Search

• The dual therapy strategy was based on co-formulated protease inhibitors plus lamivudine in treatment-naïve people living with human immunodeficiency virus. • This randomized trial shows the non-inferiority of a fixed dose co-formulation of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) combined with lamivudine (3TC) compared with a three-drug regimen based on these drugs plus tenofovir. • The combination was well tolerated. • Co-formulated DRV/r plus 3TC is an effective and safe option as initial antiretroviral therapy. Tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy regimens may have long-term toxicity-related side effects. This study aimed to compare the virological efficacy of co-formulated darunavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine with darunavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir and emtricitabine or lamivudine. The ANDES study was a 48-week, phase 4, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial in treatment-naïve adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive a daily oral regimen of either dual therapy based on a generic co-formulation of darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) plus a generic lamivudine 300 mg pill, or triple therapy with darunavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine (300/200 mg) or tenofovir/lamivudine (300/300 mg). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a viral load of <50 copies/mL at week 48 in the intention-to-treat population. The US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm and a non-inferiority margin of -12% were used. The secondary objective was to analyse safety in the per-protocol population. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02770508). Between November 2015 and 31 October 2020, 336 participants were assigned at random to the triple therapy arm (n =165) or the dual therapy arm (n =171). After 48 weeks, 153 patients in the triple therapy group (93%) and 155 patients in the dual therapy group (91%) achieved virological suppression (difference -2.1%, 95% confidence interval -7.0 to 2.9). Drug-related adverse events were more common in the triple therapy group (P =0.04). Two toxicity-related events led to discontinuation in each group. Co-formulated darunavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine showed non-inferiority and a safer toxicity profile compared with the standard-of-care triple therapy regimen including tenofovir in treatment-naïve patients. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although CD4+/CD25+ T regulatory cells (Tregs) are a potentially powerful tool in bone marrow transplantation, a prerequisite for clinical use is a cell-separation strategy complying with good manufacturing practice guidelines. We isolated Tregs from standard leukapheresis products using double-negative selection (anti-CD8 and anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies) followed by positive selection (anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody). The final cell fraction (CD4+/CD25+) showed a mean purity of 93·6% ± 1·1. Recovery efficiency was 81·52% ± 7·4. The CD4+/CD25+bright cells were 28·4% ± 6·8. The CD4+/CD25+ fraction contained a mean of 51·9% ± 15·1 FoxP3 cells and a mean of 18·9% ± 11·5 CD127 cells. Increased FoxP3 and depleted CD127 mRNAs in CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ cells were in line with flow cytometric results. In Vβ spectratyping the complexity scores of CD4+/CD25+ cells and CD4+/CD25- cells were not significantly different, indicating that Tregs had a broad T cell receptor repertoire. The inhibition assay showed that CD4+/CD25+ cells inhibited CD4+/CD25- cells in a dose-dependent manner (mean inhibition percentages: 72·4 ± 8·9 [ratio of T responder (Tresp) to Tregs, 1:2]; 60·8% ± 20·5 (ratio of Tresp to Tregs, 1:1); 25·6 ± 19·6 (ratio of Tresp to Tregs, 1:0·1)). Our study shows that negative/positive Treg selection, performed using the CliniMACS device and reagents, enriches significantly CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ cells endowed with immunosuppressive capacities. The CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ population is a source of natural Treg cells that are depleted of CD8+ and CD4+/CD25- reacting clones which are potentially responsible for triggering graft- versus-host disease (GvHD). Cells isolated by means of this approach might be used in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation to facilitate engraftment and reduce the incidence and severity of GvHD without abrogating the potential graft- versus-tumour effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]