Search

Background: Conservative and even surgical management of adhesive capsulitis often is prolonged and painful. Management of adhesive capsulitis is lacking evidence-based controlled clinical trials.Questions/purposes: We asked: (1) Does a collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection lyse shoulder capsule collagen in adhesive capsulitis and at what dose? (2) Can a shoulder capsule injection be administered extraarticularly? (3) Do CCH injections result in better scores for pain and function than can be achieved with physical therapy among patients with adhesive capsulitis?Methods: First, 60 patients with adhesive capsulitis were evaluated by clinical examination. To make the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis, a patient had to have restricted active ROM of at least 60° in total active ROM in the affected shoulder compared with the unaffected contralateral shoulder; with the scapula stabilized, external rotation with the elbow at the side was a very important determinant. Patients were randomized to receive a single injection of 0.5 mL placebo or 0.145, 0.29, or 0.58 mg CCH. All 60 patients were followed up at 30 days. After that, if patients did not attain treatment thresholds they were eligible for up to five open-label 0.58-mg collagenase injections. For the longer-term followup in the open-label phase, 53 patients (83%) were followed to 12 months, 46 (77%) for 24 months, 36 (60%) for 36 months, 37 (62%) for 48 months, and 25 (42%) for 60 months. The extraarticular injection was directed at the anterior shoulder capsule with the patient in the supine position. To prove that these injections could be delivered reliably to the anterior shoulder capsule extraarticularly, the next study involved volunteers without adhesive capsulitis, in which 10 volunteers received a 10-mL injection of normal saline under ultrasound guidance. Finally, to determine the efficacy and dosing of CCH, four cohorts of 10 patients received up to three ultrasound-guided injections separated by 21 days. These injections were administered at one of four dose-volume levels. A fifth cohort of 10 patients was used as a control group and performed standardized home shoulder exercises only. All patients performed standardized home shoulder exercises three times daily. For Study 3, followup was at 22, 43, 64, and 92 days. No patients were lost to followup.Results: In the first study, a single CCH injection did not provide clinically important improvements from baseline in active ROM, passive ROM, and function and pain scores compared with patients who received placebo. Ultrasound guidance confirmed extraarticular injection of the shoulder capsule in Study 2. The CCH injection was more effective than exercise therapy alone at 0.58 mg/1 mL and 0.58 mg/2 mL compared with exercise only in the primary measure of efficacy (active forward flexion) as shown in Study 3. For active forward flexion the mean in degrees in the 0.58 mg/2 mL group was 38° compared with 12° in the exercise-only group (p = 0.03). For active forward flexion the mean in the 0.58 mg/1mL group was 43° compared with 12° in the exercise-only group (p = 0.01).Conclusions: Extraarticular injections of CCH for treatment of adhesive capsulitis were well tolerated and seem effective compared with exercise therapy. Future FDA-regulated clinical trials must verify CCH injection therapy for adhesive capsulitis.Level Of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dupuytren's disease limits hand function, diminishes the quality of life, and may ultimately disable the hand. Surgery followed by hand therapy is standard treatment, but it is associated with serious potential complications. Injection of collagenase clostridium histolyticum, an office-based, nonsurgical option, may reduce joint contractures caused by Dupuytren's disease. Methods: We enrolled 308 patients with joint contractures of 20 degrees or more in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The primary metacarpophalangeal or proximal interphalangeal joints of these patients were randomly assigned to receive up to three injections of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (at a dose of 0.58 mg per injection) or placebo in the contracted collagen cord at 30-day intervals. One day after injection, the joints were manipulated. The primary end point was a reduction in contracture to 0 to 5 degrees of full extension 30 days after the last injection. Twenty-six secondary end points were evaluated, and data on adverse events were collected. Results: Collagenase treatment significantly improved outcomes. More cords that were injected with collagenase than cords injected with placebo met the primary end point (64.0% vs. 6.8%, P<0.001), as well as all secondary end points (P≤0.002). Overall, the range of motion in the joints was significantly improved after injection with collagenase as compared with placebo (from 43.9 to 80.7 degrees vs. from 45.3 to 49.5 degrees, P<0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events were localized swelling, pain, bruising, pruritus, and transient regional lymph-node enlargement and tenderness. Three treatment-related serious adverse events were reported: two tendon ruptures and one case of complex regional pain syndrome. No significant changes in flexion or grip strength, no systemic allergic reactions, and no nerve injuries were observed. Conclusions: Collagenase clostridium histolyticum significantly reduced contractures and improved the range of motion in joints affected by advanced Dupuytren's disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00528606.) N Engl J Med 2009;361:968-79. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A response by Lawrence C. Hurst and colleagues to a letter to the editor about their article "Injectable Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum for Dupuytren's Contracture" in the September 3, 2009 issue is presented.

Background: Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (collagenase) is an injectable treatment option for Dupuytren disease. The current study was designed to investigate the safety and ensure the effectiveness of collagenase for the treatment of Dupuytren disease, with or without concomitant antithrombotic usage. Methods: One hundred and forty-eight patients with Dupuytren disease were treated with collagenase during this period; 49 taking antithrombotics and 99 not taking antithrombotics. The primary outcomes were clinical success (a reduction in joint contracture to < 5°) and clinical improvement (a reduction in joint contracture by equal to or more than 50%). Results: No statistically significant difference in either clinical success or clinical improvement was found between those taking and those not taking antithrombotics. No significant difference was found in the incidence of any adverse effects or skin splits between the two cohorts. Conclusions: Collagenase can be safely and effectively used to treat patients with Dupuytren disease who take antithrombotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]