) were associated with poorer survival outcomes. Patients with refractory disease, whilst uncommon (n = 4), had dismal outcomes. Patients with adult BL, including HIV-related cases, harbor generally good prognosis in the modern era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study aims to evaluate the role of end-of-treatment PET-CT scans, interpreted using the Deauville score (DV), in guiding the use of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for DLBCL patients. The goal is to help avoid unnecessary RT for low-risk patients, as current guidelines are unclear, potentially leading to the overuse of RT. We analyzed the data of 349 patients and RT was associated with a significant improvement in time-to-progression amongst the DV4-5 patients but not the DV1-3 patients. Our data suggest that DLBCL patients with end-of-treatment PET-CT DV1-3 may not require consolidative RT. Background: The most common aggressive lymphoma in adults is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) is often administered to DLBCL patients but guidelines remain unclear, which could lead to unnecessary RT. We aimed to evaluate the value of end-of-treatment PET-CT scans, interpreted using the Deauville score (DV), to guide the utilization of consolidative RT, which may help spare low-risk DLBCL patients from unnecessary RT. Methods: We included all DLBCL patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2022 at the National Cancer Centre Singapore with DV measured at the end of the first-line chemoimmunotherapy. The outcome measure was time-to-progression (TTP). The predictive value of DV for RT was assessed based on the interaction effect between the receipt of RT and DV in Cox regression models. Results: The data of 349 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 38.1 months (interquartile range 34.0–42.3 months). RT was associated with a significant improvement in TTP amongst the DV4-5 patients (HR 0.33; 95%CI 0.13–0.88; p = 0.027) but not the DV1-3 patients (HR 0.85; 95%CI 0.40–1.81; p = 0.671) (interaction's p = 0.133). Multivariable analysis reported that RT was again significantly associated with improved TTP among the DV4-5 patients (adjusted HR 0.29; 95%CI 0.10–0.80; p = 0.017) but not the DV1-3 group (HR 0.86; 95%CI 0.40–1.86; p = 0.707) (interaction's p = 0.087). Conclusion: Our results suggests that DLBCL patients with end-of-treatment PET-CT DV1-3 may not need consolidative RT. Longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are still necessary to investigate long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 is an inherited tumour predisposition syndrome with a varied clinical phenotype. Long-term monitoring through imaging is inconsistent and varies in high- and low-income countries. Implementation of a clinical practice guideline through a multidisciplinary clinic is instrumental to the care of adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate the association between a country's socioeconomic status and diagnostic modalities and strategies used for adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients. Our results show multiple imaging modalities are used in high-income countries; however, there is limited use in low-income countries. The two most common diagnostic modalities used in developed countries are WB MRI and FDG PET/CT. Background: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 is an autosomal dominant tumour-predisposition condition commonly diagnosed in childhood and fully penetrant by adulthood. Long-term monitoring through imaging is inconsistent and varies between high- and low-income countries. Implementation of a clinical practice guideline through a multidisciplinary clinic is instrumental to the care of adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients. We aim to systematically review international diagnostic modalities and strategies to evaluate any association between a country's socioeconomic status and diagnostic modalities or strategies used for Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Relevant clinical information on the surveillance of adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients worldwide was reviewed, extracted, and synthesised. Results: We identified 51 papers reporting on 7724 individuals. Multiple imaging modalities are actively employed in high-income and upper-middle-income countries for surveying adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients. We did not find any relevant papers from low- and middle-income countries. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that there is robust data on diagnostic modalities for adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients in high-income countries, but not for low- and middle-income countries. There is a lack of data on consolidated diagnostic strategies from both high- and low-income countries. Efforts should be made to publish data on usual clinical practice in low- and middle-income countries to develop clinical practice guidelines describing best medical practice to fit a local context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. Although uncommon, CNS relapses are invariably fatal in this otherwise curable disease. Accurate identification of patients at risk and the optimal approach to CNS prophylaxis therefore remains an area of unmet need. The existing literature, largely retrospective in nature, provides mixed conclusions regarding the efficacy of CNS prophylaxis. The utility of CNS prophylaxis has itself been challenged. In this review, we dissect the issues which render the value of CNS prophylaxis uncertain. We first compare international clinical guidelines for CNS prophylaxis. We then interrogate the factors that should be used to identify high-risk patients accurately. We also explore how clinical patterns of CNS relapse have changed in the pre-rituximab and rituximab era. We then discuss the efficacy of CNS-directed approaches, intensification of systemic treatment and other novel approaches in CNS prophylaxis. Improved diagnostics for early detection of CNS relapses and newer therapeutics for CNS prophylaxis are areas of active investigation. In an area where prospective, randomized studies are impracticable and lacking, guidance for the use of CNS prophylaxis will depend on rigorous statistical review of retrospective data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In our Asian multicenter retrospective study, we investigated the clinical prognostic factors affecting the outcomes of AITL patients and identified a novel prognostic index relevant in the Asian context. In our 174-patient cohort, the median PFS and OS was 1.8 years and 5.6 years respectively. Age > 60, bone marrow involvement, total white cell count >12 × 109/L and raised serum lactate dehydrogenase were associated with poorer PFS and OS in multivariate analyses. This allowed for a prognostic index (AITL-PI) differentiating patients into low (0-1 factors, n = 64), moderate (2 factors, n = 59) and high-risk (3-4 factors, n = 49) subgroups with 5-year OS of 84.0%, 44.0% and 28.0% respectively (p < 0.0001). POD24 proved to be strongly prognostic (5-year OS 24% vs 89%, p < 0.0001). Exploratory gene expression studies were performed and disparate immune cell profiles and cell signaling signatures were seen in the low risk group as compared to the intermediate and high risk groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although Singapore is one of the highest vaccinated countries in the world, vaccine hesitancy remains in a subpopulation, including individuals with cancer predisposition syndromes. At the Cancer Genetics Service National Cancer Centre Singapore, we see patients with germline genetic alterations, most being BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (PV/LPV) carriers. While reported safe for cancer patients, there are limited studies addressing the safety profile and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination among individuals with germline PV/LPV in cancer predisposition genes such as BRCA1/2. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination among germline PV/LPV carriers in BRCA1/2. Methods: We conducted a phone call survey of COVID-19 vaccination uptake and toxicity in a prospective cohort of 189 participants with germline BRCA1/2 PV/LPV between 1st Sept 2021 and 30th Sept 2021. We collected demographics data including gender, race, age, history of cancer, types of cancer, and number of cancers. Statistical difference in baseline demographics between responders with history of cancer and those without were assessed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact and independent t-test analysis. Logistic regression was used to evaluate effect of demographics on the occurrence of post-vaccination side effects. Results: Among 189 BRCA1/2 PV/LPV carriers responded, 97 carried PV/LPV in BRCA1 and 92 in BRCA2. Majority were vaccinated (89.5%) and had completed the two-dose vaccine schedule, with 7 (4.1%) received only one dose. The most common post-vaccination side effects was myalgia (56.5%) followed by fever (40.2%), headache (16.3%) and fatigue (11.2%). There were no major severe side events. Evaluation by logistic regression showed that the occurrence of side effects was not affected by PV/LPV gene (BRCA1 or BRCA2), gender, race, age or history of cancer. Conclusion: The post-vaccination side effects profile among individuals with germline PV/LPV in BRCA1/2 is consistent with the Singaporean general population, hence recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination for these individuals should not differ from non-carriers and should be encouraged by their healthcare providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The six patients on rituximab who had complete or partial response to the treatment comprised three patients who had stage 4 disease and three patients who had stage 1 disease. Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) refers to a group of lymphomas arising from B lymphocytes located in the marginal zone of secondary lymphoid follicles. In the extranodal MZL cohort, patients receiving systemic therapy had an increased risk of disease progression (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.13-4.23, I p i = 0.020) compared against patients receiving local therapy. Compared to lung MZL and other MZL subtypes, gastric MZL and orbital MZL were more likely to present with earlier Ann Arbor stage at diagnosis ( I p i < 0.0001) (Figure 1(A)). [Extracted from the article]

Simple Summary: Hematological indices such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been found to be prognostic for survival outcomes, with higher NLR portending a worse prognosis in primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) and other cancers. However, corticosteroids, commonly used for reducing cerebral edema, as well as being a part of systemic treatment, subsequently alter the balance of neutrophil and lymphocyte composition in the peripheral circulation. We hypothesized that the response to corticosteroids may correlate with the response of PCNSL to systemic treatment and survival. We, therefore, investigated the NLR before and after steroids, and found that higher post-steroid NLR was paradoxically correlated with better survival. We thus developed a new decision-tree-based prognostic score using age, post-steroid NLR and pre-steroid NLR, and showed that it stratified patients into three risk profiles that predicted overall survival with good discrimination and calibration in patient cohorts across two different centers. Background: Ratios of differential blood counts (hematological indices, HIs) had been identified as prognostic variables in various cancers. In primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs), higher baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in particular was found to portend a worse overall survival. However, it was often observed that differential counts shift drastically following steroid administration. Moreover, steroids are an important part of the arsenal against PCNSL due to its potent lymphotoxic effects. We showed that the effect of steroids on differential blood cell counts and HIs could be an early biomarker for subsequent progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: This study retrospectively identified all adult patients who received a brain biopsy from 2008 to 2019 and had histologically confirmed PCNSL, and included only those who received chemoimmunotherapy, with documented use of corticosteroids prior to treatment induction. Different blood cell counts and HIs were calculated at three time-points: baseline (pre steroid), pre chemoimmunotherapy (post steroid) and post chemoimmunotherapy. Tumor progression and survival data were collected and analyzed through Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox regression. We then utilized selected variables found to be significant on Kaplan–Meier analysis to generate a decision-tree prognostic model, the NNI-NCCS score. Results: A total of 75 patients who received chemoimmunotherapy were included in the final analysis. For NLR, OS was longer with higher pre-chemoimmunotherapy (post-steroid) NLR (dichotomized at NLR ≥ 4.0, HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21–0.83, p = 0.01) only. For platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), OS was better for lower post-chemoimmunotherapy PLR (dichotomized at PLR ≥ 241, HR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.00 to 5.18, p = 0.05) and lower pre-chemoimmunotherapy (post-steroid) LMR (dichotomized at LMR ≥25.7, HR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.10 to 4.31, p = 0.03), respectively, only. The decision-tree model using age ≤70, post-steroid NLR >4.0, and pre-steroid (baseline) NLR <2.5 and the division of patients into three risk profiles—low, medium, and high—achieved good accuracy (area-under-curve of 0.78), with good calibration (Brier score: 0.16) for predicting 2-year overall survival. Conclusion: We found that post-steroid NLR, when considered together with baseline NLR, has prognostic value, and incorporation into a prognostic model allowed for accurate and well-calibrated stratification into three risk groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is treated with anti-CD 20 and multi-drug chemotherapy for cure. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans are performed at end of treatment (EOT) to assess response. EOT Deauville scores (DS) are equivocal for treatment response in some situations, requiring physicians to determine the need for further investigations or treatment. Studies have suggested the delta maximum standardised uptake value (ΔSUVmax) to be superior to DS for assessment of metabolic response at interim PET, although its use at EOT PET, especially in cases of equivocal response, has yet to be established. We investigated whether ΔSUVmax could better discriminate prognosis than DS 3 or 4 at EOT. ΔSUVmax did not outperform DS. Combination of DS 3 and International Prognostic Index (IPI) <3 selects for patients with extremely low risk of disease progression (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.62, p 0.018) compared to DS 4 and IPI ≥3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Identification of one's status as a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carrier often marks the start of navigating challenging decisions related to cancer risk management and result disclosure. Carriers report unmet informational needs, but studies have yet to explore the specific aspects of and how best to fulfill these needs. This study aims to explore the informational needs of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia to inform for the design of educational materials to support risk management decision-making. Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with two male and 22 female English-speaking BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, aged 29–66 years, identified through the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. A grounded theory approach with thematic analysis was undertaken to extract dominant themes. Results: Four themes were identified: (i) proactive online information seeking behaviors (ii) personalized informational needs; (iii) challenges in sharing the results; and (iv) lack of genetic awareness. Discussion: Participants highlight challenges with sharing their result arising from significant post-result informational needs, which have manifested into proactive online information-seeking behaviors. They desire for an online source of information, where content is personalized, reliable and local. Participants foresee the potential of an online resource to raise genetic awareness. This suggests the use of a culturally tailored online-based genetics resource, to promote result disclosure, empower risk-management decisions and raise genetic literacy rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]