Search

Highlights from the article: We have read with great interest the article "Pelvic floor rehabilitation for defecation disorders" by Bocchini et al. [[1]]. We congratulate the journal and the authors for the publication of a paper on the indications and modality of pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment in patients with defecation disorders. Clinical data collected and quantified using the scores mentioned by Bocchini et al. are important for patient evaluation, even if they play a minor role in identifying the indications for rehabilitation treatment.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine short-term outcomes of rehabilitation treatment in patients with or without previous stapled transanal resection (STARR) for rectal outlet obstruction by using a novel rehabilitation score system (Brusciano score). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary referral institution including all patients with chronic functional constipation admitted to the outpatient unit from 2004 to 2009. Results: Among 330 consecutive patients, 247 (74.8 %) (204 females and 43 males) showing a significantly higher rehabilitation score (mean of 15.7 ± 1.8; range, 7-25) than healthy controls (mean, 3.2 ± 1.2; range 2-6) ( p < .0001) were selected for rehabilitation. Of the 247 patients evaluated, group A (no previous surgery) consisted of 170 patients (53 males; mean age, 44.8 ± 12.9 years; range, 19-80) of which 38 presented mixed constipation, whereas group B (previous surgery) consisted of 77 patients (18 males; mean age, 47.0 ± 11.2 years; range, 22-81). The Brusciano score, Agachan-Wexner score and quality of life improved in both groups of patients after treatment. Better improvements of Brusciano and Agachan-Wexner scores were observed in patients with previous STARR (group B). Conclusions: The rehabilitation score system employed in this study seems to be a useful tool in selecting and assessing the outcome of patients who might benefit from rehabilitation treatment. Constipation and quality of life were significantly improved by the rehabilitation treatment. Further studies are needed to clarify either the impact of rehabilitation treatment on long-term outcome of patients treated for rectal outlet obstruction or its role in those who develop problems over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aims of this study were to evaluate several clinical and instrumental parameters in a large number of patients with constipation and incontinence as well as in healthy controls and discuss their potential implications in the functional aspects of these disorders. Eighty-four constipated and 38 incontinent patients and 45 healthy controls were submitted to a protocol based on proctologic examination, clinico-physiatric assessment, and instrumental evaluation. Constipated and incontinent patients had significantly worse lumbar lordosis as well as lower rate in the presence of perineal defense reflex than controls. Constipated but not incontinent patients had a lower rate of puborectalis relaxation than controls. Furthermore, worse pubococcygeal tests and a higher rate of muscle synergies presence, either agonist or antagonist, were observed in both constipated and incontinent patients compared to controls. This study has demonstrated strong correlations between physiatric disorders and the symptoms of constipation and incontinence. Further studies designed to demonstrate a causal relationship between these parameters and the success of a specific treatment of the physiatric disorders on the proctology symptoms are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anal ultrasound is helpful in assessing organic anorectal lesions, but its role in functional disease is still questionable. The purpose of the present study is to assess anal–vaginal–dynamic perineal ultrasonographic findings in patients with obstructed defecation (OD) and healthy controls. Ninety-two consecutive patients (77 women; mean age 51 years; range 21–71) with symptoms of OD were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent digital exploration, endoanal and endovaginal ultrasound (US) with rotating probe. Forty-one patients underwent dynamic perineal US with linear probe. Anal manometry and defaecography were performed in 73 and 43 patients, respectively. Ultrasonographic findings of 92 patients with symptoms of OD were compared to 22 healthy controls. Anismus was defined on US when the difference in millimetres between the distance of the inner edge of the puborectalis muscle posteriorly and the probe at rest and on straining was less then 5 mm. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by assuming defaecography as the gold standard for intussusception and rectocele and proctoscopy for rectal internal mucosal prolapse. Since no gold standard for the diagnosis of anismus was available in the literature, the agreement between anal US and all other diagnostic procedures was evaluated. The incidence of anismus resulted significantly higher ( P < 0.05) in OD patients than healthy controls on anal (48 vs 22%), vaginal (44 vs 21%), and dynamic perineal US (53 vs 22%). A significantly higher incidence of rectal internal mucosal prolapse was observed in OD patients when compared to healthy controls on both anal (61.9 vs 13.6%, P < 0.0001) and dynamic perineal US (51.2 vs.9% P = 0.001). For the diagnosis of rectal internal mucosal prolapse, anal US had a 100% sensitivity and specificity. For diagnosis of rectal intussusception, anal US had an 83.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity and perineal US had a 66.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In the diagnosis of anismus, anal ultrasonography resulted in agreement with perineal and vaginal US, manometry, defaecography, and digital exam ( P < 0.05). Other lesions detected by US in patients with OD include solitary rectal ulcer, rectocele and enterocele. Damage of internal and/or external sphincter was diagnosed at anal US in 19/92 (20%) patients, all continent and with normal manometric values. Anal, vaginal and dynamic perineal ultrasonography can diagnose or confirm many of the abnormalities seen in patients with OD. The value of the information obtained by this non-invasive test and its role in the diagnostic algorithm of OD is yet to be defined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

No studies have specifically reported on the use of a diagnostic tool based on physiatric assessment of constipated or incontinent patients Sixty-seven constipated and 37 incontinent patients were submitted to a standard protocol based on proctologic examination, clinico-physiatric assessment (puborectalis contraction, pubococcygeal test, perineal defence reflex, muscular synergies, postural examination) and instrumental evaluation (anorectal manometry, anal US and dynamic defaecography). Patients were offered pelvic floor rehabilitation (thoraco-abdominoperineal muscle coordination training, biofeedback, electrical stimulation and volumetric rehabilitation). After rehabilitation treatment, decreases of Wexner constipation score ( p=0.0001) and Pescatori incontinence score ( p=0.0001) were observed. This diagnostic protocol might improve the selection of patients with defaecatory disorders amenable for rehabilitation treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1 Alterations in patients affected by pelvic floor dyssynergia. Therefore, all patients with pelviperineal disorders who are candidates for pelvic floor rehabilitation need to have proper abdominal breathing. This suggests that dyssynergiais in fact just "the tip of the iceberg", careful pre-rehabilitation assessment of patients with pelvic floor disorders is necessary. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Several procedures have been described for the excision of perirectal tumours. Among them are the Kraske and York Mason operations, and the transanal approach, which may cause anal incontinence and rectal bleeding. A novel technique, i.e. the perianal intersphincteric excision (PIE), is reported here with the aim of minimising such postoperative complications, as it avoids both stretching the sphincters and endorectal wounding. Case report: The procedure has been carried out successfully in two patients: a woman with a low-grade rectal leiomyosarcoma and a man with a perirectal schwannoma. No postoperative complications were observed, and no recurrence was detected after 36 and 8 months respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, PIE seems to be a safe and effective procedure for the management of perirectal masses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COVID-19 outbreak impacting patients with pelvic floor disorders undergoing pelvic floor rehabilitation I Editor i During the COVID-19 pandemic, suspension of outpatient clinics[1] might have left many patients without care, likely impacting their quality of life. There might be times when quality of life is eclipsed by other urgent matters (like preserving life itself!)[3], but it is crucial to protect and reassure patients needing such treatments, and to start working on how rehabilitation can benefit from telemedicine and remote consultation[4]. [Extracted from the article]

Bochdalek hernia is a rare pathology. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult, and few reports are available regarding its treatment. Herein we report the case of a 25-year-old woman referred for symptoms of dyspepsia, dysphagia, and thoracic pain exacerbated by pregnancy. Preoperative radiography, EGD, and CT scan revealed a paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Laparoscopic exploration showed the complete thoracic migration of the stomach through a left posterolateral diaphragmatic foramen. The diagnosis of a Bochdalek hernia was then made. The diaphragmatic defect was repaired without inserting a prosthesis, using five separate non-reabsorbable stitches (Rieder technique). The procedure was completed with a Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication. The duration of the procedure was 150 min. Hospital stay was 12 days. There were no complications. Postoperative Gastrografin radiography of the esophagus and stomach showed a normal-shaped fundoplication and confirmed the subdiaphragmatic location of the stomach. We conclude that the laparoscopic approach represents the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of Bochdalek hernia and any associated complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is a well-established technique with satisfying outcomes even at long term for the treatment of incisional and ventral hernia. However, the literature debate is still ongoing regarding the preferred surgical technique. Nowadays, two approaches are commonly adopted: the intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (sIPOM) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement with defect closure before mesh placement (pIPOM). The aim of this prospective analysis is to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients treated for incisional hernia (IH) with sIPOM and pIPOM after 36 months follow-up in terms of recurrence, quality of life and wound events. Methods: Patients receiving pIPOM and sIPOM for IH were actively followed up for 36 months. At the outpatient clinic, hernia recurrence (HR), mesh bulging (MB), quality of life with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and wound events were assessed. Results: Between January 2015 and January 2019, 98 patients underwent a pIPOM and 89 underwent an sIPOM. At 36 months, nine patients (4 in pIPOM and 5 in sIPOM) experienced an HR, while MB was recorded in four patients in pIPOM and nine in sIPOM. No statistically significant difference could be identified also in terms of final GIQLI score and wound events. Conclusions: LVHR with or without fascial closure, also in our study, provides satisfactory results in terms of safety and efficacy. The discordant results in the literature are probably related to independent variables such as the type of mesh, the type of suture and closure technique. Therefore, was the funeral of sIPOM done too early? Study dataset is available on ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05712213 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Colostomy is a frequent event in oncological or inflammatory bowel diseases. Its related morbidity includes retraction, infection and parastomal hernia (PH), which is a quite common late complication. Several surgical options are available for PH repair, the majority including mesh. However, results are often disappointing with relevant recurrence rates, up to 33%. The study aim was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of prophylactic biosynthetic mesh (BIO-A®, polyglycolide-trimethylene carbonate copolymer) placed during colostomy fashioning, in reducing PH. A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 to compare conventional end-colostomy with end-colostomy reinforced with BIO-A mesh in ante-rectus position in patients undergoing colon diversion in emergency surgery. Methods: Patients were clinically followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and received a CT scan at 6 and 12 months. The postoperative morbidity and wound events were also evaluated. Results: 55 patients receiving conventional colostomy considered as Control Group and 55 patients receiving BIO-A mesh supported colostomy (Mesh Group) were included in the study. At 12 months, the incidence of PH was 9 (12.7%) and 24 (43.6%) in the Mesh Group and Control Group, respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity was similar between Mesh Group and Control Group (7 [12.7%] vs 4 [7.3%], respectively; p = 0.340). The multivariable analysis showed that not using a mesh (p = 0.042), age > 70 years (p = 0.041), diabetes (p < 0.001), colon dilation > 7 cm (p < 0.0001) and COPD (p = 0.009) were all related with postoperative PH. Conclusions: The prophylactic BIO-A mesh positioning during colostomy is an effective procedure reducing PH incidence at a 1 years follow-up guaranteeing low postoperative morbidity. Study dataset is available on ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04436887. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia has been validated worldwide in the past decade. However, hiatal hernia recurrence still represents the most frequent long-term complication after primary repair. Different techniques for hiatal closure have been recommended, but the problem remains unsolved. The authors theorized that ultrastructural alterations may be implicated in hiatal hernia. Thus, this study was undertaken to investigate the presence of these alterations in patients with or without hiatal hernia.Methods: Samples from Laimer-Bertelli connective membrane and muscular crura at the esophageal hiatus were collected from 19 patients with GERD and hiatal hernia (HH group), and from 7 patients without hiatal hernia enrolled as the control group (NHH group). Specimens were processed and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy.Results: Muscle and connective samples from the NHH group did not present any ultrastructural alteration that could be detected by transmission electron microscopy. Similarly, connective samples from the HH group showed no ultrastructural alterations. In contrast, all muscle samples from the HH group exhibited sarcolemmal alterations, subsarcolemmal vacuolar degeneration, extended disruption of sarcotubular complexes, increased intermyofibrillar spaces, and sarcomere splitting.Conclusion: The evidence of ultrastructural alterations in all the patients in the HH group raises the suspicion that the long-term outcomes of antireflux surgery depend not only on the surgical technique, but also on the underlying muscular diaphragmatic illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Incisional hernia is a frequent postoperative complication after midline laparotomy. Prophylactic mesh augmentation in abdominal wall closure after elective surgery is recommended, but its role in emergency surgery is less well defined. Methods: This prospective randomized trial evaluated the incidence of incisional hernia in patients undergoing urgent midline laparotomy for clean-contaminated surgery. Closure using a slowly absorbable running suture was compared with closure using an additional sublay mesh (Parietex ProGripTM). Patients were randomized just before abdominal wall closure using computer-generated permuted blocks. Patients, care providers, staff collecting data, and those assessing the endpoints were all blinded to the group allocation. Patients were followed up for 24 months by means of clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations. Results: From January 2015 to June 2018, 200 patients were randomized: 100 to primary closure (control group) and 100 to Parietex ProGripTM mesh-supported closure (mesh group). Eight patients in the control group and six in the mesh group were lost to followup. By 24 months after surgery, 21 patients in the control group and six in the mesh group had developed incisional hernia (P=0.002). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of haematoma (2 versus 5; P=0.248) and superficial wound infection (4 versus 5; P=0.733). Multivariable analysis confirmed the role of mesh in preventing incisional hernia (odds ratio 0.11, 95 per cent c.i. 0.03 to 0.37; P <0.001). One patient in the mesh group required mesh removal because of deep infection. Conclusion: Prophylactic mesh-augmented abdominal wall closure after urgent laparotomy in clean-contaminated wounds is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia. Registration number: NCT04436887 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented about the use of the term mesorectum.

Presents a letter to the editor about sacrococcygeal chordoma.

A correction to the article "Crura ultrastructural alterations in patients with hiatal hernia: a pilot study," which appeared online on June 22, 2007 is presented.

Background: Studies have demonstrated that Nissen fundoplication controls acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Combined 24-h pH and multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII-pH) allows detection of both acid and nonacid GER. Antireflux surgery is considered for any patient whose medical therapy is not efficient, particularly patients with nonacid gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Nevertheless, fundoplication used to control nonacid reflux has not been reported to date.Methods: In this study, 15 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication had MII-pH both before and after the surgical procedure. The numbers of acid and nonacid GER episodes were calculated with the patient in both upright and recumbent positions.Results: The 24-h pH monitoring confirmed the postoperative reduction of exposure to acid (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, the total, acid, and nonacid numbers of GER episodes were reduced (p < 0.05).Conclusion: According to the findings, MII-pH is feasible and well tolerated. It provides an objective means for evaluating the effectiveness of Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication in controlling both acid and nonacid GER. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to evaluate by the use of 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH) the efficacy of the Nissen fundoplication in controlling both acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients that underwent Heller myotomy for achalasia. It has been demonstrated that fundoplication prevents the pathologic acid GER after Heller myotomy, but no objective data exists on the efficacy of this antireflux surgery in controlling all types of reflux events. The study population consisted of 20 patients that underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Nissen fundoplication for achalasia. All patients were investigated with manometry and MII-pH. MII-pH showed no evidence of postoperative pathologic GER. The overall number of GER episodes was normal in both the upright and recumbent position. This reduction was obtained because of the postoperative control of both the acid and nonacid reflux episodes. The Nissen fundoplication adequately controls both acid and nonacid GER after extended Heller myotomy. Further controls with MII-pH are warranted to check at a longer follow-up for the efficacy of this antireflux procedure in achalasic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study is to evaluate if esophageal dysmotility can influence the outcome of laparoscopic total fundoplication for gatro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The advent of laparoscopic fundoplication has greatly reduced the morbidity of antireflux surgery and by now, it should be considered the surgical treatment of choice for GERD. Some authors assert that total versus partial fundoplication should improve the rate of postoperative dysphagia or gas bloat syndrome, particularly in patients with esophageal dysmotility. From September 1992 to December 2005, 420 consecutive patients 171 male and 249 female, mean age 42.8 years (range 12–80) underwent laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication. At manometric evaluation, we divided patients into two groups: group A (163/420; 38.8%) with impaired esophageal peristalsis (peristaltic waves with a pressure < 30 mmHg), and group B (257/420; 61.2%) without impaired peristalsis. We followed up clinically 406 out of 420 (96.7%) patients, 156/163 patients (95.7%) in group A and 250/257 patients (97.3%) in group B. An excellent outcome was observed in 143/156 (91.7%) group A patients and in 234/250 (93.6%) group B patients ( P = NS). Both groups showed significant improvement in clinical symptom score with no statistically significant difference between patients with normal and impaired peristalsis. Thus, preoperative defective esophageal peristalsis is not a contraindication to total laparoscopic fundoplication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Esophageal cancer is associated with a poor long-term prognosis. Only a 10% 5-year survival rate is reported. This article aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic esophagectomy for the palliative treatment of advanced esophageal cancer (T3-T4 Nx-N1) after neoadjuvant therapy.Methods: From March 1998 to July 2002, 35 patients (mean age, 64.6 years; range, 35-72 years) affected by advanced cancer of the middle lower third of the esophagus came to the authors' observation. All received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Of the 35 patients, 22 (62.9%) showed a positive response to treatment (>or=50% reduction of maximal cross-sectional area of the tumor), and surgical intervention was performed 4 weeks after the end of the therapy. The operations were accomplished through the laparoscopic approach and left lateral cervicotomy.Results: The mean operative time was 160 min (range, 120-260 min). One patient (4.5%) experienced a cervical anastomotic leak. Three patients (13.6%) died in the postoperative period: one of myocardial infarction and two of acute respiratory failure. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.1 days (range, 9-23 days). After a mean follow-up period of 20.2 months (range, 10-40 months), 13 patients (68.4%) were alive.Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach seems to be effective for the palliative treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Further trials will be necessary to evaluate the advantages of this technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thoracotomy represents the traditional surgical approach for the treatment of epiphrenic diverticula. A mini-invasive procedure has been reported in only few series. This article describes the authors experience with the laparoscopic approach for performing diverticulectomy, myotomy and Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication.Methods: From 1994 to 2002, 13 patients (6 men and 7 women), mean age 57 years (range 45-71 years), with symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum underwent laparoscopic diverticulectomy, myotomy, and Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication.Results: The mean operative time was 145 min (range 110-180 min). No operative mortality was observed. The mean hospital stay was 13.9 days (range 7-25 years). The first three patients (23.1%) who underwent surgery experienced a partial disruption of the suture staple line. One patient (7.7%) died of a myocardial infarction. After a mean clinical follow-up period of 58 months (range 3-96 months), all the patients were symptom free.Conclusions: Laparoscopic management of epiphrenic diverticula seems to be as safe and effective as the traditional approach, although a longer follow-up period is necessary to confirm the study results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

I Editor i Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is putting the healthcare system of every nation under stress[[1]]. All hospital personnel and patients were screened by a rapid IgM/IgG test of fingertip blood; no one showed any symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of testing. COVID-19 outbreak impacting patients with pelvic floor disorders undergoing pelvic floor rehabilitation. [Extracted from the article]