Search

Myelosuppression, particularly febrile neutropenia (FN), are serious dose-limiting toxicities that occur frequently during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Identifying patients most at risk of developing FN might help physicians to target prophylactic treatment with colony-stimulating factor (CSF), in order to decrease the incidence, or duration, of myelosuppression and facilitate delivery of chemotherapy as planned. We present a risk model for FN occurrence in the first cycle of chemotherapy, based on a subgroup of 240 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) enroled in our European prospective observational study. Eligible patients had an International Prognostic Index of 0–3, and were scheduled to receive a new myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen with at least four cycles. Clinically relevant factors significantly associated with cycle 1 FN were older age, increasing planned cyclophosphamide dose, a history of previous chemotherapy, a history of recent infection, and low baseline albumin (<35 g/l). Prophylactic CSF use and higher weight were associated with a significant protective effect. The model had high sensitivity (81%) and specificity (80%). Our model, together with treatment guidelines, may rationalise the clinical decision of whether to support patients with CSF primary prophylaxis based on their risk factor profile. Further validation is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A prospective randomised study involving 810 elderly patients was conducted in an attempt to compare alternating chemotherapy with conventional first-line chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in order to improve prognosis with an acceptable toxicity for elderly patients.Patients and methods: Patients included were 55–69 years old and had at least one adverse prognostic factor. Patients were treated either with ACVBP followed by consolidation (n = 396) or with an alternating regimen (n = 414). This regimen was an association of active drugs in NHL relapsing patients, alternating VIMMM with ACVBP for induction and alternation of VIM and ACVM in consolidation. Eight hundred and sixty-six patients were randomised. After histological review, 810 patients met the inclusion criteria: 396 in arm A, 414 in arm B.Results: The complete response rate after induction was superior for conventional first-line therapy (58.5% vs 48%, P = 0.003) but at the end of treatment, the CR rate was not statistically different (52% vs 48%, P = 0.19). Conventional chemotherapy had a better five-year event-free survival than alternating regimen (33% (95% CI: 30–36%) vs 28% (95% CI: 26–30%), P = 0.0289) but overall survival was not statistically different (40% (CI 95% 38–42%) vs 36% (CI 95% 34–38%), P = 0.068). In this elderly high risk population, the toxicity was very high: 19% in arm A and 26% in arm B died during treatment.Conclusion: Alternating regimen did not improve outcome, was less efficient and more toxic.The Hematology Journal (2001) 2, 279–285 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This international, multicentre phase II study was conducted to assess ofatumumab, a human anti- CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed/progressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ( DLBCL) who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation ( TI) or who had relapse/progression after transplantation ( PT). Eighty-one patients received ofatumumab 300 mg intravenously ( IV) on Day 1, followed by seven weekly IV infusions of 1000 mg. Patients in the TI and PT groups had received a median of 3 (range, 1-7) and 5 (range, 2-7) prior therapies, respectively. One-third of patients did not respond to the last prior therapy, and 53% had failed two or more rituximab-containing therapies. Overall response rate was 13% for the TI group (seven partial responses) and 8% for the PT group (two complete responses). Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months, and median duration of response was 9·5 months. The most common Grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (11%), leucopenia (6%), lymphopenia (6%) and thrombocytopenia (6%). Sixteen deaths have been reported, with disease progression as the most common cause of death. In conclusion, ofatumumab monotherapy was well tolerated and provided clinical benefit to some DLBCL patients in this study. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT00622388). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although an activating mutation of Ras is commonly observed in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the role of Ras in the natural history of MDS remains largely unknown. We prospectively studied efficiency and tolerance of lonafarnib, a compound able to inhibit Ras signalling pathway through an inhibition of farnesyl transferase, in patients with MDS or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (sAML). Lonafarnib was administered orally at a dose of 200 mg twice daily for three courses of 4 weeks (separated by 1 to 4 weeks without treatment). Sixteen patients were included: FAB/RAEB ( n = 10), RAEB-T ( n = 2), sAML ( n = 2) and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML; n = 2); WHO/RAEB-1 ( n = 4), RAEB-2 ( n = 5), AML ( n = 5), CMML ( n = 2). Median age was 70 (53–77) years. The karyotype was complex or intermediate in 11 patients, and the International Prognostic Scoring Systems (IPSS) risk groups were low in two patients, INT-1 in one patient, INT-2 in four patients and high in six patients (unknown or not applicable in three patients). Among the 14 patients tested, five had Ras mutations in codons 12, 13 or 61 of N-Ras, K-Ras or H-Ras. One patient was excluded of the analysis for protocol violation, and 15 patients were assessable for tolerance. Gastrointestinal toxicities (diarrhoea, nausea and anorexia) and myelosuppression were the major side effects. Other toxicities included infections, fatigue, increase of liver enzymes, arrhythmia and skin rash. One patient died of infection, and the treatment was stopped in one other who developed atrial fibrillation. Doses were reduced in all but one patient treated with more than one course of farnesyl transferase inhibitor. Responses were assessable in 12 patients. A partial response in one sAML patient and a very transient decrease of blast cell count with normalisation of karyotype in one MDS patient were observed. No relation between improvement of marrow parameters and detected Ras mutations was observed. Lonafarnib alone, administered following our schedule, has shown limited activity in patients with MDS or secondary AML. Gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities appear the limiting toxicity in this population of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) plays an increasing role in the management of patients with lymphoma, for which it is successfully used for staging and treatment monitoring. We report seven patients with a history of lymphoma who presented a positive FDG-PET suggestive of lymphoma relapse and for which FDG-PET oriented biopsies revealed alternative diagnoses. Early in lymphoma follow-up, persistence of focal increased FDG activity corresponded to inflammatory or infectious lesions in two patients: one aspergillosis and one sarcoidosis. Later in the follow-up, five cases of secondary malignancies were identified (three lung cancers, one epidermoid carcinoma, and one villous tumor) in this particularly exposed population. The routine use of FDG PET to evaluate lymphoma significantly increases the probability of detecting unexpected diseases. These cases illustrate the potential pitfalls in PET follow-up. Because FDG is not lymphoma-specific, a relapse suspected only on FDG-PET imaging requires biopsy, as alternative diagnoses--infectious or malignant--are possible. Our data draws clinician's attention to potential false-positive FDG-PET findings, which may lead to therapeutic mistakes. Our data also suggests that FDG-PET might be a new imaging modality for long-term monitoring of late effects, especially second cancer occurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Analysis of the chronic lymphocytic leukemia coding genome: role of NOTCH1 mutational activation" by G. Fabrri, S. Rasi and D. Rossi in April 19, 2012 issue.

This post-hoc subanalysis of the LYM-3002 phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of substituting vincristine in rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (R-CHOP; n = 42) for bortezomib (VR-CAP; n = 38) in a subgroup of 80 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients aged <60 years who did not receive stem cell transplantation (SCT) despite medical eligibility. Complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR (CRu) rates were 67 vs. 39% (odds ratio 3.69 [95% CI(confidence interval): 1.31, 10.41]; p = .012). After 40 months median follow-up, median progression-free survival by independent radiology committee with VR-CAP vs. R-CHOP was 32.6 vs. 12.0 months (hazard ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: 0.31, 1.13]; p = .108); median overall survival was not reached vs. 47.3 months (HR 0.81 [95% CI: 0.33, 1.96]; p = .634). Adverse events included neutropenia (92/76%), thrombocytopenia (70/10%) and leukopenia (65/50%). VR-CAP represents a potential alternative to R-CHOP in combined and/or alternating regimens for younger, SCT-eligible MCL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mantle cell lymphoma is characterised by a poor long-term prognosis. The European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network aimed to investigate whether the introduction of high-dose cytarabine to immunochemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) improves outcome.Methods: This randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial was done in 128 haemato-oncological hospital departments or private practices in Germany, France, Belgium, and Poland. Patients aged 65 years or younger with untreated stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma were centrally randomised (1:1), with computer-assisted random block selection, to receive either six courses of R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by myeloablative radiochemotherapy and ASCT (control group), or six courses of alternating R-CHOP or R-DHAP (rituximab plus dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin) followed by a high-dose cytarabine-containing conditioning regimen and ASCT (cytarabine group). Patients were stratified by study group and international prognostic index. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure from randomisation to stable disease after at least four induction cycles, progression, or death from any cause. Patients with stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma were included in the primary analysis if treatment was started according to randomisation. For safety analyses, patients were assessed according to the treatment actually started. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00209222.Findings: Of 497 patients (median age 55 years [IQR 49-60]) randomised from July 20, 2004, to March 18, 2010, 234 of 249 in the control group and 232 of 248 in the cytarabine group were included in the primary analysis. After a median follow-up of 6.1 years (95% CI 5.4-6.4), time to treatment failure was significantly longer in the cytarabine group (median 9.1 years [95% CI 6.3-not reached], 5 year rate 65% [95% CI 57-71]) than in the control group (3.9 years [3.2-4.4], 40% [33-46]; hazard ratio 0.56; p=0.038). During induction immunochemotherapy, patients who received high-dose cytarabine had increased grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity (haemoglobin 71 [29%] of 241m vs 19 [8%] of 227 controls; platelets 176 [73%] of 240 vs 21 [9%] of 225), grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia (39 [17%] of 230 vs 19 [8%] of 224), and grade 1 or 2 renal toxicity (creatinine 102 [43%] of 236 vs 22 [10%] of 224). The number of ASCT-related deaths was similar (eight [3.4%]) in both groups.Interpretation: Immunochemotherapy containing high-dose cytarabine followed by ASCT should be considered standard of care in patients aged 65 years or younger with mantle cell lymphoma.Funding: European Commission, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and Roche. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prognostic value of interim 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-PET) was investigated in 73 patients (median age 60 years) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). i-PET was analyzed using the Deauville score (DS) and change in maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUVmax). Patients with a DS of 1-3 demonstrated a significantly ( p < 0.0001) better outcome (median follow-up 2.4 years) than patients with a score of 4 or 5 in terms of event-free survival (EFS) (79% vs. 36%), progression-free survival (PFS) (84% vs. 47%) and overall survival (OS) (91% vs. 51%). EFS (73% vs. 42%), PFS (78% vs. 50%) and OS (88% vs. 56%) were also significantly ( p = 0.023) different between patients with ΔSUVmax > 66% or ≤ 66%. Patients ( n = 33) combining a favorable age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) (0 or 1) and a negative i-PET either by DS or ΔSUVmax criteria showed a particularly good outcome (EFS: 85%, PFS: 88%, OS: 94%). Overall, i-PET was highly and independently predictive of any outcome, and its negative predictive value was improved by combination with IPI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: This multicentre, single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Methods: Patients received oral lenalidomide 25mg once daily on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 24months, until disease progression or development of unacceptable adverse events (AEs). The primary end-point was efficacy; safety was evaluated as a secondary end-point. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00655668. Findings: A total of 54 patients with PTCL were treated. The overall response rate was 22% (12 of 54), including complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu) in 11% of patients; 31% of patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) responded (CR/CRu in 15% of patients). The median progression-free survival and median response duration were 2.5 and 3.6months, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population, and 4.6 and 3.5months, respectively, in patients with AITL. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the most common grade 3 or 4 haematological AEs, in 11 (20%) and 8 (15%) patients, respectively. Overall, 19 patients (35%) experienced at least 1AE leading to study dose interruption or reduction (commonly neutropenia or thrombocytopenia). Serious AEs were observed in 54% of patients and 12 patients died during the study; lymphoma progression (n =6); and acute respiratory distress syndrome, dyspnea, lung infiltration, neutropenic sepsis, pneumonia and cerebral ischaemia (n =1 each). Interpretation: Lenalidomide exhibited single-agent activity in heavily pretreated patients with PTCL, particularly in patients with AITL. Future development is warranted in specific histologies, such as AITL, and in combination with chemotherapy or other agents considered active in PTCL. Funding: Celgene Corporation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Elevated serum free light chains (FLCs) have been associated with an unfavorable prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance of a quantitative assessment of intact circulating immunoglobulin (Ig), using serum Ig heavy chain/light chain pair (HLC) measurements in patients with DLBCL. FLC and HLC were measured in 409 serum samples of patients with DLBCL included in the LNH03-B clinical trial program of the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). Patients with an abnormal IgMκ/IgMλ ratio or an abnormal FLC ratio more frequently displayed adverse clinical characteristics. Patients with abnormal IgMκ/IgMλ ratios had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as compared to patients with a normal ratio in the overall cohort (5-year PFS 44.9% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.0003 and 5-year OS 50.8% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.0003) and in the R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) cohort (5-year OS 43.5% vs. 70.3%, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, including elevated FLC/HLC and International Prognostic Index (IPI), an abnormal IgMκ/IgMλ ratio (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.3, p = 0.03) remained predictive of shorter progression-free survival. Gene expression profile experiments and immunohistochemistry indicate that this measurement is at least partially related to tumor cell secretion. Both elevated serum FLCs and an abnormal IgMκ/IgMλ ratio are associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with DLBCL treated by R-CHOP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has become the standard of care for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We aimed to ascertain if a dose-dense R-CHOP regimen administered every 2 weeks (R-CHOP14) was superior to the standard 3-week schedule (R-CHOP21). Methods: We did a randomised phase 3 trial at 83 centres in four countries. 602 patients aged 60–80 years with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and at least one adverse prognostic factor (age-adjusted international prognostic index ≥1) were eligible for the study. We randomly allocated individuals to R-CHOP—ie, rituximab (375 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), vincristine (1·4 mg/m2, up to 2 mg) all on day 1, and prednisone 40 mg/m2 daily for 5 days—administered every 14 days (n=304) or every 21 days (n=298) for eight cycles. We did permuted-block randomisation (block size four, allocation ratio 1:1) stratified by centre and number of adverse prognostic factors. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Our analysis was of the intention-to-treat population, and we present the final analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00144755. Findings: Two patients allocated R-CHOP21 were ineligible for the study and were excluded from analyses. After median follow-up of 56 months (IQR 27–60), 3-year event-free survival was 56% (95% CI 50–62) in the R-CHOP14 group and 60% (55–66) in the R-CHOP21 group (hazard ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·82–1·31; p=0·7614). Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 224 (74%) of 304 patients allocated R-CHOP14 and 189 (64%) of 296 assigned R-CHOP21, despite increased use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the R-CHOP14 group compared with the R-CHOP21 group. 143 (47%) patients in the R-CHOP14 group received at least one red-blood-cell transfusion versus 93 (31%) in the R-CHOP21 group (p=0·0001). 35 (12%) patients allocated R-CHOP14 received at least one platelet transfusion versus 25 (8%) assigned R-CHOP21 (p=0·2156). 155 (51%) patients who were assigned R-CHOP14 had at least one serious adverse event compared with 140 (47%) who were allocated R-CHOP21. Interpretation: In elderly patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and at least one adverse prognostic factor, a 2-week dose-dense R-CHOP regimen did not improve efficacy compared with the 3-week standard schedule. The frequency of toxic side-effects was similar between regimens, but R-CHOP14 was associated with increased need for red-blood-cell transfusion. Funding: Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA), Amgen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: Bortezomib has previously demonstrated activity in indolent lymphomas including follicular lymphoma with response rate ranging from 13% to 56%. However, the optimal schedule of bortezomib remains to be investigated in follicular lymphoma. Experimental design: We conducted a randomised phase II study where patients with follicular lymphoma in relapse or refractory receive either bortezomib 1.5mg/m2 biweekly on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle (arm A) or 1.6mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 35-day cycle (arm B). An interim analysis was planned after 15 fully evaluable patients randomised in each treatment arm. If only five subjects or fewer respond, the treatment arm was concluded to be ineffective and was closed to inclusion. Results: Eighty-seven patients were included in the trial. Arm B was closed to inclusion after interim analysis. 15/50 patients (30%) in arm A and 8/37 patients (22%) in arm B achieved a response. Median duration of response was 16 and 15 months for arms A and B, respectively. Most drug-related adverse events (AEs) (all grades, all cycles) were mild. Conclusion: This study demonstrates tolerability and durable clinical benefit of bortezomib when given at 1.5mg/m2 biweekly. Despite a higher response rate in the biweekly arm, no major difference in patient’s outcome was observed between the two arms in the final analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: Bortezomib has previously demonstrated activity in indolent lymphomas including follicular lymphoma with response rate ranging from 13% to 56%. However, the optimal schedule of bortezomib remains to be investigated in follicular lymphoma. Experimental design: We conducted a randomised phase II study where patients with follicular lymphoma in relapse or refractory receive either bortezomib 1.5mg/m2 biweekly on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle (arm A) or 1.6mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 35-day cycle (arm B). An interim analysis was planned after 15 fully evaluable patients randomised in each treatment arm. If only five subjects or fewer respond, the treatment arm was concluded to be ineffective and was closed to inclusion. Results: Eighty-seven patients were included in the trial. Arm B was closed to inclusion after interim analysis. 15/50 patients (30%) in arm A and 8/37 patients (22%) in arm B achieved a response. Median duration of response was 16 and 15 months for arms A and B, respectively. Most drug-related adverse events (AEs) (all grades, all cycles) were mild. Conclusion: This study demonstrates tolerability and durable clinical benefit of bortezomib when given at 1.5mg/m2 biweekly. Despite a higher response rate in the biweekly arm, no major difference in patient’s outcome was observed between the two arms in the final analysis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a study on the comparison between dose-intensive rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin and prednisone (R-ACVBP) with standard rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) for large B-cell lymphoma. The study conducted computer-assisted randimisation-allocation sequence on patients to compare R-ACVBP and R-CHOP. Results show differences on the event-free survival and haematological toxic effects on both groups.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) places patients at risk of life-threatening infections. While reduction of chemotherapy dose or delay of the subsequent treatment cycle and, consequently, reduction of relative dose intensity (RDI) may limit myelotoxicity, these actions can also impact adversely on treatment outcome and should be avoided in adjuvant settings.Patients and Methods: Based on data from 444 breast cancer patients in the INC-EU Prospective Observational European Neutropenia Study, we have evaluated patient-specific and treatment-specific factors that impact on the incidence of grade 4 CIN (absolute neutrophil count <0.5 × 10(9)/L), either during the first or in any cycle of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, across a range of regimens and doses.Results: Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, risk factors for grade 4 CIN were identified as older age, lower weight, higher planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, epirubicin, or docetaxel, higher number of planned cycles, vascular comorbidity, lower baseline white blood cell count, and higher baseline bilirubin. Use of colony-stimulating factor before a neutropenic event occurred, dose delays, and dose reductions were protective against grade 4 CIN.Conclusions: By identifying risk factors for grade 4 CIN, CSF prophylaxis may be appropriately targeted to prevent low RDI in patients treated with curative intent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on a research about the long-term results of the registered patients and their rate of histologic transformation (HT) rate to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). It states that 164 patients with nodular, lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) served as subjects of the study. Findings show that there was no significant difference in the overall survival rate after HT of patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and the others.

Background: The use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia (defined as having a FN incidence of 10% or more) and the respective incidence and clinical management of FN in breast cancer and NHL has not been studied in Belgium. The existence of a medical need for G-CSF primary and secondary prophylaxis with these regimens was investigated in a real-life setting. Methods: Nine oncologists and six hematologists from different Belgian general hospitals and university centers were surveyed to collect expert opinion and real-life data (year 2007) on the use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the clinical management of FN in patients aged <65 years with breast cancer or NHL. Data were retrospectively obtained, over a 6-month observation period. Results: The most frequently used regimens in breast cancer patients (n = 161) were FEC (45%), FEC-T (37%) and docetaxel alone (6%). In NHL patients (n = 39), R-CHOP-21 (33%) and R-ACVBP-14 (15%) were mainly used. Without G-CSF primary prophylaxis (PP), FN occurred in 31% of breast cancer patients, and 13% had PSN. After G-CSF secondary prophylaxis (SP), 4% experienced further FN events. Only 1 breast cancer patient received PP, and did not experience a severe neutropenic event. Overall, 30% of chemotherapy cycles observed in breast cancer patients were protected by PP/SP. In 10 NHL patients receiving PP, 2 (20%) developed FN, whereas 13 (45%) of the 29 patients without PP developed FN and 3 (10%) PSN. Overall, 55% of chemotherapy cycles observed in NHL patients were protected by PP/SP. Impaired chemotherapy delivery (timing and/or dose) was reported in 40% (breast cancer) and 38% (NHL) of patients developing FN. Based on oncologist expert opinion, hospitalization rates for FN (average length of stay) without and with PP were, respectively, 48% (4.2 days) and 19% (1.5 days). Similar rates were obtained from hematologists. Conclusions: Despite the studied chemotherapy regimens being known to be associated with a moderate or high risk of FN, upfront G-CSF prophylaxis was rarely used. The observed incidence of severe neutropenic events without G-CSF prophylaxis was higher than generally reported in the literature. The impact on medical resources used is sizeable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Goals Of Work: Neutropenia is a life-threatening, dose-limiting toxicity of many chemotherapy regimens. The goals of this study were to assess the incidence and risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, febrile neutropenia (FN) and dose limitations in breast cancer and lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy in Europe.Patients and Methods: Four hundred forty-four breast cancer and 305 lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy at 66 practices in five European countries participated in this prospective, observational study. Predictors of impaired chemotherapy delivery were investigated using a logistic regression model.Main Results: In breast cancer, FN incidence was low (6%); however, grade 4 neutropenia was frequent (34%). Lymphoma patients experienced higher incidences of FN (non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) 22%; Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) 15%) and grade 4 neutropenia (NHL 54%; HL 40%). For both diseases, FN and grade 4 neutropenia were associated with low relative dose intensity (RDI). Multivariate regression models indicated that first cycle FN, age > or = 65 years and Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group > 1 were associated with low RDI in breast cancer and lymphoma, while colony-stimulating factor (CSF) primary prophylaxis appeared to be protective in lymphoma only. Primary CSF prophylaxis was provided to 9% of breast cancer, 28% of NHL and 19% of HL patients.Conclusions: Neutropenia and low RDI remain serious problems in both breast cancer and lymphoma populations undergoing chemotherapy. Several risk factors which can trigger reduced chemotherapy delivery were identified. These results can support physicians in identifying patients most at risk of receiving impaired chemotherapy delivery who would benefit from suitable preventive measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary. Death during the induction phase of chemotherapy remains a common event in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In a series of patients with aggressive NHL homogeneously treated with intensive induction chemotherapy [ACVB (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone) regimen], we determined the clinical and biological parameters that were predictive of early death. Early death was defined as death, for whatever reason, occurring within 100 d of randomization. Predictive factors were identified by logistic regression and an index predictive for individual risk of early death was designed. Among the 2210 patients treated with ACVB, there were 162 (7·3%) early deaths. There was no significant reduction in the rate of early death between 1987 and 1998. In a multivariate analysis, age > 60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 1, serum lactate dehydrogenase > normal, serum albumin < 30 g/l, leucocyte counts > 10 × 109 /l and haemoglobin levels < 8·5 g/dl were found to be independent predictive factors for early death. An early death index was designed, enabling the evaluation of the individual risk of early death in young (range 2–31% risk of early death) and elderly patients (range 5–53%). Clinical and biological parameters available at diagnosis can help physicians identify patients with aggressive lymphoma at low or high risk of early death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia (defined as having a FN incidence of 10% or more) and the respective incidence and clinical management of FN in breast cancer and NHL has not been studied in Belgium. The existence of a medical need for G-CSF primary and secondary prophylaxis with these regimens was investigated in a real-life setting.Methods: Nine oncologists and six hematologists from different Belgian general hospitals and university centers were surveyed to collect expert opinion and real-life data (year 2007) on the use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the clinical management of FN in patients aged <65 years with breast cancer or NHL. Data were retrospectively obtained, over a 6-month observation period.Results: The most frequently used regimens in breast cancer patients (n = 161) were FEC (45%), FEC-T (37%) and docetaxel alone (6%). In NHL patients (n = 39), R-CHOP-21 (33%) and R-ACVBP-14 (15%) were mainly used. Without G-CSF primary prophylaxis (PP), FN occurred in 31% of breast cancer patients, and 13% had PSN. After G-CSF secondary prophylaxis (SP), 4% experienced further FN events. Only 1 breast cancer patient received PP, and did not experience a severe neutropenic event. Overall, 30% of chemotherapy cycles observed in breast cancer patients were protected by PP/SP. In 10 NHL patients receiving PP, 2 (20%) developed FN, whereas 13 (45%) of the 29 patients without PP developed FN and 3 (10%) PSN. Overall, 55% of chemotherapy cycles observed in NHL patients were protected by PP/SP. Impaired chemotherapy delivery (timing and/or dose) was reported in 40% (breast cancer) and 38% (NHL) of patients developing FN. Based on oncologist expert opinion, hospitalization rates for FN (average length of stay) without and with PP were, respectively, 48% (4.2 days) and 19% (1.5 days). Similar rates were obtained from hematologists.Conclusions: Despite the studied chemotherapy regimens being known to be associated with a moderate or high risk of FN, upfront G-CSF prophylaxis was rarely used. The observed incidence of severe neutropenic events without G-CSF prophylaxis was higher than generally reported in the literature. The impact on medical resources used is sizeable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]